Recommended Posts

Unban the three that where banned, give them warnings and if it happens again then perma ban, sort out the modding issues on the irc channel and job done, it really is THAT simple ;)

Given that you don't know why we banned them, and as you know, we won't discuss that with you, because that's not fair on them, it's really not that simple.

Behave, don't break the rules, and respect staff decisions and you won't have problems. It IS that simple.

Given that you don't know why we banned them, and as you know, we won't discuss that with you, because that's not fair on them, it's really not that simple.

Behave, don't break the rules, and respect staff decisions and you won't have problems. It IS that simple.

Oh please do me a Favour Dave, I know exactly what went on stop treating your user base like they are noobs you are being bloody insulting

Given that you don't know why we banned them, and as you know, we won't discuss that with you, because that's not fair on them, it's really not that simple.
I know why they where banned. In fact, I had no idea on what was going on until Neobond send me (and others) a PM. Fubar and the others here probably received the same or a similar PM.

Given that you don't know why we banned them, and as you know, we won't discuss that with you, because that's not fair on them, it's really not that simple.

Behave, don't break the rules, and respect staff decisions and you won't have problems. It IS that simple.

To be honest, talking to them, they don't know either. The last thing that happened was we were talking about Bear Grylls. The banter between ourselves doesn't deserve a permaban from the entire site.

To be honest, talking to them, they don't know either. The last thing that happened was we were talking about Bear Grylls. The banter between ourselves doesn't deserve a permaban from the entire site.

As an addition to this issue; I'm pretty sure one of the banned users had a 0% warn level prior to his permanent ban. I understand that there is a process to moderation on this site and on the irc, and I also understand that things have changed from when I was staff here. I don't understand what happened here and how the above happened.

I'm in that room everyday, watching the conversations and what happens; IRC was what I lived and breathed as staff, it is also where I spend a lot of time interacting with people from Neowin. I can understand that some people are far more out there than others and their behaviour crosses lines. At the same time I understand those people would not jeopardise being able to go to a place they enjoy.. given fair warning.

snipped.

Do you want me to go ahead and post the log of the conversations that followed you posting non tagged NSFW content? (until now, I avoided naming anyone out of courtesy)

We would have been ok with: "Sorry, I meant to PM it to neobond" or some unconvincing but very plausible excuse like that. But no, you ignored our complaints and a long standing Global Moderator started defending you calling us "immature" because we called you on it. I can post the log to see that we have been nothing but mature about it.

Unfortunately, it didn't stop there. A dev sets the channel to +m and basically told us to stfu, ignoring our questions and concerns. We would have been ok with that and a "Yeh, we talked about in #staff, and this won't occure again". No, said Dev pulled his frequent childish attitude again and told us to "be mature about it".

I can go on with this rambling, but point is, you have not being helpful nor understanding when we report stuff (through PM or in #neowin or using /report). Every staff from newsies to devs inconsistently enforces some mysterious rules and people get warned/banned for whatever reason said staff fancies.

You know from reading our rules that we do not discuss moderation with other users, as we usually say in response when we're asked about it.

As for developers and other members of staff moderating IRC, that's the way it always has been, and always will be, with the exception of News Posters. Developers run the IRC server, and as such, have always been granted the permission to step in where needed. Generally, I only step in when there aren't any supervisors around, and the moderators need someone higher up the chain to refer to. Often the best way to deal with things when a huge issue has sprung up that is preventing other talk in the channel, is to silence the channel while we deal with it. It prevents things being said that cause people's tempers to run high etc.

Let's just assume for a moment, as you're suggesting, that you're high up the rank the moderation queue (which technically, you are not), do you realize that your approach is down right insulting and immature? Every time you (personally) don't like a discussion (within the rules) you silence the channel and you start calling the lot of us "immature" and "kids".

Just because you run the servers doesn't mean you can moderate #neowin. You should not, because you are not part of it. You don't participate in the discussions, you are not familiar with the day to day events/incidents. You should stick to running the server. If you want to moderate the channel, get involved in it please.

I know you banned them without giving all three of them a reason....

They were all PMed when the bans were issued, if they had a problem with the reasoning, or didn't understand it, they could have just replied to the PM instead of (in some cases) creating further issues.

They were all PMed when the bans were issued, if they had a problem with the reasoning, or didn't understand it, they could have just replied to the PM instead of (in some cases) creating further issues.

