Opera 11.00 Beta 1


Recommended Posts

To all those of you complaining about bugs in the first beta of a web browser: Please remind yourself of the original meaning of beta. There will be bugs, newly introduced features like tab stacking are likely not yet completed. Report all bugs and hope for Opera to fix them during the beta cycle.

Personally, I won't switch to Opera, but I will admit that 11b1 has some nifty features which I hope will find their way into other browsers.

The panels on Mac OS X seem a little buggy. Specifically, if you hide the status bar, then the panel sidebar has an odd thick bottom that isn't on the Windows version.

Also, it uses a highly non-standard scroll bar...

Want an example of how bad non-standard widgets can look? Try this from a mere three years ago:

Panel Icons

To all those of you complaining about bugs in the first beta of a web browser: Please remind yourself of the original meaning of beta. There will be bugs, newly introduced features like tab stacking are likely not yet completed. Report all bugs and hope for Opera to fix them during the beta cycle.

Personally, I won't switch to Opera, but I will admit that 11b1 has some nifty features which I hope will find their way into other browsers.

I have no hopes for a less quirky and much more standard interface on Mac OS X.

The widgets are much better, but that scroll bar is just very out of place. Wasn't it more effort to actually use a custom scroll bar rather than the Aqua standard one?

The entire UI on both Windows and Mac is custom, unfortunately. They're just emulating it really well in most cases. But not as well in others. Scrollbars, buttons, dialog boxes, you name it. It's building on Cocoa on Mac though, but the UI widgets are all custom. I just recently saw another problem due to this -- the font setting list box in the preferences on Mac had repaint issues here. That would never have happened if they used the actual OS X widgets. Also, on Windows, you can see that the scroll bar has no context menu, and that the Aero-lookalike buttons don't actually fade into their hover state when hovered on... It's all small signs of being completely emulated besides for the window frames.

LOL @ the reddit comments.

"Opera Software - I'll let you know once it's its up."

"We are live:

Front page: http://www.opera.com/?display=myopera

Community page: http://www.opera.com/community/

Thanks - this is awesome."

"What the **** just happened?"

The tab bar on the side needs some work, it doesn't look too good.

Also, are they going to address being able to have more than one stack extended? I don't like that I'm forced to only keep one expanded at all times.

Both Opera 10 and 11 beta 1 seem a bit sluggish to launch compared to Safari. Anyway to fix that?

odd, people complaining about how apps don't conform to Mac themes but gladly let Apple off for desecrating the Windows themes with their sub-par ports

Gotta love the rhetoric of some people... Using your logic: Why should Apple care about their Windows applications if not even Microsoft themselves can be bothered to bring a remotely unified user experience to their operating system and applications?

Using your logic: Why should Apple care about their Windows applications if not even Microsoft themselves can be bothered to bring a remotely unified user experience to their operating system and applications?

I think the poor horse has been beaten to death already about this...

1. Office uses the Ribbon interface because it makes productivity a lot better. A lot of Windows applications do not require them, but the ones that can benefit from it already use it.

2. Windows live applications (well pretty much WLM really, since the others use the ribbon) use the WL theme because it fits in with that suite of product and their web designs for it.

3. Zune player uses a Metro style design because thats what the Zune is about.

4. IE fits in relatively well into Windows. 9 does look a bit odd though.

5. WMP12 fits in perfectly and I would gladly use it over the Zune player if MS allowed syncing using it...

I don't get the whole fascination with every product having to look exactly alike, I just don't. As long as it looks like a good Windows application it's fine by me. Now iTunes on Windows looks exactly like a Mac application (Safari does better though). Adobe's products also look quite out of place..but then they're adobe.

To all those of you complaining about bugs in the first beta of a web browser: Please remind yourself of the original meaning of beta. There will be bugs, newly introduced features like tab stacking are likely not yet completed. Report all bugs and hope for Opera to fix them during the beta cycle.

Personally, I won't switch to Opera, but I will admit that 11b1 has some nifty features which I hope will find their way into other browsers.

I'm ignoring the obvious bugs in the tab stacks because it's a new feature but bugs that have been in existence for some time and then fixed for a while then break again aren't a good sign. We know Opera have multiple branches of code and work on features / bug fixes separate to what they release so it points to bad source code management when bugs get unfixed.

I think the poor horse has been beaten to death already about this...

In my opinion not every application needs to look 100% the same as long as they fit in with the OS and have that proper feel to it. The Zune software, while performing somewhat better, is in my opinion just as worse as iTunes is especially because it's an application is written by Microsoft. While person X might prefer Zune over iTunes or visa versa doesn't change the fact both interfaces have absolutely nothing to do with Windows Aero, regardless what spin you give it.

Also, you have to put my post in context to the one by resol612. If I can't complain about Opera having a horribly out of place feel to it on Mac OS X because of Apple's design of iTunes for Windows, I don't want to hear anything about iTunes for Windows either since Microsoft isn't much better (on either Mac or PC).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!