Recommended Posts

Ehh, XUL is in a funny place, everything it did is slowly being moved into HTML/CSS (Flexbox being a big one), eventually they'll be at a point where they could rewrite the entire interface in plain HTML and then they wouldn't need XUL at all.

But keep in mind MSE is still pretty experimental, especially H.264.

 

I've been using MSE on Youtube with Firefox since I uninstalled Flash like 5 or 6 months ago and it works perfectly smooth with no errors. I'm just looking for 60fps, I don't care about 1080 It's fine for me at 720.

In 36 yes, but they're going to be shipping it in 37 (Along with EME if it doesn't slip), so it's not that experimental any more. WebM support is though, so don't enable that.

The biggest issues blocking 64bit support have been fixed (Stuff like the crash reporter not working, and actual crashes), and after that all that was left was plugin support, but both Flash and Silverlight install 64bit variants now so they're not going to bother with 32bit plugins with a 64bit browser, so it's mainly an issue of working out how to upgrade users (Last thing they want is to automatically upgrade users from the 32bit to 64bit release, and break all their plugins and binary addons)

In 36 yes, but they're going to be shipping it in 37 (Along with EME if it doesn't slip), so it's not that experimental any more. WebM support is though, so don't enable that.

The biggest issues blocking 64bit support have been fixed (Stuff like the crash reporter not working, and actual crashes), and after that all that was left was plugin support, but both Flash and Silverlight install 64bit variants now so they're not going to bother with 32bit plugins with a 64bit browser, so it's mainly an issue of working out how to upgrade users (Last thing they want is to automatically upgrade users from the 32bit to 64bit release, and break all their plugins and binary addons)

I have been using a 3rd party 64-bit for a long time without any problems.

Best idea would be to check if user only has whitelisted 64-bit compatible add-ons / plugins and then upgrade those uses by default.

EDIT: And I am fairly certain that ABP / ABE slows Firefox down considerably...

Yeah, problem with those 64bit community builds is that they worked "well enough" that people didn't report problems, but then when Mozilla went to run their tests (Which test nearly every part of the codebase, that's the point) they'd often fail and crash. One of the last things blocking an official 64bit build was actually a problem with the way the JS engine interacted with the crash reporter, so that under certain circumstances it could crash in such a way that the crash reporter would produce a broken crash report, their tests caught it, yet it basically never happened under normal web browsing.

It's similar to those old edited builds of XP people used to slim down the install size, they'd work perfectly fine until they tried to print, then they found out the print spooler had been ripped out to save space (We often had threads about that)

Edit: And that's ignoring the random preferences that community builds flip, like Waterfox 35 enabling support for MSE for MP4 and WebM.

I have been using a 3rd party 64-bit for a long time without any problems.

Best idea would be to check if user only has whitelisted 64-bit compatible add-ons / plugins and then upgrade those uses by default.

EDIT: And I am fairly certain that ABP / ABE slows Firefox down considerably...

 

oddly my Firefox is relatively fast an i do use ABP. i always keep my extensions up to date. ABP is on AMO. ublock isnt.  i tend to trust an extension more thats on AMO 

oddly my Firefox is relatively fast an i do use ABP. i always keep my extensions up to date. ABP is on AMO. ublock isnt.  i tend to trust an extension more thats on AMO 

ublock is on amo and has been preliminarily reviewed by mozilla: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/ublock/

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!