[Official] NFL 2010

By rajputwarrior
in The Sporting Arena

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

rajputwarrior

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Is it the coaching? I watch the bengals almost religiously, and I am fairly certian it's the coaching.

This site pretty much sums it up:

http://www.whodeyrevolution.com/whodeyrevolution/2010/10/fire-bratkowski.html

he was talking about the cowboys, way to hijack his post with that **** team (Y)

Grand Master

Mathachew Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

The one thing that makes me feel better about my Chargers, is that Dallas are infinitely worse.

That's true. If the Chargers had a better special teams unit, their record could be reversed. In other news, the Saints..... ugh

facepalm.jpg

Grand Master

rajputwarrior

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I thought the Bengals turned the corner and were going to be as good as they are supposed to me... but then I was dissapointed... again.

falcosn fell asleep and got cocky, then they woke up and you saw what happened, first quarter all over again.

from what I saw from your bengals, no chemistry whatsoever. No one was clicking, all it was was palmer and ocho just beaking eachother on the side lines and T.O. all ****ed off.

Grand Master

TrevorLahey

Posted
Posted

falcosn fell asleep and got cocky, then they woke up and you saw what happened, first quarter all over again.

from what I saw from your bengals, no chemistry whatsoever. No one was clicking, all it was was palmer and ocho just beaking eachother on the side lines and T.O. all ****ed off.

They played better believe it or not. Bob Bratkowski needs to let palmer play his own game, which you seen the second half. Bob is very predictable. It's run, run, and then pass on 3rd and long. The defense needs to stop giving up the BIG plays... I think if you see that happen, we will be as good as we should be. TO has caught more balls then Ocho. I'm guessing shipley and greshem have just as many also (before the falcons game). The is Chemistry is there, we just need better play calling and a little bit of creativness. TO and a couple other players have pretty much said Bob Bratkowski is a dummy. TO talks about how he has been around some "great football minds" and knows a little bit about him running a route specifically to get somebody open. He said they aren't listening here, and it isn't happening.

Grand Master

rajputwarrior

Posted
  • Author
Posted
TO talks about how he has been around some "great football minds" and knows a little bit about him running a route specifically to get somebody open. He said they aren't listening here, and it isn't happening.

in their defense though, TO talks **** about every coach...

Grand Master

I am Reid

Posted
Posted

You guys got a pretty crappy game over there in london, well at least it started out bad. As an Ohio State fan I was watching to see how Troy Smith did, but the 49ers offense was so damn dumbed down I couldnt even watch it, they basically only allowed gore to run up the middle for a small 5 yard gain or 8 yard slant routes. So I stopped watching, but it does look like they opened up the playbook in the 2nd half. Im just glad to see Smith finally get a shot, I dont see why it took so long.

Grand Master

TrevorLahey

Posted
Posted

You guys got a pretty crappy game over there in london, well at least it started out bad. As an Ohio State fan I was watching to see how Troy Smith did, but the 49ers offense was so damn dumbed down I couldnt even watch it, they basically only allowed gore to run up the middle for a small 5 yard gain or 8 yard slant routes. So I stopped watching, but it does look like they opened up the playbook in the 2nd half. Im just glad to see Smith finally get a shot, I dont see why it took so long.

Smith is small for a QB and he got really sick that set him back didn't he? I think Boeckman would have had a better shot at being a decent (not elite) QB in the nfl. Atleast a pretty good backup, but the vest had to screw that all up for him, imo...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By +samw61 · Posted

      I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By +samw61 · Posted

      I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By +samw61 · Posted

      The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • Ladybird Browser is no longer accepting outside contributions thanks to AI

      By noobient · Posted

      Loving AI yet?
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By +Nik Louch · Posted

      I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      262
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      86
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!