[UK] iPhone 4 Handset Prices Announced PAYG


Recommended Posts

Anyone that has that much money to waste on a phone + contract would be better off investing in technology (or savings for that matter) that aren't obsolete after six months. Crazy, crazy prices.

For me iPhones seem to last for 2 years, and still have a high resale value.

Take a look at the HTC Hero for obsolete in 6 months.

Last comment is on point. The iPhone is still able to hold it's value long after it's launch, infact, it goes into years.

I pre-ordered mine within hours of launch and it'll be arriving on the 24th. I wish some of you done the same. The prices will be no different vs O2 launch prices.

That's not an attack on the iPhone. It's an attack on every phone. Spending that much money on ANY phone is absurd.

iPhone's don't lose value like most other handsets.

Example: iPhone 3G at launch: ?349, They're still going for ?160-?180 on eBay (that's for a 2 year old, "obsolete" phone). You couldn't rent a phone for ?84 a year.

That's a delusion for a start. You say "don't lose vale" yet you say you can only get 53% of the initial. I spend ?10 a month on my mobile and I only get a new model when I can get one for free.

But ?500 for a phone? How can anyone say that is sensible? Or spending ?35 a month + extra calls + data + texts that go over the included amount? It's such an unnecessary waste of money and is one of the great distractions that people simply do not need.

Pretty much... I earn my money, I spend it on the essentials and then whatever is left I will spend how I choose. I could blow it all on hookers and booze if I wanted to, it's none of your business to say I "don't need it" if I didn't work for my money then fairplay, but I do so shh :p

iPhone's don't lose value like most other handsets.

Example: iPhone 3G at launch: ?349, They're still going for ?160-?180 on eBay (that's for a 2 year old, "obsolete" phone). You couldn't rent a phone for ?84 a year.

Money4MyMobile.com are offering ?205 for an iPhone 3G 16GB. I know someone who sold his on eBay for ?309.

In YOUR opinion its a waste of money, just because you spend £10 a month on a phone doesnt mean no one else can buy expensive phones.

We're on a forum, of course it's "MY" opinion. Where else would it come from?

People can spend their money any way they choose, do you think I'm King Jong Il or something? I don't give two craps - but in MY opinion (I guess from now on I have to put that in every post? stupid) it's a waste of money that could be spent on more useful stuff.

I'm getting away from my main point a bit. I can understand people spending up to £200 / £25 a month on a moble. But the upper end prices for iphones and other mobiles are extortionate. Look at what you can buy for £500 - a used car (banger) a laptop, a mid-high range desktop computer, a stereo, a 30"+ HD TV - or a phone. Crazy.

iPhone 4 will only be available for existing O2 customers at launch

iPhone stock will be extremely limited in the UK at launch and not everybody who wants one will be able to get one straight away. We want to make sure that our existing customers get priority so until at least the end of July, only existing O2 customers will be able to get an iPhone 4 from us.

Whether you're an existing O2 mobile customer looking to upgrade, or one of our broadband customers looking to move your mobile to O2, our iPhone stock is reserved exclusively for you.

O2's latest update

. . .or one of our broadband customers looking to move your mobile to O2. . .

That is me :)

Got some home internet with them a few months ago and it has been great. I'm with Vodafone at the moment but unfortunately got sucked into their 24 month deal, so if O2 can offer me something good then I will happily switch, although I have until November on my current contract (with a Sony Ericsson W595). They might buy me out though in August?

The problem is, there seems to be no space for someone who wants a cheaper contract.

I currently get:

Sony Ericsson W595 - Free

24 Months

300 Minutes

Unlimited Texts

£15 a month

I want:

HTC Desire - Free (or under £50)

18 Months

100-300 Minutes

Unlimited Texts

Unlimited Internet (I don't really know how much mobile phones use with the likes of Facebook as that and Neowin, maybe checking emails will be the only use it will get).

£15 - £20 a month. £25 at a push.

But then I have a trick card up my jumper with O2 as I want to get my phone line with them too :shifty: Plus, The HTC will still be a very good phone even in November! Then again, maybe Sim only is a way to go if they only offer 24 month contracts.

That is me :)

Got some home internet with them a few months ago and it has been great. I'm with Vodafone at the moment but unfortunately got sucked into their 24 month deal, so if O2 can offer me something good then I will happily switch, although I have until November on my current contract (with a Sony Ericsson W595). They might buy me out though in August?

The problem is, there seems to be no space for someone who wants a cheaper contract.

I currently get:

Sony Ericsson W595 - Free

24 Months

300 Minutes

Unlimited Texts

?15 a month

I want:

HTC Desire - Free (or under ?50)

18 Months

100-300 Minutes

Unlimited Texts

Unlimited Internet (I don't really know how much mobile phones use with the likes of Facebook as that and Neowin, maybe checking emails will be the only use it will get).

?15 - ?20 a month. ?25 at a push.

But then I have a trick card up my jumper with O2 as I want to get my phone line with them too :shifty: Plus, The HTC will still be a very good phone even in November! Then again, maybe Sim only is a way to go if they only offer 24 month contracts.

Yeah that tariffs ?35 a month with the phone being ?100 on 18 month, they really wont budge that much to your expectation

So that would be ?526 for the 16GB, ouch!.

That's just Belgium. Add to that at least ?45/month (seperately) for a plan with 1hr call time and 500MB data (HSPA though, with pretty much national coverage).

I really don't like iPhones etc, but the iPhone 4... The screen :omg: :drool:

Have people seen the crazy prices the iPhone 4 is going for on eBay?! I know people don't have them in hand, which is making it even more crazy but I am assuming these are people who pre-ordered it for delivery on 24th June.

16GB iPhone 4 has been going for ?800............

Have people seen the crazy prices the iPhone 4 is going for on eBay?! I know people don't have them in hand, which is making it even more crazy but I am assuming these are people who pre-ordered it for delivery on 24th June.

16GB iPhone 4 has been going for ?800............

Ugh, wish I had pre-ordered, would have happily sold it on eBay for twice the price :laugh: Mugs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!