Just how many people hate Windows 8?


Recommended Posts

Personally I really like Windows 8. It's undeniable that the OS itself (putting aside the polarising Metro interface for a moment) is superior to Windows 7. It boots quicker, loads apps quicker, and uses less system resources out of the box. This is all undisputable fact.

From my perspective, for the reasons above, PC enthusiasts would be fools not to adopt it. Why deny yourselves the aforementioned OS improvements just because you don't like Metro? Hell, you are the most able to avoid Metro, what with all the myriad of tweaks out there both free and paid. I'm at the desktop on my desktop most of the time, though I have ModernMix installed so I can use the Netflix and Email apps (for simplicity and speed, Mail app opens faster than Outlook ever did) from there.

For the average guy on the street, your "mum and dad" or example... Windows 8 has a bit of a problem. For the average computer illiterate person who is used to using Windows 7 or earlier, if you take that interace away and give them Windows 8 without any tutoring or hand holding, they are of course going to balk at it. It's not surprising and is completely understandable. Microsoft did a **** poor job of educating people on the changes.

Now for me, I spent the time installing Windows 8 onto my Dad's PC... showing him where everything was, how all the apps worked, how to get back to start, how to share things between apps, how to switch between apps, and where the shutdown option was (I made him a shutdown tile for ease), etc. You want to know what he said after I'd finished showing it to him and answering a few questions....? "That's very good. Everything I need is right there. And it's much quicker than it was before.". This by the way was after I'd let him have a play by himself for an hour, because as you know you remember stuff better when you figure it out yourself. He'd already figured out how to launch apps, get back to start, bring out the charms bar, and to toggle the most recent two apps, I just showed him the rest.

So my opinion is this... instead of projecting your own negativity onto those "average users" to ensure that they hate it... spend a little time holding their hand through the rough parts (and I don't deny there are some rough parts here and there), and you might actually find that the Windows 8 interface actual does suit the average user who just browses the web, sernds some emails, and does some shopping. My average user Dad certainly now agrees.

that the Windows 8 interface actual does suit the average user who just browses the web, sernds some emails, and does some shopping. My average user Dad certainly now agrees.

this is exactly the reason I hate it.

because its taking a leaf out of the apple book of lets dumb down everything so it just "Works for the masses"

so as a user who has multiple programs open, with heavy reliance on mouse, dual monitor setup etc. windows 8 is pathetic for the desktop.

Touch is far from a fad. There are many benefits to having a touch UI. A more dynamic UX is one of them. I yearn for a more dynamic computing experience, and Metro is delivering just that. It's 2013, to suffer through a bland, static UX is insane, computers can do and offer so much more, but we'll never get there cling on to an old paradigm. It's not 1995 anymore, the computer has matured, and now it's time for the next level.

Many of you want to claim ergonomics, but grasping a mouse isn't as ergonomic as you may think either, nor is sitting down, and being sedentary but many here claim they do anyway. Touch offers a new way to interact with our data and our machines, ways the mouse will never offer.

Then again your name is "Dot Touch is the Future Matrix"

I'm a power user that uses Windows all day with lots of windows open and generally gets stuff done. Touch is OK for casual use but to my utter amazement I found that the mouse actually does still work as it did before!

I'd heartedly recommend it. (Y)

touch is great for portable devices and kiosks. I had to write a 20 page paper on optics for my physics final. I could never imagine having to do all that work on a touch screen. Touch will never be nearly as accurate and precise as a real key stroke and I could never imagine doing all notes and MLA crap and sourcing on touch either. and software programming.. with all the special characters required. What a pain in the ass. "Touch" and all the other "natural" inputs that they keep trying to develop are basically toys and never measure up to real buttons.

Just look at gaming.

Wii's controls are just wailing your arms around hoping that it got your input correct

Kinect's voice recognition is a hit or miss experience as well as flailing your arms and legs at the camera

Move is just the same.

so yeah. "natural inputs" are really in alpha stage of development but being sold as complete products when they aren't. I don't think most people would stand for a mouse or keyboard that sometime got a keystroke right and sometimes not. Why should we accept it from these technologies?

Agree with everything except Xbox Kinect's "Voice Recognition" is awesomely accurate in my experience. Having said that, if a controller or my universal remote that does my xbox too is nearby I grab it. It's faster to use it than voice in almost all instances. I use voice if I can't quickly find a controller or the remote.

this is exactly the reason I hate it.

because its taking a leaf out of the apple book of lets dumb down everything so it just "Works for the masses"

so as a user who has multiple programs open, with heavy reliance on mouse, dual monitor setup etc. windows 8 is pathetic for the desktop.

Funny then that dual monitor support is actually one of those undeniable superiorities that I mentioned. As someone who is clearly well versed in using a computer, it's astonishing that you seem to believe that Windows 8 is just the touch-centric Metro interface. There is a desktop underneith you know, that can be made to function identically to Windows 7, but with the benefits of Windows 8 if you so desire.

If you somehow believe that on a desktop you are forced to stay at the Metro interface, and can't actually use the PC identically to how you used it in Windows 7. then perhaps it's not Windows 8 that is pathetic.

That's business 101, bro.

If that's your business model and volume has always been Microsoft's model. I wouldn't mind if they brought back the Workstation distinction and workstation allowed GPO settings to disable Start Page and Modern UI Search. But, alas, I can do that for $5 with Start8. I guess that's why I'm OK with Windows 8 :) except for the apps.

You know what would be hilarious? If Apple released an awesome iTunes for Modern UI to sync iPhones and iPads and Microsoft still had no Modern UI equivalent.

