Recommended Posts

Loving this game so far. The combat system really bugged me at first because I was so used to the time system of the original Witcher. I kept trying to combo attacks together by clicking as soon as my last strike hit, and it didn't work that well. Instead I've found clicking as quick as you can to be much more effective.

Though one thing I don't like about the combat, is group fights are much more complicated....luckily they generally only happen in numbers of 3-4 and not many more. Without a type of attack that generally hits everything (yet, at least, still a low lvl), I struggle to take on multiple opponents at once. Anyone have tips for group fights? I usually start using the sign that knocks people down on a weaker guy so I get a few seconds to attack the others in slightly fewer numbers, but it only marginally helps most of the time.

I finally had a chance to play the game recently and I'm very impressed. It actually feels like a PC game and it seems to run fairly well on a Radeon HD 5850. I'm definitely going to buy this game as soon as possible. CD Projekt deserves a lot of support because they did an awesome job. Right now, they're a shining beacon of hope in a market full of great-but-not-awesome PC games. They're also a good example of a PC developer that actually cares about its fan-base. Seriously, unlimited installs on a single PC with the ability to play it on up to five unique PCs is amazing.

fairly well on a 5850? heh that card should be enough to run anything maxed out, failure to do so is developers getting lazy with resources imo.

and again no offense to inferniac and the good people of Poland, i know CD Projekt are big there and are important to the country's efforts to become a game development center, but from the feedback i hear and from what folks like neo003 and DL are saying it looks like many of the gameplay and interface issues the previous entry had persist. this is not trolling CDP or the game, i really wanted to get the sequel but after the first one proved itself incomplete i decided not to. BTW i'm not surprised the graphics are sweet, it was clear from the first game that the art department is definitely not the issue there. that game also looked marvelous overall, despite the odd conversation scenes...

fairly well on a 5850? heh that card should be enough to run anything maxed out, failure to do so is developers getting lazy with resources imo.

and again no offense to inferniac and the good people of Poland, i know CD Projekt are big there and are important to the country's efforts to become a game development center, but from the feedback i hear and from what folks like neo003 and DL are saying it looks like many of the gameplay and interface issues the previous entry had persist. this is not trolling CDP or the game, i really wanted to get the sequel but after the first one proved itself incomplete i decided not to. BTW i'm not surprised the graphics are sweet, it was clear from the first game that the art department is definitely not the issue there. that game also looked marvelous overall, despite the odd conversation scenes...

My friend has a really weak CPU so my experience may not be a good indication of how well the HD 5850 performs in The Witcher 2. Check this out:

TheWitcher2-GPUs-1920.png

[Source]

I finally had a chance to play the game recently and I'm very impressed. It actually feels like a PC game and it seems to run fairly well on a Radeon HD 5850. I'm definitely going to buy this game as soon as possible. CD Projekt deserves a lot of support because they did an awesome job. Right now, they're a shining beacon of hope in a market full of great-but-not-awesome PC games. They're also a good example of a PC developer that actually cares about its fan-base. Seriously, unlimited installs on a single PC with the ability to play it on up to five unique PCs is amazing.

I agree, the developers did an awesome job with resource management on this game. I just turned the graphics up to High, increased texture memory size to "Very Large".....basically the only difference between my settings and ultra, is ultra has shadows set higher (both number and quality) and has ubersampling enabled, and it runs great on my i7 @ 3.5Ghz and GTX 295 @ stock. I forgot to run FRAPS so I don't know exact values, but it seems really smooth for the time I played it this morning. I quite surprised my 295 is handling it as well as it is.

fairly well on a 5850? heh that card should be enough to run anything maxed out, failure to do so is developers getting lazy with resources imo.

and again no offense to inferniac and the good people of Poland, i know CD Projekt are big there and are important to the country's efforts to become a game development center, but from the feedback i hear and from what folks like neo003 and DL are saying it looks like many of the gameplay and interface issues the previous entry had persist. this is not trolling CDP or the game, i really wanted to get the sequel but after the first one proved itself incomplete i decided not to. BTW i'm not surprised the graphics are sweet, it was clear from the first game that the art department is definitely not the issue there. that game also looked marvelous overall, despite the odd conversation scenes...

The only gameplay issue I have had (once I adjusted to the new combat system) is interacting with in-game objects seems a little broken. Basically there can be times where I have to wait 3-4 seconds for an object to light up (where I can actually use it), sometimes I actually have to walk away from it and come back in range. Its pretty annoying, but its something I think a patch could fix. As for the interface, I haven't had any issues with it. It is different than most games, but once you learn it, it's actually very easy to use and doesn't present any real issues. If anything, the gameplay and interface issues you read about are likely differences of opinion, and not actual issues that need to be fixed to make the game any better, except for interacting with world objects.

