San Francisco may vote on banning male circumcision


Recommended Posts

Whoever thinks that the parents of a child should be allowed to decide about doing something irreversible to it is a moron. Ban it.

Anyone who thinks parents shouldn't have the power to make whatever choices they feel important whether for medical reasons or religious, is a moron. agree to disagree.

Isn't this the same crowd that thinks that govt should fund late term abortion (read: murder)? Liberals balk at pro-life people but don't think it's within the parent's rights to have a circumcision done? ROFL.

if they ban circumcision, tell them to vote for ban of baptism too. you are drowning an infant in water!

Ermm... no.

Skip to 2:00 and watch from there.

Anyone who thinks parents shouldn't have the power to make whatever choices they feel important whether for medical reasons or religious, is a moron. agree to disagree.

Isn't this the same crowd that thinks that govt should fund late term abortion (read: murder)? Liberals balk at pro-life people but don't think it's within the parent's rights to have a circumcision done? ROFL.

Uh no. I don't think you'll find anyone who is a liberal that would want anyone to fund late term abortion.

Parents make tons of irreversible decisions for their children... that argument is positively ludicrous.

Circumcision isn't dangerous, or harmful, or abusive, or traumatic... this is just a bunch of pushy crazies trying to force their opinion on others.

edit: am I the only person who sees this as Take 2 for the "ritual slaughter" argument? At least I can take consolation in the fact that this is being pushed by a lobby, and not the senators themselves. I'm sure it will be struck down quickly.

Uh no. I don't think you'll find anyone who is a liberal that would want anyone to fund late term abortion.

Huh??? Liberals are the overwhelming majority of those in support of lifting bans on late term abortion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-term_abortion#United_States_2

Oh, and on the baptism thing, I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic, but you do know there is a difference between what you showed in that video and "immersion baptism", right?

It doesn't remove any sensativity. On the contrary, it exposes the area with the higest level of nerve endings to direct contact.

That's right, it exposes the area. To your pants and underwear. So after years and years of rub rub rub against your underwear, it becomes significantly desensitized.

Huh??? Liberals are the overwhelming majority of those in support of lifting bans on late term abortion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-term_abortion#United_States_2

Oh, and on the baptism thing, I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic, but you do know there is a difference between what you showed in that video and "immersion baptism", right?

I see nothing in that link about Liberals wanting to lift bans on Late term abortion. In fact, the word Liberal does not exist on that page.

It was done to me when I was a baby, but did no damage that I am aware of... just I have a easier to clean penis and the girls couldn't be happier with it :) baboom!

That's right, it exposes the area. To your pants and underwear. So after years and years of rub rub rub against your underwear, it becomes significantly desensitized.

I don't think it ever becomes significantly desensitized... except after like an hour of sex, then of course, anyone's starts to.

If people over 18 would like to be circumcised, I see nothing wrong with that, but forcing unconsenting children to be circumcised is awful, immoral, and damaging. What if they don't want to be religious and decide not to follow a religion? What if they'd rather have a foreskin? Why do children not get a choice in the matter? It's a disgusting tradition that should only be carried out when the person being circumcised consents.

Parents make tons of irreversible decisions for their children... that argument is positively ludicrous.

Circumcision isn't dangerous, or harmful, or abusive, or traumatic... this is just a bunch of pushy crazies trying to force their opinion on others.

Umm... my friend who works at the hospital would disagree with you.

1. Dangerours/Harmful - Sometimes circumcision doesn't go well and people end up with ugly looking stuff.

2. Abusive? I consider tying someone up and cutting part of their stuff without any anesthesia pretty abusive.

I don't know about making a law about it, but I'm glad my parents didn't take that decision for me :laugh:

Huh??? Liberals are the overwhelming majority of those in support of lifting bans on late term abortion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-term_abortion#United_States_2

Oh, and on the baptism thing, I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic, but you do know there is a difference between what you showed in that video and "immersion baptism", right?

Didn't see immersion baptism mentioned.

If people over 18 would like to be circumcised, I see nothing wrong with that, but forcing unconsenting children to be circumcised is awful, immoral, and damaging. What if they don't want to be religious and decide not to follow a religion? What if they'd rather have a foreskin? Why do children not get a choice in the matter? It's a disgusting tradition that should only be carried out when the person being circumcised consents.

It was done to me when I was a baby, but I have to say, I prefer it like this.. though I don't remember what it was like before lol. But from videos I've seen that have had other's junk in them, I think the foreskin is something nasty and odd.

