Recommended Posts

Watched through it all just now. Pretty much echoing what everone here's already said: poetic justice for Brandao, Rousey was a disrespectful bitch after her fight, and Anderson...  :omg: I was watching it with my dad and I've never seen him recoil in horror so much when we saw what happened to his leg! That action shot vcfan posted on the last page was even worse.  :| I saw Silva wasn't doing any of the showboating he did in the first fight; he was taking it seriously this time. That kick showed how much effort and power he was putting in, and that was such an unfortunate end to the fight, and maybe also the career of what many would consider to be the greatest MMA fighter of all time.

Rousey has earned the right to be bitchy, all her career opponents and critics have been giving her ###### and she's taken it all in stride, she beat Tate twice now, eventually it gets tiring of being the nice one when everyone is out to get you, hell she was being criticized even when being nice, so why not be nasty once in a while? 

why cant anyone defend against rouseys armbars? is she really that good? or is it a lack of skill in women fighters? I wouldn't be so skeptical if it wasn't the finish in every single rousey fight. 

 

but I gotta say,those judo throws were something else. just wow. so strong.

I suppose, never heard a champ get booed so much - was quite funny.

 

Until UFC sign that beast from Invicta (Cant think of her name right now) i cant see anyone beating Rousey

 

Cristiane "Cyborg" Justino. She was signed to the UFC but left because they wouldn't give her a fight at 145. She can't make 135 so that point is moot anyway. Ronda herself is interested in Holly Holm (big hype train). Marloes Coenen would also be an interesting challenger if the UFC picked her up.

 

why cant anyone defend against rouseys armbars? is she really that good? or is it a lack of skill in women fighters? I wouldn't be so skeptical if it wasn't the finish in every single rousey fight. 

 

but I gotta say,those judo throws were something else. just wow. so strong.

 

Don't fear the guy with 10000 moves. Fear the guy that has done one move 10000 times. Ronda has pretty much perfected every variation of the armbar, every sweep to it, every reversal. If she gets you into the position, you're toast 90% of the times. Your gameplan must be to avoid it at all costs. Much like Alan Belcher when he fought Toquinho, you can only defend to a certain point. After that, you must neutralize that advantage in any way possible.

Tate's gameplan was terrible. She should've stopped trying to take Ronda down immediately after the first throw. If she was going to keep trying, she should've switched to a single or an ankle pick instead of a double leg.

 

Women fighters are like every other fighter: some are great overall, some are one-dimensional, and some have big holes in their game. The next fight Ronda has lined up should be interesting as Sara McMann is a silver medalist in wrestling. Her ground game is top notch. There's also Cat Zingano waiting in the wings. It's too bad that she didn't get the next crack at it but she must still be rehabbing her knee. Watch Zingano vs Tate on The Ultimate Fighter 17 Finale, it's a great fight and display all of their skill set.

With the 115lb division coming along, they should also recruit Jessica Aguilar. She'll probably be smart, skip TUF, and sign up later for a better deal (despite the Invicta - TUF deal being quite sweet in guaranteed money).

Cristiane "Cyborg" Justino. She was signed to the UFC but left because they wouldn't give her a fight at 145. She can't make 135 so that point is moot anyway. Ronda herself is interested in Holly Holm (big hype train). Marloes Coenen would also be an interesting challenger if the UFC picked her up.

 

 

Don't fear the guy with 10000 moves. Fear the guy that has done one move 10000 times. Ronda has pretty much perfected every variation of the armbar, every sweep to it, every reversal. If she gets you into the position, you're toast 90% of the times. Your gameplan must be to avoid it at all costs. Much like Alan Belcher when he fought Toquinho, you can only defend to a certain point. After that, you must neutralize that advantage in any way possible.

