Recommended Posts

In which case, take it to a supervisor, that's the reason they exist.

+1 Rep

We have Supervisors. And, failing that, we have Admins.

If you really, really want a forum where you are free to insult other members, Neowin is not the place for you. Sorry, but that is the plain truth.

+1 Rep

We have Supervisors. And, failing that, we have Admins.

If you really, really want a forum where you are free to insult other members, Neowin is not the place for you. Sorry, but that is the plain truth.

No one is saying lets start cursing everyone out.I just think somethings like trivial pictures should be taken with a grain of salt.

No one is saying lets start cursing everyone out.I just think somethings like trivial pictures should be taken with a grain of salt.

I'd say the moderation staff have a much better idea of what's a warnable offence and what not.

If pictures posted are trivial, then they're spam. Which is not allowed.

Mods over it look it all the time though. Ive seen them post in threads that have pictures in them.When they delete a post they usually give a reason.But i hardly ever see them do that.Unless its pictures of almost naked chicks.

If it was such a big taboo they would post a sticky up telling everyone not to do it.

One thing that members shouldn't need to be told to do is to be respectful to other members. If someone lashes out and call other members "twats" or they post insulting images then they aren't being a good member, plain and simple.

Now sometimes you'll get away with it and sometimes you won't. We can't read every thread and not every member uses the report button. If you get a warning that you think is in error then talk to a Supervisor. I know that I have reversed other mods' warnings and I know that other staff have pointed out some of my mistakes as well. Each warning gets its own thread and it isn't uncommon for there to be a discussion of the incident.

Mods over it look it all the time though. Ive seen them post in threads that have pictures in them.When they delete a post they usually give a reason.But i hardly ever see them do that.Unless its pictures of almost naked chicks.

They could have been on lunch/work, and wanted to post something quick, but were unable to take care the issue at the time. Or they just didn't want to deal with it at that time. I know sometimes the last thing I want to do is warn someone when I'm just relaxing on a lunch break. Thats why we have more then one mod, as well as the report function.

Mods over it look it all the time though. Ive seen them post in threads that have pictures in them.When they delete a post they usually give a reason.But i hardly ever see them do that.Unless its pictures of almost naked chicks.

If it was such a big taboo they would post a sticky up telling everyone not to do it.

You are dragging this on a bit much.

Solution as said before is "Use the report button." Problem solved. And if its considered trolling, flame bait or a personal attack on someone it will most likely result in a warning with the post being edited.

You are dragging this on a bit much.

Solution as said before is "Use the report button." Problem solved. And if its considered trolling, flame bait or a personal attack on someone it will most likely result in a warning with the post being edited.

I also said I was done with the matter as well.

One thing that members shouldn't need to be told to do is to be respectful to other members. If someone lashes out and call other members "twats" or they post insulting images then they aren't being a good member, plain and simple.

Now sometimes you'll get away with it and sometimes you won't. We can't read every thread and not every member uses the report button. If you get a warning that you think is in error then talk to a Supervisor. I know that I have reversed other mods' warnings and I know that other staff have pointed out some of my mistakes as well. Each warning gets its own thread and it isn't uncommon for there to be a discussion of the incident.

The real problem is when a user voices their honest opinion on a thread and a mod finds it insulting (not other members, only the mod). That's when the mod uses his/her power on something personal. That is wrong.

The real problem is when a user voices their honest opinion on a thread and a mod finds it insulting (not other members, only the mod). That's when the mod uses his/her power on something personal. That is wrong.

Huh?

So mods should not act on posts unless they are reported? Are mods incapable of determining rule violations?

Moderator actions DO NOT occur in a vacuum. They are known to all staffers, and often discussed. Of the 10 open reports being considered and discussed, one of them has 8 different comments on it.

There are no rogue moderators. Yes, there is an occasional error, but bringing the issue up with a Supervisor (or an Admin, if the Super issued the warn or whatever) will re-open discussion on the item.

You are making a mountain out of where not even a molehill exists here. :ermm:

:p Read the thread. The feature has been totally disabled for the time being.

I did, but it changes so quickly, and beer slows down the senses.:blush:

And it was neodude was it? Well I can tell you that he'd better...do whatever he likes with them, cos I have never used them, and probably never would.

I'll buy a sub 2 and Neobond some beer. Will that work?

Would totally work if I were him ;)

Personally, I don't get the thing about moving retired moderators to an own group, which doesn't have the privileges anymore. Just that someone gives up their position as a moderator, because of lack of time (we're not talking about people who turned out irresponsible etc.), shouldn't take their powers back...