Personally I really like Windows 8. It's undeniable that the OS itself (putting aside the polarising Metro interface for a moment) ... snip

Well said. I wouldn't push anyone "to" Windows 8, myself, but I certainly wouldn't push them away. Unless:

They Sync music with Zune or are just heavy Zune users if they have a WP8.

For the type of users you're talking about, I actually think Windows 8 would encourage more use even if they just Web Browse, Facebook, Tweet, and Email. And a whole lot of people just do that. In fact, many can't even do that easily with Windows 7 or XP specially if their PC was loaded with shovelware when they got it. Their PCs typically collect dust and viruses (XP).

this is exactly the reason I hate it.

because its taking a leaf out of the apple book of lets dumb down everything so it just "Works for the masses"

so as a user who has multiple programs open, with heavy reliance on mouse, dual monitor setup etc. windows 8 is pathetic for the desktop.

If that's why you hate it get Star8 or one of the free Star Menu replacements that allow you to boot to Desktop.

People do not see the improvement in Windows 8, and in fact, many see areas of regression. Something Windows has never done in the past.

Well, one would say that the majority DO see the great improvements, and the minority are simply wrong and stifling creativity and forward thinking.

There will always be the ones that never see 'enough' improvement, or want to keep the old. One day, they will be forced to change.

I'm a power user that uses Windows all day with lots of windows open and generally gets stuff done. Touch is OK for casual use but to my utter amazement I found that the mouse actually does still work as it did before!

I'd heartedly recommend it. (Y)

Seriously? There are still things that you can click on?

This must be an April Fool's joke.

i love it - used win 8 since dev preview.

my wife on the other hand despised it initially when i installed it on her laptop.shes not the most technologically inclined but now she loves it and even defends it when her friends and/or family talk bad about the metro aspect of it lol.

...but now she loves it and even defends it when her friends and/or family talk bad about the metro aspect of it lol.

the fact that this even comes up in conversations with friends and/or family means that Microsoft did it's job right. I have used windows since wayyyyy back when, and never have I had conversations with friends and family members about any other version other then 'yeah, check out the new OS'. Now, I have older family members asking specifics, what is really different, what about this boxes on the screen, etc.

Win, imo.

  • Like 1

Maybe because I use desktop, I like large keypad and dislike laptop.

Maybe because I use the keyboard more than the mouse, shortcut keys facilitate me use the computer.

Maybe because I like my icons where I find it easier to use them in place and I'm used to for 17 years.

and certainly because I use a 47-inch screen as a monitor, sitting on my sofa with my wireless keyboard and mouse, so I use windows 8 but configured to look like XP.

My tablet runs android, motorola xoom, but if I had a surface probably i will like to use it.

Sorry for my bad english, it is not my native language

Well, one would say that the majority DO see the great improvements, and the minority are simply wrong and stifling creativity and forward thinking.

There will always be the ones that never see 'enough' improvement, or want to keep the old. One day, they will be forced to change.

It's not that they don't see improvement, it's that the regression or just the new things that irk the way they work are not outweighed for them by those improvements. Trust me, if the Modern UI Music, Video, and Calendar apps were just awesome, many who shun it for a lot of these annoyances would put up with it. We all know there's annoyances and room for improvement, it's a personal matter of what outweighs what. Letting MS know their dissatisfaction will result in some changes. How much is iffy. MS has gone down a road they can't retreat much from now.

Sales say otherwise.

And if that continues things will change. I mean look how early we are in 8's lifecycle and already people are talking more about Blue and 9. That speaks volumes.

Ever play Shadow Complex on XBLA? Dude if that was a Windows 8 exclusive ... Microsoft on the consumer in just ain't cool right now. They need to hire some cooler dudes or something. MS' own Full House Poker. Bizzare's Geometry Wars.

And sadly to say, the iOS Lync app is slicker than the Windows 8 for Desktop and Surface. How did that happen?

i love it - used win 8 since dev preview.

my wife on the other hand despised it initially when i installed it on her laptop.shes not the most technologically inclined but now she loves it and even defends it when her friends and/or family talk bad about the metro aspect of it lol.

Cool avatar :D I've already stolen it and made an icon. Long live Explorer UI, context menus, taskbar, and MDI.

Afro Dude II.ico

Personally I like it...

But:

My only complaints....

the left corner there should be a little more room where they placed the IE to click the start... sometimes I accidentally click on the IE instead of start...

Second was trying to get to the settings you want... (however creating the GOD MODE folder and pinning that to the start menu fixed that) (or using the search)

My wife says she does not like it... that she can't get used to it.

i like it but:

1. no easy way to pin apps, always have to right click and "show all apps"

2. metro apps on a 27" screen... i like to have more than 1 app open for, for example, comparing things

Right now you can 2 apps split 70%-30%, but with blue this summer you can have up to 4 side by side at arbitrary sizes. To do this, click at the top of the screen (mouse should turn into a hand) and drag down and sideways to the side of the screen. If you drag the app all the way you can close the app. This works with touch as well, swipe in from the top to about halfway and then slide your finger to the side.

  • Like 2

And if that continues things will change. I mean look how early we are in 8's lifecycle and already people are talking more about Blue and 9. That speaks volumes.

If sales don't improve after Blue is released I think we will see some changes.

I mean look how early we are in 8's lifecycle and already people are talking more about Blue and 9. That speaks volumes.

That tells me that people want something new, hoping MS listens to people's complaints and addresses their issues with Win 8.

Don't know...haven't had much of a chance to count them. If you have the time, be my guest, but I have a life....and I intend to keep it instead of taking a census. Good luck OP. (I still love ya though!)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!