Apple Restricts Hard Drive Replacements on New iMacs


Recommended Posts

All iMacs and eMacs to date are a bitch to upgrade, none of them were unibody before so that's not the issue alone.

It actually used to be really easy to replace the HDD in an iMac G5. I would think that it'd certainly be possible to design it like that again, if upgradeability was a priority with Apple...

LOL.. good idea.. it's a $250 rip off for something you shouldn't need in the first place.

It's $169 USD (what, the cost of a good hard drive?), and I'd rather pay that and have three years of coverage, instead of paying through the nose for a replacement part that I have to put in myself via suction cups and a dust free room. I didn't get Apple Care when I bought my first iMac back in 2005, and when the logic board failed in 2007, it would have cost $1,000 just to for a new logicboard. I know hard drives run a lot cheaper, but the iMac was never designed to be serviced by the user, and I have no problem having Apple do it for me. And honestly, what typical user services their HP, Dell, Viao themselves? If the disk fails after the warranty period, I'll get a new computer and use my backup to restore it. I'd rather do that then invest time and money to fix it.

I would only consider Apple Care a rip off if I paid the $169, and they refused to fix my computer that broke within it's coverage period. From my experience, it's a great service. I sold my first iPhone to a friend of mine, and he noticed that the speaker wasn't very loud. So he called up Apple, and since it was still under its initial warranty, they had a new one on his door step the next day. I know people think warranties are rip-offs, but I'm the type that gets it for my high dollar purchases (Car, HVAC, TV, etc) because paid professionals would be a lot better and faster at it than I am. It also ends up being cheaper.

To all those saying "it's by design" -- yes, it is, but it's out of complete unnecessary greed. There's NO design benefit from this except to restrict people. It doesn't make the PC perform better and it doesn't help with space.

This is a really greedy decision by Apple, because 90% of Apple users will never touch the HDD, or even think of it. It's only the tech-enthusiasts who will. Why bother some of your most loyal customers who will probably buy more of their products in the future anyway?

There is a reason, it's called design. If you have an issue with it simply don't buy an iMac and quit your whining. Nobody is forcing you to buy one. Problem solved.

I wish I could +1 multiple times.

Is that your answer to everything, you sound like a petulant child. I dont HAVE to buy one i WANTED to buy one, as a consumer i will whine all i want despite the apologists defending Apple to the death.

Just saying "its called design" isnt an excuse, they could swap it so the motherboard was mounted to the LCD and had a latch or two on the back to give you access to memory, etc.. and still have 'design' and the fact that you think its acceptable and that you should have to buy Apple Care is disgusting.

Setting aside how small a marketshare Apple has compared to Microsoft, imagine Microsoft created a branded computer and made it so you could only install Microsoft Windows, had it locked up so tight that you risk damaging it if you wanted to replace any parts and if you could strip it without breaking it had propietary connectors and hardware that on every other PC is standardised so you could only buy them from Microsoft at an over inflated price and if you wanted to skip all that and get it easily repaired you are forced to buy Microsoft warranty???

Doesnt sound so good now does it, they would get an antitrust slapped against them faster than you could say i love steve jobs.

More Apple apologists, pretty sad how people will jump to Apples defense. Despite what you may think Apple doesnt care about you they only have their interests at heart. Hard Drives are user replaceable parts on pretty much every kind and make of computer out there........ except any Apple computers that is.

What I think is pathetic is when someone like yourself who runs Windows feels the need to post in the Mac section of a forum - if you're so happy with your purchase why do you feel the need to troll the Mac section and spew ignorance?

What I think is pathetic is when someone like yourself who runs Windows feels the need to post in the Mac section of a forum - if you're so happy with your purchase why do you feel the need to troll the Mac section and spew ignorance?

I see someone hasnt read the thread fully.

For the 3rd? 4th? time, i was saving up to get a Mac, i like Mac OSX, i like the hardware, i dont like Steve Jobs, i dont like Apples business practices, i dont like it when Apple makes their components propietary, i dont like the fact Apple chooses form over function.

If you wanted to spin it round.....

What i think is pathetic is when someone like yourself who runs OSX feels the need to post defending Apple against the evil Windows users - if you're so happy with your purchase why do you feel the need to defend Apple and spew ignorance?