My point is a group called "ex-moderators", which has technically got the same privileges, but at the same time means, that the person is not obligated to do one's duty :p

Would totally work if I were him ;)

Personally, I don't get the thing about moving retired moderators to an own group, which doesn't have the privileges anymore. Just that someone gives up their position as a moderator, because of lack of time (we're not talking about people who turned out irresponsible etc.), shouldn't take their powers back...

My point is a group called "ex-moderators", which has technically got the same privileges, but at the same time means, that the person is not obligated to do one's duty :p

Are you complaining about Vets?

They have no powers at all. They are also saddled with the disadvantages of being a staffer of being forever ineligible for Neowin giveaways (to avoid appearances of favoritism).

Not sure what you think they have as the "same privileges", but they don't. Trust me, I was one for years before being asked if I would want to come back to staff.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We need a game update frequency setting. * Right now your recent games will be auto updated overnight, and your unrecent games won't be updated. The bifurcation of recent and unrecent is fine, but we should be able to control the update frequency for both, with any of the following options: 1. Don't auto update 2. Auto update weekly 3. Auto update overnight 3. Auto update immediately (push) i.e. When I'm playing a lot, I want my recently played games to have push updates, so if a dev releases an update at 4pm, it's already downloaded on my Xbox by the time I get home. The current overnight cadence leaves a lot of wasted time waiting for updates on slow connections. My infrequently played games in ok with deferring to overnight, or maybe weekly, but let the users control their frequency. Basing it on data and last played sounds smart but ignores the human reality that often when I'm busiest and have the least time for games is when it sucks the most to come home and find a huge update list waiting for you.
    • Genocide is intent to exterminate and both the Israeli government AND its people openly declare, even boast about their intent to exterminate Arabs. This society of sick psychopaths has even made songs about it. Zionist means believing Israel should exist as an religious ethno-state where only Jews have rights and everyone else is second class citizen. As for the blood libel thing, we already know zionists get off on killing children. We also know Israel is a safe heaven for all the pedophiles and rapists of the world. Honestly, after what we saw in the Epstein files, I wouldn't put anything past this depraved death cult. Of course all atrocities committed by tHe wOrLds mOsT mOrAl aRmY are always "unproven or taken out of context". Unfortunately for them, their soldiers are dumb enough to leave a trail of their war crimes all over social media. Then again, when you live in a society that's obsessed with death and destruction, posting videos of yourself in the act of ransacking homes and desecrating religious monuments earns you brownie points I guess. Israel is the only society in the world where people come out on the roads for the right to **** prisoners. Also claiming that the BBC said this and AP said that without so much as a link has gotten me curious. Are all zionists this dumb? I really hope you aren't getting paid for this because this is some low effort propaganda.
    • Microsoft is bringing big performance improvements to OneDrive on Mac by Taras Buria Microsoft has announced a major update for the OneDrive client on macOS. Today, the company released version 26.098, promising significantly faster sync, optimized CPU usage, a smaller memory footprint, and better energy efficiency. In a newly published blog post, Microsoft acknowledged that changes implemented in OneDrive for Mac in 2022 brought some unwanted side effects. Due to architectural changes and the need to keep the OneDrive sync engine unchanged, Microsoft created a hidden cache folder. With time, it would cause reliability and performance issues for customers. Now, Microsoft is ditching the old engine for native sync, delivering a faster, more reliable experience. As a result of this change, OneDrive for Mac now integrates more deeply into the operating system, offers about two times faster sync performance, and uses fewer system resources. While the hidden folder still exists, the app only uses it to store files that have not been uploaded yet, link file types, and macOS-related packages. In total, even when holding hundreds of files, the temporary folder does not take more than a couple of megabytes on the drive. Besides optimizations, the new sync engine enables external drive support, allowing you to keep your OneDrive folder on a removable drive (it should meet all the requirements). Microsoft is now rolling out the updated OneDrive client for Microsoft 365 Insiders. To check if your Mac has the new sync engine, go to the About tab and check the app version. If it ends with something like 26H, you are on the new engine. If not, you are on the old one. Microsoft says it will take a few weeks to complete the rollout to Insiders, but it won't say when to expect the update in the stable channel. Big performance updates for OneDrive on Mac came right after Microsoft confirmed it would soon kill document editing in Office 2019 for Mac due to expiring certificates. This change will force users to look for alternatives or switch to Microsoft 365.
    • Sorry but that makes no sense. What does using the same laptop have to do with anything? 
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      X-No-file earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      johnjacobb40 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      211
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      92
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!