Opera 11.00 Beta 1


Recommended Posts

That could be applied to Apple as well and their terrible Windows ports.

Yeah, it could. Also to Microsoft applications on both Mac OS X and Windows. What's your point and what does it have to do with this thread?

Omg im drooling over this tab stack feature lol. Another cool thing is when you stack them, collapse them, and hover over them it lets you select thumbnails exactly how the win7 taskbar works! Thats nice os integration right there.

Considering the Mac version has it as well, it doesn't have much to do with OS integration. Mimicking certain behavior with custom code ≠ OS services integration.

Some things I've noticed almost immediately:

The newly designed infotips that appear when you hover over the tabs don't always disappear.

Getting some of the 'remote server not found' error pages that plagued 10.7x alpha builds. Server / connection is fine, pressing F5 and the page pops up.

A *really* old bug where tooltips have no padding on the bottom / right so the text looks like it's slightly cropped.

And a bizarre one, typing "sunspider" in the address bar goes to sunspider.co.uk and doesn't search like every other word I try :/

Hopefully they'll replace the beta like they have before :p

Some things I've noticed almost immediately:

The newly designed infotips that appear when you hover over the tabs don't always disappear.

Getting some of the 'remote server not found' error pages that plagued 10.7x alpha builds. Server / connection is fine, pressing F5 and the page pops up.

A *really* old bug where tooltips have no padding on the bottom / right so the text looks like it's slightly cropped.

And a bizarre one, typing "sunspider" in the address bar goes to sunspider.co.uk and doesn't search like every other word I try :/

Hopefully they'll replace the beta like they have before :p

For me typing sunspider just brings up a google search for sunspider. Haven't seen any remote connection issues, but I do notice the tooltips. And this IS still a beta, when its released its still gonna have bugs.

EDIT:

Man stacking tabs and pinning them is so awesome! I can see this being extremely useful, especially at work. I can have all the work related pages I need open and pinned in a nice group I wont accidentally close.

The new way tabs are pinned in Opera are nice....it seems like it shrinks the tab size down to the favicon (good and bad.....pretty sure the old method left the tab the same auto size it was, which could make them very large with few tabs).

Tab stacking though is really nice, I tend to have lots of Neowin pages open @ home (easily 20 or so), being able to put them all under one tab will really up my tab bar a lot, same with other sites where I have multiple pages I keep open for awhile. Only bad thing is no mouse-over previews (you can mouse-over the stacked tab to get a preview, but no larger previews like when you mouse over a thumbnail in Windows 7), but I assume that will change eventually. Still really helps organization of tabs if you can stand stacking them (depending on how many tabs you have, it could get annoying).

Love the updated URL bar (never tried the last build that added the badges and what not in), looks really nice and fitting.

Mike: Typing "sunspider" in the address bar for me goes to a google search for sunspider.....are you sure you do not have auto-completion turned on (which will try to finish URLs if you do not add the .com or .co.uk or whatever)? Seems to work normally here.

EDIT: Viper, I feel the same way, up until now I have been using Chrome at work, but with the tab stacking and what not I can put specific tabs under others and make them much easier to navigate. Same @ home, drop all my Neowin tabs in one place and more easily find other non-Neowin tabs. All it needs is maximized previews like Windows 7 (when you mouse over a tab thumbnail image, it should load that page in the main browser area behind the tab thumbnails).

Not that I see but That would be AMAZING. I will suggest that in the forums and blog comments when the beta comes out for sure.

For example one nice little thing would be for a group to auto collapse when you fill the tab bar/expand when there's room.

Not that I see but That would be AMAZING. I will suggest that in the forums and blog comments when the beta comes out for sure.

For example one nice little thing would be for a group to auto collapse when you fill the tab bar/expand when there's room.

That and autostack based on domain name.

Auto stacking should be possible. IE already groups together sites from the same domain using a random colour. (I think that colouring looks tacky though.)

Yeah, they should be able to do something similar with tab stacking and it would be pretty awesome IMO. It keeps the individual tabs for specific pages that you want, but at the same time it keeps them organized so all your tabs from site YYY are over there, while all your tabs from site ZZZ are over here.

Auto stacking should be possible. IE already groups together sites from the same domain using a random colour. (I think that colouring looks tacky though.)

They could use colors on a more subtle way possibly. Like when you have a group of tabs, the transparent box around it could be have a slightly transparent color to it.