It actually used to be really easy to replace the HDD in an iMac G5. I would think that it'd certainly be possible to design it like that again, if upgradeability was a priority with Apple...

Yeah, I had the newer iMac G5 in mind. The rev A and B were relatively easy. They were also relatively less powerful, less feature packed and pretty fat compared to today's iMacs. You win some, you loose some... ;)

Is that your answer to everything, you sound like a petulant child. I dont HAVE to buy one i WANTED to buy one, as a consumer i will whine all i want despite the apologists defending Apple to the death.

Just saying "its called design" isnt an excuse, they could swap it so the motherboard was mounted to the LCD and had a latch or two on the back to give you access to memory, etc.. and still have 'design' and the fact that you think its acceptable and that you should have to buy Apple Care is disgusting.

Setting aside how small a marketshare Apple has compared to Microsoft, imagine Microsoft created a branded computer and made it so you could only install Microsoft Windows, had it locked up so tight that you risk damaging it if you wanted to replace any parts and if you could strip it without breaking it had propietary connectors and hardware that on every other PC is standardised so you could only buy them from Microsoft at an over inflated price and if you wanted to skip all that and get it easily repaired you are forced to buy Microsoft warranty???

Doesnt sound so good now does it, they would get an antitrust slapped against them faster than you could say i love steve jobs.

They wouldn't get slapped with an antitrust lawsuit, because, realistically (or as realistic as you can get in your crazy, hyperbolic hypothetical situation), Microsoft probably wouldn't be enjoying 80+% of the market?and we'd probably have a lot more OS competition (which, honestly, might have been a good thing).

You're also throwing the whole thing way out of proportion. Design decisions to slim down products have consequences. Get over yourself. If you want Apple to make the machine fatter by adding extra space for antennas, mounting brackets, etc. so that you can **** around inside the machine as you please then send them feedback, but calling them totalitarian is ridiculous.

Is that your answer to everything, you sound like a petulant child. I dont HAVE to buy one i WANTED to buy one, as a consumer i will whine all i want despite the apologists defending Apple to the death.

Just saying "its called design" isnt an excuse, they could swap it so the motherboard was mounted to the LCD and had a latch or two on the back to give you access to memory, etc.. and still have 'design' and the fact that you think its acceptable and that you should have to buy Apple Care is disgusting.

Again, read the thread: For the last time I don't agree at all with this change, but continuously complaining about it here isn't constructive either. Adding latches and whatnot isn't Apple's style and you know it. Of course it's technically possible, I'm not disputing that, but it would have an impact on the minimalistic style of the product. At this point you sound like a spoiled kid who doesn't get his way, blowing the whole thing out of proportion. If you can't deal with the changes being made you'll have to look for a different computer, simple as that. We've established by now the iMac isn't for you, others simply don't care as much about the issues you have with Apple's design. Nobody here, myself included, can help you with your problem. Time to move on and look for a different Mac/PC or suck it up.

This is why is always good idea to buy an Apple Care Support.

OR maybe buying into a different brand would be a cheaper and less angering alternative. I don't think I will give Apple anymore of my money. They keep creating business opportunities for themselves at the expense of my wallet and I am sick of playing this stupid game. I am going to buy into a serious company from now on that has a solid business model instead of the Apple model of pinching money from every possible angle. I want to be able to replace my own battery in devices and now HDD's etc. They build computers that are intended to be kept at most 2 years and then they expect you to buy a new one well I have learned my lesson with my MacBook Pro. Adios!

Your post really shows the kind of mentality that Apple thrives on. Oh you can't do it yourself anymore BUT if you spend $200 on warranty you could have US do it for you. ALl you have to do is lug that heavy iMac down to the Apple store, hold onto the heavy thing while waiting for the 10 customers ahead of you who are incapable of syncing their iPod to iTunes and are taking forever and then in a few hours it will be done. BUT oh wait, if you simply want an upgrade then pay us 400$ for the 160GB drive and we'll install it for you............................OR you could allow us to do it ourselves in 5 mins., in the comfort of our own homes with a 2TB HDD which costs 100$

LOL.. good idea.. it's a $250 rip off for something you shouldn't need in the first place.

AppleCare Protection Plan for the iMac costs $169, even less with an educational discount. Check your facts next time.

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • How is everyone doing? My hobbies are gaming, sports (netball, tennis) and going to the gym. I also love cooking. Where are you guys from?
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!