Recommended Posts

Loving this game so far. The combat system really bugged me at first because I was so used to the time system of the original Witcher. I kept trying to combo attacks together by clicking as soon as my last strike hit, and it didn't work that well. Instead I've found clicking as quick as you can to be much more effective.

Though one thing I don't like about the combat, is group fights are much more complicated....luckily they generally only happen in numbers of 3-4 and not many more. Without a type of attack that generally hits everything (yet, at least, still a low lvl), I struggle to take on multiple opponents at once. Anyone have tips for group fights? I usually start using the sign that knocks people down on a weaker guy so I get a few seconds to attack the others in slightly fewer numbers, but it only marginally helps most of the time.

I finally had a chance to play the game recently and I'm very impressed. It actually feels like a PC game and it seems to run fairly well on a Radeon HD 5850. I'm definitely going to buy this game as soon as possible. CD Projekt deserves a lot of support because they did an awesome job. Right now, they're a shining beacon of hope in a market full of great-but-not-awesome PC games. They're also a good example of a PC developer that actually cares about its fan-base. Seriously, unlimited installs on a single PC with the ability to play it on up to five unique PCs is amazing.

fairly well on a 5850? heh that card should be enough to run anything maxed out, failure to do so is developers getting lazy with resources imo.

and again no offense to inferniac and the good people of Poland, i know CD Projekt are big there and are important to the country's efforts to become a game development center, but from the feedback i hear and from what folks like neo003 and DL are saying it looks like many of the gameplay and interface issues the previous entry had persist. this is not trolling CDP or the game, i really wanted to get the sequel but after the first one proved itself incomplete i decided not to. BTW i'm not surprised the graphics are sweet, it was clear from the first game that the art department is definitely not the issue there. that game also looked marvelous overall, despite the odd conversation scenes...

fairly well on a 5850? heh that card should be enough to run anything maxed out, failure to do so is developers getting lazy with resources imo.

and again no offense to inferniac and the good people of Poland, i know CD Projekt are big there and are important to the country's efforts to become a game development center, but from the feedback i hear and from what folks like neo003 and DL are saying it looks like many of the gameplay and interface issues the previous entry had persist. this is not trolling CDP or the game, i really wanted to get the sequel but after the first one proved itself incomplete i decided not to. BTW i'm not surprised the graphics are sweet, it was clear from the first game that the art department is definitely not the issue there. that game also looked marvelous overall, despite the odd conversation scenes...

My friend has a really weak CPU so my experience may not be a good indication of how well the HD 5850 performs in The Witcher 2. Check this out:

TheWitcher2-GPUs-1920.png

[Source]

I finally had a chance to play the game recently and I'm very impressed. It actually feels like a PC game and it seems to run fairly well on a Radeon HD 5850. I'm definitely going to buy this game as soon as possible. CD Projekt deserves a lot of support because they did an awesome job. Right now, they're a shining beacon of hope in a market full of great-but-not-awesome PC games. They're also a good example of a PC developer that actually cares about its fan-base. Seriously, unlimited installs on a single PC with the ability to play it on up to five unique PCs is amazing.

I agree, the developers did an awesome job with resource management on this game. I just turned the graphics up to High, increased texture memory size to "Very Large".....basically the only difference between my settings and ultra, is ultra has shadows set higher (both number and quality) and has ubersampling enabled, and it runs great on my i7 @ 3.5Ghz and GTX 295 @ stock. I forgot to run FRAPS so I don't know exact values, but it seems really smooth for the time I played it this morning. I quite surprised my 295 is handling it as well as it is.

fairly well on a 5850? heh that card should be enough to run anything maxed out, failure to do so is developers getting lazy with resources imo.

and again no offense to inferniac and the good people of Poland, i know CD Projekt are big there and are important to the country's efforts to become a game development center, but from the feedback i hear and from what folks like neo003 and DL are saying it looks like many of the gameplay and interface issues the previous entry had persist. this is not trolling CDP or the game, i really wanted to get the sequel but after the first one proved itself incomplete i decided not to. BTW i'm not surprised the graphics are sweet, it was clear from the first game that the art department is definitely not the issue there. that game also looked marvelous overall, despite the odd conversation scenes...

The only gameplay issue I have had (once I adjusted to the new combat system) is interacting with in-game objects seems a little broken. Basically there can be times where I have to wait 3-4 seconds for an object to light up (where I can actually use it), sometimes I actually have to walk away from it and come back in range. Its pretty annoying, but its something I think a patch could fix. As for the interface, I haven't had any issues with it. It is different than most games, but once you learn it, it's actually very easy to use and doesn't present any real issues. If anything, the gameplay and interface issues you read about are likely differences of opinion, and not actual issues that need to be fixed to make the game any better, except for interacting with world objects.

