Recommended Posts

i knew SP would suck...

We all know the single player isn't the main focus of these games so why even talk about it? And honestly, I played about 3/4 of the BC2 single player and it was fine, not buggy at all. So his experience with BF3 may have been bad and that sucks (the game isn't even out yet...yeah...) but I wouldn't say that's how it will be for everyone.

Either way, the single player isn't why *most* of us choose to get the games we do.

We all know the single player isn't the main focus of these games so why even talk about it? And honestly, I played about 3/4 of the BC2 single player and it was fine, not buggy at all. So his experience with BF3 may have been bad and that sucks (the game isn't even out yet...yeah...) but I wouldn't say that's how it will be for everyone.

Either way, the single player isn't why *most* of us choose to get the games we do.

cause DICE was?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMuqCeDH6F0

Not entirely sure how that video is relevant to what I said to be honest.

you said why talk about SP when it's a part of the game? DICE seemed to be hyping it, so why not alk about it. to be honest, you seem kinda butt hurt that battlefield just got a negative review on an aspect of a game that is a prevelant part of it cause DICE was hyping it like a mother and then all of a sudden stopped (probably cause they knew it sucked...) Why not talk about SP. a lot of people love good SP campaigns...

holy crap that gun does ALOT of damage to buildings

It's fairly realistic damage. I take you've never shot a gun before?

you said why talk about SP when it's a part of the game? DICE seemed to be hyping it, so why not alk about it. to be honest, you seem kinda butt hurt that battlefield just got a negative review on an aspect of a game that is a prevelant part of it cause DICE was hyping it like a mother and then all of a sudden stopped (probably cause they knew it sucked...) Why not talk about SP. a lot of people love good SP campaigns...

I think you misunderstood me. I meant, why are we talking about it? I think anyone with half a brain knows the single player won't be an award winner. I haven't slept in over 24 hours so I'm having issues conveying my point as I would like to. I know the point I want to make I just can't put it into words. :rofl:

And no, I'm not butthurt that the SP might or might not get bad reviews. My official stance on a single player for battlefield 3 since it was anounced the game would have one was that I felt it shouldn't have been made at all. I personally think the time creating the single player could have been devoted to creating more maps for multiplayer and perfecting it. That being said, I certainly won't mind if it turns out to be decent and because I didn't want it in the first place I couldn't care less if it turns out to be bad.

Either way I'll find out on my own and not take the word of someone who got/played the game through very questionable means.

Single Player is indeed disappointing. Especially the Jet Mission. The whole mission is on rails.

The pacing seems off a bit. Some parts are just too stretched out.

AI is TERRIBLE! I literally stood behind a spawn and knifed countless enemies in the back as they all walked by me.

I shot them all in the back and none bothered to turn around. And this was just on the first mission lol.

At close range, there were times also where they'll just stand in front of you for a couple seconds before lunging at you with a knife. This wasn't even on Easy.

The game crashed once so far. Just doesn't seem well polished. Sadly, another EA rush job.

Agreed on SP not even having to be made. MP is where this one will shine.

Edit:

This was on the 360 btw.

^ no wonder they still stopped talking about SP, cause even they knew it was garbage. how can you be a CoD killer if your SP sucks?

deep down i still want this game to suck so EA can eat their own words for a third time. maybe it does and that's why they are filtering reviews? they only want BF fanboys reviewing the game...

deep down i still want this game to suck so EA can eat their own words for a third time...

I don't think that would make a difference at all. Look at CoD...that series has sucked since MW1 and they've seen nothing but success.

There would have to be groundbreaking flaws (I'm talking about the game not running at all on 95% of user's PCs, constant server outages, etc.) for something significant to happen.

I don't think that would make a difference at all. Look at CoD...that series has sucked since MW1 and they've seen nothing but success.

There would have to be groundbreaking flaws (I'm talking not run at all on 95% of user's PCs, constant server outages, etc.) for something significant to happen.

mw2 was brilliant... the MP was awesome too. and if you look at metacritic numbers, they would agree on that. none of the games suck, just treyarch ones suck compared to infinity ward ones. all the games are always well reviewed. the games always have awesome SP ans awesome MP. DICE can only get one right apparently.

also console games should never crash at release... PC sure. dif configs etc etc. consoles, no excuse.

mw2 was brilliant... the MP was awesome too. and if you look at metacritic numbers, they would agree on that. none of the games suck, just treyarch ones suck compared to infinity ward ones. all the games are always well reviewed. the games always have awesome SP ans awesome MP. DICE can only get one right apparently.

Modern Warfare 2 was a mess on the PC. Peer-to-peer hosting was a horrible idea and gave the host massive advantages over the rest of the players. That wasn't fun at all.

The real problem is not that the games are "bad", per se. It's the fact that they're almost exactly the same year after year. They just make some new models and maps and call it a new game.

If you like playing almost the same game over and over be my guest, but I'd much rather play something different.

Im not sure why battlelog has got all this hate tbh. At first i thought i would hate it, but seriously looking at it i couldnt find many faults, it was just as quick actually getting in a server than it is for black ops etc. In a way it was slightly quicker as i like to use my 2nd monitor to display temps, pings, ts etc so while normally i would set that up before i loaded the game, now with battlelog i can join a server, set up everything how i like and then when im ready to play i can just click go to game and im there.

