Recommended Posts

6.0 is out, but the channel switch hasn't been updated yet. Any idea when Mozilla usually updates? I'm on Eastern Standard Time. I'm eager to switch to 7.0 Beta. I can't wait to get the new tab animations!

This is the correct site to keep checking, right? http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/channel/

Little UX change:

https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=648668

Will be in FF8.

Stuff I think, which will appear in FF9.

1. TI JS engine

2. MSVC 2010 support (in build system channel)

3. Few UX changes

4. PGO (on build system channel few fixes landed)

5. Maybe new Garbage Collector (highly doubt)

I prefer Nightly over Firefox 6 currently but Pale Moon 64 bit over either because it is the only Firefox with a official 64 bit version and with a nice icon.

http://img814.imageshack.us/img814/8026/nightly.png

No surprise there really. Nightly and aurora are both leaps and bounds ahead of FF6 due to the memory and performance improvements. I really think we will see some nice reaction from recent defectors who continue to complain how sluggish and resource hog it is. Looking forward to see the FF8 changes come to aurora later this week whenever they merge the code.

No surprise there really. Nightly and aurora are both leaps and bounds ahead of FF6 due to the memory and performance improvements. I really think we will see some nice reaction from recent defectors who continue to complain how sluggish and resource hog it is. Looking forward to see the FF8 changes come to aurora later this week whenever they merge the code.

Yep the problem is DownThemAll doesn't work with Firefox 8 yet. Not a huge deal but still sucks. That is why I haven't used Firefox 8 64 bit entirely. Even though I most likely wouldn't still it is alpha but at least it will soon be getting close to beta! Firefox 7 isn't to bad with it going to beta very soon! Still no official supported 64 bit from Mozilla

Yep the problem is DownThemAll doesn't work with Firefox 8 yet. Not a huge deal but still sucks.

please try the following:

save the add-on .xpi to your desktop you must navigate to the addons page (not using the addon browser, but going to the ff addons site) and right click on the download button>save as> save the xpi file then:

rename the .xpi to .zip

open the zip and extract the install.rdf

open the install.rdf with any text editor

find 4.0.* could be any version number

edit to 8.0.* or higher!

save and put back in zip overwriting the original and save zip

rename .zip back to .xpi

open firefox and "install add-on from file" find modified .xpi

now you'd follow the procedure I've noted above to get those addons to work.

please try the following:

save the add-on .xpi to your desktop you must navigate to the addons page (not using the addon browser, but going to the ff addons site) and right click on the download button>save as> save the xpi file then:

rename the .xpi to .zip

open the zip and extract the install.rdf

open the install.rdf with any text editor

find 4.0.* could be any version number

edit to 8.0.* or higher!

save and put back in zip overwriting the original and save zip

rename .zip back to .xpi

open firefox and "install add-on from file" find modified .xpi

now you'd follow the procedure I've noted above to get those addons to work.

I dare you to try it yourself with DownThemAll. It doesn't work.

please try the following:

save the add-on .xpi to your desktop you must navigate to the addons page (not using the addon browser, but going to the ff addons site) and right click on the download button>save as> save the xpi file then:

rename the .xpi to .zip

open the zip and extract the install.rdf

open the install.rdf with any text editor

find 4.0.* could be any version number

edit to 8.0.* or higher!

save and put back in zip overwriting the original and save zip

rename .zip back to .xpi

open firefox and "install add-on from file" find modified .xpi

now you'd follow the procedure I've noted above to get those addons to work.

Can you or someone try this method with two extensions that I would like to get to work fully with the latest Nightly? I don't currently have it installed, cause I went back to Aurora 7.0 The first extension is TabGroups Manager, which works somewhat but won't allow you to move tabs into specific groups, possibly because of the new tab animations feature. The second extension is TabMixPlus, which doesn't work at all. You have to disable it just to get the new tab animations to work. I'm wondering if this method could work for them? If so, I might go back to Nightly. Thanks if you can!! I'd really appreciate it!!

Can you or someone try this method with two extensions that I would like to get to work fully with the latest Nightly? I don't currently have it installed, cause I went back to Aurora 7.0 The first extension is TabGroups Manager, which works somewhat but won't allow you to move tabs into specific groups, possibly because of the new tab animations feature. The second extension is TabMixPlus, which doesn't work at all. You have to disable it just to get the new tab animations to work. I'm wondering if this method could work for them? If so, I might go back to Nightly. Thanks if you can!! I'd really appreciate it!!

no, i don't even need to try to know the answer, because of the specific changes that have been made to the browser the developers of these two extensions will need to update to accommodate to the change

Why switch to full tab-size notification? When are they going to start using the notification bar-type popups you see in chrome and IE9? These are far less intrusive and better streamlined.

I know I'm late replying, but this is made intrusive because the user has to make the decision before continuing to use Firefox.

