Recommended Posts

Oh for god sake I wish they would **** off nerfing things because of the whiners, stuff like RPGs and Frag rounds do frick all damage now, they are explosives they are supposed to hurt.

One gun gets nerfed then people whine because another gun is overpowered, then that gets nerfed and someone else whinges, I dont think there is one gun that has the same settings from launch.

Oh for god sake I wish they would **** off nerfing things because of the whiners, stuff like RPGs and Frag rounds do frick all damage now, they are explosives they are supposed to hurt.

One gun gets nerfed then people whine because another gun is overpowered, then that gets nerfed and someone else whinges, I dont think there is one gun that has the same settings from launch.

To be fair, currently the m16a3 is hands down the best assault rifle in pretty much every way.

The double exp is for everyone, not just premium people. I do not have premium and I was getting it this weekend.

This weekend we're hosting our first ?#BF3Premium?-exclusive Double XP event!

Source: Battlefield Twitter

Turns out I was right about the exclusive Double XP events that are planned for us Premium users :p

Oh for god sake I wish they would **** off nerfing things because of the whiners, stuff like RPGs and Frag rounds do frick all damage now, they are explosives they are supposed to hurt.

One gun gets nerfed then people whine because another gun is overpowered, then that gets nerfed and someone else whinges, I dont think there is one gun that has the same settings from launch.

Sometimes it would seem the tards at Dice don't even play the game at all and simply rely on the angry kids and their complaints about weapons, for the most part weapon balance was spot-on at release time, now it's not even close.

Also there never used to be a problem with flares but for the past couple of months you don't know when they will work or not, total crapshoot and extremely frustrating at times.

It's a ****ty practice by EA that is forcing other users to buy their stupid premium just to get Weapon, Armor and XP advantage over all other people that have purchased their game. It's pretty much a legal EA-authorized cheating for $50.00

They couldnt stop cheaters and hackers from abusing the servers so they joined them byy offering couple of maps and stronger weapons and ammo for Premium Accounts.

I hate companies like this, and I hope EA looses customers and money...

It's a ****ty practice by EA that is forcing other users to buy their stupid premium just to get Weapon, Armor and XP advantage over all other people that have purchased their game. It's pretty much a legal EA-authorized cheating for $50.00

They couldnt stop cheaters and hackers from abusing the servers so they joined them byy offering couple of maps and stronger weapons and ammo for Premium Accounts.

I hate companies like this, and I hope EA looses customers and money...

EA is an absolutely horrible company but man those Battlefield games are good, I just try to take the good with the bad however difficult that can be at times.

It's a ****ty practice by EA that is forcing other users to buy their stupid premium just to get Weapon, Armor and XP advantage over all other people that have purchased their game. It's pretty much a legal EA-authorized cheating for $50.00

They couldnt stop cheaters and hackers from abusing the servers so they joined them byy offering couple of maps and stronger weapons and ammo for Premium Accounts.

I hate companies like this, and I hope EA looses customers and money...

Except for the part where the close quarters weapons are not stronger than the vanilla guns. And that you don't have to pay $50 to get them. And then there is the fact that bad players will still be bad even if they get double experience or buy the unlock packs.

Do you remember when fps games didn't have unlocks and ranks in them? I do. Pretty much everything you said was blindly hating EA for no reason what so ever. Blame DICE for balancing their game badly if you want but EA really has very little to do with that.

Premium in the end saves you money. But I guess that's a bad thing?

It's one thing to play the game and unlock weapons as you gain XP and another to give double XP to premium accounts, give Premium Account holders priority on some servers, when joining. Give Premium Account holders better armor,.. etc...

All this crap for extra $50, so noobs and 'bad players' will jump on it as flys on shlt.

I would've rather DICE fix the bugs, random crashes, cheating exploits, and weapon balancing before asking for more money for couple of more maps...

I am not giving them a buck... and not fifty

How does it save you money exactly?

Why dont they give discounts for people that already own the Kirklend map?

Greedy little piggy... thats what EA is...

You get 5 DLC in the pack, each will retail at ?11.99, so 5 x ?11.99 is ?59.95, BF Premium in the UK costs ?39.99 so even if you dont find a good deal (many shops are selling it for ?32~) its more than worth it, even if you already have Karkand thats 4 x DLC at ?47.89 RRP cost, not only that you get camo, weapons, xp weekends, etc.. etc..