I agree, the developers did an awesome job with resource management on this game. I just turned the graphics up to High, increased texture memory size to "Very Large".....basically the only difference between my settings and ultra, is ultra has shadows set higher (both number and quality) and has ubersampling enabled, and it runs great on my i7 @ 3.5Ghz and GTX 295 @ stock. I forgot to run FRAPS so I don't know exact values, but it seems really smooth for the time I played it this morning. I quite surprised my 295 is handling it as well as it is.

The only gameplay issue I have had (once I adjusted to the new combat system) is interacting with in-game objects seems a little broken. Basically there can be times where I have to wait 3-4 seconds for an object to light up (where I can actually use it), sometimes I actually have to walk away from it and come back in range. Its pretty annoying, but its something I think a patch could fix. As for the interface, I haven't had any issues with it. It is different than most games, but once you learn it, it's actually very easy to use and doesn't present any real issues. If anything, the gameplay and interface issues you read about are likely differences of opinion, and not actual issues that need to be fixed to make the game any better, except for interacting with world objects.

I'm pretty sure you can only interact with objects after the fight and it usually takes a few seconds after the last persons died for the fight to be over it is incredibly annoying.

A list of what some of the GFX options do stolen from somewhere.

-Texture downscaling: higher values result in lower texture quality.

-Texture memory size: sets the amount of graphics card memory allocated to textures. Larger values will decrease the amount of streaming that occurs in game and will make the game run more smoothly, but they can also cause the graphics card to run out of memory and even result in game crashes. Choose a reasonable value based on the amount of memory available on your graphics card.

- Shadow quality: affects graphics performance. Consumes GPU power without affecting CPU performance.

- Number of shadowed lights: set the maximum number of lights that cast shadows. Affects graphics performance. Consumes GPU power without affecting CPU performance.

- LOD distance: distance scale for level of detail on meshes. Lower values improve game performance but result in reduced detail on models.

- Bloom: effect greatly improves quality of game graphics without placing excess demands on GPU.

- Light shafts: visual effect recommended for medium-high/high-end machines. Should be disabled on older systems.

- Anti-aliasing: demanding effect that can significantly reduce performance, so it should be disabled on medium and low-end machines.

- Blur effects: special blur and radial blur visual effects that are quite demanding on hardware but used rarely in the game.

- Depth of field ? gameplay: subtle visual effect. Option determines appearance of effect only during gameplay sequences and does not affect DoF in cutscenes.

- Vignette: aesthetic option that produces a photographic vignette around the game screen. Does not affect performance.

- Rain, Wet surfaces rain effect: modest impact on performance.

- SSAO (Screen Space Ambient Occlusion): lighting effect that is important to the game but unfortunately places significant demands on the GPU.

- Motion blur: blur effect on camera movement, demanding on the GPU.

- Cinematic depth of field: provides movie-like depth of field in cutscenes and dialogue sequences. Extremely detailed but demands significant power. Should only be enabled on machines equipped with top-end graphics cards.

- Depth of field ? cutscenes: option only affects cutscenes and dialogue sequences, does not affect gameplay performance.

- Dangling objects limit: limiter for physical animation of character components like Geralt's hair. Disabling this option places greater demands on the CPU.

- Ubersampling: high quality rendering mode under which whole scenes are rendered multiple times to provide the best possible textures, object details and anti-aliasing (superior to anti-alias and anisotropy even on the highest settings). Use with caution, only on top-end computers (best possible in terms of both GPU and CPU).

- Vertical sync: helps eliminate "screen tearing" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_tearing) during camera movements and blinking on very quick animations (e.g., bright explosions), but can cause somewhat slower rendering and short input lags.

- Decals: enabling decals like dust or blood on characters can affect CPU performance.

UBERSAMPLING is the only thing that absolutely rapes my PC.

Just in case anyone has any trouble with Crossfire...

Current settings:

witcher2settings.png

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/546/witcher2settings.png/

Runs smoothly between 40 - 60 in worse case scenarios. Get over 100 indoors and in caves etc. Averaging round 60 fps

outside in the forest

in Act 1.

Using RadeonPro with DiRT2 crossfire profile with the slider set at alternate frame buffering.

Drivers are Catalyst 11.5.

Gah so annoying they've removed the storage from the game in order to speed the game up so people aren't wasting time stashing items away while at the same time added a new crafting system and 100s of random items so now rather than just stashing your items away you have to go through a giant list deciding on what you can sell and what you should keep. :angry:

Also from the looks of it you HAVE to keep potion recipes so don't sell them.

quick question (probably asked before) do i have to play the first one to know what's going on?

