Recommended Posts

^ I can't help but laugh at that. Bellator pulled Rampage and Ortiz off of Impact Wrestling to keep them from getting injured and it happened anyway! :rofl: That's done ****ed up their first PPV; they should probably just move it to Spike and try a PPV later on.

 

And you who got the shortest end of the stick in all of this? EDDIE ######ING ALVAREZ. I sure hope his contract said that if the PPV is a no-go on that date, that he's a free agent.

 

Also, how the ###### do you break your neck training so close to the fight? Was he training getting slammed by Quinton in the cage, like Quinton always tries to do? No fakery there, no sir, Bellator is legit*

 

*And also associates way too much with pretend fighting.

UFN Manchester shows, once again, that the downed opponent rule needs to be changed. If one or both of your knees are on the floor, downed opponent. If you're just touching your hand on the mat but are on the soles of your feet, it should be legal.

UFC: Fight for the Troops 3 was pretty fun. There weren't any really bad fights, except for Green vs Krause, and it opened up some fun match-ups for future events.

 

Only 6 events left in the "season" until the end of 2013, where both of the PPV lined up have to potential to be the best PPV of the year, in terms of fights and PPV buys.

 

UFC Fight Night: Belfort vs. Henderson

UFC 167: St-Pierre vs. Hendricks

The Ultimate Fighter: Team Rousey vs. Team Tate Finale

UFC Fight Night: Hunt vs. Bigfoot

UFC on Fox: Pettis vs. Thomson

UFC 168: Weidman vs. Silva 2

It's a pretty terrible card all around. Rafael Cavalcante vs Igor Pokrajac is the 3rd bout on the card. It's THAT bad. I'll still watch it. But it's bad.

What was it like, anyway? I forgot to set Sky+ to record it; haven't even looked at the results.

What was it like, anyway? I forgot to set Sky+ to record it; haven't even looked at the results.

 

11 fights, 9 finishes. It ended up being a "fun" card but absolutely irrelevant, except for the main event.

UFC is publishing a ton of amazing videos on YouTube to celebrate their 20th anniversary. Good :D

 

Past

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gR2GpzESbHc

 

and Present

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SS77cgAjNw

Updated_UFC_167_event_poster.jpg

 

TOMORROW!

 

Facebook/UFC.tv Prelims

 

Cody Donovan vs. Gian Villante

Will Campuzano vs. Sergio Pettis

Jason High vs. Anthony Lapsley

 

Prelims on FS1

 

Erik Perez vs. Edwin Figueroa

Brian Ebersole vs. Rick Story

Ed Herman vs. Thales Leites

Donald Cerrone vs. Evan Dunham

 

Main Card (PPV)

 

Tim Elliott vs. Ali Bagautinov

Josh Koscheck vs. Tyron Woodley

Rory MacDonald vs. Robbie Lawler

Rashad Evans vs. Chael Sonnen

Georges St-Pierre vs. Johny Hendricks

Are we in for a shock?

 

Yes, maybe this time it will be 49-46 instead of the usual 50-45. :woot:

 

Josh Koscheck had a big right hand, got his eye socket broken for his troubles. If Hendricks doesn't close the deal in the first, he's in for a long night. His wins over Pierce and Kos are blueprints of how you can neutralize his power. The Condit fight, where he faded a bit in the 3rd, is also a troubling sign. GSP being GSP and gameplaning as he does, his chances aren't great. But we've already seen a massive upset in 2013. Another one would be something special, albeit not very likely.

Going to get my unpopular opinion in now....

 

GSP won that fight.

 

Yep. I said it.

I agree. it all came down to the first round,and that was close because they each got a takedown,and landed similar amount of strikes, but GSP got a sub in there. it surely wasn't a robbery like some folks seem to think, it was just a super close fight.

it surely wasn't a robbery like some folks seem to think, it was just a super close fight.

That's exactly what it was; only difference is I had it 48-47 to Hendricks rather than GSP. I'm surprised one of the judges didn't rule it a draw, to be honest; it really was that close. The way GSP talked in his post-match interview, we probably won't be seeing a rematch. :/

 

 

Meanwhile...

tyron-woodley-ufc-167-knockout.gif?w=640

Lots of ###### score cards last night but the main event took the cake. In my eyes, Hendricks won that fight. He also came very close to finishing GSP, something not even Carlos Condit, probably the best striker GSP ever faced, could achieve.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!