Opera 11.00 Beta 1


Recommended Posts

Something also to consider for an upcoming snapshot leading up to the final:

http://twitter.com/#!/opvard/status/7557472231366656

Could very well be hardware acceleration as they're trying to get it to work cross platform (not just the desktop browsers, but on Mobile and Mini).

Want an example of how bad non-standard widgets can look? Try this from a mere three years ago:

Panel Icons

That doesn't look like standard Opera anything.

Seems to be the most effective Opera marketing campaign yet, why hasn't Opera done this until now? :p

What makes you think Opera hasn't done similar things in the past?

I'm ignoring the obvious bugs in the tab stacks because it's a new feature but bugs that have been in existence for some time and then fixed for a while then break again aren't a good sign.

What bugs are you referring to? If you think regressions are uncommon in software, you are a bit out of touch :D

We know Opera have multiple branches of code and work on features / bug fixes separate to what they release so it points to bad source code management when bugs get unfixed.

They obviously can't fix all bugs. No software is bug free. That isn't because of "bad source code management", but because software is complex stuff. Especially browsers. And especially something like Opera, which has a million different ways to configure things, so when you make a change, it can have unintended consequences.

I dont like how NoAds requires a manual preference change...it might hurt its popularity among 'noobs'...i wonder if thats a flaw in opera itself?

No I think it's just a poorly written extension. Opera's extension system is supposed to be slightly more powerful than chrome's, I am sure a proper adblock is possible. The no ads extension is a glorified userJS.

Also, good news! Some new features people have been suggesting are definitely being added to tab stacks:

Currently, tab stacking is not very fleshed out. There will be some fixes for the 11.0 final, but bigger things may be added after that.

The latest internal build now always adds links opened in a new tab to the current stack, or if there is just a single tab, it creates a stack containing the original and the new tab. I'm not sure if always adding links opened in a new tab to a stack is the right thing to do, but I really liked that semi-automatic creating of stacks during my testing. After all, links opened in a new tab are usually related to the tab they were opened from, so it makes sense to group them. And when I open a new and unrelated site, I almost always create a new tab (Ctrl+T) anyway. This is a bit like the "Automatic grouping by original tab" option in the first post.

We've also been thinking about grouping tabs automatically when a certain threshold of tabs is reached (minimum number + minimum width or something like that), or perhaps asking the user (because things happening automatically without user control could be confusing).

Grouping by domain and by type (mail, chat, and so on) are two possible ways to do automatic grouping.

There is also some talk about integration with sessions, bookmarks, and so on.

We will want to keep it simple and easy to use, though.

http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=816122&t=1290661722&page=1#comment7816532

^ Sounds good, as long as the speed dial doesn't open the links in 1 tab :p Would be nice for the middle click action to open out of the stack too.

From what I can tell, when closing tabs it'll stay in the stack which is a good thing as the tabs in the stack are all related so you would want to "cycle" through them

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

What makes you think Opera hasn't done similar things in the past?

They may have, I have been using Opera since 9 and do not recall them doing anything similar to this since 9 released.

I was taking a look at it yesterday. Not quite sure what advantage stacking tabs is for when Ii can open as many as I need now to have open.

Organization. It depends how many tabs you have open, you obviously only need a few amount of tabs, but people like myself (who open many tabs, like >20) will be able to stack similar tabs together so we can keep track of where tabs are. For instance, if I have 5 Neowin tabs open and 30 total tabs, it can be a bit confusing to find a specific Neowin tab, with stacking, I can go to my Neowin stack, then pick the specific one I want out of 5 instead of out of 30.

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

I can agree with you on some level. But I don't think there is a big problem with new users. For the most case they wont notice those settings (if you aren't a power user). I like that they do mix things around a little, because that gives me the excuse to try something new.

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

That's one of the things I love about Opera and hate about Chrome (where there are like 10 user accesible settings overall). Besides if most of the settings are hidden in opera:config I don't think it is confusing for average users out there.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

Wouldn't it be nice if one day they'll sync your toolbar/keyboard/mouse/etc setups over Opera Link...

It's also useful if your profile goes corrupt somehow :p

A few months ago I had to clear out my profile folders as one of the snapshots would crash repeatedly on start.

I don't think so. Usually by a beta release, there are some signs of any major UI changes.

I'd say that the address bar changes are pretty major even if they only cover a small part of the UI.

They may have, I have been using Opera since 9 and do not recall them doing anything similar to this since 9 released.

They are doing stuff all the time. They have quite a few successful viral videos on YouTube with millions of views, for example.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

That you can do something doesn't mean that you have to do it.

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another.

I don't think most people do much customization, actually. So this isn't really a big deal.

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine.

Bad ideas? You are assuming that because it's possible to do all sorts of stuff, everyone will do it. That's a fallacy. The bad ideas are in your head because you are making too many assumptions.

The bad ideas are in your head because you are making too many assumptions.

Fridge

widgets

unite

web server

bit torrent client

All of the above are not needed in a web browser. I don't care that they use zero resources. I care that they take up a place on the screen/menus/config on a fresh install and they have options that I can mess with. I don't want to see them at any point.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
    • my problem with outlook (new) is that it connects only to outlook.com. all connections to external providers goes through there. Got your mail server and want to use imap directly? no way... it adds a connector on outlook.com. last bug; if your email on an external provider if the same as principal email of your microsoft account, it doesn't work...
    • It's the only reason I finally have an iPhone (for work) and enjoy using it so much that I'm tempted to move from android next time I need to replace my own device
    • So is Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, just to mention a few. What's your point? Everyone is a threat from their enemies' perspective. I'd say that Israel is only a threat to their immediate enemies like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iranian regime, not to anyone else.
    • The government is not the good guy either. You propose 99% of people require that the government overreach and govern their freedom of information and privacy, while ignoring the government is made up 100% of people, of which 99% are (as you described) brain dead. You can't have both. The reality is Signal is absolutely right and the government is doing what it has always done. Ignoring that we are their boss and grabbing all the power they possibly can to make sure we aren't. Your (societies) ###### parenting is not reason enough as to why I can't have a safe platform for my data/information. Thinking the government is helping is precisely what they are targeting psychologically to take suckers like you for a ride. "Think of the children" was, has, is, and will always be a mechanism of control. In the rare occasion it's actually essential the mass consensus has always been there and it doesn't become a debate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!