Yeah i think you are clearly wrong here, Pandya Received No such thing Sam was on 0% warn and still got perma banned from both the Site and IRC so yeah keep telling yourself that mate :) oh and ive seen the logs of the convo between neobond and those involved and i can certainly tell you after they replied NOTHING was said from the staff just the perm bans

This is version of events,

1: Warned by Laura to stop trolling which they did

2:Biohazard hands out 10 day bans for three involved pretty much 5 mins after

3: they try to talk to said mod who handed out the bans but was told to refer it to higher up

4:fake twitter account created by some one blamed on one of the three with no proof

5:neobond started a Pm with people involved along with people who had nothing to do with events asking for input to what happened and how he can help

6:said three replied with very decent answers and very constructive criticism

7:**** take site started up mocking the actions of neowin staff and so on again blamed on either three with no proof

8:Staff Member of neowin staff entered another IRC server and started Calling everyone in the room Retards to which logs of this was posted to neobond in the PM

9:Perma Bans handed out without a reason given to any of the three involved

the fact that said banned members tired to do it the staffs way and getting a decent response to unfair bans and it fell on deaf ears is laughable, users notice this and started questioning the actions of the staff and we got stone walled saying we dont discuss this in public, im not surprised you dont not when you have a half arsed way of Modding an irc chatroom

You know from reading our rules that we do not discuss moderation with other users, as we usually say in response when we're asked about it.

You simply can not do that on IRC where people have over the years become long term friends with each other. If you had one of your IRL friendship group suddenly ejected by another guy for absolutely no reason you'd be pretty peeved and want a reason why it was done. Being told just to "deal with it" would enrage you even more.

You simply can not do that on IRC where people have over the years become long term friends with each other. If you had one of your IRL friendship group suddenly ejected by another guy for absolutely no reason you'd be pretty peeved and want a reason why it was done. Being told just to "deal with it" would enrage you even more.

Perhaps also somewhat relevantly, if they just get a bad attitude when they ask, they all move on to somewhere else as a big group. I'm not an IRC veteran but have been a regular for three years. It takes ages to establish channels and banning three regulars as they were undoes that overnight.

I can personally say I was put off from #neowin over the past few months. Due to the "trolling" of sorts, it was directed at a number of members and staff, me being one. I have seen a huge improvement in IRC over the past few weeks, and beginning to participate once again.

Many staff members on IRC do not actively participate in #neowin, but the staff operations are very much active. I would have to disagree with turning IRC into a staff-only feature, because I think a lot of members really enjoy chatting with other members. I've been an active member on IRC for two and a half years now, since first joining staff. I remember the first thing I did once I learned of being hired was jump on IRC.

I should also note that because staff members don't actively participate in #neowin, we are very active in the staff area. There are also a number of staff watching #neowin while we're doing others things aswell, so some members should take into account that some members of staff have been watching #neowin unfold to what it is today for a number of months, even years. Even if we aren't talking in #neowin, most are aware of issues going on in other channels.

snipped.

Since you made this about yourself, need I remind you that you are one of the staff who regularly were called out on piracy issues and simply brushed it away as nothing? You were also one of the staff who personally attacked people (calling them idiots and whatnot) and some of the people who called you out on this are the very ones that are now banned?

So the improvements you're talking about are a chat room where you get to personally attack people, admit to piracy, get away with it and ban anyone who uses memes you feel are directed against you?

Yeh, amazing improvements.

When you have majority of the active chatters in the irc chat room speaking out and saying something isnt right here.. and it just gets ignored even though we are told to let them know is just simply astonishing tbh

Your Modding of the IRC chatroom needs to be sorted once and for all so this entire farce doesn't happen in the first place, like i said you guys should undo the three bans that where simply far too draconian for what transpired.

When Laura warned them for trolling they stopped and thats where it should have been left not what transpired afterwards which to be totally frank it was the staffs own doing with the way they handle the bans, I can quite easily get the chatlogs from all three regarding their chat as to why they where being banned for ten days and let me tell you this... when you staff say its down to them to pm people involved they did and the reply they got was just plain rude and ignorant...

The harassment toward staff had been going on longer than I realised, the snide comments like "rounded corners", "traction" and "gaining traction" among others wouldn't on the outside appear to be warn or even bannable offenses, but it is trolling and it even came across as if members had finally found a way to get around the rules by doing it. Most staff members here are doing the work here voluntarily, and in their own free time. Why should they be a constant target of abuse too?

The Twitter accounts and Tumblr site existed before the bans were handed out, and were quite offensive, no-one should have to put up with it.

One staff member slips up and posts something NSFW in the #neowin channel and that staff member is jumped on. I've seen many more examples of members posting inappropriate content in #neowin and then apologizing for it, no action was taken? Action is taken when it appears to be intentional. As for discussion on warez, I still haven't got an example of that, unless you mean Windows 8?

Some members think their input or critique is ignored, thats totally false, we have a report button for comments and articles in our news and I can assure you each report is dealt with, including errors within articles.

Neowin is for the most part a hobby for most of our staff, who aren't actually professional journalists, we got pretty big on being unprofessional and just reporting what we saw, now we're trying to be semi-professional about the news (not copy/pasting from other sites) and there are correct ways to go about reporting issues, but that of course will never work for people who want to be in the vocal center of everything.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!