Plus i always have firefox/chrome open so i can just have it open on a tab all the time, and whenever i fancy playing, all i have to do is go to that tab and press join server, which is again is quicker than opening up a game/steam, well for me anyway

Also granted i have a new pc so alt+tabbing between the desktop and a game has no issue, i have no idea if this is sluggish on lower spec pc's which is the only problem i can really see

Modern Warfare 2 was a mess on the PC. Peer-to-peer hosting was a horrible idea and gave the host massive advantages over the rest of the players. That wasn't fun at all.

The real problem is not that the games are "bad", per se. It's the fact that they're almost exactly the same year after year. They just make some new models and maps and call it a new game.

If you like playing almost the same game over and over be my guest, but I'd much rather play something different.

100 percent, it was a **** PC game. it's why i played it on my ps3. MW3 looks as if it's going to be a true PC game. i play them for the MP mainly and the SP for it's crazy over the top story with awesome scripted action. works for me. new one has real dedicated servers (Y) (Y)

100 percent, it was a **** PC game. it's why i played it on my ps3. MW3 looks as if it's going to be a true PC game. i play them for the MP mainly and the SP for it's crazy over the top story with awesome scripted action. works for me. new one has real dedicated servers (Y) (Y)

I've glad we're on the same page there. Call of Duty is without a doubt a console game. I simply don't find the multiplayer to be interesting enough (because it's mostly the same every year) to warrant me re-buying it.

Call of Duty SP campaigns have been pretty good, I'm not going to deny that. I'm not too impressed with the launch trailer for MW3 though.

I've glad we're on the same page there. Call of Duty is without a doubt a console game. I simply don't find the multiplayer to be interesting enough (because it's mostly the same every year) to warrant me re-buying it.

Call of Duty SP campaigns have been pretty good, I'm not going to deny that. I'm not too impressed with the launch trailer for MW3 though.

that's fair too. i just stoked that we get real dedicated servers (in terms of we can make our own) with this one which will only make PC communities for this game better. i'm still getting it for PC this year cause i'll be playing with people who will be doing the same.

that's fair too. i just stoked that we get real dedicated servers (in terms of we can make our own) with this one which will only make PC communities for this game better. i'm still getting it for PC this year cause i'll be playing with people who will be doing the same.

Sounds good to me. I'm glad they're at least making an effort to deliver a decent PC title.

Finished campaign. Very disappointed I was hoping DICE would step it up a notch, if you had stamped a Call of Duty name on it instead of Battlefield I would have been convinced it was a CoD game with all its trite clichés. The second half of the game picked up a bit but I cant really complain I only want BF3 for Multiplayer

Finished campaign. Very disappointed I was hoping DICE would step it up a notch, if you had stamped a Call of Duty name on it instead of Battlefield I would have been convinced it was a CoD game with all its trite clichés. The second half of the game picked up a bit but I cant really complain I only want BF3 for Multiplayer

Did you finish it on PC or console if on PC how? Lol, I am dying to play BF3 SP...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
    • Password Safe 3.72.0 by Razvan Serea Password Safe is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination"), instead of all the username/password combinations that you use. Once stored, your user names and passwords are just a few clicks away. Using Password Safe you can organize your passwords using your own customizable references—for example, by user ID, category, web site, or location. You can choose to store all your passwords in a single encrypted master password list (an encrypted password database), or use multiple databases to further organize your passwords (work and home, for example). And with its intuitive interface you will be up and running in minutes. PasswordSafe was originally designed by the renowned security technologist Bruce Schneier and released as a free utility application. Password Safe 3.72.0 changelog: Fixed bugs Improved font scale handling - should resolve font size issues on high resolution displays. GH1749 In the Master Password Setup window, "Show Master Password" is no longer truncated on some displays. GH1092, SF1595 Size and position of main window is now correctly restored on scaled displays. SF1630 Keep password expiry date when both password and password expiry are changed; don't clear a non-recurring expiry when the password's changed. SF1628 Custom values can now be copied to the clipboard in read-only mode via Ctrl-C and right-click->Copy Value. New features GH1196 Dark display mode support: Password Safe now supports the system display mode, as well as setting the mode directly via Manage->Options->Display->Display Mode. This change also updates the general "look & feel" of the app to the current Windows theme. Known limitations: The Date picker and keyboard shortcut controls do not switch to dark theme The Customize Toolbar dialog does not switch to dark theme Custom Field support has been added to the more advanced features: Filters XML and Text import and export Comparison, Sync and Merge databases SF938 Custom field values may now be selected by name and copied via a "Copy Custom Field Value..." submenu in the entry context popup menu. SF936 Notes and Custom fields layout now overlap, selectable by tabs, resulting in a more compact and less cluttered layout. SF935 Autotype: Specifying '\v{name}' in the autotype text will cause the corresponding value to be autotyped. Download: PasswordSafe 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: PasswordSafe 32-bit | Portable 32-bit View: PasswordSafe Website | Quickstart Guide | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!