97 members have voted

  1. 1. What race do you play as (the most)?

    • Protoss
      36
    • Terran
      38
    • Zerg
      14
    • Random
      9


Recommended Posts

Yeah... he would have beat me, had he warped in something other than cannons. He only used cannons which are easy to avoid. By the time he figured out the cannons weren't working I had my army built up enough to kill off the 5 or so zealots he had. I bet he was really proud of himself at first.

Like Sikh said, if you were not prepared for that rush and he failed to kill you, he did it horribly wrong. Unless you are Terran, he would have blocked you in your base before you knew he was there (and if you were terran, you would have to still relocate by flying your CC away due to him blocking any proper expansion).

In short, the guy was a noob or made a mistake by not blocking off the entrances to your base before pushing in on you. If he had done that, he would have been able to close in on you slowly, keeping your expansion to a minimum and backing you into a corner.

But, I haven't played SC2 multiplayer, so I have no idea how effect cannons are anymore.

<snip>

Pft.....I use to fight 3-4 Zerg at a time as protoss in SC....granted I never turned the difficulty above Easy for each one of them, it wasn't that bad...

Well not always. If we play I'll show you a true toss proxy. Learned by myself and from the best.

If done properly, army assistance isn't needed as a proxy shouldn't let you build at all.

id like to see that. whats your bnet id? im always looking to better myself.

Like Sikh said, if you were not prepared for that rush and he failed to kill you, he did it horribly wrong. Unless you are Terran, he would have blocked you in your base before you knew he was there (and if you were terran, you would have to still relocate by flying your CC away due to him blocking any proper expansion).

In short, the guy was a noob or made a mistake by not blocking off the entrances to your base before pushing in on you. If he had done that, he would have been able to close in on you slowly, keeping your expansion to a minimum and backing you into a corner.

But, I haven't played SC2 multiplayer, so I have no idea how effect cannons are anymore.

Pft.....I use to fight 3-4 Zerg at a time as protoss in SC....granted I never turned the difficulty above Easy for each one of them, it wasn't that bad...

Well he started by putting his pylon in the far corner of my base behind the smoke. And then proceded to slowly move outwards with his cannons. By the time he got anywhere near my command center I had 2 barracks up and at that point he should have GG'd out. But he wanted to be an ******* about it by making cannons all over the map so I had to clear them out to get the win. And yeah, he was a noob. Even more than me. :laugh:

Ok I agree with the previous post. Even if you are a noob.

DO NOT DO PRACTICE LEAGUE. Its so ****ing lame. Actual strategy is no use. Its all about who amasses the biggest army of thors first. Lost every practice league match(only won one purely because of a teammate in 2v2), then skipped it into placement and won a couple 1v1 handily with only far less units units. Practice league is lame.

On a 2009 Mbp 15" with a 9400 it plays well at 1024 with low/med settings balanced.

Razor LMAO

What? That's pretty lame. On my my Vaio FW it plays great at 1920x1080 and medium settings.

Would have thought the "most advanced laptop in the world" would be more powerful :shiftyninja:

Ok I agree with the previous post. Even if you are a noob.

DO NOT DO PRACTICE LEAGUE. Its so ****ing lame. Actual strategy is no use. Its all about who amasses the biggest army of thors first. Lost every practice league match(only won one purely because of a teammate in 2v2), then skipped it into placement and won a couple 1v1 handily with only far less units units. Practice league is lame.

+1

If you're in the Edmonton Alberta area there's a SC2 1v1 tourney coming up on Aug.28 at Absolute Power.

Yeah... he would have beat me, had he warped in something other than cannons. He only used cannons which are easy to avoid. By the time he figured out the cannons weren't working I had my army built up enough to kill off the 5 or so zealots he had. I bet he was really proud of himself at first.

That's how I cheese'd my way out of bronze for 1v1 was to do quick proxy cannon rush. Laugh people try and do it to me and fail.

Do you guys think there is any chance my laptop will be able to run starcraft 2? Here are the specs:

Intel? Core?2 Duo CPU P9600??@ 2.53GHz

4GB System Memory

Intel X4500MHD Graphics Card <--- the problem?

120GB Intel SSD

To be honest it only may be able to do so on the lowest settings.

I'm getting absolutely raped online, and in the Practice League at that :pinch: I'm 5 and 23 right now in 1v1.

StarCraft is the only RTS I've ever played, and I haven't touched the game in 8 years. I'm finding it really difficult to compete against others who have a lot more experience. Kinda irks me that some people, who clearly aren't beginners, stick to playing in the Practice League.

The game is great (I'm enjoying the campaign), but it's hard to have fun when you spend 30 minutes playing only to have your entire army decimated in 2 minutes... over and over again.

To those looking for ways to improve, you should check out Day[9]'s videos. He casts replays from various players and analyzes the strategies involved. There is a large archive of videos and he casts new ones every few days. Some of them do get a little in depth, but helpful if you can follow.

Day[9] Archived Videos

Husky and/or HDStarcraft (both found on YouTube) are other popular casters, but mainly exist for entertainment purposes and don't discuss game tactics too much.

To those looking for ways to improve, you should check out Day[9]'s videos. He casts replays from various players and analyzes the strategies involved. There is a large archive of videos and he casts new ones every few days. Some of them do get a little in depth, but helpful if you can follow.

Day[9] Archived Videos

Husky and/or HDStarcraft (both found on YouTube) are other popular casters, but mainly exist for entertainment purposes and don't discuss game tactics too much.

They do some.. they comment on what units work against what units and stuff.

http://www.youtube.c...ser/HDstarcraft

http://www.youtube.c.../HuskyStarcraft

http://www.youtube.c...er/PsyStarcraft

It might be a nerdy thing to do but if you're playing Starcraft 2 isn't that already nerdy enough as it is? :laugh:

So I just found out about the ending to WoL (no, didn't play through the game quite yet heh) and yowza.

Did Blizz jump the gun on that already or what? I mean, if you look at it one way, it's only been one game so far. But it's also been 12 years between said first game. But Raynor saving Kerrigan and her changing back to Human seems a bit quick don't it? Reading some of the comments for the next two...uh expansions? most people seem to think that Kerrigan will keep her link to the Zerg and control them and use them to help save the Universe from the Xalnaga or whatever they are called. Especially when one of the two...games coming out...is called Heart of the Swarm and is directly about the Zerg no? But without Kerrigan running things? Or will she still be the Queen of Blades, since the "prophecy" doesn't specify whether the Queen of Blades HAS to be Zerg, right?

OK, confused. Done. Oy.

My temps are fine. I'm running a 3870 with a zalman cooler.

The thing is, it never happens during the game. It only happens when I leave the game in the menu/console.

I finish a b.net battle, go for a smoke, and come back 2 minutes later (too early for my windows sleep setting to kick in) only to find my PC in permanent state of non-responsiveness :D

Overheating problem:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/925122-blizzard-confirms-starcraft-ii-overheating-bug/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!