Recommended Posts

IGN : 8.5

GameTrailers : 9.2

I still don't like the feel of it really. Been watching a lot of videos.. but it just couldn't surpass MW2 IMHO.

how can't it? It's a different era and different war. I think it will be as good, if not better than MW2.

So, the servers for MP have gone down, and SP doesn't work for me. It gets through the first intro and then black screens with a cursor.

Overloaded probably from all the people playing hooky from work and the high schoolers who skipped school.

Just finished the SP, thought it was pretty good considering the story that was in MW2 that was all over the place at points, and was put together and more solid than MW2.

The ending section genuinely surprised me too.

Though the very first Vietnam level I still found pretty disappointing compared to the rest of it, which was the one with the infinite spawns that kept screwing me over, lol.

wtf finished the game already?

Well I got it at midnight and played it from half 12 till about 4.30ish, and then when I continued from about 1 to just before 6.

So it was at least 8 hours long on normal if your not running through all the levels and die a few times on the way too, lol.

Just finished the SP, thought it was pretty good considering the story that was in MW2 that was all over the place at points, and was put together and more solid than MW2.

The ending section genuinely surprised me too.

Though the very first Vietnam level I still found pretty disappointing compared to the rest of it, which was the one with the infinite spawns that kept screwing me over, lol.

how long did it take you? Seems like you've played an entire night :D

I had about 6 hours sleep between 6am and 1pm where I wasn't playing the game, lol.

But as I put above, about 7-8 hours in single player and I played on-line till I was level 10 too.

you beat it on Veteran?

I haven't looked the trophies/cheivy's yet...

From the SP videos I've watched.. it wasn't as Epic and Big as MW2.

Indeed, it doesn't have as many "set peices" as MW2 did, but personally I think it was a better experience and a more solid game all together, they didn't seem to throw everything in regardless of if it was going to work well together or not.

Indeed, it doesn't have as many "set peices" as MW2 did, but personally I think it was a better experience and a more solid game all together, they didn't seem to throw everything in regardless of if it was going to work well together or not.

Well to me, that's a step back.. but then that's just me.

Well to me, that's a step back.. but then that's just me.

Well that's your opinion, and that's fine, lol.

But to me MW1 and 2 were like say, Transformers 1 and 2 to me, the first was a solid fun action styled move, you don't go in expecting shake spear or anything as its a summer blockbuster type film, but for Transformers 2, they threw in more set pieces, more big explosions etc.

Sure it made more money but it just wasn't as good and took away from what could have been a solid sequel but instead was missing that soul that MW had.

Its not like MW2 was bad or anything, just not as good as MW1 and BO from what I've played.

Only got about 15 minutes to play this morning but good god I love the fact that there are no cheaters yet. I had a score of 15 and 6. If I had been playing MW2 I would have had maybe a 15-16 score. I have to say I like the fact that guns seem to be a lot more lethal. It no longer takes 10 shots from a weapon to kill someone. Anyone else notice this?

Well to me, that's a step back.. but then that's just me.

I think the campaign is a lot better. A lot more variety in the gameplay and a story thats at least semi-coherent and interesting (still not very good, its a cod is about explosions not story rofl)

I absolutely LOVED the knife stealth Vietnam mission. The graphics in the rainy jungle were very impressive.

I wasn't going to buy another cod game after mw2 but I ended up caving because I have no resolve, and this seems like a good improvement all around, Multiplayer is a lot better sans the alg issues too. More recoil, more balanced, better weapon sounds, more game modes, better unlock system, dedi servers. I give treyarch props.

Also I really like that the "pace" of the multiplayer has slowed down a lot, even in modes like domination. MW2 was way too frantic and arcady. The pace seems a lot more manageable and fun to me, instead of being a spawn-then die immediately fest in any mode thats not hardcore and/or s and d.

The general gunplay makes it more balanced. More recoil, seems to take longer to scope, way longer to switch to nade launcher.

Just picked mine up at Walmart on my lunch hour. They have a display case right by the Walmart greeter when you walk in that has Black Ops "Available Now", with the PS3 and 360 version of the game. I walked in, right past the greeter, picked up the game, and checked out. BAM! (I can see not many PS3 gamers like shooters, the 360 version was almost out).

Based on the videos, this game looks like it's going to be better than MW2, especially with the multiplayer fixes.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol. The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique shaders by using master materials and generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game and managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime, it's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!