Barclays Premier League Season 2010/2011


  

334 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will take the title this year?

    • Arsenal
      17
    • Aston Villa
      2
    • Birmingham
      0
    • Blackburn
      0
    • Blackpool
      4
    • Chelsea
      33
    • Everton
      3
    • Fulham
      0
    • Liverpool
      7
    • Manchester City
      0
    • Manchester United
      57
    • Newcastle
      1
    • Stoke
      0
    • Sunderland
      1
    • Tottenham
      4
    • West Bromwich
      0
    • West Ham
      0
    • Wigan
      1
    • Wolverhampton
      0
  2. 2. Who's getting relegated?

    • Arsenal
      5
    • Aston Villa
      1
    • Birmingham
      2
    • Blackburn
      3
    • Blackpool
      39
    • Chelsea
      5
    • Everton
      4
    • Fulham
      6
    • Liverpool
      15
    • Manchester City
      2
    • Manchester United
      8
    • Newcastle
      15
    • Stoke
      15
    • Sunderland
      9
    • Tottenham
      1
    • West Bromwich
      50
    • West Ham
      45
    • Wigan
      52
    • Wolverhampton
      57
  3. 3. Who will take the scoring title?

    • Drogba (Chelsea)
      34
    • Rooney (Manchester United)
      18
    • Bent (Sunderland)
      1
    • Tevez (Manchester City)
      8
    • Lampard (Chelsea)
      2
    • Dafoe (Tottenham)
      4
    • Torres (Liverpool)
      12
    • Fabregas (Arsenal)
      3
    • Adebayor (Manchester City)
      1
    • Agbonlahor (Aston Villa)
      1
    • Saha (Everton)
      1
    • Berbatov (Manchester United)
      25
    • Malouda (Chelsea)
      1
    • Anelka (Chelsea)
      0
    • Bellamy (Manchester City)
      0
    • Carew (Aston Villa)
      1
    • Carlton Cole (West Ham)
      0
    • Arshavin (Arsenal)
      2
    • Jerome (Birmingham)
      1
    • Other!
      14


Recommended Posts

Bluenoses or Wolves? :p :D If I'm honest I hope Villa finish above Birmingham as apart from A****n I dislike Blues as well mainly cause of having to listen to the crap from the porno 2 and that silly cow Brady when they were there.

Bluenoses. I know us Villa fans are supposed to hate every other Midlands team bar Walsall, but personally I've never had no probs with Wolves - then again I did grow up round the corner from where Steve Bull was born, so that's probably why ;) As for Albion - well you just gotta feel sorry for 'em aint ya (WBA FC - We're Bottom Again. For Christmas)

Bluenoses. I know us Villa fans are supposed to hate every other Midlands team bar Walsall, but personally I've never had no probs with Wolves - then again I did grow up round the corner from where Steve Bull was born, so that's probably why ;) As for Albion - well you just gotta feel sorry for 'em aint ya (WBA FC - We're Bottom Again. For Christmas)

Wolves fans in general prefer Villa over Blues and WBA, just like Blues and Albion has their friendship. The one thing we all have in common is none of us careless about Walsall who consider all Midland teams their rivals. :laugh:

Wolves fans in general prefer Villa over Blues and WBA, just like Blues and Albion has their friendship. The one thing we all have in common is none of us careless about Walsall who consider all Midland teams their rivals. :laugh:

How true is that - Never met a Saddlers fan who didn't want 'em to beat every other team.

Most surprising result of the year. Even more so than Blackpool beating Wigan.

Villa were awful mind. But, 3 points for us!

hardly surprising when we did them 4-1 last year in the Carling Cup and we had our reserve squad out then.

Great games. We were poor in defense and it cost us the game. Nany should have score that penalty (even if it's questionnable) though!

Hey nothuman you've seen Squillaci play for France right? How good is this guy?

Also how is Ciani? These two are linked to us in recent days..

Hey nothuman you've seen Squillaci play for France right? How good is this guy?

Also how is Ciani? These two are linked to us in recent days..

Squillaci is a good defenser, his pair with Escudé in Sevilla FC is one of the best in Spain. He didn't play much for France though. Ciani is very talented and can be a key players for the new France squad. He was in the best 11 of 2009/2010 Ligue 1. If I have to chose between the two I will take Ciani, he is younger, more powerful, and potientaly better than Squilaci. They both good with the header.

Squillaci is a good defenser, his pair with Escud? in Sevilla FC is one of the best in Spain. He didn't play much for France though. Ciani is very talented and can be a key players for the new France squad. He was in the best 11 of 2009/2010 Ligue 1. If I have to chose between the two I will take Ciani, he is younger, more powerful, and potientaly better than Squilaci. They both good with the header.

Just saw both on YouTube.. I would pick Ciani too but will Wenger.. seeing Bordeaux want ?15M for him? :p

I read on one of Arsenal forums Wenger had ?45M transfer kitty!! What is he saving this money for?

Lets get Ciani and Akinfeev plz..

Can't really help it now that's he's a Scouser but ok that was pretty low.

He's not a Scouser, he is the manager of Liverpool Football Club. Whilst I am still firmly a 'Rafa man', I have the inherent trait of getting behind any manager we have... so hence why I pulled you on that :p

Waste your life away why don't you :laugh:? Sad boy.

He wasn't our manager then, hence I had no need to defend him to the masses. Since he has taken over Liverpool though all you hear is 'Woy', 'Woy', 'Woy'. If he wasn't English the the media would be after him like they were when they were constantly lynching Benitez.

Great games. We were poor in defense and it cost us the game. Nany should have score that penalty (even if it's questionnable) though!

Nani shouldn't have taken that penalty though! it should have been either Scholesy or Giggsy -- they would have buried it :angry:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!