I agree, the developers did an awesome job with resource management on this game. I just turned the graphics up to High, increased texture memory size to "Very Large".....basically the only difference between my settings and ultra, is ultra has shadows set higher (both number and quality) and has ubersampling enabled, and it runs great on my i7 @ 3.5Ghz and GTX 295 @ stock. I forgot to run FRAPS so I don't know exact values, but it seems really smooth for the time I played it this morning. I quite surprised my 295 is handling it as well as it is.

The only gameplay issue I have had (once I adjusted to the new combat system) is interacting with in-game objects seems a little broken. Basically there can be times where I have to wait 3-4 seconds for an object to light up (where I can actually use it), sometimes I actually have to walk away from it and come back in range. Its pretty annoying, but its something I think a patch could fix. As for the interface, I haven't had any issues with it. It is different than most games, but once you learn it, it's actually very easy to use and doesn't present any real issues. If anything, the gameplay and interface issues you read about are likely differences of opinion, and not actual issues that need to be fixed to make the game any better, except for interacting with world objects.

I'm pretty sure you can only interact with objects after the fight and it usually takes a few seconds after the last persons died for the fight to be over it is incredibly annoying.

A list of what some of the GFX options do stolen from somewhere.

-Texture downscaling: higher values result in lower texture quality.

-Texture memory size: sets the amount of graphics card memory allocated to textures. Larger values will decrease the amount of streaming that occurs in game and will make the game run more smoothly, but they can also cause the graphics card to run out of memory and even result in game crashes. Choose a reasonable value based on the amount of memory available on your graphics card.

- Shadow quality: affects graphics performance. Consumes GPU power without affecting CPU performance.

- Number of shadowed lights: set the maximum number of lights that cast shadows. Affects graphics performance. Consumes GPU power without affecting CPU performance.

- LOD distance: distance scale for level of detail on meshes. Lower values improve game performance but result in reduced detail on models.

- Bloom: effect greatly improves quality of game graphics without placing excess demands on GPU.

- Light shafts: visual effect recommended for medium-high/high-end machines. Should be disabled on older systems.

- Anti-aliasing: demanding effect that can significantly reduce performance, so it should be disabled on medium and low-end machines.

- Blur effects: special blur and radial blur visual effects that are quite demanding on hardware but used rarely in the game.

- Depth of field ? gameplay: subtle visual effect. Option determines appearance of effect only during gameplay sequences and does not affect DoF in cutscenes.

- Vignette: aesthetic option that produces a photographic vignette around the game screen. Does not affect performance.

- Rain, Wet surfaces rain effect: modest impact on performance.

- SSAO (Screen Space Ambient Occlusion): lighting effect that is important to the game but unfortunately places significant demands on the GPU.

- Motion blur: blur effect on camera movement, demanding on the GPU.

- Cinematic depth of field: provides movie-like depth of field in cutscenes and dialogue sequences. Extremely detailed but demands significant power. Should only be enabled on machines equipped with top-end graphics cards.

- Depth of field ? cutscenes: option only affects cutscenes and dialogue sequences, does not affect gameplay performance.

- Dangling objects limit: limiter for physical animation of character components like Geralt's hair. Disabling this option places greater demands on the CPU.

- Ubersampling: high quality rendering mode under which whole scenes are rendered multiple times to provide the best possible textures, object details and anti-aliasing (superior to anti-alias and anisotropy even on the highest settings). Use with caution, only on top-end computers (best possible in terms of both GPU and CPU).

- Vertical sync: helps eliminate "screen tearing" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_tearing) during camera movements and blinking on very quick animations (e.g., bright explosions), but can cause somewhat slower rendering and short input lags.

- Decals: enabling decals like dust or blood on characters can affect CPU performance.

UBERSAMPLING is the only thing that absolutely rapes my PC.

Just in case anyone has any trouble with Crossfire...

Current settings:

witcher2settings.png

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/546/witcher2settings.png/

Runs smoothly between 40 - 60 in worse case scenarios. Get over 100 indoors and in caves etc. Averaging round 60 fps

outside in the forest

in Act 1.

Using RadeonPro with DiRT2 crossfire profile with the slider set at alternate frame buffering.

Drivers are Catalyst 11.5.

