97 members have voted

  1. 1. What race do you play as (the most)?

    • Protoss
      36
    • Terran
      38
    • Zerg
      14
    • Random
      9


Recommended Posts

Yeah... he would have beat me, had he warped in something other than cannons. He only used cannons which are easy to avoid. By the time he figured out the cannons weren't working I had my army built up enough to kill off the 5 or so zealots he had. I bet he was really proud of himself at first.

Like Sikh said, if you were not prepared for that rush and he failed to kill you, he did it horribly wrong. Unless you are Terran, he would have blocked you in your base before you knew he was there (and if you were terran, you would have to still relocate by flying your CC away due to him blocking any proper expansion).

In short, the guy was a noob or made a mistake by not blocking off the entrances to your base before pushing in on you. If he had done that, he would have been able to close in on you slowly, keeping your expansion to a minimum and backing you into a corner.

But, I haven't played SC2 multiplayer, so I have no idea how effect cannons are anymore.

<snip>

Pft.....I use to fight 3-4 Zerg at a time as protoss in SC....granted I never turned the difficulty above Easy for each one of them, it wasn't that bad...

Well not always. If we play I'll show you a true toss proxy. Learned by myself and from the best.

If done properly, army assistance isn't needed as a proxy shouldn't let you build at all.

id like to see that. whats your bnet id? im always looking to better myself.

Like Sikh said, if you were not prepared for that rush and he failed to kill you, he did it horribly wrong. Unless you are Terran, he would have blocked you in your base before you knew he was there (and if you were terran, you would have to still relocate by flying your CC away due to him blocking any proper expansion).

In short, the guy was a noob or made a mistake by not blocking off the entrances to your base before pushing in on you. If he had done that, he would have been able to close in on you slowly, keeping your expansion to a minimum and backing you into a corner.

But, I haven't played SC2 multiplayer, so I have no idea how effect cannons are anymore.

Pft.....I use to fight 3-4 Zerg at a time as protoss in SC....granted I never turned the difficulty above Easy for each one of them, it wasn't that bad...

Well he started by putting his pylon in the far corner of my base behind the smoke. And then proceded to slowly move outwards with his cannons. By the time he got anywhere near my command center I had 2 barracks up and at that point he should have GG'd out. But he wanted to be an ******* about it by making cannons all over the map so I had to clear them out to get the win. And yeah, he was a noob. Even more than me. :laugh:

Ok I agree with the previous post. Even if you are a noob.

DO NOT DO PRACTICE LEAGUE. Its so ****ing lame. Actual strategy is no use. Its all about who amasses the biggest army of thors first. Lost every practice league match(only won one purely because of a teammate in 2v2), then skipped it into placement and won a couple 1v1 handily with only far less units units. Practice league is lame.

On a 2009 Mbp 15" with a 9400 it plays well at 1024 with low/med settings balanced.

Razor LMAO

What? That's pretty lame. On my my Vaio FW it plays great at 1920x1080 and medium settings.

Would have thought the "most advanced laptop in the world" would be more powerful :shiftyninja:

Ok I agree with the previous post. Even if you are a noob.

DO NOT DO PRACTICE LEAGUE. Its so ****ing lame. Actual strategy is no use. Its all about who amasses the biggest army of thors first. Lost every practice league match(only won one purely because of a teammate in 2v2), then skipped it into placement and won a couple 1v1 handily with only far less units units. Practice league is lame.

+1

If you're in the Edmonton Alberta area there's a SC2 1v1 tourney coming up on Aug.28 at Absolute Power.

Yeah... he would have beat me, had he warped in something other than cannons. He only used cannons which are easy to avoid. By the time he figured out the cannons weren't working I had my army built up enough to kill off the 5 or so zealots he had. I bet he was really proud of himself at first.

That's how I cheese'd my way out of bronze for 1v1 was to do quick proxy cannon rush. Laugh people try and do it to me and fail.

Do you guys think there is any chance my laptop will be able to run starcraft 2? Here are the specs:

Intel? Core?2 Duo CPU P9600??@ 2.53GHz

4GB System Memory

Intel X4500MHD Graphics Card <--- the problem?

120GB Intel SSD

To be honest it only may be able to do so on the lowest settings.

I'm getting absolutely raped online, and in the Practice League at that :pinch: I'm 5 and 23 right now in 1v1.

StarCraft is the only RTS I've ever played, and I haven't touched the game in 8 years. I'm finding it really difficult to compete against others who have a lot more experience. Kinda irks me that some people, who clearly aren't beginners, stick to playing in the Practice League.

The game is great (I'm enjoying the campaign), but it's hard to have fun when you spend 30 minutes playing only to have your entire army decimated in 2 minutes... over and over again.

To those looking for ways to improve, you should check out Day[9]'s videos. He casts replays from various players and analyzes the strategies involved. There is a large archive of videos and he casts new ones every few days. Some of them do get a little in depth, but helpful if you can follow.

Day[9] Archived Videos

Husky and/or HDStarcraft (both found on YouTube) are other popular casters, but mainly exist for entertainment purposes and don't discuss game tactics too much.

To those looking for ways to improve, you should check out Day[9]'s videos. He casts replays from various players and analyzes the strategies involved. There is a large archive of videos and he casts new ones every few days. Some of them do get a little in depth, but helpful if you can follow.

Day[9] Archived Videos

Husky and/or HDStarcraft (both found on YouTube) are other popular casters, but mainly exist for entertainment purposes and don't discuss game tactics too much.

They do some.. they comment on what units work against what units and stuff.

http://www.youtube.c...ser/HDstarcraft

http://www.youtube.c.../HuskyStarcraft

http://www.youtube.c...er/PsyStarcraft

It might be a nerdy thing to do but if you're playing Starcraft 2 isn't that already nerdy enough as it is? :laugh:

So I just found out about the ending to WoL (no, didn't play through the game quite yet heh) and yowza.

Did Blizz jump the gun on that already or what? I mean, if you look at it one way, it's only been one game so far. But it's also been 12 years between said first game. But Raynor saving Kerrigan and her changing back to Human seems a bit quick don't it? Reading some of the comments for the next two...uh expansions? most people seem to think that Kerrigan will keep her link to the Zerg and control them and use them to help save the Universe from the Xalnaga or whatever they are called. Especially when one of the two...games coming out...is called Heart of the Swarm and is directly about the Zerg no? But without Kerrigan running things? Or will she still be the Queen of Blades, since the "prophecy" doesn't specify whether the Queen of Blades HAS to be Zerg, right?

OK, confused. Done. Oy.

My temps are fine. I'm running a 3870 with a zalman cooler.

The thing is, it never happens during the game. It only happens when I leave the game in the menu/console.

I finish a b.net battle, go for a smoke, and come back 2 minutes later (too early for my windows sleep setting to kick in) only to find my PC in permanent state of non-responsiveness :D

Overheating problem:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/925122-blizzard-confirms-starcraft-ii-overheating-bug/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      228
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      163
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!