Stephen Hawking says universe not created by God


Recommended Posts

Didn't a theorist once say that the human mind will never be able to understand the complexity of how we were created? I'm sure I read that somewhere at neowin.

I firmly believe this.

How can a human comprehend the idea of something being infinite, when everything we know has a beginning and end? Every living organism is born and dies. Even naturally occurring materials from our planet eventually fade after hundreds/thousands of years.

How can something be born from nothing, and if that something wasn't "born," then how can it have always just existed? If somebody created it, then who created the creator, and who created the creator of the creator? And so forth.

I don't think we'll ever truly know how the universe began.

I firmly believe this.

How can a human comprehend the idea of something being infinite, when everything we know has a beginning and end? Every living organism is born and dies. Even naturally occurring materials from our planet eventually fade after hundreds/thousands of years.

How can something be born from nothing, and if that something wasn't "born," then how can it have always just existed? If somebody created it, then who created the creator, and who created the creator of the creator? And so forth.

I don't think we'll ever truly know how the universe began.

Humans are fine with infinity within mathematics and calculus. Which is all that string theory boils down to: math.

I don't see the problem.

If you want to talk about philosophical infinity (discussing "how is this possible" or "how does this make sense"), then we can have an interesting discussion.

I do know that, even if string theory could show how to create the particles of the universe out of thin air (or no air), and we could be pointed to what equation says that it can, we as humans still wouldn't intuitively "get it." But that the same time, we don't need to "get it", we just need to "know that it could've happened this way, somehow."

If nothing existed, how could gravity have existed when there was nothing. It was either one or the other. The idea that there was nothing (which itself is difficult to fathom) and then suddenly something makes absolutely no sense. I'm surprised Hawkings would write something like that.

You are taking that way too literally. Gravity isn't a physical object, and by "nothing", he's referring to physical things. His theory is that intangible forces are what created the universe as we know it today. I would say that's a pretty damn good theory.

I wish you guys would realise how futile the Atheist vs. Theist debate is. Nobody is going to sway the other party, so just give it up and accept that people believe in different things.

If people feel better for believing in a Deity then that is their right and there's nothing wrong with that, whether there's evidence or not. Personally I live my life by science and don't believe in any deity because there is no evidence, but I don't preach my views on others; just let people get on with it.

Likewise, religious preachers who try to force their beliefs on people on the street should be ashamed of themselves.

Humans are fine with infinity within mathematics and calculus. Which is all that string theory boils down to: math.

I don't see the problem.

If you want to talk about philosophical infinity (discussing "how is this possible" or "how does this make sense"), then we can have an interesting discussion.

I do know that, even if string theory could show how to create the particles of the universe out of thin air (or no air), and we could be pointed to what equation says that it can, we as humans still wouldn't intuitively "get it." But that the same time, we don't need to "get it", we just need to "know that it could've happened this way, somehow."

I'm talking about the idea that something has been there forever. Something that wasn't born, it just always existed, and will always exist. That's the way I'm using the word infinite :)

I'm talking about the idea that something has been there forever. Something that wasn't born, it just always existed, and will always exist. That's the way I'm using the word infinite :)

To some extent, humans are capable of dealing with this.

I mean, you weren't born at the beginning of the universe, you are born into a world where things already existed as they are. You never asked "where did time come from" because you've understood that time has "always existed" at least as long as the words "always" and "exist" have meaning.

Hm, I'd like to see Hawking prove that some 'God' did not create the universe. Surely he can't make that claim unless he provides proof?

Please don't start that discussion again.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/934746-stephen-hawking-says-universe-not-created-by-god/page__view__findpost__p__593103300

This is not the place for it.

Cool Story Bro.

That was totally intelligent.

Anyway, this shouldn't come as a surprise who knows or is familar with Hawking's stuff.

Hm, I'd like to see Hawking prove that some 'God' did not create the universe. Surely he can't make that claim unless he provides proof?

And it's ok for religious people to make the claim that god does exist and "is all around us"? That's totally not a double-standard.

Hm, I'd like to see Hawking prove that some 'God' did not create the universe. Surely he can't make that claim unless he provides proof?

