Recommended Posts

Or you didn't clarify it in your previous post. All you say is "I raced once, finished 3rd, couldn't get past it. Set the controller down, told my friend to sell it now while it still has resell value." So we can only assume you only did one race.

The premium cars look amazing, and I'm playing in 1080p on a Samsung 32" TV.

And as for development and delays, you're blowing it all out of proportion. There were four years between the releases of GT3 and GT4. There were five years between GT4 and GT5. Now, considering GT3 and GT4 were both done on the same console, and GT5 was done on a new console, I'd say that's not a bad timeframe. And as for the delays, it was only delayed twice, and the second delay was by less than a month, so you're definitely exaggerating things.

I never said I raced more than once.

I never said it was a "bad game" as he stated I did, which is what prompted my previous post.

1080p doesn't do anything on a 32", it supports a 1080p input but your still getting 720p and resolution doesn't directly effect graphic rendering so it's irrelevant either way.

I exaggerated nothing as I only presented facts.

I never commented on the racing, physics, features, gameplay or overall value of the game.

I said I was underwhelmed, graphically speaking. There is a large population of gamers that will take interest in a genre outside of their norm simply because we want to see impressive graphics.

The game is unimpressive graphically. The GT series is widely associated with premium graphics. You missed my point more so than the other guy.

I'm not a fan of the series, I don't particularly care for simulation racing, all I ever said is the graphics disappoint.

I never said I raced more than once.

I never said it was a "bad game" as he stated I did, which is what prompted my previous post.

1080p doesn't do anything on a 32", it supports a 1080p input but your still getting 720p and resolution doesn't directly effect graphic rendering so it's irrelevant either way.

I exaggerated nothing as I only presented facts.

I never commented on the racing, physics, features, gameplay or overall value of the game.

I said I was underwhelmed, graphically speaking. There is a large population of gamers that will take interest in a genre outside of their norm simply because we want to see impressive graphics.

The game is unimpressive graphically. The GT series is widely associated with premium graphics. You missed my point more so than the other guy.

I'm not a fan of the series, I don't particularly care for simulation racing, all I ever said is the graphics disappoint.

You should really stick to PC gaming if you're expecting much better when there's 16 cars on the track at 60FPS :p

I never said I raced more than once.

I never said you did. I said we could only assume you did one race, which seems to be the case now.

I never said it was a "bad game" as he stated I did, which is what prompted my previous post.

Even though you told your friend to sell it while it still has resale value? Do you really care that much about the graphics? It's the gameplay that matters!

1080p doesn't do anything on a 32", it supports a 1080p input but your still getting 720p and resolution doesn't directly effect graphic rendering so it's irrelevant either way.

And you obviously know nothing here, as I've just booted up GT5 here, and it's outputting onto my TV at 1080p, not 720p. My TV tells me what the resolution is when the game starts up, so I know if it's not 1080p.

Even though you told your friend to sell it while it still has resale value? Do you really care that much about the graphics? It's the gameplay that matters!

And you obviously know nothing here, as I've just booted up GT5 here, and it's outputting onto my TV at 1080p, not 720p. My TV tells me what the resolution is when the game starts up, so I know if it's not 1080p.

My friend has the same graphic enthusiasm, lack of racing interest I do, so its valid.

You know nothing about resolution, common consumer.

Console hardware specs are not an excuse, you're not getting much better.

It's not smooth. Don't tell me I can't expect smooth.

You posted a bit too quick there, AB. :p

Nope, the game runs in 1280x1080. The vertical resolution is upscaled from 1280 to 1920, however what's most important is horizontal, which does indeed run at 1080.

Let's kick off the proceedings by taking a look at the physical make-up of the framebuffer. By and large, not a great deal has really changed from the rendering principles laid down by Gran Turismo 5 Prologue. The game still renders at native 720p with 4x multi-sampling anti-aliasing (MSAA) when your XMB is set to 720p mode, while the resolution shifts to 1280x1080 with 2x quincunx (QAA) when the 1080p mode is engaged. So we're not seeing anything like native 1080p resolution here, but you are getting a 50 per cent increase in the number of pixels rendered.

Thin objects and specular highlights such as the sheen on the beautifully rendered cars (one of the most important elements in the game's visual make-up) definitely benefit from the increase in resolution, adding to the precision look of the game. However, up against the 4x MSAA of the 720p mode, the combination of the upscaling from 1280 to 1920 pixels in width, along with the use of quincunx anti-aliasing, does serve to make textures look a touch more blurred.

If you're actually trying to tell us the game runs in 720p you've just made a fool of yourself, it runs in 1280x1080.

Yeah, that's exactly what I said...

Can no one here read?

I said a 32" can't output a 1080p signal. It accepts it as an input (which is what GT5 sends out) and displays it's native, which is 720p.

You guys look for arguments and fabricate them when they don't exist.

Nope, the game runs in 1280x1080. The vertical resolution is upscaled from 1280 to 1920, however what's most important is horizontal, which does indeed run at 1080.

Woah, really? That's an unusual resolution. :blink: Shows that it doesn't really matter though, as it still looks good to me. Well, the premium cars do; the standard cars are mixed. :p

Yeah, that's exactly what I said...

Can no one here read?

I said a 32" can't output a 1080p signal. It accepts it as an input (which is what GT5 sends out) and displays it's native, which is 720p.

You guys look for arguments and fabricate them when they don't exist.

The way you worded what you wrote above was confusing to say the least... All you had to say was YOUR 32" TV doesn't support 1080p, lots do haha. Your TV isn't accepting a 1080p signal at all, it's getting a 720p signal sent to it.

Yeah, that's exactly what I said...

Can no one here read?

I said a 32" can't output a 1080p signal. It accepts it as an input (which is what GT5 sends out) and displays it's native, which is 720p.

You guys look for arguments and fabricate them when they don't exist.

You fail again. 720p is 1280x720, not 1280x1080, so it's beyond 720p.

And what AB said. My TV fully supports 1080p, regardless of what you keep saying. I've had it for over a year, and I know that it outputs in 1080p.

Woah, really? That's an unusual resolution. :blink: Shows that it doesn't really matter though, as it still looks good to me. Well, the premium cars do; the standard cars are mixed. :p

Yup. Even though GT5 isn't true 1080p, it looks great. Just like Halo Reach, which runs at like 640p, and that still looks great. It shows that the "P" doesn't always matter as long as it looks good and is fun.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!