Recommended Posts

User interface mockup by someone on the UK forums. DICE needs to make these changes, asap.

Reminds me a lot of BC2. DICE really is regressing when it comes to interface and backend.

I was also thinking: Why the hell can't we have it use the entire screen? Seems like it was developed for 720p (consoles).

I really hope the nerf mortars soon or do something about them, iv played metro a few times and its just impossible to progress from the first part, get anywhere near A or B and you just get hit with a mortar, how much ammo do they even have :s

Here's a shocker for you. Unlimited.

Its amazing how poorly thought out the mortar is. How did they think that would be balanced?

Are you serious? Obviously if you stay in one spot for a prolonged period of time the mortar will get you. I love it since it's such a great anti-camping weapon. It keeps the game active and less stagnant. The solution is easy, as long as you always keep moving the mortar shouldn't be an issue. I don't see a problem with mortars at all.

Are you serious? Obviously if you stay in one spot for a prolonged period of time the mortar will get you. I love it since it's such a great anti-camping weapon. It keeps the game active and less stagnant. The solution is easy, as long as you always keep moving the mortar shouldn't be an issue. I don't see a problem with mortars at all.

Also using flak specialization means even if it does hit you it won't do much damage. I unlocked the mortar yesterday and it's really not all that effective if your team is moving around like they should be.

The stuttering on this game is incredibly annoying. Me and my friend have found that it's nearly unplayable because of the amount of stuttering there is...

What video card do you have? I am experiencing absolutely no stuttering at all. I did however experience stuttering on BF2. I had an nVidia 8800GT so I went and bought an nVidia GTX 570 and the stuttering disappeared so I am guessing your problem must be the video card. It may not be powerful enough to run BF3.

What video card do you have? I am experiencing absolutely no stuttering at all. I did however experience stuttering on BF2. I had an nVidia 8800GT so I went and bought an nVidia GTX 570 and the stuttering disappeared so I am guessing your problem must be the video card. It may not be powerful enough to run BF3.

^This.

What video card do you have? I am experiencing absolutely no stuttering at all. I did however experience stuttering on BF2. I had an nVidia 8800GT so I went and bought an nVidia GTX 570 and the stuttering disappeared so I am guessing your problem must be the video card. It may not be powerful enough to run BF3.

I don't think it's just video card related. My gtx 470 runs the game just fine. Most of the time I don't go below 40 fps. It's just certain maps, Caspian Border and Operation Firestorm to be exact, and then when performing certain types of actions on those maps. Mostly for me it has to do with useing ADS on guns. Flying or driving a vehicle causes no stuttering, though.

Are you serious? Obviously if you stay in one spot for a prolonged period of time the mortar will get you. I love it since it's such a great anti-camping weapon. It keeps the game active and less stagnant. The solution is easy, as long as you always keep moving the mortar shouldn't be an issue. I don't see a problem with mortars at all.

I love teams with a people using gadgets, my Mav locks on and destroys any gadget. The funny thing is I fly right above the enemy and they never shoot at it.

Any comparison between BF3 and MW3 are just ridiculous. It is truly dumb of EA to even have the current marketing campaign that they do which tries it's best to pit the two games against each-other. The inclusion of vehicles alone makes the Battlefield series drastically different than CoD. The emphasis on teamplay, and for that matter the importance, also makes no sense at all to me to compare. True, if you play as a team within CoD, you have a better chance of winning overall, but whether people choose to do so or not, the whole underlying basis of playing Battlefield is all about the teamwork. The game is literally structured on this fact.

Just absolutely loving the game so far. Have had a few technical issues here and there, almost all with getting kicked from servers or the game crashing, but they have not been that dominant, and in no way have taken away my overall enjoyment of the game itself.

I only play Conquest, and already in just the first 4 or 5 hours now I have played, I have had some truly epic moments. Like I cannot believe that just happened moments. Or just the absolute rush one can get from marching with the 32 other players on their team to the choke point on the Sienne Crossing map and meeting the other team for an amazing exchange at the bridge. Moments like that which are truly and sincerely just adrenaline pumping moments that only Battlefield can deliver. On the 64 player maps, just stop and sit back and look at absolutely everything that is going on, and it is just truly impressive and immersive.

Cannot stress how much I enjoy playing the game. It needs some patches, but so far it is already at an incredible place, and it really is just going to continue to get better. I am sure some will disagree, it seems those that have a lot of a time to play have the ability to truly critique all of the details about the game itself, but from the standpoint of someone who just does not have a lot of time to play these days, and when I do it is just all about enjoying myself as much as possible, well it just does not get better than this.

This is my Battlefield Veteran Status...

post-34384-0-51848900-1319930763.jpg

I share this not to brag or boast, but to simply put some context to my words based on the first few hours of me playing the MP.

It is meant to reiterate the fact that the Battlefield series is personally my favorite MP based FPS of all time. I have played it literally since the very beginning. I can say that with the utmost of certainty. So keep this in mind. I am a life long fan of the series, so I am obviously biased due to this fact. But damn, this game is good. And as I said, it is only going to get better from here. :yes:

Its amazing how poorly thought out the mortar is. How did they think that would be balanced?

It's not very accurate weapon. Can miss sometimes even a tank that's not moving.

But when it hits, it hurts really good. Killed one time 7 campers at once with it. They were all having a tea party at the bazaar :)

I... I cannot stress how GODDAMN ENRAGING the singleplayer is on hard.

Round a corner without peeking slowly first? Even if you have a shotgun, the AI will react quicker, and blow your head off in an instant. What I presume to be headshots are even more enraging, because when you should be able to take 3-4 hits, you die instantaneously.

But guess what? When you die from that bull**** kill, you have to start 10 minutes ago. You end up rushing in frustration, and you die even more.

I want a quicksave, DICE. I want it. And my fingers want to crush your throats right now at how many mistakes you made with BF3. Never has a game gotten me so worked up.

The singleplayer campaign on hard broke me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!