Recommended Posts

Very true, especially when compared to ABP. There's the 2.0 beta available on their site which is said to use less resources than the 1.x builds.

just tried v2.01 beta for chrome, reduced ram usage from 96mb to 85mb. I have around 25 tabs open btw. They have open sourced the extension too which is cool, ublock is open source too. Hopefully both dev teams will copy the best code from each other and make both extensions even better.

I don't really like Adguard, it uses a lot of CPU and doesn't block as much.

Report such issues, regardless of which extension is used.

 

Speaking of extensions, I find LastPass works a lot better in Nightly with e10s enabled without many lock-ups, freezes and slow page loading issues these days. But this issue still remains.

Report such issues, regardless of which extension is used.

 

Speaking of extensions, I find LastPass works a lot better in Nightly with e10s enabled without many lock-ups, freezes and slow page loading issues these days. But this issue still remains.

Sure, but I would preferably use the one with the lowest footprint.

cpu-usage-overall-chart-20141226.png

mem-usage-overall-chart-20141224.png

For those who are in between "ublock" vs "Adblock Plus", should try this magical preference:

privacy.trackingprotection.enabled

Turn it ON and see the difference:

 

More read - http://monica-at-mozilla.blogspot.com/2015/03/tracking-protection-talk-on-air-mozilla.html

  • Like 2

For those who are in between "ublock" vs "Adblock Plus", should try this magical preference:

privacy.trackingprotection.enabled

Turn it ON and see the difference:

 

More read - http://monica-at-mozilla.blogspot.com/2015/03/tracking-protection-talk-on-air-mozilla.html

 

Why not uBlock, Ghostery and privacy.trackingprotection.enabled = True ? :D

Why not uBlock, Ghostery and privacy.trackingprotection.enabled = True ? :D

 

Focus should be performance without compromise in memory, CPU usage and amazing ad free experience, when it can be achieved with single preference then why should go with other two to increase memory usage, CPU consumption and not to mention CO2 emission (last part is joke BTW)...

 

I am happy with this preference.

Focus should be performance without compromise in memory, CPU usage and amazing ad free experience, when it can be achieved with single preference then why should go with other two to increase memory usage, CPU consumption and not to mention CO2 emission (last part is joke BTW)...

 

I am happy with this preference.

 

But that preference just block cookies right?

Does uBlock not also block all the same things as Ghostery? I've never used Ghostery so maybe I'm not understanding exactly what it does.

Ghostery is rogue software that reports your activities using GhostRank to the same third parties you are trying to block. Supposedly it blocks tracking. uBlock fulfills Ghostery's purpose nearly completely, if you enable the privacy filters, and RequestPolicy might fill in the remaining gaps.

Ghostery is rogue software that reports your activities using GhostRank to the same third parties you are trying to block. Supposedly it blocks tracking. uBlock fulfills Ghostery's purpose nearly completely, if you enable the privacy filters, and RequestPolicy might fill in the remaining gaps.

You can disable Ghostrank :rofl:

There were some fixes for desktop APZ landed in the latest nightly, so I'm playing with that enabled and Silk, man it's nice.

There are some downsides though, pages that would cause Firefox to "jank" while scrolling, now scroll smoothly, but now don't render anything while scrolling because the content process is falling behind. It's not that different to Chrome/Safari, but man it doesn't look nice.

Doorhanger Addon Install Flow:

 

Picture and Mockup - https://bug1139656.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8578019

 

[First bit] Bug - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1139656

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Firefox Reading List design flow - https://projects.invisionapp.com/share/NK1ZBQ6SY#/screens/53109337?maintainScrollPosition=false

 

Interesting landing in this part - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1137556

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Firefox Auto Translation dependent bug - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1012532

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Firefox Pointer Events relevant fixes:

 

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143618

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143655

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This could be considered to uplift to Firefox 38.

 

New Password Manager Meta bug - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1141601

 

Editable password fields in door-hanger - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1145913

 

Road Map document - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gAt67COAIIhAFXHTINHDxAvdmff48iDJsYJB1Z0Pb_M/edit

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[bACKED OUT FOR Breaking Windows 10] Enabled VSync refresh driver on Windows - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1144317

MemShrink - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143256

Bengali font bug fix on Mac OS X - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686225

Bookmarklet not working after data migration (Import) - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1146299

Performance fix with Browser Console open during "In Content Pages" - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1142623

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • "...a low price of just $340..." I don't think it means what you think it means.
    • This Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 32GB RAM with RGB is a great deal for limited time by Sayan Sen Memory prices have been through the roof for a while, though it seems like things might finally be getting better. If you are in the market for one, then grab this Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 6000 CL36 kit with RGB for a low price of just $340 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The kit is compatible with both AMD and Intel systems as it supports both EXPO and XMP overclocking profiles, respectively. 6000 MT/s is often the sweet spot for many systems as it provides ample data transfer speed while still being on Gear 1 mode. This Vengeance variant has RGB so if you love bright setups with such lighting, this is a win-win for you. The technical specifications of the Corsair Vengeance memory kit are given in the table below: Specification Value Memory Type DDR5 Memory Size (Total) 32GB Kit Configuration 2 × 16GB Form Factor UDIMM (Desktop) Pin Count 288-pin Speed (Data Rate) 6000 MT/s Speed Rating PC5-48000 Tested CAS Latency 38-44-44-96 Voltage (Tested) 1.35V Performance Profile AMD EXPO & Intel XMP Heat Spreader Aluminum heatspreader Cooling Type Passive (Heatsink) Lighting Ten Zone RGB Software Support Corsair iCUE Get it at the link below: CORSAIR Vengeance RGB DDR5 32GB (2 x 16GB) 6000 CL38 – Gray (CMH32GX5M1E6000Z38): $339.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US, Fulfilled by Amazon US) This Woot deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!