Mike: Typing "sunspider" in the address bar for me goes to a google search for sunspider.....are you sure you do not have auto-completion turned on (which will try to finish URLs if you do not add the .com or .co.uk or whatever)? Seems to work normally here.

That's the bizarre thing, typing "bbc" searches google and I've been to the bbc site before, i've not been to sunspider.co.uk before ><

And yes, auto stacking would be nice, as well as a shortcut for it

Edit: brain wave! local box called "sun" which i've visited before, and told Opera that typing sun -> http://sun/ so a bug that means it's not checking for the URL properly :p

The tab stacking feature is simply awesome! great concept that will have plenty of other possibilities I'm sure. It's definitely going to be copied by other browsers too.

It would be even better If we could select tabs by ctrl+click and then right click them > add to a stack, kinda an overkill but it's a faster way than putting tabs on each other.

The tab stacking feature is simply awesome! great concept that will have plenty of other possibilities I'm sure. It's definitely going to be copied by other browsers too.

How do you think it compares to Tabcandy/Panorama in Firefox? I think I like Firefox's tab groups better. They seem a bit cooler and more flexible.

How do you think it compares to Tabcandy/Panorama in Firefox? I think I like Firefox's tab groups better. They seem a bit cooler and more flexible.

Tab candy is surely a lot more powerful than this feature, but nothing beats a built in feature tbh, I have always found the features provided by extensions to be kinda messy and doesn't integrate quite well with everything else in the browser. So I actually meant it will be copied as a built-in feature as the speed dial concept for example.

Wow, I love the Tab Stack feature.

Tab Candy evolved into something too complicated for my needs. I just wanted something that let me group tabs together in the main brwoser window, and this is exactly that. (Y)

i havent really used opera in a long time, but cant u just right click and reopen closed tabs? seems easier.

Sure, but then you loose the content you have written. When I write a lot on the web I almost always use the pin feature. Especially if I have to do some research in between.

Tab candy while technically being more powerful ends up being a lot less useful then this IMO. Yeah when I first saw the tab candy videos I drooled, looked amazing, but upon trying to actually use it its just a PIA.

I don't know if this makes sense to anyone else, but it seems to me that tab candy is more focused on the act of managing your tabs then actually web browsing and being able to quickly and conveniently group them.

With tab candy you have to go to a separate page, and drag your tabs around there to your hearts content, then you have to click a group which brings you back to the normal gui, then if you want to go back you gotta hit tab candy again. What opera did is a much more straight forward approach, instead of having to go to a separate page to drag and group tabs together you just do it quickly on the tab bar, it feels more natural, and more convenient to use for most situations. Tab candy is really only better if you have a metric arseton of tabs open constantly.

Auto stacking should be possible. IE already groups together sites from the same domain using a random colour. (I think that colouring looks tacky though.)

IE doesn't group by domain, it groups by sites opened from.

so if I open a a link in a new tab on neowin, those tabs will have the same color, no matter where that other links goes.

IE doesn't group by domain, it groups by sites opened from.

so if I open a a link in a new tab on neowin, those tabs will have the same color, no matter where that other links goes.

Yeah and I actually prefer that to domain. The way I browse is I tend to open sites like reddit and neowin in a tab, and then middle click all the interesting links I see and then read them all.

Tab candy while technically being more powerful ends up being a lot less useful then this IMO. Yeah when I first saw the tab candy videos I drooled, looked amazing, but upon trying to actually use it its just a PIA.

I don't know if this makes sense to anyone else, but it seems to me that tab candy is more focused on the act of managing your tabs then actually web browsing and being able to quickly and conveniently group them.

With tab candy you have to go to a separate page, and drag your tabs around there to your hearts content, then you have to click a group which brings you back to the normal gui, then if you want to go back you gotta hit tab candy again. What opera did is a much more straight forward approach, instead of having to go to a separate page to drag and group tabs together you just do it quickly on the tab bar, it feels more natural, and more convenient to use for most situations. Tab candy is really only better if you have a metric arseton of tabs open constantly.

Agreed. Tab Candy is a classic example of overengineering a good idea. Opera's stacked tabs are much easier to use, albeit at the moment too basic - as has been mentioned before an auto-stacking option is a must.

I fully expect to see an Opera-like implementation of tab grouping in Chrome 10 or 11, and maybe Safari 6.

yeah, but I can see benefits to each method.

I fully expect to see an Opera-like implementation of tab grouping in Chrome 10 or 11, and maybe Safari 6.

Except it'll be a new and revolutionary idea that noone else has thought of before.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!