And it's ok for religious people to make the claim that god does exist and "is all around us"? That's totally not a double-standard.

i have yet to see any proof one way or the other.

just because the religious can't prove god exists(which according to their relgion they should never even try to do anyway), doesn't mean the atheists can prove the opposite.

science has proved the existence of things we never knew existed or thought were impossible, yet dreamed of and imagined, so we shouldn't be too surprised if someday science actually proves there really is a god, or creator being who threw will alone ro some other mechanic influences every single force and piece of matter in the unirevse in ways we can't begin to imagine currently.

it's even possible such a being might care about humans, certain groups of humans over other groups of humans for some reason we can't begin to understand, or hand down laws on pieces of stone and speak through burning bushes or w/e.

then again someday we might be able to prove the opposite, that every thing attributed to some god being is pure imagination and makea road map of the beginning of the unieverse including what, if anything existed in it's place before that and what caused the big bang.

hell we still assume multiple universes to be the stuff of sci fi for the most part, but science has yet to prove either way.

even time travel may become possible.

and then there's the subject of aliens and if they could possibly have a role in teh whole god thing throughout human history. i mean what if we meet up with some vulcan from planet x in 500 years and they tell all about the times they talked to some human through a burning bush or instpired a pyramid and we have a good laugh about it over space coffee.

hawking is losing his edge imho. although i agree with his stance about talking to aliens. they could be hostile and try to kill us all or enslave us or steal our water.

Something to think about. ?

Scenario #1

You claim to be holding an apple. You say that its in your hand. However, I can't see it. No one else can see it. We can't touch it, we can't feel it, we obviously can't hear it, and by extension of those, we cannot taste it. How will you prove to me (by the same standards of science where evidence dictates what is real and what is not) that you are holding an Apple? Saying that I must have "faith" that you really are holding an apple is avoiding the question. Telling me that x number of people believe that you are holding an apple makes no difference to me, because that just proves to me that other people believe the apple exists, it does not prove to me that the apple actually exists. You cannot show me a book that says teh apple exists, because that just tells me that a book exists which claims that you are holding the apple. You cannot use the excuse/question of "how else can I be holding an apple if the apple does nto exists" because that is still avoiding the question: how can you prove to me that I am holding an apple?

Scenario #2

I claim to be holding an Apple. I say that its in my hand. if I open my hand, you can see it. You can touch it. You can feel it. if I allowed you to, you can taste it. You do not need faith to assume that I am holding the apple, you understand that the apple exists and is currently residing in my hand because all five of your senses have confirmed it. The same five sense that you've been using all your life to confirm or debunk situations where the existence of something is questioned. You do not need the secondary source of a book to tell you that the apple is in my hand. You also don't need to care about how many other people think or believe I am holding the apple, because your observations can be reproduced. All hygiene aside, you too can see, touch, an taste the apple as well.

Why not keep this in mind before jumping down the throats of atheists demanding the same proof which you cannot give?

I meant how and why did this or these laws come into existence? Why should the Universe follow these laws?

We....don't?make the laws of physics. All the physical laws of the world are in existence. Whether or not we've found, defined, and documented them, that's a matter of time. Your argument is useless, and your idea of "the Universe" is poorly and vaguely defined (read: not at all)

We....don't make the laws of physics. All the physical laws of the world are in existence. Whether or not we've found, defined, and documented them, that's a matter of time. Your argument is useless, and your idea of "the Universe" is poorly and vaguely defined (read: not at all)

You seem to have missed my point completely? I said nothing about human beings finding out these laws. My question was if God didn't create the laws of the universe, why and how were these laws (or the law) come into existence? Why should the Universe follow it?

You seem to have missed my point completely? I said nothing about human beings finding out these laws. My question was if God didn't create the laws of the universe, why and how were these laws (or the law) come into existence? Why should the Universe follow it?

They just exist. Why do those laws have to be created by a superior being? Is the concept of the universe as well as the laws of physics just existing that alien to you?

You seem to have missed my point completely? I said nothing about human beings finding out these laws. My question was if God didn't create the laws of the universe, why and how were these laws (or the law) come into existence? Why should the Universe follow it?

? What "laws" are you talking about? An why is it that what we don't understand or have an answer for we instantly assume is the work of god? Didn't we once think to ourselves that god was the reason why the tides rose and the sun rose and set?

They just exist. Why do those laws have to be created by a superior being? Is the concept of the universe as well as the laws of physics just existing that alien to you?

I find it much more logical to believe that a superior being, i.e, God, makes the universe exist, rather than believing (yes, you are also blindly believing) that everything just exists without any reason.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!