Gah so annoying they've removed the storage from the game in order to speed the game up so people aren't wasting time stashing items away while at the same time added a new crafting system and 100s of random items so now rather than just stashing your items away you have to go through a giant list deciding on what you can sell and what you should keep. :angry:

Also from the looks of it you HAVE to keep potion recipes so don't sell them.

quick question (probably asked before) do i have to play the first one to know what's going on?

Some dude with stylish long hair prances around the forest and kills things and in-between that tries to get laid a lot. I think that about sums it up. :rofl:

I am jk FTR.

Some dude with stylish long hair prances around the forest and kills things and in-between that tries to get laid a lot. I think that about sums it up. :rofl:

I am jk FTR.

dude, that sounds like the perfect game story... other then the long hair.

Apparently Yrden should be used to hit the tentacles - once you "pin" 3 of them the fourth will sweep across. You then get a QTE to press to ride the tentacle (heh) whereupon it will smash the enarby bridge and allow Geralt to climb atop the demolished bridge and leap onto its back.

I got that from reading the GOG.com forum.

I read spoilers to help you, mister :angry: Now go out there and kill some monsters :crazy:

Man, this game is a beast on the graphics. I am averaging about 35 FPS and that is with most everything set to High, Textures set to Medium. I just let it Auto Detect. I kept Shadows and whatever else is after that at High. Inside areas it jumps up to 60, and I have VSync enabled so assuming it can go higher. It is a beautiful looking game though, no doubt about that.

I have to say, not playing the first game, I am absolutely lost. Story wise. Game play. Just absolutely lost. So I am contemplating going back and playing it first actually. With that said, I did get the game from GOG, so I will be referring to the manual and guide heavily it seems. I can say though I absolutely LOVE the combat system, but I think I have shared I am not a big classic RPG player, so the fact the combat is more similar to an action game is actually the entire reason I picked it up to begin with.

Regardless, I have no plans on playing this until I beat LA Noire, I just wanted to check out how it ran, and I absolutely see this as a game that I will just play over the next half a year or so. As being 40 hours long, even if I did play it at every moment I get to play these days, it will still take me well over a month to beat it, so I will just keep going back to it when I have nothing else to play. And I am pretty sure it will actually take me much longer to beat it then 40 hours since I am an RPG noob.

Man, this game is a beast on the graphics. I am averaging about 35 FPS and that is with most everything set to High, Textures set to Medium. I just let it Auto Detect. I kept Shadows and whatever else is after that at High. Inside areas it jumps up to 60, and I have VSync enabled so assuming it can go higher. It is a beautiful looking game though, no doubt about that.

I have to say, not playing the first game, I am absolutely lost. Story wise. Game play. Just absolutely lost. So I am contemplating going back and playing it first actually. With that said, I did get the game from GOG, so I will be referring to the manual and guide heavily it seems. I can say though I absolutely LOVE the combat system, but I think I have shared I am not a big classic RPG player, so the fact the combat is more similar to an action game is actually the entire reason I picked it up to begin with.

Regardless, I have no plans on playing this until I beat LA Noire, I just wanted to check out how it ran, and I absolutely see this as a game that I will just play over the next half a year or so. As being 40 hours long, even if I did play it at every moment I get to play these days, it will still take me well over a month to beat it, so I will just keep going back to it when I have nothing else to play. And I am pretty sure it will actually take me much longer to beat it then 40 hours since I am an RPG noob.

Get the trainer for Witcher 1 and activate god mode - then you can play through the game fairly quickly to get the background history etc :p

Turning off ssao/ubersampling will boost your fps.

As for sound problems: http://www.gog.com/en/forum/the_witcher_2/common_issues_and_possible_solutions_read_before_posting

Get the trainer for Witcher 1 and activate god mode - then you can play through the game fairly quickly to get the background history etc :p

Turning off ssao/ubersampling will boost your fps.

As for sound problems: http://www.gog.com/en/forum/the_witcher_2/common_issues_and_possible_solutions_read_before_posting

That is a brilliant idea. (Y) Thanks for suggesting it.

And I believe the ubersampling was off by default with the auto detect, but I will definitely make sure. I am reading all over the place people saying it kills FPS.

I also read a few people saying that for Nvidia drivers, to uninstall the 3D Vision part of the drivers and that makes a difference. Since I do not have a 3D capable monitor, I am going to give it a whirl, but just do not see how that could make a difference, but stranger things have happened.

Thanks again for that idea.

