Recommended Posts

Was being sarcastic :p

It's true though, DICE gave us Metro as the beta demo map, to draw in the COD kids. Now they've dumbed down vehicles because COD kids cry they can't wipe out a tank while on foot.

Battlefield is dead, the future is tiny shoe box maps so people can rank up and get excited everytime something new flashes up on the screen.

BF2 / 2142 are the last of any true BF game. The franchise is dead.

Ah, than it's a good thing you where sarcastic, haha. And yeah, it's too bad that DICE feels the need to comply to the wishes of COD kids. I just hope that they'll see their mistakes and make up for it with BF3 or a future BF (Perhaps a Bad Company 3 ^_^).

Here's hoping that Armored Kill will come with some neat things for vehicles. All I know is that there are going to be new battle tanks, the biggest map of BF history and mobile artillery in that DLC.

Was being sarcastic :p

It's true though, DICE gave us Metro as the beta demo map, to draw in the COD kids. Now they've dumbed down vehicles because COD kids cry they can't wipe out a tank while on foot.

Battlefield is dead, the future is tiny shoe box maps so people can rank up and get excited everytime something new flashes up on the screen.

BF2 / 2142 are the last of any true BF game. The franchise is dead.

Yeah I loved the tanks pre patch. Now tanks are just a rolling target. No chance against choppers, two engineers with RPGs will kill a tank in no time. Pre patch it was a good fight against infantry.

Its not about tank camping

For someone who have played a significant amount of time, both as infantry and vehicle player, I can assure you that tanks are now almost useless.

I doubt you have spent much time in vehicles, because otherwise you wouldn't be saying that.

awwww you noob tank campers are mad they dumbed down the only way you know how to play the game :(

I love it when people like you blast other players for playing the game in their way.

Tanks are meant to be manned, it's way they are there, they play a significant role in the battle. What do you want? Do you want people to not get in the tanks so that you can't sulk that people are 'noob tank campers'?

Get over it. Let people play the game how it was intended and how they enjoy it. Instead of throwing your toys out of the pram like a baby, throw your BF3 disc out of the window and let the rest of us enjoy the game with one less sulking baby troll.

  • Like 3
Tanks are meant to be manned, it's way they are there, they play a significant role in the battle.

Tanks weren't meant to be the unstoppable killing machines that they were (in public games). I don't see a problem with taking their resilience down a notch for balance sake.

Tanks weren't meant to be the unstoppable killing machines that they were (in public games). I don't see a problem with taking their resilience down a notch for balance sake.

Absolutely. If, for balance sake, the tanks needed balancing then fair enough (i'm a poor xbox players so i haven't had a patch yet *cry* ). My issue isn't with that, it was with the slating the way people play comment above.

Vehicles require skill. Not all of us can jump in one and take out a dozen of enemy players straight. I remember back when I started, I barely got one or two kills, in the whole round, 300-500 ticket match. Why? Because I didn't know how to do it.

After the patch, they are rendered almost, almost useless.

Played a 100 ticket match yesterday, and I couldn't get more than 9 kills, in the whole match, whereas normally, before the patch, I would get more than 25-30, easily.

So something is only useful if you personally can do well with it? Just putting this out there, but maybe, just maybe the enemy team had a lot of engineers on their team hunting for tank kills?

Saying something is bad because you can't get 50 kills a game with it is not really a valid argument. Also neither is using the "real life" argument. If we balanced for that there would be no respawns and the average military grunt wouldn't be able to just hop in a tank anyways.

Vehicles require skill. Not all of us can jump in one and take out a dozen of enemy players straight. I remember back when I started, I barely got one or two kills, in the whole round, 300-500 ticket match. Why? Because I didn't know how to do it.

After the patch, they are rendered almost, almost useless.

Played a 100 ticket match yesterday, and I couldn't get more than 9 kills, in the whole match, whereas normally, before the patch, I would get more than 25-30, easily.

tanks don't, at all. and you're bottom statements sounds like you are crying because all your vehicles killed got nerfed.

