Recommended Posts

It got backed out, broke too many things :laugh:

I've hit a couple of issues with APZ, but I'm not sure whether to file bugs for them because it's still so early (Desktop integration wise, they're already using it on Firefox OS) that things can change fairly quickly.

Why would they do that? Even if Mozilla Firefox sucked, no one would ever want to use a product closely related to google.

majority of the open-source browsers already use webkit, even pidgin3 will use webkit. Empathy is getting ported to webkit , Evolution now uses Webkit . probably much more uses webkit also. 

majority of the open-source browsers already use webkit, even pidgin3 will use webkit. Empathy is getting ported to webkit , Evolution now uses Webkit . probably much more uses webkit also. 

So? What does that have to do with anything? Should we also meation Chromium does NOT use Webkit but Blink which is a fork of Webkit?

i wouldnt be surprised if Linux Distro's Ditch Mozilla Firefox as Default Browser an use Chromium as Default eventually

Has been discussed for several years, but hasn't happened yet. I seem to remember Canonical considered it but didn't do it because Chromium packages tended to be out-of-date, among other things.

Has been discussed for several years, but hasn't happened yet. I seem to remember Canonical considered it but didn't do it because Chromium packages tended to be out-of-date, among other things.

well i do know that Chromium is Packaged for RHEL also. it hasnt happened yet but i reckon it will happen.

So? What does that have to do with anything? Should we also meation Chromium does NOT use Webkit but Blink which is a fork of Webkit?

whether it be webkit or blink iBlink is just a Different name, thats about all. its like MATE Linux DE, its still Gnome2

Firefox is going the way of IE 6 and Netscape.

 

It is dying and it is both sad, yet non surprising. Firefox has fallen below %10 http://www.computerworld.com/article/2893514/an-incredibly-shrinking-firefox-faces-endangered-species-status.html

 

The amazing savior of the internet from the crushing hands of IE 6 and endless security breaches forced webmasters to focus on standards and not Microsoft when the temptation hit. Without firefox the internet would become so proprietary that Chrome or mobile could never take off as workarounds and specific fixes for IE 6 would make up %100 of the web! But that changed. Firefox is a shell of itself while it has ignored users for many years with bloated releases and removal of features and add-ons that break as it keeps trying to update itself every 6 weeks.

 

Meanwhile both Chrome and IE have improved tremendously to fill in the void with webkit leading innovation. Time to move on. At this stage I use it to test a project I work on that is it. In another 5 years I shall ignore it as everyone will be using webkit by then and IE

well i do know that Chromium is Packaged for RHEL also. it hasnt happened yet but i reckon it will happen.

whether it be webkit or blink iBlink is just a Different name, thats about all. its like MATE Linux DE, its still Gnome2

Please stop making statements about things you have no idea what you are talking about...

  • Like 1

Firefox is going the way of IE 6 and Netscape.

 

It is dying and it is both sad, yet non surprising. Firefox has fallen below %10 http://www.computerworld.com/article/2893514/an-incredibly-shrinking-firefox-faces-endangered-species-status.html

 

The amazing savior of the internet from the crushing hands of IE 6 and endless security breaches forced webmasters to focus on standards and not Microsoft when the temptation hit. Without firefox the internet would become so proprietary that Chrome or mobile could never take off as workarounds and specific fixes for IE 6 would make up %100 of the web! But that changed. Firefox is a shell of itself while it has ignored users for many years with bloated releases and removal of features and add-ons that break as it keeps trying to update itself every 6 weeks.

 

Meanwhile both Chrome and IE have improved tremendously to fill in the void with webkit leading innovation. Time to move on. At this stage I use it to test a project I work on that is it. In another 5 years I shall ignore it as everyone will be using webkit by then and IE

 

 

Please stop making statements about things you have no idea what you are talking about...

 

as the poster above said 

 

  • Like 1

Firefox is going the way of IE 6 and Netscape.

 

It is dying and it is both sad, yet non surprising. Firefox has fallen below %10 http://www.computerworld.com/article/2893514/an-incredibly-shrinking-firefox-faces-endangered-species-status.html

 

The amazing savior of the internet from the crushing hands of IE 6 and endless security breaches forced webmasters to focus on standards and not Microsoft when the temptation hit. Without firefox the internet would become so proprietary that Chrome or mobile could never take off as workarounds and specific fixes for IE 6 would make up %100 of the web! But that changed. Firefox is a shell of itself while it has ignored users for many years with bloated releases and removal of features and add-ons that break as it keeps trying to update itself every 6 weeks.