Thanks to my fast networked printers at work, I was able to print out with no one finding out the 97 page Game Guide and the 37 page manual, both from the GOG.com Digital Edition, so I think that should help a total noob like me with playing the game. And I was smart enough to remember to rename the files to something work related sounding, just in case deleting them from the print logs did not stick. :shiftyninja: :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dupe of "Microsoft further improving Windows 11 Taskbar with latest builds", published <20 minutes apart
    • Dupe of "Windows 11 is getting redesigned taskbar settings in new build", published <20 minutes apart
    • Ooooh! Two editorial from Paul Hill on the same day! Is it my birthday or something? 😉 Okay, let's see if I get it right. SearXNG develops a meta-search engine app. Individuals install it on their relays. Users connect to these relays to have their own identity-stripping meta-search engine instead of relying on DuckDuckGo. And some of these volunteers have listed their SearXNG instances on SearX.space. That was a lot of wrap my head around. I hope I haven't missed anything.
    • You sound like some Ukrainians in Crimea before 2014: "I didn't vote for USSR disbanding - I want Ukraine to be part of Russia again" 🤣
    • Uninstalr 3.1 by Razvan Serea Introducing Uninstalr: Easy to use and very accurate software uninstaller for Windows. It can uninstall multiple apps at the same time and we think it’s pretty cool. Developed with expertise by Macecraft Software - the minds behind jv16 PowerTools. Key Features Batch uninstall many apps at the same time. Supports unattended uninstallation of apps. Supports monitoring of new software installations. Also detects portable apps and previously uninstalled software leftovers. Shows all the data added to your system by installed software on a file by file basis. Shows all the data it will remove before starting the uninstallation. Filter and search the list of installed software. According to our benchmark, Uninstalr is the most accurate software uninstaller by leaving the least amount of leftovers when uninstalling apps. Supports detection and uninstallation of Microsoft Store, Steam, Big Fish Game System, Chocolatey, NuGet and Ninite installed software. Supports Windows Dark Mode. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8 and 7. Comes with these translations builtin: Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Czech, Danish, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Turkish, Ukrainian and Vietnamese. Has a single executable file portable version and a normal setup version. Uninstalr is freeware, lightweight and easy to use. No bells and whistles, no nonsense. Uninstalr’s custom uninstallation engine has a dedicated support for the detection and uninstallation of 15 types of apps: Normal Windows apps Microsoft Store apps Portable apps Chocolatey apps Ninite apps PortableApps.com apps Steam games EA App games Epic Games Store games Riot platform games GOG Galaxy games WarGaming.net games Battle.net games itch.io games Big Fish platform games Uninstalr 3.1 changelog: Key Changes Uninstalr now starts and shows the list of installed apps faster after the initial scan has been completed, and with much smaller memory usage. Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps. Improvements New feature: Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. New feature: Uninstalr now highlights possible leftovers and apps from Russia and China. This can be disabled from the Settings. New feature: A new filter that allows you to show only software that is installed to other than the system drive. New feature: Users can now select to always do the deepest and the most accurate scan for installed apps, at the cost of the analysis taking a longer time. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps, such as added dedicated support for MiTeC, EZ Tools and SysInternals tools. Improved support for portable apps installed via Windows System Control Center (WSCC). NirSoft portable apps are now listed with "NirSoft" prefix for easier identification. Improved the speed of uninstalling apps. The main installed software listing search will now find "Xbox GameBar" if you search for "Game bar" and vice versa. The tooltip now displays more detailed information of the installed apps, such as its registry key and uninstaller path. The links in the About section now look more like clickable links. The main menu is now more clearly indicated in the main user interface. Microsoft Teams Meeting Add-in for Microsoft Office ships with some Windows 11 installations and is now considered a builtin Windows app and only listed if builtin Windows apps filter is enabled. Added a Help button to the main user interface that opens the help section of the website. Added an option not to close Uninstalr after uninstallation. If you open the Uninstalr website from the app, the website now receives the version number of your current Uninstalr version and warns you if you are using anything but the latest version. Improved the accuracy of the New Software Monitor. Improved confirmation messages for Steam and other platform related uninstalls. Improved the uninstallation performance of Steam games. Fixes: Known bug fixed: Some installed app names are capitalized incorrectly, such as "CCleaner Portable" is listed as "ccleaner portable". Known bug fixed: Some apps can be listed twice, for example, Smart Defrag can be listed once as Smart Defrag and then Smart Defrag Home. Known bug fixed: On the pre-uninstallation screen, the Scripts checkbox can be checked by default on Dark Mode but not on the normal mode. Known bug fixed: Perform Deep Analysis can be started only by clicking the button, not via the Right Click menu, main menu or F4 keyboard shortcut. Muse Hub could be incorrectly listed as Adobe Muse. SyncTrayzor was incorrectly detected as two unrelated software, SyncTrayzor and