Whoever thinks that the parents of a child should be allowed to decide about doing something irreversible to it is a moron. Ban it.

Exactly. If the child wants it, he can do it when he's 18. The parents, or their religion, should not have any irreversible influence on the kid.

Allowing people to do anything they want to themselves and their children always ends up badly.

...out of curiosity, how many non-American guys in this thread think circumcision is normal? :whistle:

I see nothing in that link about Liberals wanting to lift bans on Late term abortion. In fact, the word Liberal does not exist on that page.

I guess you don't know this, but in the US "liberal" and "pro-choice" are virtually synonymns. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-choice#United_States

It was done to me when I was a baby, but did no damage that I am aware of... just I have a easier to clean penis and the girls couldn't be happier with it :) baboom!

I don't think it ever becomes significantly desensitized... except after like an hour of sex, then of course, anyone's starts to.

It's not even significantly easier to clean. I mean. If you've got funk building up under the foreskin, then you either dont bathe at all.. or you don't know you have a penis.

I mean, it's not very hard to pull the foreskin back and lather that sucker up.

Parents make tons of irreversible decisions for their children... that argument is positively ludicrous.

No, this point you're trying to make is ludicrous. These people are taking off body parts of unconsenting children. How is that fine? I know I would have despised my mother if she'd had me circumcised. I like having a foreskin and would rather not be without.

It's not even significantly easier to clean. I mean. If you've got funk building up under the foreskin, then you either dont bathe at all.. or you don't know you have a penis.

I mean, it's not very hard to pull the foreskin back and lather that sucker up.

I have no clue about how to clean a foreskin had penis LOL, but pulling back skin always sounds odd :p. Mines more like washing my arm, just rub it lol.

Didn't see immersion baptism mentioned.

He was calling baptism "drowning" which only would be even somewhat reasonable in the context of immersion baptism. Sprinkling certainly couldn't be compared to drowning.

Since it seems that all you are wanting to do is play word games without making an effort at understanding the context of what is being said, I'm just going to assume that you are now doing nothing but trolling.

I guess you don't know this, but in the US "liberal" and "pro-choice" are virtually synonymns. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-choice#United_States

So you're saying that a couple of pro-choice groups is "MAJORITY OF LIBERALS WANT LATE TERM ABORTIONS?"

Laughable. At best.

No, this point you're trying to make is ludicrous. These people are taking off body parts of unconsenting children. How is that fine? I know I would have despised my mother if she'd had me circumcised. I like having a foreskin and would rather not be without.

Actually, I think if you grew up without it, you would view it more in my way. It's all about how long you have to become attached to "what is you". I doubt though if you had it done as a kid you would hate it, as you would most likely have grown up thinking that most people were like you. I didn't know about foreskin for quite some time, and by then, I was accustomed to myself as is, and viewed it differently.

I have no clue about how to clean a foreskin had penis LOL, but pulling back skin always sounds odd :p. Mines more like washing my arm, just rub it lol.

How does it sound odd? You pull it back and it looks just like yours, although, the tip of it always hurts due to it being more sensitive. Then you just wash it like normal. And then the skin goes back.

And when its hard, it looks exactly like a cut penis. Foreskin might be on the head a little bit, but barely.

It was done to me when I was a baby, but I have to say, I prefer it like this.. though I don't remember what it was like before lol. But from videos I've seen that have had other's junk in them, I think the foreskin is something nasty and odd.

It's fine if you don't mind the fact you've had it done, but what if you'd grown up to dislike not having a foreskin? There would be no way to change it back. You could have had yourself circumcised at this age; an age you are ready to consent. Circumcising unconsenting children is horrible. I can't even stand the idea that I was christened, and they obviously did nothing to harm me whereas circumcision harms the child.

He was calling baptism "drowning" which only would be even somewhat reasonable in the context of immersion baptism. Sprinkling certainly couldn't be compared to drowning.

Since it seems that all you are wanting to do is play word games without making an effort at understanding the context of what is being said, I'm just going to assume that you are now doing nothing but trolling.

Not playing word games. If people don't correctly identify what they're talking about, then i'm going to nitpick that until it is mentioned what is being talked about.

And on one note. I've never heard of any girl not sleeping with a guy because of their foreskin or lack of foreskin. And for those that do, then they're too shallow, and i'd never give them the time of day :)

Or they have the IQ of a brick. Either or.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!