Don't hate on EA because its 'cool' to hate them, just look at the facts.

How does it save you money exactly?

Why dont they give discounts for people that already own the Kirklend map?

Greedy little piggy... thats what EA is...

How does it save you money exactly?

Why dont they give discounts for people that already own the Kirklend map?

Greedy little piggy... thats what EA is...

It's the whole premise of Premium, you get access to all of the map packs at a cheaper price than if you bought them all separately. On top of that, you get added extras as well like Double XP and 2 weeks early access for us PC players.

Yes, EA is greedy. But they are a business and they are making money from as many avenues as possible as most people on here would probably do if they had to take charge of EA and got to look at their accounts.

You get 5 DLC in the pack, each will retail at ?11.99, so 5 x ?11.99 is ?59.95, BF Premium in the UK costs ?39.99 so even if you dont find a good deal (many shops are selling it for ?32~) its more than worth it, even if you already have Karkand thats 4 x DLC at ?47.89 RRP cost, not only that you get camo, weapons, xp weekends, etc.. etc..

Don't hate on EA because its 'cool' to hate them, just look at the facts.

What if I dont want to buy all the packs and maps?

Why do I have to pay for somehting that I'll have to receive in instalments as packs get released... I have to trust them that they'll deliver a quality product when there are already quite a few flaws that they havent fixed... I dont even want to go there...

I spent weeks with their Customer Support on the random crashes... and finally gave up ...

Now I play from time to time and I accept it for what it is, a "should have been good game" thats sporadicaly spammed by crying babies, anoying hackers and now even better server ques for Non-Prime players.

Like they advertised that when they orignaly sold the game...

What happened to DICE's promise that they'll never charge for additional maps?

What if I dont want to buy all the packs and maps?

Why do I have to pay for somehting that I'll have to receive in instalments as packs get released... I have to trust them that they'll deliver a quality product when there are already quite a few flaws that they havent fixed... I dont even want to go there...

I spent weeks with their Customer Support on the random crashes... and finally gave up ...

Now I play from time to time and I accept it for what it is, a "should have been good game" thats sporadicaly spammed by crying babies, anoying hackers and now even better server ques for Non-Prime players.

Like they advertised that when they orignaly sold the game...

What happened to DICE's promise that they'll never charge for additional maps?

Uhm. Then don't buy premium? You're not paying "extra" if you buy them 1 at a time. You're paying the regular price. Premium gives you a discount. You're looking at it the wrong way.

Just take a step back, take a deep breath, and realize that you don't have to buy any of it. If you don't like the idea behind it remember that it's your choice to buy or not.

Uhm. Then don't buy premium? You're not paying "extra" if you buy them 1 at a time. You're paying the regular price. Premium gives you a discount. You're looking at it the wrong way.

Just take a step back, take a deep breath, and realize that you don't have to buy any of it. If you don't like the idea behind it remember that it's your choice to buy or not.

Yeah I can understand outrage if they had done something like rasing the individual expansion prices and then introducing premiums, but previous battlefield expansions also cost 15 dollars.... premium is a straight up discount to anyone that planned to get all of them, and if you don't want all of them you pay the same price as before. What's the big deal?

Is not the premium pricing that gets me, but the extra crap that they offer for the premium... Weapons, Armor, Extra XP, and most of it what gest me is that now Premium holders have priority access to servers, so you are kicked out in a que until a slot is available, even if you were already playing.

So in other words, they are telling you to pay upfront so you dont have to deal with all the other crap.

They should have mentioned that when they originaly sold the game and the back to kirkland map...

That downthe road you might need to pay $50 just not to be kick out of servers for not being a premium account holder.

@ Viper.. if you buy them separately than you dont get the Premium stamp so you still get stuck in a que.

It's one thing to play the game and unlock weapons as you gain XP and another to give double XP to premium accounts, give Premium Account holders priority on some servers, when joining. Give Premium Account holders better armor,.. etc...

All this crap for extra $50, so noobs and 'bad players' will jump on it as flys on shlt.

I would've rather DICE fix the bugs, random crashes, cheating exploits, and weapon balancing before asking for more money for couple of more maps...

