Opera 11.00 Beta 1


Recommended Posts

Something also to consider for an upcoming snapshot leading up to the final:

http://twitter.com/#!/opvard/status/7557472231366656

Could very well be hardware acceleration as they're trying to get it to work cross platform (not just the desktop browsers, but on Mobile and Mini).

Want an example of how bad non-standard widgets can look? Try this from a mere three years ago:

Panel Icons

That doesn't look like standard Opera anything.

Seems to be the most effective Opera marketing campaign yet, why hasn't Opera done this until now? :p

What makes you think Opera hasn't done similar things in the past?

I'm ignoring the obvious bugs in the tab stacks because it's a new feature but bugs that have been in existence for some time and then fixed for a while then break again aren't a good sign.

What bugs are you referring to? If you think regressions are uncommon in software, you are a bit out of touch :D

We know Opera have multiple branches of code and work on features / bug fixes separate to what they release so it points to bad source code management when bugs get unfixed.

They obviously can't fix all bugs. No software is bug free. That isn't because of "bad source code management", but because software is complex stuff. Especially browsers. And especially something like Opera, which has a million different ways to configure things, so when you make a change, it can have unintended consequences.

I dont like how NoAds requires a manual preference change...it might hurt its popularity among 'noobs'...i wonder if thats a flaw in opera itself?

No I think it's just a poorly written extension. Opera's extension system is supposed to be slightly more powerful than chrome's, I am sure a proper adblock is possible. The no ads extension is a glorified userJS.

Also, good news! Some new features people have been suggesting are definitely being added to tab stacks:

Currently, tab stacking is not very fleshed out. There will be some fixes for the 11.0 final, but bigger things may be added after that.

The latest internal build now always adds links opened in a new tab to the current stack, or if there is just a single tab, it creates a stack containing the original and the new tab. I'm not sure if always adding links opened in a new tab to a stack is the right thing to do, but I really liked that semi-automatic creating of stacks during my testing. After all, links opened in a new tab are usually related to the tab they were opened from, so it makes sense to group them. And when I open a new and unrelated site, I almost always create a new tab (Ctrl+T) anyway. This is a bit like the "Automatic grouping by original tab" option in the first post.

We've also been thinking about grouping tabs automatically when a certain threshold of tabs is reached (minimum number + minimum width or something like that), or perhaps asking the user (because things happening automatically without user control could be confusing).

Grouping by domain and by type (mail, chat, and so on) are two possible ways to do automatic grouping.

There is also some talk about integration with sessions, bookmarks, and so on.

We will want to keep it simple and easy to use, though.

http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=816122&t=1290661722&page=1#comment7816532

^ Sounds good, as long as the speed dial doesn't open the links in 1 tab :p Would be nice for the middle click action to open out of the stack too.

From what I can tell, when closing tabs it'll stay in the stack which is a good thing as the tabs in the stack are all related so you would want to "cycle" through them

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

What makes you think Opera hasn't done similar things in the past?

They may have, I have been using Opera since 9 and do not recall them doing anything similar to this since 9 released.

I was taking a look at it yesterday. Not quite sure what advantage stacking tabs is for when Ii can open as many as I need now to have open.

Organization. It depends how many tabs you have open, you obviously only need a few amount of tabs, but people like myself (who open many tabs, like >20) will be able to stack similar tabs together so we can keep track of where tabs are. For instance, if I have 5 Neowin tabs open and 30 total tabs, it can be a bit confusing to find a specific Neowin tab, with stacking, I can go to my Neowin stack, then pick the specific one I want out of 5 instead of out of 30.

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

I can agree with you on some level. But I don't think there is a big problem with new users. For the most case they wont notice those settings (if you aren't a power user). I like that they do mix things around a little, because that gives me the excuse to try something new.

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

That's one of the things I love about Opera and hate about Chrome (where there are like 10 user accesible settings overall). Besides if most of the settings are hidden in opera:config I don't think it is confusing for average users out there.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

Wouldn't it be nice if one day they'll sync your toolbar/keyboard/mouse/etc setups over Opera Link...

It's also useful if your profile goes corrupt somehow :p

A few months ago I had to clear out my profile folders as one of the snapshots would crash repeatedly on start.

I don't think so. Usually by a beta release, there are some signs of any major UI changes.

I'd say that the address bar changes are pretty major even if they only cover a small part of the UI.

