Opera 11.00 Beta 1


Recommended Posts

Something also to consider for an upcoming snapshot leading up to the final:

http://twitter.com/#!/opvard/status/7557472231366656

Could very well be hardware acceleration as they're trying to get it to work cross platform (not just the desktop browsers, but on Mobile and Mini).

Want an example of how bad non-standard widgets can look? Try this from a mere three years ago:

Panel Icons

That doesn't look like standard Opera anything.

Seems to be the most effective Opera marketing campaign yet, why hasn't Opera done this until now? :p

What makes you think Opera hasn't done similar things in the past?

I'm ignoring the obvious bugs in the tab stacks because it's a new feature but bugs that have been in existence for some time and then fixed for a while then break again aren't a good sign.

What bugs are you referring to? If you think regressions are uncommon in software, you are a bit out of touch :D

We know Opera have multiple branches of code and work on features / bug fixes separate to what they release so it points to bad source code management when bugs get unfixed.

They obviously can't fix all bugs. No software is bug free. That isn't because of "bad source code management", but because software is complex stuff. Especially browsers. And especially something like Opera, which has a million different ways to configure things, so when you make a change, it can have unintended consequences.

I dont like how NoAds requires a manual preference change...it might hurt its popularity among 'noobs'...i wonder if thats a flaw in opera itself?

No I think it's just a poorly written extension. Opera's extension system is supposed to be slightly more powerful than chrome's, I am sure a proper adblock is possible. The no ads extension is a glorified userJS.

Also, good news! Some new features people have been suggesting are definitely being added to tab stacks:

Currently, tab stacking is not very fleshed out. There will be some fixes for the 11.0 final, but bigger things may be added after that.

The latest internal build now always adds links opened in a new tab to the current stack, or if there is just a single tab, it creates a stack containing the original and the new tab. I'm not sure if always adding links opened in a new tab to a stack is the right thing to do, but I really liked that semi-automatic creating of stacks during my testing. After all, links opened in a new tab are usually related to the tab they were opened from, so it makes sense to group them. And when I open a new and unrelated site, I almost always create a new tab (Ctrl+T) anyway. This is a bit like the "Automatic grouping by original tab" option in the first post.

We've also been thinking about grouping tabs automatically when a certain threshold of tabs is reached (minimum number + minimum width or something like that), or perhaps asking the user (because things happening automatically without user control could be confusing).

Grouping by domain and by type (mail, chat, and so on) are two possible ways to do automatic grouping.

There is also some talk about integration with sessions, bookmarks, and so on.

We will want to keep it simple and easy to use, though.

http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=816122&t=1290661722&page=1#comment7816532

^ Sounds good, as long as the speed dial doesn't open the links in 1 tab :p Would be nice for the middle click action to open out of the stack too.

From what I can tell, when closing tabs it'll stay in the stack which is a good thing as the tabs in the stack are all related so you would want to "cycle" through them

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

What makes you think Opera hasn't done similar things in the past?

They may have, I have been using Opera since 9 and do not recall them doing anything similar to this since 9 released.

I was taking a look at it yesterday. Not quite sure what advantage stacking tabs is for when Ii can open as many as I need now to have open.

Organization. It depends how many tabs you have open, you obviously only need a few amount of tabs, but people like myself (who open many tabs, like >20) will be able to stack similar tabs together so we can keep track of where tabs are. For instance, if I have 5 Neowin tabs open and 30 total tabs, it can be a bit confusing to find a specific Neowin tab, with stacking, I can go to my Neowin stack, then pick the specific one I want out of 5 instead of out of 30.

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

I can agree with you on some level. But I don't think there is a big problem with new users. For the most case they wont notice those settings (if you aren't a power user). I like that they do mix things around a little, because that gives me the excuse to try something new.

I wonder if it'll get to the point where you can customise too much with Opera.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another. It's not like I could say "Oh cool, Opera. I'll use that". It's more like "Oh damn, that's your Opera, I can't find anything."

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine. People ask "What's this do? What's that? This looks overwhelming... I'll use IE because it's always that same, and it's simple. "

When you give people too much freedom, it turns to chaos.