I am not giving them a buck... and not fifty

Mate, what? Please do some research before you bash on Premium. Premium players do not get better armor, weapons and whatnot. All we're getting is in the list that's been posted numerous times. We're only getting the DLC, Server Priority (Which we could do without IMO), Premium events (We actually payed for this so what's the big deal?), monthly content drops (So far we only know that we'll be getting new camouflage next month) and we're getting videos and whatnot. We don't get ANYTHING that makes us stronger in game. The weapons are actually part of the Close Quarters DLC which are actually weapons for EVERY player who buys the DLC.

There's too many misconceptions about Premium. Everyone who doesn't have Premium believes that Premium gives you a huge boost in power but it doesn't. We're not getting anything extra to make us stronger ingame whatsoever. So what are you going on about? :/

Just do some research about what Premium actually really is before bashing it.

^That's server based dude. Server admins are now able to appoint VIP slots for players which also has nothing to do with Premium. The server queue thing only gives us priority while queuing with normal players, normal players won't get kicked for this at all.

You seem to be blaming Premium for everything now :s

Is not the premium pricing that gets me, but the extra crap that they offer for the premium... Weapons, Armor, Extra XP, and most of it what gest me is that now Premium holders have priority access to servers, so you are kicked out in a que until a slot is available, even if you were already playing.

So in other words, they are telling you to pay upfront so you dont have to deal with all the other crap.

They should have mentioned that when they originaly sold the game and the back to kirkland map...

That downthe road you might need to pay $50 just not to be kick out of servers for not being a premium account holder.

@ Viper.. if you buy them separately than you dont get the Premium stamp so you still get stuck in a que.

Extra armor and weapons? What? Do you even have a clue what you're talking about? You don't get anything different if you buy them one at a time or all at once. Premium owners get skins. That is all. They do not do anything for you other than change appearances of weapons.

Like I said before, the only thing anyone could possible have an issue with premium is the server queue priority and server owners can even turn that off if they want to. Extra exp? Meh. If you're good and don't have premium you'll still get experience faster than someone who is bad and has premium. Besides that, as has been discussed before, how much exp a person gets has absolutely no effect on your own personal game what so ever. Besides that the weapons added in the dlc packs aren't rank dependent to unlock, you can get them at rank 1 if you desired.

You're just hating for the entire purpose of hating without really having any clue what is actually going on.

P.S. I do not own premium yet and I kill people just the same as before and also do not die any more or less than I did before, too. Also, get this. I probably won't buy premium either, I'll buy the dlc packs as they are released. The horror.

You'll never be respected in the community if people know you bought the shortcuts, also In my opinion it ruins the point of the game: Get Pointlles >> Upgrade, etc.

So yea its a waste of money when you can get the stuff the old free legit way.

That's a blatant lie. I couldn't care less if anyone buys short cuts and anyone who does doesn't really deserve respect anyways. Buying the short cut pack will NEVER affect your own personal game so why would you care if someone buys them or not? If you get killed by a rank 100 using the m16 how is that worse than a rank 1 killing you with the AEK? You still died.

Some people just want to play the game with all unlocks available to them, not go through the gear treadmill multiple times. Do you guys remember little games like Counter Strike, Quake, or Unreal Tournament? Yeah, none of those games had stupid unlock grinds and ranks and are still considering the best fps games ever made. The point of the game is to play and have fun not progress down a linear gear unlock path.

Get over yourself.

Is Short Cuts worth getting - or even necessary - for a new player on PC (coming from PS3)? Thinking about getting BF3 PC with the Origin 50% off deal.

Yes they are if you have the cash. Don't mind what anyone else says, it's up to you if they are worth it or not. If you don't want to spend time unlocking stuff that you already did then I would say go for it.

I played last weekend and got kicked out twice to free up a place for a premium account holder... so yeah I am ****ed....

I am done here... Have fun playing.

How do you know you were kicked from a server for a premium account holder? Did you get a message saying as much? Because I really doubt you did. You might have gotten kicked for an admin for the server or a clan member for the server (that might of also own premium) but that's about it. Kicking random peoples for clan members has been a common practice in fps games for as long as I can remember. Yes and I also played a lot over the weekend and never once got kicked. Premium says it gives you server queue priority, not priority once you are in the server playing.

So again I think you're just spouting hate for no reason.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!