Opera 11.00 Beta 1


Recommended Posts

Something also to consider for an upcoming snapshot leading up to the final:

http://twitter.com/#!/opvard/status/7557472231366656

Could very well be hardware acceleration as they're trying to get it to work cross platform (not just the desktop browsers, but on Mobile and Mini).

Want an example of how bad non-standard widgets can look? Try this from a mere three years ago:

Panel Icons

That doesn't look like standard Opera anything.

Seems to be the most effective Opera marketing campaign yet, why hasn't Opera done this until now? :p

What makes you think Opera hasn't done similar things in the past?

I'm ignoring the obvious bugs in the tab stacks because it's a new feature but bugs that have been in existence for some time and then fixed for a while then break again aren't a good sign.

What bugs are you referring to? If you think regressions are uncommon in software, you are a bit out of touch :D

We know Opera have multiple branches of code and work on features / bug fixes separate to what they release so it points to bad source code management when bugs get unfixed.

They obviously can't fix all bugs. No software is bug free. That isn't because of "bad source code management", but because software is complex stuff. Especially browsers. And especially something like Opera, which has a million different ways to configure things, so when you make a change, it can have unintended consequences.

I dont like how NoAds requires a manual preference change...it might hurt its popularity among 'noobs'...i wonder if thats a flaw in opera itself?

No I think it's just a poorly written extension. Opera's extension system is supposed to be slightly more powerful than chrome's, I am sure a proper adblock is possible. The no ads extension is a glorified userJS.

Also, good news! Some new features people have been suggesting are definitely being added to tab stacks:

Currently, tab stacking is not very fleshed out. There will be some fixes for the 11.0 final, but bigger things may be added after that.

The latest internal build now always adds links opened in a new tab to the current stack, or if there is just a single tab, it creates a stack containing the original and the new tab. I'm not sure if always adding links opened in a new tab to a stack is the right thing to do, but I really liked that semi-automatic creating of stacks during my testing. After all, links opened in a new tab are usually related to the tab they were opened from, so it makes sense to group them. And when I open a new and unrelated site, I almost always create a new tab (Ctrl+T) anyway. This is a bit like the "Automatic grouping by original tab" option in the first post.

We've also been thinking about grouping tabs automatically when a certain threshold of tabs is reached (minimum number + minimum width or something like that), or perhaps asking the user (because things happening automatically without user control could be confusing).

Grouping by domain and by type (mail, chat, and so on) are two possible ways to do automatic grouping.

There is also some talk about integration with sessions, bookmarks, and so on.

We will want to keep it simple and easy to use, though.

http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=816122&t=1290661722&page=1#comment7816532

^ Sounds good, as long as the speed dial doesn't open the links in 1 tab :p Would be nice for the middle click action to open out of the stack too.

From what I can tell, when closing tabs it'll stay in the stack which is a good thing as the tabs in the stack are all related so you would want to "cycle" through them

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

What makes you think Opera hasn't done similar things in the past?

They may have, I have been using Opera since 9 and do not recall them doing anything similar to this since 9 released.

I was taking a look at it yesterday. Not quite sure what advantage stacking tabs is for when Ii can open as many as I need now to have open.

Organization. It depends how many tabs you have open, you obviously only need a few amount of tabs, but people like myself (who open many tabs, like >20) will be able to stack similar tabs together so we can keep track of where tabs are. For instance, if I have 5 Neowin tabs open and 30 total tabs, it can be a bit confusing to find a specific Neowin tab, with stacking, I can go to my Neowin stack, then pick the specific one I want out of 5 instead of out of 30.

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

I can agree with you on some level. But I don't think there is a big problem with new users. For the most case they wont notice those settings (if you aren't a power user). I like that they do mix things around a little, because that gives me the excuse to try something new.

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

That's one of the things I love about Opera and hate about Chrome (where there are like 10 user accesible settings overall). Besides if most of the settings are hidden in opera:config I don't think it is confusing for average users out there.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

Wouldn't it be nice if one day they'll sync your toolbar/keyboard/mouse/etc setups over Opera Link...

It's also useful if your profile goes corrupt somehow :p

A few months ago I had to clear out my profile folders as one of the snapshots would crash repeatedly on start.

I don't think so. Usually by a beta release, there are some signs of any major UI changes.

I'd say that the address bar changes are pretty major even if they only cover a small part of the UI.

They may have, I have been using Opera since 9 and do not recall them doing anything similar to this since 9 released.

They are doing stuff all the time. They have quite a few successful viral videos on YouTube with millions of views, for example.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

That you can do something doesn't mean that you have to do it.

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another.

I don't think most people do much customization, actually. So this isn't really a big deal.

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine.

Bad ideas? You are assuming that because it's possible to do all sorts of stuff, everyone will do it. That's a fallacy. The bad ideas are in your head because you are making too many assumptions.

The bad ideas are in your head because you are making too many assumptions.

Fridge

widgets

unite

web server

bit torrent client

All of the above are not needed in a web browser. I don't care that they use zero resources. I care that they take up a place on the screen/menus/config on a fresh install and they have options that I can mess with. I don't want to see them at any point.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!