Recommended Posts

Or you didn't clarify it in your previous post. All you say is "I raced once, finished 3rd, couldn't get past it. Set the controller down, told my friend to sell it now while it still has resell value." So we can only assume you only did one race.

The premium cars look amazing, and I'm playing in 1080p on a Samsung 32" TV.

And as for development and delays, you're blowing it all out of proportion. There were four years between the releases of GT3 and GT4. There were five years between GT4 and GT5. Now, considering GT3 and GT4 were both done on the same console, and GT5 was done on a new console, I'd say that's not a bad timeframe. And as for the delays, it was only delayed twice, and the second delay was by less than a month, so you're definitely exaggerating things.

I never said I raced more than once.

I never said it was a "bad game" as he stated I did, which is what prompted my previous post.

1080p doesn't do anything on a 32", it supports a 1080p input but your still getting 720p and resolution doesn't directly effect graphic rendering so it's irrelevant either way.

I exaggerated nothing as I only presented facts.

I never commented on the racing, physics, features, gameplay or overall value of the game.

I said I was underwhelmed, graphically speaking. There is a large population of gamers that will take interest in a genre outside of their norm simply because we want to see impressive graphics.

The game is unimpressive graphically. The GT series is widely associated with premium graphics. You missed my point more so than the other guy.

I'm not a fan of the series, I don't particularly care for simulation racing, all I ever said is the graphics disappoint.

I never said I raced more than once.

I never said it was a "bad game" as he stated I did, which is what prompted my previous post.

1080p doesn't do anything on a 32", it supports a 1080p input but your still getting 720p and resolution doesn't directly effect graphic rendering so it's irrelevant either way.

I exaggerated nothing as I only presented facts.

I never commented on the racing, physics, features, gameplay or overall value of the game.

I said I was underwhelmed, graphically speaking. There is a large population of gamers that will take interest in a genre outside of their norm simply because we want to see impressive graphics.

The game is unimpressive graphically. The GT series is widely associated with premium graphics. You missed my point more so than the other guy.

I'm not a fan of the series, I don't particularly care for simulation racing, all I ever said is the graphics disappoint.

You should really stick to PC gaming if you're expecting much better when there's 16 cars on the track at 60FPS :p

I never said I raced more than once.

I never said you did. I said we could only assume you did one race, which seems to be the case now.

I never said it was a "bad game" as he stated I did, which is what prompted my previous post.

Even though you told your friend to sell it while it still has resale value? Do you really care that much about the graphics? It's the gameplay that matters!

1080p doesn't do anything on a 32", it supports a 1080p input but your still getting 720p and resolution doesn't directly effect graphic rendering so it's irrelevant either way.

And you obviously know nothing here, as I've just booted up GT5 here, and it's outputting onto my TV at 1080p, not 720p. My TV tells me what the resolution is when the game starts up, so I know if it's not 1080p.

Even though you told your friend to sell it while it still has resale value? Do you really care that much about the graphics? It's the gameplay that matters!

And you obviously know nothing here, as I've just booted up GT5 here, and it's outputting onto my TV at 1080p, not 720p. My TV tells me what the resolution is when the game starts up, so I know if it's not 1080p.

My friend has the same graphic enthusiasm, lack of racing interest I do, so its valid.

You know nothing about resolution, common consumer.

Console hardware specs are not an excuse, you're not getting much better.

It's not smooth. Don't tell me I can't expect smooth.

You posted a bit too quick there, AB. :p

Nope, the game runs in 1280x1080. The vertical resolution is upscaled from 1280 to 1920, however what's most important is horizontal, which does indeed run at 1080.

Let's kick off the proceedings by taking a look at the physical make-up of the framebuffer. By and large, not a great deal has really changed from the rendering principles laid down by Gran Turismo 5 Prologue. The game still renders at native 720p with 4x multi-sampling anti-aliasing (MSAA) when your XMB is set to 720p mode, while the resolution shifts to 1280x1080 with 2x quincunx (QAA) when the 1080p mode is engaged. So we're not seeing anything like native 1080p resolution here, but you are getting a 50 per cent increase in the number of pixels rendered.

Thin objects and specular highlights such as the sheen on the beautifully rendered cars (one of the most important elements in the game's visual make-up) definitely benefit from the increase in resolution, adding to the precision look of the game. However, up against the 4x MSAA of the 720p mode, the combination of the upscaling from 1280 to 1920 pixels in width, along with the use of quincunx anti-aliasing, does serve to make textures look a touch more blurred.

If you're actually trying to tell us the game runs in 720p you've just made a fool of yourself, it runs in 1280x1080.

Yeah, that's exactly what I said...

Can no one here read?

I said a 32" can't output a 1080p signal. It accepts it as an input (which is what GT5 sends out) and displays it's native, which is 720p.

You guys look for arguments and fabricate them when they don't exist.

Nope, the game runs in 1280x1080. The vertical resolution is upscaled from 1280 to 1920, however what's most important is horizontal, which does indeed run at 1080.