I love it when people like you blast other players for playing the game in their way.

Tanks are meant to be manned, it's way they are there, they play a significant role in the battle. What do you want? Do you want people to not get in the tanks so that you can't sulk that people are 'noob tank campers'?

Get over it. Let people play the game how it was intended and how they enjoy it. Instead of throwing your toys out of the pram like a baby, throw your BF3 disc out of the window and let the rest of us enjoy the game with one less sulking baby troll.

then these smae people bitch at engineers camping in bushes blasting them rpgs when in reality it isn't doing that much because you needed four, five hits to kill them. nerfing the tanks needed to happen. it was retarded. there is no skill involved in using a tank. you get in drive, take a hit, keep driving, kill a few people, keep driving until rpgs hit you a bunch of times. it was stupid. i've used the tank before, it was cheap.

Yeah just like in real life.........

apparently i missed the part this is a NON REALISTIC video game...

I know its been covered before, but now we've had patch, which are the recommend weapons.

Im at 400 on AEK as Assualt and looking to change as over distance its not so great ( Had out side map problems for a while ), which others should i look at ? Ive hit Major so ive most of them unlock, except the COOPs.

So something is only useful if you personally can do well with it? Just putting this out there, but maybe, just maybe the enemy team had a lot of engineers on their team hunting for tank kills?

Saying something is bad because you can't get 50 kills a game with it is not really a valid argument. Also neither is using the "real life" argument. If we balanced for that there would be no respawns and the average military grunt wouldn't be able to just hop in a tank anyways.

Its not about getting kills. Its about what is fair. Tanks are supposed to be powerful. I doubt you have checked them after the patch. If you have played with them before and after the patch, you'll know exactly what I am talking about.

You remember the patch where IRNV scope was nerfed? Same with the tanks

Its not about getting kills. Its about what is fair. Tanks are supposed to be powerful. I doubt you have checked them after the patch. If you have played with them before and after the patch, you'll know exactly what I am talking about.

You remember the patch where IRNV scope was nerfed? Same with the tanks

What you think is fair and what I think is fair may not align properly. I think tanks are fine as they are now.

I know its been covered before, but now we've had patch, which are the recommend weapons.

Im at 400 on AEK as Assualt and looking to change as over distance its not so great ( Had out side map problems for a while ), which others should i look at ? Ive hit Major so ive most of them unlock, except the COOPs.

Same as before patch - M16A3. Pretty much the best assault rifle.

awwww you noob tank campers are mad they dumbed down the only way you know how to play the game :(

Could you please show us where the big bad tank touched you?

Honestly, a rather weak trolling attempt, rajput. I expected more from you.

Same as before patch - M16A3. Pretty much the best assault rifle.

Before the patch the AEK blasted the M16 out of the water, but as post-patch I agree with you: M16A3 all the way.

They still need to nerf the heck out of the USAS, or change the name from BF3 to That USAS Game.

Before the patch the AEK blasted the M16 out of the water, but as post-patch I agree with you: M16A3 all the way.

They still need to nerf the heck out of the USAS, or change the name from BF3 to That USAS Game.

Disagree about the AEK. I preferred the M16 even then due to its accuracy and super fast reload.

The tanks are fine now. They were just way too powerful before the patch, taking them out required too much resources, usually resulting in the asshat camping inside just hoping out and repairing the tank before you could fully destroy it.

I think they need to tone down the bull**** suppression. They increased the effect on it way to much and the resist suppress perk doesn't seem to work at all now. That's probably my only complaint for the patch so far. Oh yeah, and they took the extended mags from the mg36, which is bull**** as well.

Also if you have high accuracy and you actually hit people but don't kill them quickly, you are not actually suppressing them, which I think is stupid, too. So they can easily return fire and suppress you instead.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!