Some dude with stylish long hair prances around the forest and kills things and in-between that tries to get laid a lot. I think that about sums it up. :rofl:

I am jk FTR.

Some dude with stylish long hair prances around the forest and kills things and in-between that tries to get laid a lot. I think that about sums it up. :rofl:

I am jk FTR.

dude, that sounds like the perfect game story... other then the long hair.

Apparently Yrden should be used to hit the tentacles - once you "pin" 3 of them the fourth will sweep across. You then get a QTE to press to ride the tentacle (heh) whereupon it will smash the enarby bridge and allow Geralt to climb atop the demolished bridge and leap onto its back.

I got that from reading the GOG.com forum.

I read spoilers to help you, mister :angry: Now go out there and kill some monsters :crazy:

Man, this game is a beast on the graphics. I am averaging about 35 FPS and that is with most everything set to High, Textures set to Medium. I just let it Auto Detect. I kept Shadows and whatever else is after that at High. Inside areas it jumps up to 60, and I have VSync enabled so assuming it can go higher. It is a beautiful looking game though, no doubt about that.

I have to say, not playing the first game, I am absolutely lost. Story wise. Game play. Just absolutely lost. So I am contemplating going back and playing it first actually. With that said, I did get the game from GOG, so I will be referring to the manual and guide heavily it seems. I can say though I absolutely LOVE the combat system, but I think I have shared I am not a big classic RPG player, so the fact the combat is more similar to an action game is actually the entire reason I picked it up to begin with.

Regardless, I have no plans on playing this until I beat LA Noire, I just wanted to check out how it ran, and I absolutely see this as a game that I will just play over the next half a year or so. As being 40 hours long, even if I did play it at every moment I get to play these days, it will still take me well over a month to beat it, so I will just keep going back to it when I have nothing else to play. And I am pretty sure it will actually take me much longer to beat it then 40 hours since I am an RPG noob.

Man, this game is a beast on the graphics. I am averaging about 35 FPS and that is with most everything set to High, Textures set to Medium. I just let it Auto Detect. I kept Shadows and whatever else is after that at High. Inside areas it jumps up to 60, and I have VSync enabled so assuming it can go higher. It is a beautiful looking game though, no doubt about that.

I have to say, not playing the first game, I am absolutely lost. Story wise. Game play. Just absolutely lost. So I am contemplating going back and playing it first actually. With that said, I did get the game from GOG, so I will be referring to the manual and guide heavily it seems. I can say though I absolutely LOVE the combat system, but I think I have shared I am not a big classic RPG player, so the fact the combat is more similar to an action game is actually the entire reason I picked it up to begin with.

Regardless, I have no plans on playing this until I beat LA Noire, I just wanted to check out how it ran, and I absolutely see this as a game that I will just play over the next half a year or so. As being 40 hours long, even if I did play it at every moment I get to play these days, it will still take me well over a month to beat it, so I will just keep going back to it when I have nothing else to play. And I am pretty sure it will actually take me much longer to beat it then 40 hours since I am an RPG noob.

Get the trainer for Witcher 1 and activate god mode - then you can play through the game fairly quickly to get the background history etc :p

Turning off ssao/ubersampling will boost your fps.

As for sound problems: http://www.gog.com/en/forum/the_witcher_2/common_issues_and_possible_solutions_read_before_posting

Get the trainer for Witcher 1 and activate god mode - then you can play through the game fairly quickly to get the background history etc :p

Turning off ssao/ubersampling will boost your fps.

As for sound problems: http://www.gog.com/en/forum/the_witcher_2/common_issues_and_possible_solutions_read_before_posting

That is a brilliant idea. (Y) Thanks for suggesting it.

And I believe the ubersampling was off by default with the auto detect, but I will definitely make sure. I am reading all over the place people saying it kills FPS.

I also read a few people saying that for Nvidia drivers, to uninstall the 3D Vision part of the drivers and that makes a difference. Since I do not have a 3D capable monitor, I am going to give it a whirl, but just do not see how that could make a difference, but stranger things have happened.

Thanks again for that idea.

Thanks to my fast networked printers at work, I was able to print out with no one finding out the 97 page Game Guide and the 37 page manual, both from the GOG.com Digital Edition, so I think that should help a total noob like me with playing the game. And I was smart enough to remember to rename the files to something work related sounding, just in case deleting them from the print logs did not stick. :shiftyninja: :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Ditto that, I have a few Alexa devices around the house to control lighting and such for a disabled person I live with, and it shows a *lot* of ads on the display. The dots are simple but effective. A lot cheaper too.
    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!