Like Heartripper said, you'll only see this screen when there are 3rd party "drive-by" add-on installations from outside of Firefox.

How is it not supported officially? It gets updated just as often as 32bit nightly, and if not it's only a day behind at most.

http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/system-requirements.html

Firefox 5 System Requirements

Windows

Operating Systems

Windows 2000

Windows XP

Windows Server 2003

Windows Vista

Windows 7

Please note that while the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows Vista and Windows 7 can be used to run Firefox 5, only 32-bit builds of Firefox 5 are supported at this time.

Recommended Hardware

Pentium 4 or newer processor that supports SSE2

512MB of RAM

200MB of hard drive space

Mac

Operating Systems

Mac OS X 10.5

Mac OS X 10.6

Mac OS X 10.7

Recommended Hardware

Macintosh computer with an Intel x86 processor

512 MB of RAM

200 MB hard drive space

Linux

Software Requirements

Please note that Linux distributors may provide packages for your distribution which have different requirements.

Firefox will not run at all without the following libraries or packages:

GTK+ 2.10 or higher

GLib 2.12 or higher

Pango 1.14 or higher

X.Org 1.0 or higher (1.7 or higher is recommended)

libstdc++ 4.3 or higher

For optimal functionality, we recommend the following libraries or packages:

NetworkManager 0.7 or higher

DBus 1.0 or higher

HAL 0.5.8 or higher

GNOME 2.16 or higher

http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/system-requirements.html

Firefox 5 System Requirements

Windows

Operating Systems

Windows 2000

Windows XP

Windows Server 2003

Windows Vista

Windows 7

Please note that while the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows Vista and Windows 7 can be used to run Firefox 5, only 32-bit builds of Firefox 5 are supported at this time.

Recommended Hardware

Pentium 4 or newer processor that supports SSE2

512MB of RAM

200MB of hard drive space

Mac

Operating Systems

Mac OS X 10.5

Mac OS X 10.6

Mac OS X 10.7

Recommended Hardware

Macintosh computer with an Intel x86 processor

512 MB of RAM

200 MB hard drive space

Linux

Software Requirements

Please note that Linux distributors may provide packages for your distribution which have different requirements.

Firefox will not run at all without the following libraries or packages:

GTK+ 2.10 or higher

GLib 2.12 or higher

Pango 1.14 or higher

X.Org 1.0 or higher (1.7 or higher is recommended)

libstdc++ 4.3 or higher

For optimal functionality, we recommend the following libraries or packages:

NetworkManager 0.7 or higher

DBus 1.0 or higher

HAL 0.5.8 or higher

GNOME 2.16 or higher

Did Fx5 even have an official 64bit build like 6, 7 and 8? oh well. *shrug* Any software receiving constant updates from the devs counts as supported in my book.

Yep the problem is DownThemAll doesn't work with Firefox 8 yet. Not a huge deal but still sucks. That is why I haven't used Firefox 8 64 bit entirely. Even though I most likely wouldn't still it is alpha but at least it will soon be getting close to beta! Firefox 7 isn't to bad with it going to beta very soon! Still no official supported 64 bit from Mozilla

Weird, DownThemAll works just fine here using Nightly and UX nightly builds. Never had a problem.

Try this to have DTA working.

Go to "about:config" and add this as a "string".

String; extensions.dta.directory

Value; ["Z:\\H?mtade filer"]

Change the path to yours. but use \\ in the path.

When i removed this value DTA dissappeared from download dialog and when adding it it came back.

Did Fx5 even have an official 64bit build like 6, 7 and 8? oh well. *shrug* Any software receiving constant updates from the devs counts as supported in my book.

They're test builds, that's it. Only the developer builds have 64bit variants (See here), and they're not the general use.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • The funny thing here is that like 70% or so of the web browser users use 'Google Chrome' as web browser. What I don't understand is that why on earth would ANYONE choose 'Google Chrome' on Windows when 'Microsoft Edge' is not just better in most things, but it's already there right out of the box for the Windows users. Microsoft Edge has less data collection (yes, that's a fact), less RAM usage and is more optimized for Windows (as it's a Microsoft product) right out of the box. I'm sure you will come with the argument of bloat in Microsoft Edge. Sure, but most of that can be fixed with a simple tool (there are many good ones out there for this). Yes, that require a couple of clicks in the same way as it requires several clicks to install 'Google Chrome'. And I'm sure you really love the 4 GB of AI-slop data 'Google Chrome' is downloading for Chrome without you agreeing to it. Fun right? Sure, the way Microsoft is pushing 'Microsoft Edge' on users might not be the best way of doing it and might need to change. But I would never choose 'Google Chrome' over 'Microsoft Edge' today anyways. I'm sure there was a period back in the days when 'Google Chrome' actually was better in most things, but that period is not today.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
    • That stupid annoying Sign in with Google on all these sites now... get the fk outta here
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!