Recommended Posts

I think you're being overly generous there :laugh:

Agreed :p .

I remember playing that game once just for the hell of it (my friend had it laying around in his collection). A few minutes later, one of my friends sent me a message on Xbox Live asking me why the hell I was playing that game. I guess it's universally accepted as one of the series's low points.

I actually liked World at War, though. I've already aired my grievances regarding the maps, but I thought that the fundamental gameplay was solid. It didn't do anything better than CoD4 (and was probably inferior in many respects), but it had a good foundation.

So my opinion after completing the single-player campaign and messing around with the various settings and weapons in Multiplayer: Fantastic!

The campaign is a typical Call of Duty campaign with a bit of cheesy explosions and over the top action but the variety Treyarch put into it and the atmosphere they've managed to squeeze out of every single level is above and beyond any Call of Duty so far. The gunplay is still what us Call of Duty nuts have come to know and love but there's something that has gotten an extra kick. The new sounds are fantastic, for the first time in the history of Call of Duty we reached a point where the weapons doesn't sound like a starving African child banging away on tin cans. Also the weapons while some are iconic weapons they are still the bread and butter for us gun lovers - I'm really digging using early models and even prototype weapons, feels a bit more gritty and crude. I'm already looking forward to playing through the campaign again, because there's SO much you get to do in tons of different environments and many of the script-sequences are very well done. I did hit a few massive showstoppers and there was a certain level where the poor explanation of the next step lead me to around 20 retries.

They also did excellent work on the engine, while it's a minuscule improvement for some, they updated the stream part of the engine to allow for larger terrain and more detailed scenery and it really shows - Combined with the amazing atmosphere they've worked into every map, both multiplayer and single-player. Some of the multiplayer maps brings you right back to the Counter-strike era in layout and feel, plus updated graphics.

Treyarch also seem to have put balance back into multiplayer by refining the rock, paper and scissor system - Each aspect has a counter now, unlike MW2 where some things were just a continuous evil. I never had much respect for Treyarch. Call of Duty 3 was a really poor game compared to Call of Duty 2, it lacked the atmosphere, the feel and the finesse. World at War seemed like a cheap cash-in of one of the best first-person shooters I played in a very long time but now, after the muck that was Modern Warfare 2, Treyarch really stepped up big-time and put the Call of Duty franchise back in its place, back on the track and Tuesday can't come soon enough (Y)

Massive respect to Treyarch and I haven't been this giddy and excited about a game in years.

So my opinion after completing the single-player campaign and messing around with the various settings and weapons in Multiplayer: Fantastic!

The campaign is a typical Call of Duty campaign with a bit of cheesy explosions and over the top action but the variety Treyarch put into it and the atmosphere they've managed to squeeze out of every single level is above and beyond any Call of Duty so far. The gunplay is still what us Call of Duty nuts have come to know and love but there's something that has gotten an extra kick. The new sounds are fantastic, for the first time in the history of Call of Duty we reached a point where the weapons doesn't sound like a starving African child banging away on tin cans. Also the weapons while some are iconic weapons they are still the bread and butter for us gun lovers - I'm really digging using early models and even prototype weapons, feels a bit more gritty and crude. I'm already looking forward to playing through the campaign again, because there's SO much you get to do in tons of different environments and many of the script-sequences are very well done. I did hit a few massive showstoppers and there was a certain level where the poor explanation of the next step lead me to around 20 retries.

They also did excellent work on the engine, while it's a minuscule improvement for some, they updated the stream part of the engine to allow for larger terrain and more detailed scenery and it really shows - Combined with the amazing atmosphere they've worked into every map, both multiplayer and single-player. Some of the multiplayer maps brings you right back to the Counter-strike era in layout and feel, plus updated graphics.

Treyarch also seem to have put balance back into multiplayer by refining the rock, paper and scissor system - Each aspect has a counter now, unlike MW2 where some things were just a continuous evil. I never had much respect for Treyarch. Call of Duty 3 was a really poor game compared to Call of Duty 2, it lacked the atmosphere, the feel and the finesse. World at War seemed like a cheap cash-in of one of the best first-person shooters I played in a very long time but now, after the muck that was Modern Warfare 2, Treyarch really stepped up big-time and put the Call of Duty franchise back in its place, back on the track and Tuesday can't come soon enough (Y)

Massive respect to Treyarch and I haven't been this giddy and excited about a game in years.

Finally! This sounds like just the thing the series needed to get back on its feet.

Treyarch also seem to have put balance back into multiplayer by refining the rock, paper and scissor system - Each aspect has a counter now, unlike MW2 where some things were just a continuous evil. I never had much respect for Treyarch. Call of Duty 3 was a really poor game compared to Call of Duty 2, it lacked the atmosphere, the feel and the finesse. World at War seemed like a cheap cash-in of one of the best first-person shooters I played in a very long time but now, after the muck that was Modern Warfare 2, Treyarch really stepped up big-time and put the Call of Duty franchise back in its place, back on the track and Tuesday can't come soon enough (Y)

Nice. The parts I bolded are definitely the biggest sources of relief for me. I was hoping that Treyarch would bring it, and it sounds like they did exactly that.

Release date on Tuesday and a four-day weekend after that. Fantastic timing :).

for the first time in the history of Call of Duty we reached a point where the weapons doesn't sound like a starving African child banging away on tin cans.

About time, Cod4 through mw2 had some of the most pathetic weapon sounds ever. I Just wish they'd add some actual recoil too.

hey seth, sound wise, how does this compare to bad company 2?

They don't. It's still the clean sound experience from previous Call of Duty games with more oomph on the gun sounds ( See the video I posted earlier http://vimeo.com/16439438 ). BC2 is just noise and everything easily gets drowned out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol. The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique shaders by using master materials and generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game and managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime, it's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!