(PS: I've used Opera as a web developer on and off since 1999, and used it as a default since 9. But it has to come to a point where you lock people down and decide what to keep and what to chuck)

(Also, I've made up the quotes, no one has said that to me, but it's how I've felt sometimes)

That's one of the things I love about Opera and hate about Chrome (where there are like 10 user accesible settings overall). Besides if most of the settings are hidden in opera:config I don't think it is confusing for average users out there.

Also, when I start on a new PC I have to start all over again (with the exception of bookmarks).

Wouldn't it be nice if one day they'll sync your toolbar/keyboard/mouse/etc setups over Opera Link...

It's also useful if your profile goes corrupt somehow :p

A few months ago I had to clear out my profile folders as one of the snapshots would crash repeatedly on start.

I don't think so. Usually by a beta release, there are some signs of any major UI changes.

I'd say that the address bar changes are pretty major even if they only cover a small part of the UI.

They may have, I have been using Opera since 9 and do not recall them doing anything similar to this since 9 released.

They are doing stuff all the time. They have quite a few successful viral videos on YouTube with millions of views, for example.

It's great to give people the option to remove or tweak one or two things, but when you can allow the user to basically redesign the browser it can be a little overwhelming.

That you can do something doesn't mean that you have to do it.

The point I'm trying to make is that no Opera is the same. There's little in common between my install and another.

I don't think most people do much customization, actually. So this isn't really a big deal.

I wonder if there are too many bad ideas in Opera to make the good points shine.

Bad ideas? You are assuming that because it's possible to do all sorts of stuff, everyone will do it. That's a fallacy. The bad ideas are in your head because you are making too many assumptions.

The bad ideas are in your head because you are making too many assumptions.

Fridge

widgets

unite

web server

bit torrent client

All of the above are not needed in a web browser. I don't care that they use zero resources. I care that they take up a place on the screen/menus/config on a fresh install and they have options that I can mess with. I don't want to see them at any point.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
    • Is your Apple Watch supported? Check the watchOS 27 compatibility list by Aditya Tiwari Apple kicked off WWDC 2026 with a ton of announcements, mostly centered around Apple Intelligence improvements, the Siri AI, and Liquid Glass updates. However, there is a lot of other stuff that couldn't catch the limelight. Let's talk about watchOS 27 and which models are supported by the newest operating system. According to the Cupertino giant, watchOS 27 will be supported on the following Apple Watch models when it arrives later this year: Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple Watch Series 11 Apple Watch SE 3 Apple Watch Series 10 Apple Watch Ultra 2 It's a stark contrast with last year's watchOS 26 update, which had almost a dozen Apple Watch models in its list of supported devices. Apple supported models all the way back to Apple Watch Series 6. That said, if you own one of the five models, you'll need an iPhone 11 (or later) with iOS 27 to install the latest update. Yes, Apple has shown some extra love to the iPhone 11, and it old horse supports the iOS 27 update. watchOS 27 beta 1 is now available for developers and interested power users through the Apple Developer Program. So, if you're among those who like to play with fire, you can download it to your supported Apple Watch. Otherwise, the public beta for watchOS 27 will be available next month. The freshly baked Apple Watch update comes with Siri AI - an advanced, fully conversational version of Siri powered by Apple Intelligence due for later this year. A new dynamic app grid features icons for five Siri-suggested apps. You can use a new tap gesture to open a widget in the Smart Stack, and a new Find My app finally clears the mess of Find Devices, Find Items, and Find People on Apple Watch. Workout Buddy can run without an iPhone nearby and offers new insights based on data, including your progress for pace, distance, and workout duration. Apple improved its motion tracking algorithms to measure the distance of indoor treadmill runs and walks more precisely. Speaking of other changes, the music playback on watchOS 27 starts faster and you can create custom passes for any membership or card that uses a QR code or barcode, then easily access them in the Wallet app or pin in the Smart Stack.
    • "and pull old flight details from your email during back-and-forth conversations" The Siri I've become to know and trust. I've always wanted to pull info on old flights. /s
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!