 

Meanwhile both Chrome and IE have improved tremendously to fill in the void with webkit leading innovation. Time to move on. At this stage I use it to test a project I work on that is it. In another 5 years I shall ignore it as everyone will be using webkit by then and IE

Hi 2009, nice to see you again.

WebKit usage is going down since it's as stagnant as IE6 was, even Google broke away from it so they could focus on standards support.

  • Like 1

Firefox is going the way of IE 6 and Netscape.

 

It is dying and it is both sad, yet non surprising. Firefox has fallen below %10 http://www.computerworld.com/article/2893514/an-incredibly-shrinking-firefox-faces-endangered-species-status.html

 

The amazing savior of the internet from the crushing hands of IE 6 and endless security breaches forced webmasters to focus on standards and not Microsoft when the temptation hit. Without firefox the internet would become so proprietary that Chrome or mobile could never take off as workarounds and specific fixes for IE 6 would make up %100 of the web! But that changed. Firefox is a shell of itself while it has ignored users for many years with bloated releases and removal of features and add-ons that break as it keeps trying to update itself every 6 weeks.

 

Meanwhile both Chrome and IE have improved tremendously to fill in the void with webkit leading innovation. Time to move on. At this stage I use it to test a project I work on that is it. In another 5 years I shall ignore it as everyone will be using webkit by then and IE

The comments on that article make me want to punch a baby

Yeah, they are. Too many comments about Brendan Eich being the reason they stopped using Firefox.

Well, they are not wrong. But the Brendan Eich fiasco is nothing compare to the bs Asa is causing though. His dictorial regine at Mozilla has propbably done more to push away developers interest than anything. A public corp running on donations isn't going to change Firefox's incompetence anytime soon. And people like Asa acts like Mozilla is the only game in town.

 

I'm glad Firefox's popularity is going down. It was only ever popular because people wanted something else other than IE in 2004. Now there's Chrome and god knows how many forks, it's open season for browsers. I'm sure once Spartan allows extension, it's gonna overtake Firefox in no time. Mozilla can take its legacy and drown in it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Who uses Outlook anymore? Seriously. When you have open-source and completely free clients such as Thunderbird, Outlook is really obsolete now.
    • "Low price of just $340" ? I don't think so, especially when these same memories were less than $100 just last year before the AI craze started.
    • Spyro: A Realm Beyond revealed by Toys for Bob, the first new entry after almost 20 years by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The Xbox Games Showcase had a surprise reveal from Activision that wasn't related to Call of Duty. The Microsoft-owned publisher revealed a brand-new Spyro game, confirming the return of the series that last had a brand-new entry appear nearly 20 years ago. Watch the new Spyro: A Realm Beyond trailer above, which shows off a new look for the iconic dragon. While most of the trailer is a rendered cinematic, the very end does feature a snippet of gameplay captured on PC. The development team working on this project is Toys for Bob. This is the same studio that delivered the Spyro Reignited Trilogy remasters that brought back the original games for fans. "We are huge Spyro fans ourselves and we are so excited that 'the adventure continues'," says Toys For Bob Studio Head, Paul Yan. "I know the wait has been excruciating but we’re so thrilled to finally come out of stealth and confirm that a new Spyro game is indeed what we’ve been up to these past few years." As is evident from the trailer, Spyro has grown since his previous adventures, and that means he is better at flying too. Players will be able to fly around with freedom for the first time in the series this time, and not just inside mini-levels. "In Spyro: A Realm Beyond, Spyro will experience the freedom of true dragon flight," adds Yan. "He’s small, but mighty, so we had to do a lot of different experiments to explore how he could be both nimble and still be very physical when actively pushing his way through the air." The studio promises the return of whimsical worlds to explore, with plenty of treasure and activities to find. There is a new antagonist coming in to threaten this peaceful world too. Moreover, Tom Kenny is returning to voice Spyro. Spyro: A Realm Beyond is releasing sometime in Spring 2027 across PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Nintendo Switch 2.
    • They couldn't have done a better job, this is beautiful!
    • Oh, of course not. The real "victims" are the people who snipe kids in the head, have killed more journalist than all the worlds wars combined, do double tap strikes on medical personnel, claim history started on October 7th, have a $700 million dollar annual Hasbara budget and pay influencers $7k a post to spout exactly this kind of propaganda. How dare you question the most moral army in the world. Victimhood belongs to these genocidal freaks alone. Anyone who denies that is literally Hitler. If you're going to support a terrorist state, the least you could do is come up with better talking points.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!