They may have, I have been using Opera since 9 and do not recall them doing anything similar to this since 9 released.

They are doing stuff all the time. They have quite a few successful viral videos on YouTube with millions of views, for example.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

That you can do something doesn't mean that you have to do it.

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another.

I don't think most people do much customization, actually. So this isn't really a big deal.

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine.

Bad ideas? You are assuming that because it's possible to do all sorts of stuff, everyone will do it. That's a fallacy. The bad ideas are in your head because you are making too many assumptions.

The bad ideas are in your head because you are making too many assumptions.

Fridge

widgets

unite

web server

bit torrent client

All of the above are not needed in a web browser. I don't care that they use zero resources. I care that they take up a place on the screen/menus/config on a fresh install and they have options that I can mess with. I don't want to see them at any point.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Apple are scared of their customers! They have built a brand over the years of "it just works out of the box", but that slows innovation. Samsung's master stroke was the Galaxy Ultra: "Let's cram everything into one handset, make it so stupid only real nerds will love it, some of the features will work, some won't, but the audience will have such a high tolerance they won't care". Apple has no such device and so they are constantly worrying these days about the fallout of creating a new experience that customers might not like. I know it is often cited the reason they don't build a touchscreen Mac Book is they don't want to cannibalise the the iPad market, but I think it's equally cold feet after the criticism Microsoft receive trying to make a touch compatible desktop OS
    • HandBrake 1.11.2 by Razvan Serea HandBrake is an open-source, GPL-licensed, multiplatform, multithreaded video transcoder, available for MacOS X, Linux and Windows. Handbrake can process most common multimedia files and any DVD or BluRay sources that do not contain any kind of copy protection. Here is a detailed breakdown of HandBrake’s features: Built-in Device Presets—Get started with HandBrake in seconds by choosing a profile optimized for your device, or choose a universal profile for standard or high quality conversions. Simple, easy, fast. For those that want more choice, tweak many basic and advanced options to improve your encodes. Supported Input Sources—Handbrake can process most common multimedia files and any DVD or Blu-ray sources that do not contain any kind of copy protection. Outputs: File Containers: .MP4(.M4V) and .MKV Video Encoders: H.265 (x265 and QuickSync), H.264(x264 and QuickSync), H.265 MPEG-4 and MPEG-2, VP8 and Theora Audio Encoders: AAC / HE-AAC, MP3, Flac, AC3, or Vorbis Audio Pass-thru: AC-3, E-AC3, DTS, DTS-HD, TrueHD, AAC and MP3 tracks Additional features: Title/ Chapter Selection Queue up Multiple Encodes Chapter Markers Subtitles (VobSub, Closed Captions CEA-608, SSA, SRT) Constant Quality or Average BitRate Video Encoding Support for VFR, CFR and VFR Video Filters—Deinterlacing, Decomb, Detelecine, Deblock, Grayscale, Cropping and Scaling Live Video Preview HandBrake 1.11.2 changelog: All platforms Video Fixed a crash that happened when doing a 2-pass lossless x265 encode Fixed a memory leak that happened when doing a 2-pass MPEG-4/MPEG-2/VP9/FFV1 encode Audio Updated the list of supported dithers and encoders combinations Fixed the Core Audio AAC encoder 7.1 channel layout Subtitles Fixed the VobSub palette creation in the MP4 container Build system Improved build system compatibility with older build tools Third-party libraries FFmpeg 8.0.2 (decoding and filters) SVT-AV1 4.1.0 (AV1 video encoding) Linux Added WebM MIME type to the list of the supported formats Mac Improved handling of unsupported presets Updated Sparkle automatic update library Windows Improved handling of unsupported presets Improved queue low space pause behaviour Fixed the automatic audio track name generation Fixed the summary description of HDR video Download: HandBrake 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~30.0 (Open Source) Download: HandBrake ARM64 | Portable Links: HandBrake Website | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • So, an article that has nothing to do with Windows 11, still gets Windows 11 in the title and a build number as the picture? Dell have a buggy build of Support Assist HP have UEFI settings that need unlocking for the secureboot cert upgrade to take place.
    • What I can't seem to understand is that Google are paying SpaceX? Surely it would be the other way round, with SpaceX needing Google's datacenters etc.? Oh well, this level of money and power is way outside of my comprehension at the best of times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      242
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      neufuse
      67
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!