97 members have voted

  1. 1. What race do you play as (the most)?

    • Protoss
      36
    • Terran
      38
    • Zerg
      14
    • Random
      9


Recommended Posts

Was hoping it wouldn't be over a year each. Blah. Oh well, I've waited 11 years or so, I can wait a few more. Blizzard has yet to disappoint me.

I was just guessing, looking at WoW as an example. They said they were aiming for a year-by-year release of expansions for WoW, but when you look at the release dates, its closer to year and a half (more or less). Blizzard will probably do the same with Starcraft 2, its best to "allow" people to gather money again and get familiar with the base game before releasing any expansions.

ok so i played the beta and was placed in copper

after launch i played one of my friends who has NEVER played before and after i let him have some fun i steamrolled him

i was away on vacation for a couple weeks and last night i logged on and i saw that he placed in platinum league for 1v1. i was pretty shocked considering he had like zero experience playing SC2

so i thought either someone played his placement matches for him or he got really good really fast

so i played him a 1v1 last night and i smoked him (and i still suck btw)

so i wonder, is it just that the pool of players in the beta was a lot better?

or the pool of players now is just so big there are a lot of noobs?

i mean... if he placed platinum i should be able to place diamond?

or none of these Blizzard rankings/leagues matter?

/confused

so i wonder, is it just that the pool of players in the beta was a lot better?

or the pool of players now is just so big there are a lot of noobs?

i mean... if he placed platinum i should be able to place diamond?

or none of these Blizzard rankings/leagues matter?

/confused

The Beta's players were a lot better.

The player pool is now bigger, so there are a few more million noobs playing it.

Don't worry, he'll drop out of Platinum soon. :D

Blizzard's rankings matter if you wanna play the game for money. :D

I'm getting absolutely raped online, and in the Practice League at that :pinch: I'm 5 and 23 right now in 1v1.

StarCraft is the only RTS I've ever played, and I haven't touched the game in 8 years. I'm finding it really difficult to compete against others who have a lot more experience. Kinda irks me that some people, who clearly aren't beginners, stick to playing in the Practice League.

The game is great (I'm enjoying the campaign), but it's hard to have fun when you spend 30 minutes playing only to have your entire army decimated in 2 minutes... over and over again.

That's Starcraft. If you want an RTS with long lasting units try SupCom, RUSE or even C&C. Difference is that those games aren't as micro oriented as SC2 is. One of the things that irks me about SC2 is that you have to do a ton of stuff manually, like the queen's spew larva ability. Why can't I just repeat the dang order and move on with my life? In reality if you order someone to do something you wouldn't have to shout it at them every 30 seconds.

My biggest hate/love about this game, however, is its simplicity. While on one hand it allows for a far easier learning experience the game is extremely limited in terms of how things play out. Strategies are pretty simple as well and I can already see that this game will usually come down to who's faster and not necessarily who is better. This was one of my big problems with SupCom. When the community had exhausted most strategies and boiled down to one strategy per faction the game became incredibly stale. Hopefully this doesn't happen with SC2.

My biggest hate/love about this game, however, is its simplicity. While on one hand it allows for a far easier learning experience the game is extremely limited in terms of how things play out. Strategies are pretty simple as well and I can already see that this game will usually come down to who's faster and not necessarily who is better. This was one of my big problems with SupCom. When the community had exhausted most strategies and boiled down to one strategy per faction the game became incredibly stale. Hopefully this doesn't happen with SC2.

Blizzard's games... Easy to learn, hard to master. ;)

ok so i played the beta and was placed in copper

after launch i played one of my friends who has NEVER played before and after i let him have some fun i steamrolled him

i was away on vacation for a couple weeks and last night i logged on and i saw that he placed in platinum league for 1v1. i was pretty shocked considering he had like zero experience playing SC2

so i thought either someone played his placement matches for him or he got really good really fast

so i played him a 1v1 last night and i smoked him (and i still suck btw)

so i wonder, is it just that the pool of players in the beta was a lot better?

or the pool of players now is just so big there are a lot of noobs?

i mean... if he placed platinum i should be able to place diamond?

or none of these Blizzard rankings/leagues matter?

/confused

he might had gotten lucky in the placement matches. my friend is a noob too and he got lucky and won all 5 placement matches and placed him in the platinum league. Ever since, he had lost all the game and he finally dropped back to gold league.

So noob question - Any 'micro' tips or good videos? I keep getting zonked by the harder AI and humans but when I watch the replay I'm usually ahead on econ and units are usually close. My fav RTS (usually prefer turn based) is the Kohan series and micro in that game was all about cycling units and specials. In SC2 specials seem more of an annoyance and any retreat seems to be treated as a route. Maybe I just miss a morale system.

For example, the harder AI absolutely rapes me with his 4x4 marine/maurader inital rush. With even forces I need a pill box to survive. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong and both units have same upgrades. Just like the enemy SCV can take down multiple units but I'll easily sacrifice 4x as many to get the same damage done.

I usually don't like vikings very much and used them purely for air defense but I decided to go offensive with them ina match today (since I had a bunch for fending off a battlecruiser attack) and they wtfpwn buildings pretty damn fast if you get a lot of them, and you can pump them out superfast with a reactor starport.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WutJYr0dJFk

So noob question - Any 'micro' tips or good videos? I keep getting zonked by the harder AI and humans but when I watch the replay I'm usually ahead on econ and units are usually close. My fav RTS (usually prefer turn based) is the Kohan series and micro in that game was all about cycling units and specials. In SC2 specials seem more of an annoyance and any retreat seems to be treated as a route. Maybe I just miss a morale system.

For example, the harder AI absolutely rapes me with his 4x4 marine/maurader inital rush. With even forces I need a pill box to survive. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong and both units have same upgrades. Just like the enemy SCV can take down multiple units but I'll easily sacrifice 4x as many to get the same damage done.

you need to concentrate fire at single unit or two and not many targets at once. you need to decrease their units, not damage them and kill later.

So noob question - Any 'micro' tips or good videos? I keep getting zonked by the harder AI and humans but when I watch the replay I'm usually ahead on econ and units are usually close. My fav RTS (usually prefer turn based) is the Kohan series and micro in that game was all about cycling units and specials. In SC2 specials seem more of an annoyance and any retreat seems to be treated as a route. Maybe I just miss a morale system.

For example, the harder AI absolutely rapes me with his 4x4 marine/maurader inital rush. With even forces I need a pill box to survive. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong and both units have same upgrades. Just like the enemy SCV can take down multiple units but I'll easily sacrifice 4x as many to get the same damage done.

With ranged units, you'll want to attack the enemy units one by one. With melee units, you'll want to surround the enemy units. Also, little things like weapon/armour upgrades go a long way. In most games, people don't even get 1 upgrade for anything (armour/shields/weapons).

Free character name change / Creation of additional characters for a fee coming soon!

http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/407872#blog

The way I read it, the first name change will be free and any additional name changes will cost you a fee. Basically, it'll be like World of Warcraft.

US link: http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/572264#blog

I'm not one to usually play these types of games, but I got it due to my friends are playing multiplayer, I thought I'd join in. I'm actually really enjoying it. Terren its not to bad. I still need to get the hang of zerg and protoss. :) "well butter my biscuit!"

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!