[CA] Internet costs to rise


Recommended Posts

Surfing and downloading from the internet is about to get more expensive for many Canadians as internet companies Shaw and Primus have announced plans to impose new fees and caps on internet usage.

Over the past year, the CRTC, Canada's communication regulator, let Bell and Rogers start charging extra for customers who download a lot of data. The growing demand for live-streaming and online movies gobbles up huge chunks of bandwidth on the World Wide Web.

Primus and Shaw have said they will begin passing on higher fees to their customers beginning Feb. 1. Primus, for example, rents bandwidth on Bell's networks and said Bell is inflating the costs for everyone, including them.

http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2011/01/07/internet-expensive-surfing-canadians.html

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/966966-ca-internet-costs-to-rise/
Share on other sites

Welcome to Bhell! This is so backwards, with technology expanding so fast they shouldn't be imposing bandwidth caps now, very low caps at that. I'm with Bell and I have to pay an extra $10 so I can get an additional 80GB, making it 140GB. Yes, the normal bandwidth cap is 60GB, in 2011!

It's 75GB I believe for Fibe25 (25mbps), how crazy are they?

And let's not mention the overage fees. Want to use your internet for more than watching at 360p youtube videos and chatting on Facebook? Be ready to fork out $60 if you go over the limit.

3 years ago bandwidth caps was unheard of here. How low have we fallen.

Eastlink ftw.

No caps :)

Even though their 30mbit and 100mbit service is advertised with caps, at the moment there aren't any because they don't have a way to monitor usage lol.

wont last for long as is wholesale of bell.

same with teksavvy is wholesale of bell all dsl in ontario is owned by bell technically

This is why we will all be speaking Japanese some day.

My parents have DSL and are capped at 10 gigs per month. The DSL provider also advertises that you can watch all the netflix movies you want. In that ad the 10 gig cap is never mentioned.

It's such a shame that the bigger companies can call the shots. Right now, those big companies are Bell and Rogers. The smaller wholesale resellers like Primus and Teksavvy have no choice but to buckle under the pressure of Bell and Rogers. It's sad because the CRTC allows this. Fortunately, they're not all that bad. In fact, they've done some good for the little guys (see here and here). Personally though, it doesn't excuse the CRTC ruling that forced the wholesale resellers to enforce the bandwidth caps of whichever major ISP they were leasing from.

Up until 2004, Canada used to be among the top countries when it came to high speed Internet access and broadband penetration. Over the years, our broadband infrastructure gradually became stagnant and... never mind. I could go on and on but it won't change things. Instead, I leave you with this: '2011 Villain: Bandwidth Caps'

It's a good read.

wont last for long as is wholesale of bell.

same with teksavvy is wholesale of bell all dsl in ontario is owned by bell technically

There are places that aren't Ontatio you know.. And Eastlink, at least in Atlantic Canada, is a Cable company.

Exactly. And they do have a way to monitor. Every ISP does.

Not according to the people I know that work for them.. They have never cared in the past about usage, thus they never implemented a system to accurately track customers usage.

They do their traffic shaping during the day, to keep people from killing the network, but aside from that they really don't care..

I live in windsor ontario and i pay $50 a month for a 14mb line unlimited BW. I get it from Kelcom. They rent the lines from Cogeco cable but they dont monitor the BW so i get unlimited for the same price and speed i would have to pay cogeco for 60gb a month.

The latest CRTC decision allows Cogeco to tell Kelcom to charge you for your actual bandwidth. That means that your "unlimited" internet will be soon given a limit.

The day Brighthouse Networks starts limiting the internet by putting caps on it I will quit using it. That is stupid and ridiculous because then you won't be able to play any online games as you will use all that bandwidth in a heartbeat.

There are places that aren't Ontatio you know.. And Eastlink, at least in Atlantic Canada, is a Cable company.

Bell only really provides internet in Ontario and Quebec so this is only really effecting us. For now, it will effect you guys too.

I really don't see cable companies doing this. They tried having caps here a long time ago, it failed as everyone just went someplace else so now we have none. All of our cable goes through Eastlink, who has no caps.

