Opera 11.00 Beta 1


Recommended Posts

To all those of you complaining about bugs in the first beta of a web browser: Please remind yourself of the original meaning of beta. There will be bugs, newly introduced features like tab stacking are likely not yet completed. Report all bugs and hope for Opera to fix them during the beta cycle.

Personally, I won't switch to Opera, but I will admit that 11b1 has some nifty features which I hope will find their way into other browsers.

The panels on Mac OS X seem a little buggy. Specifically, if you hide the status bar, then the panel sidebar has an odd thick bottom that isn't on the Windows version.

Also, it uses a highly non-standard scroll bar...

Want an example of how bad non-standard widgets can look? Try this from a mere three years ago:

Panel Icons

To all those of you complaining about bugs in the first beta of a web browser: Please remind yourself of the original meaning of beta. There will be bugs, newly introduced features like tab stacking are likely not yet completed. Report all bugs and hope for Opera to fix them during the beta cycle.

Personally, I won't switch to Opera, but I will admit that 11b1 has some nifty features which I hope will find their way into other browsers.

I have no hopes for a less quirky and much more standard interface on Mac OS X.

The widgets are much better, but that scroll bar is just very out of place. Wasn't it more effort to actually use a custom scroll bar rather than the Aqua standard one?

The entire UI on both Windows and Mac is custom, unfortunately. They're just emulating it really well in most cases. But not as well in others. Scrollbars, buttons, dialog boxes, you name it. It's building on Cocoa on Mac though, but the UI widgets are all custom. I just recently saw another problem due to this -- the font setting list box in the preferences on Mac had repaint issues here. That would never have happened if they used the actual OS X widgets. Also, on Windows, you can see that the scroll bar has no context menu, and that the Aero-lookalike buttons don't actually fade into their hover state when hovered on... It's all small signs of being completely emulated besides for the window frames.

LOL @ the reddit comments.

"Opera Software - I'll let you know once it's its up."

"We are live:

Front page: http://www.opera.com/?display=myopera

Community page: http://www.opera.com/community/

Thanks - this is awesome."

"What the **** just happened?"

The tab bar on the side needs some work, it doesn't look too good.

Also, are they going to address being able to have more than one stack extended? I don't like that I'm forced to only keep one expanded at all times.

Both Opera 10 and 11 beta 1 seem a bit sluggish to launch compared to Safari. Anyway to fix that?

odd, people complaining about how apps don't conform to Mac themes but gladly let Apple off for desecrating the Windows themes with their sub-par ports

Gotta love the rhetoric of some people... Using your logic: Why should Apple care about their Windows applications if not even Microsoft themselves can be bothered to bring a remotely unified user experience to their operating system and applications?

Using your logic: Why should Apple care about their Windows applications if not even Microsoft themselves can be bothered to bring a remotely unified user experience to their operating system and applications?

I think the poor horse has been beaten to death already about this...

1. Office uses the Ribbon interface because it makes productivity a lot better. A lot of Windows applications do not require them, but the ones that can benefit from it already use it.

2. Windows live applications (well pretty much WLM really, since the others use the ribbon) use the WL theme because it fits in with that suite of product and their web designs for it.

3. Zune player uses a Metro style design because thats what the Zune is about.

4. IE fits in relatively well into Windows. 9 does look a bit odd though.

5. WMP12 fits in perfectly and I would gladly use it over the Zune player if MS allowed syncing using it...

I don't get the whole fascination with every product having to look exactly alike, I just don't. As long as it looks like a good Windows application it's fine by me. Now iTunes on Windows looks exactly like a Mac application (Safari does better though). Adobe's products also look quite out of place..but then they're adobe.

To all those of you complaining about bugs in the first beta of a web browser: Please remind yourself of the original meaning of beta. There will be bugs, newly introduced features like tab stacking are likely not yet completed. Report all bugs and hope for Opera to fix them during the beta cycle.

Personally, I won't switch to Opera, but I will admit that 11b1 has some nifty features which I hope will find their way into other browsers.

I'm ignoring the obvious bugs in the tab stacks because it's a new feature but bugs that have been in existence for some time and then fixed for a while then break again aren't a good sign. We know Opera have multiple branches of code and work on features / bug fixes separate to what they release so it points to bad source code management when bugs get unfixed.

I think the poor horse has been beaten to death already about this...

In my opinion not every application needs to look 100% the same as long as they fit in with the OS and have that proper feel to it. The Zune software, while performing somewhat better, is in my opinion just as worse as iTunes is especially because it's an application is written by Microsoft. While person X might prefer Zune over iTunes or visa versa doesn't change the fact both interfaces have absolutely nothing to do with Windows Aero, regardless what spin you give it.

Also, you have to put my post in context to the one by resol612. If I can't complain about Opera having a horribly out of place feel to it on Mac OS X because of Apple's design of iTunes for Windows, I don't want to hear anything about iTunes for Windows either since Microsoft isn't much better (on either Mac or PC).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
    • Yes, I actually glossed over the Linux part from the OP. You could always go for a 9070 XT and if you really want to play Ray Traced games in the future, GeForce Now is pretty damn good on Linux https://www.neowin.net/news/nvidias-native-geforce-now-app-for-linux-bridges-the-gaming-gap-hands-on/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!