Tate's gameplan was terrible. She should've stopped trying to take Ronda down immediately after the first throw. If she was going to keep trying, she should've switched to a single or an ankle pick instead of a double leg.

that's my point. why is everyones gameplan terrible. everyone knows her strengths,and everyone knows she will try to finish with the armbar. why hasn't anyone cracked this?

 

1388355024.gif

Yamasaki: "BURNNNNNN"

that's my point. why is everyones gameplan terrible. everyone knows her strengths,and everyone knows she will try to finish with the armbar. why hasn't anyone cracked this?

 

Yamasaki: "BURNNNNNN"

 

Because the few weaknesses she had were worked on, look at Tate;s face after that fight, not only will Rhonda rip your arm out, she can now beat you to a pulp while getting there, she also absorbed Tate's best shots and was pushed to the third round, it's going to take a damn good fighter or a huge mistake on her part to beat Rousey for the foreseeable future

that's my point. why is everyones gameplan terrible. everyone knows her strengths,and everyone knows she will try to finish with the armbar. why hasn't anyone cracked this?

 

Because it's a fight. It's not a one-sided deal. Quoting the great Joe Louis: "Every fighter's got a plan until they get hit."

 

Ronda fights to her strengths. To beat her, you have to neutralize her gameplan AND implement yours, she won't simply roll over if you successfully defend an armbar. She certainly has other submissions but favors that one. Don't think she won't take that triangle from the bottom if you leave it available. She has continuously shown her ability to adapt during the fight and change her approach in order to secure the win. Miesha didn't show that ability to adapt and got tossed around for her troubles. Julie Kedzie almost beat Tate in Strikeforce before she pulled a miracle armbar out of thin air. Tate's game isn't evolving and that is costing her fights. She needs to switch training camps or put more work in with TAM.

Because the few weaknesses she had were worked on, look at Tate;s face after that fight, not only will Rhonda rip your arm out, she can now beat you to a pulp while getting there, she also absorbed Tate's best shots and was pushed to the third round, it's going to take a damn good fighter or a huge mistake on her part to beat Rousey for the foreseeable future

Because it's a fight. It's not a one-sided deal. Quoting the great Joe Louis: "Every fighter's got a plan until they get hit."

Ronda fights to her strengths. To beat her, you have to neutralize her gameplan AND implement yours, she won't simply roll over if you successfully defend an armbar. She certainly has other submissions but favors that one. Don't think she won't take that triangle from the bottom if you leave it available. She has continuously shown her ability to adapt during the fight and change her approach in order to secure the win. Miesha didn't show that ability to adapt and got tossed around for her troubles. Julie Kedzie almost beat Tate in Strikeforce before she pulled a miracle armbar out of thin air. Tate's game isn't evolving and that is costing her fights. She needs to switch training camps or put more work in with TAM.

the reason im theorizing is because to get an armbar, there is great risk in losing position. because the book has been out on her for awhile, you would think someone would focus majorily on capitalizing on these opportunities. so the question I asked earlier is, is it because she is just that damn good? or is there a lack of skill in this area on capitalizing on these openings? it seems both of you are to the opinion that it is her skillfull abilities that enable her to pull off her signature move every single time. that's fine,thats what I wanted to discuss,and get some opinions.

the reason im theorizing is because to get an armbar, there is great risk in losing position. because the book has been out on her for awhile, you would think someone would focus majorily on capitalizing on these opportunities. so the question I asked earlier is, is it because she is just that damn good? or is there a lack of skill in this area on capitalizing on these openings? it seems both of you are to the opinion that it is her skillfull abilities that enable her to pull off her signature move every single time. that's fine,thats what I wanted to discuss,and get some opinions.

 

She really is that good, and improving, she's still very young and will only get better, her competition will have to majorly step up if anyone really wants to beat her, simple as that, remember Tyson in his heyday? Everyone knew what he was going to do and yet he still knocked people out every time, same thing here, some are just for a while literally the best at their games

the reason im theorizing is because to get an armbar, there is great risk in losing position. because the book has been out on her for awhile, you would think someone would focus majorily on capitalizing on these opportunities. so the question I asked earlier is, is it because she is just that damn good? or is there a lack of skill in this area on capitalizing on these openings? it seems both of you are to the opinion that it is her skillfull abilities that enable her to pull off her signature move every single time. that's fine,thats what I wanted to discuss,and get some opinions.