Woah, really? That's an unusual resolution. :blink: Shows that it doesn't really matter though, as it still looks good to me. Well, the premium cars do; the standard cars are mixed. :p

Yeah, that's exactly what I said...

Can no one here read?

I said a 32" can't output a 1080p signal. It accepts it as an input (which is what GT5 sends out) and displays it's native, which is 720p.

You guys look for arguments and fabricate them when they don't exist.

The way you worded what you wrote above was confusing to say the least... All you had to say was YOUR 32" TV doesn't support 1080p, lots do haha. Your TV isn't accepting a 1080p signal at all, it's getting a 720p signal sent to it.

Yeah, that's exactly what I said...

Can no one here read?

I said a 32" can't output a 1080p signal. It accepts it as an input (which is what GT5 sends out) and displays it's native, which is 720p.

You guys look for arguments and fabricate them when they don't exist.

You fail again. 720p is 1280x720, not 1280x1080, so it's beyond 720p.

And what AB said. My TV fully supports 1080p, regardless of what you keep saying. I've had it for over a year, and I know that it outputs in 1080p.

Woah, really? That's an unusual resolution. :blink: Shows that it doesn't really matter though, as it still looks good to me. Well, the premium cars do; the standard cars are mixed. :p

Yup. Even though GT5 isn't true 1080p, it looks great. Just like Halo Reach, which runs at like 640p, and that still looks great. It shows that the "P" doesn't always matter as long as it looks good and is fun.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Apple are scared of their customers! They have built a brand over the years of "it just works out of the box", but that slows innovation. Samsung's master stroke was the Galaxy Ultra: "Let's cram everything into one handset, make it so stupid only real nerds will love it, some of the features will work, some won't, but the audience will have such a high tolerance they won't care". Apple has no such device and so they are constantly worrying these days about the fallout of creating a new experience that customers might not like. I know it is often cited the reason they don't build a touchscreen Mac Book is they don't want to cannibalise the the iPad market, but I think it's equally cold feet after the criticism Microsoft receive trying to make a touch compatible desktop OS
    • HandBrake 1.11.2 by Razvan Serea HandBrake is an open-source, GPL-licensed, multiplatform, multithreaded video transcoder, available for MacOS X, Linux and Windows. Handbrake can process most common multimedia files and any DVD or BluRay sources that do not contain any kind of copy protection. Here is a detailed breakdown of HandBrake’s features: Built-in Device Presets—Get started with HandBrake in seconds by choosing a profile optimized for your device, or choose a universal profile for standard or high quality conversions. Simple, easy, fast. For those that want more choice, tweak many basic and advanced options to improve your encodes. Supported Input Sources—Handbrake can process most common multimedia files and any DVD or Blu-ray sources that do not contain any kind of copy protection. Outputs: File Containers: .MP4(.M4V) and .MKV Video Encoders: H.265 (x265 and QuickSync), H.264(x264 and QuickSync), H.265 MPEG-4 and MPEG-2, VP8 and Theora Audio Encoders: AAC / HE-AAC, MP3, Flac, AC3, or Vorbis Audio Pass-thru: AC-3, E-AC3, DTS, DTS-HD, TrueHD, AAC and MP3 tracks Additional features: Title/ Chapter Selection Queue up Multiple Encodes Chapter Markers Subtitles (VobSub, Closed Captions CEA-608, SSA, SRT) Constant Quality or Average BitRate Video Encoding Support for VFR, CFR and VFR Video Filters—Deinterlacing, Decomb, Detelecine, Deblock, Grayscale, Cropping and Scaling Live Video Preview HandBrake 1.11.2 changelog: All platforms Video Fixed a crash that happened when doing a 2-pass lossless x265 encode Fixed a memory leak that happened when doing a 2-pass MPEG-4/MPEG-2/VP9/FFV1 encode Audio Updated the list of supported dithers and encoders combinations Fixed the Core Audio AAC encoder 7.1 channel layout Subtitles Fixed the VobSub palette creation in the MP4 container Build system Improved build system compatibility with older build tools Third-party libraries FFmpeg 8.0.2 (decoding and filters) SVT-AV1 4.1.0 (AV1 video encoding) Linux Added WebM MIME type to the list of the supported formats Mac Improved handling of unsupported presets Updated Sparkle automatic update library Windows Improved handling of unsupported presets Improved queue low space pause behaviour Fixed the automatic audio track name generation Fixed the summary description of HDR video Download: HandBrake 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~30.0 (Open Source) Download: HandBrake ARM64 | Portable Links: HandBrake Website | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • So, an article that has nothing to do with Windows 11, still gets Windows 11 in the title and a build number as the picture? Dell have a buggy build of Support Assist HP have UEFI settings that need unlocking for the secureboot cert upgrade to take place.
    • What I can't seem to understand is that Google are paying SpaceX? Surely it would be the other way round, with SpaceX needing Google's datacenters etc.? Oh well, this level of money and power is way outside of my comprehension at the best of times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      neufuse
      67
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!