Syncthing. Smart Defrag was incorrectly listed twice as Smart Defrag 11 and Smart Defrag Home. It was possible to enter non-printable characters to the search input boxes of the main screen, and the path listing screen, which caused the UI to look funny. Changing the translation from Settings, especially many times in a row, caused the UI to distort. If you had multiple instances of portable apps on your system, such as the 64b and 32b versions of the same portable app, typically only one of them was detected, not both. In some very rare cases, Uninstalr UI could start with random characters in its search input boxes, which could make the UI look rather confusing. This was a rare issue, only reported by two users. The pre-uninstallation screen could display non-existing paths for example as the software's installation directory or main exe file. This was a cosmetic issue. New Software Monitor cannot detect the installation of Claude. Selecting all the found software made the UI look funny with the top panel covering everything else (because the names of all the selected software were listed there). Sometimes a Steam game could be listed a normal app instead of a Steam game. If the system restart after an uninstallation is delayed, e.g. because of Windows Updates being installed, this additional delay is incorrectly added to the time how long the uninstallation process took. This cosmetic bug could cause the program incorrectly report an uninstallation time longer than the actual uninstallation time. Uninstalling Minecraft could simply fail. The Only scan the system drive for installed apps setting does not fully work. If some apps are installed to a non system drive and this setting is enabled, the app could still be detected and listed on the main user interface. Changing any settings could also incorrectly alter the Only Scan The System Drive For Installed Apps setting. Microsoft OneDrive and Copilot are not always detected. If you enter something to the search filter field, then select the text and press the Delete key, this triggers the Uninstall button click even if your intent was to delete the text input. If you press the F5 key to refresh the screen during the uninstallation loading screen, the program will crash. If you enabled some setting, such as "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes", it could automatically be unchecked later. Uninstalr doesn't warn you if you try to remove Fortec antivirus. There should be a warning if user attempts to remove any antivirus or antimalware type program. Such programs should not be uninstalled using a third party uninstaller, as they are typically protected against automated uninstallation, for security reasons. With "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes" option checked from the Settings, Uninstalr could still display some installation size related elements in the UI which was confusing. The "Only scan the system drive" option moved under Improve Scan Speed from the General settings. If two software have the exact same name and version number, selecting both of them for uninstallation fails because only one is actually selected. Sorting the installed apps by size sometimes fails and the order is incorrect. The "Don't show which paths are currently analyzed" did not work correctly - some parts of the UI still show the currently analyzed path with this setting checked. The "Don't list software less than 10 MB" filter did not work correctly - some apps smaller than 10 MB could still be listed. Uninstalr could start very quickly and display an empty list of detected apps. Restarting the app usually fixed the issue and the list of installed apps was properly displayed. If you placed portable Uninstalr to a same folder with other portable apps, those were not detected because Uninstalr automatically added its installation folder to the ignore list. When trying to uninstall some specific software, Uninstalr could get stuck on the Searching for more data relating to the app phase. Uninstalr could sometimes do a silent uninstallation even if user had unchecked the Perform a silent uninstallation option. Known issues: Uninstalr can fail to run with an Out Of Memory error in systems that have a lot of installed apps. Using the New Software Monitor tool multiple times during one session can cause the program to get stuck on the Scanning stage. The "uninstallation completed" message box sometimes closes when the user moves the mouse cursor over the button before user clicks it. There is no feedback for the user after Fix Information feature has been used. The Right Click menu's Select by publisher option can display the number of apps per each publisher without correct vertical alignment. The default user interface might not display all of the found installed apps if you have over 600 installed apps. If you do, using the Screen Reader Compatible Interface solves the issue. Leftover apptype filter checkbox is shown in red font only in Dark Mode. Clicking the app's icon from the Windows Taskbar doesn't minimize/restore the app like other apps. The warning about an app that user wishes to uninstall being related to some other app user did not select can sometimes be inaccurate. If app's language is changed without restarting Uninstalr, the list of installed software might not automatically refresh. When software is being uninstalled, the UI can say it is processing paths unrelating to the uninstalled app. This is purely cosmetic and does not mean these paths are removed. Uninstalr might not properly detect and/or uninstall Steam games if they are installed to a drive different than Steam's default location in C:\. You might see "This action is only valid for products that are currently installed" error message from Windows Installer during uninstallation. This is a cosmetic issue. Download: Uninstalr 3.1 | 7.1 MB (Free, paid version available) Download: Uninstalr Setup 3.1 View: Uninstalr Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!