 

She has the skill and the power to enforce her will. Think of her as the female Paul Harris but with better fight IQ. She knows how to pick her spots and generally goes for an armbar from mount. When she goes for an armbar from the bottom, her opponents generally defend with hand on hand but by then she already has her legs over their head and has perfect leverage. Being an Olympic level judoka certainly doesn't hurt her chances. But now is where the fun beings. All of her opponents have been only averagely skilled in the grappling department. Sara McMann is a whole different thing. She has the size and grappling credentials to make this an interesting fight. The only issue is that she may still be too green in the MMA game for this level of fight. She's also 7-0 but her best wins are Hitomi Akano and Shayna Baszler, both recently beaten by Alexis Davis. I think Zingano poses the greatest challenge since her striking is better and can tag Ronda on her way in.

Rousey has earned the right to be bitchy, all her career opponents and critics have been giving her **** and she's taken it all in stride, she beat Tate twice now, eventually it gets tiring of being the nice one when everyone is out to get you, hell she was being criticized even when being nice, so why not be nasty once in a while? 

 

What people dont understand is that Tate insulted her family - some people take it in stride others do not. I think if Tate is going to stoop to that level she cant cry and bitch when Ronda refused to shake her hand, for what it's worth she did compliment her fighting afterwards in an interview. Shes also only been like this to Tate... she has been nice and cool with the others she's fought in the past.. these two just have some real beef with one another. I love Rhonda because she's an amazing fighter and her ability to adapt her style and impose her will makes her that good..it's not that she's fighting weak women mma fighters - she's simply on an entire different level

 

why cant anyone defend against rouseys armbars? is she really that good? or is it a lack of skill in women fighters? I wouldn't be so skeptical if it wasn't the finish in every single rousey fight. 

 

but I gotta say,those judo throws were something else. just wow. so strong.

 

She's been working on it since she was 13 i believe...ever since she started Judo - as i said above - her level of judo is above everyone else

 

Because the few weaknesses she had were worked on, look at Tate;s face after that fight, not only will Rhonda rip your arm out, she can now beat you to a pulp while getting there, she also absorbed Tate's best shots and was pushed to the third round, it's going to take a damn good fighter or a huge mistake on her part to beat Rousey for the foreseeable future

 

Clearly we saw who took more time to train and work on their weaknesses and it wasn't Tate, going for Rousey is only going to get you slammed and submitted - I'm surprised as much as she kept coming after her she didn't screw up and lose in the 1st again.

the spider is coming back,according to his boxing coach.

He's super good. Said that in three months to six months he's coming back, I can train normal. He's good, he's quiet. I think if the fight never happened. In the third round was coming back a Anderson Silva stronger, more agile, faster. And certainly would seek a knockout or a victory-said

translated article

http://www.microsofttranslator.com/bv.aspx?from=&to=en&a=http://sportv.globo.com/site/programas/sportv-news/noticia/2013/12/tecnico-de-boxe-de-anderson-silva-revela-previsao-de-retorno-do-lutador.html

original article

http://sportv.globo.com/site/programas/sportv-news/noticia/2013/12/tecnico-de-boxe-de-anderson-silva-revela-previsao-de-retorno-do-lutador.html

 

Three to six months? That's clearly wishful thinking. Corey Hill was 30 years old when he destroyed his leg and took a year. GSP took over a year to recover from his knee injury. 2015 is a more realistic return date.

 

If he comes back, and that's a big IF that only Anderson can answer, who will he fight in the MW division? He's in a weird spot right now and the division will (finally) move forward without him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!