I think this will really only affect DSL customers in the short term. Who knows what cable will do later on, but for now we are safe (except if you are with Rogers I guess).

Q1: Why is it the case that there are ONLY 2 ISPs in Ontario BELL/Rogers (everyone else rents the pipes from them) ...

-----This is monopoly as Bell has DSL and Rogers Cable, hence if you'd like to go to another ISP say Tecksavvy you still get capped (which theoretically and practically still counts as BELL) hence monopoly

Q2: Why is it the case that there does not exist any other company that provides internet other than BELL/Rogers that is NOT rented from them? where is the competition?!

Q1: Why is it the case that there are ONLY 2 ISPs in Ontario BELL/Rogers (everyone else rents the pipes from them) ...

-----This is monopoly as Bell has DSL and Rogers Cable, hence if you'd like to go to another ISP say Tecksavvy you still get capped (which theoretically and practically still counts as BELL) hence monopoly

Q2: Why is it the case that there does not exist any other company that provides internet other than BELL/Rogers that is NOT rented from them? where is the competition?!

bell owns the last mile to 255front street so no one can touch the lines from 255 front to your house other then bell. thanks to the CRTC thus eliminating competition

Q1: Why is it the case that there are ONLY 2 ISPs in Ontario BELL/Rogers (everyone else rents the pipes from them) ...

-----This is monopoly as Bell has DSL and Rogers Cable, hence if you'd like to go to another ISP say Tecksavvy you still get capped (which theoretically and practically still counts as BELL) hence monopoly

Q2: Why is it the case that there does not exist any other company that provides internet other than BELL/Rogers that is NOT rented from them? where is the competition?!

This isn't accurate. We have an ISP in our town that ran its own cables to everything and now is it's own ISP. I know in places like Toronto this can't happen but it did here. I do realize it does have to connect to something outside of us but I'm not sure who they use ... it might be Ontera or something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
    • Is your Apple Watch supported? Check the watchOS 27 compatibility list by Aditya Tiwari Apple kicked off WWDC 2026 with a ton of announcements, mostly centered around Apple Intelligence improvements, the Siri AI, and Liquid Glass updates. However, there is a lot of other stuff that couldn't catch the limelight. Let's talk about watchOS 27 and which models are supported by the newest operating system. According to the Cupertino giant, watchOS 27 will be supported on the following Apple Watch models when it arrives later this year: Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple Watch Series 11 Apple Watch SE 3 Apple Watch Series 10 Apple Watch Ultra 2 It's a stark contrast with last year's watchOS 26 update, which had almost a dozen Apple Watch models in its list of supported devices. Apple supported models all the way back to Apple Watch Series 6. That said, if you own one of the five models, you'll need an iPhone 11 (or later) with iOS 27 to install the latest update. Yes, Apple has shown some extra love to the iPhone 11, and it old horse supports the iOS 27 update. watchOS 27 beta 1 is now available for developers and interested power users through the Apple Developer Program. So, if you're among those who like to play with fire, you can download it to your supported Apple Watch. Otherwise, the public beta for watchOS 27 will be available next month. The freshly baked Apple Watch update comes with Siri AI - an advanced, fully conversational version of Siri powered by Apple Intelligence due for later this year. A new dynamic app grid features icons for five Siri-suggested apps. You can use a new tap gesture to open a widget in the Smart Stack, and a new Find My app finally clears the mess of Find Devices, Find Items, and Find People on Apple Watch. Workout Buddy can run without an iPhone nearby and offers new insights based on data, including your progress for pace, distance, and workout duration. Apple improved its motion tracking algorithms to measure the distance of indoor treadmill runs and walks more precisely. Speaking of other changes, the music playback on watchOS 27 starts faster and you can create custom passes for any membership or card that uses a QR code or barcode, then easily access them in the Wallet app or pin in the Smart Stack.
    • "and pull old flight details from your email during back-and-forth conversations" The Siri I've become to know and trust. I've always wanted to pull info on old flights. /s
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!