Recommended Posts

For the later arrivals, here's a mini-FAQ of sorts -

1. While Heart of the Swarm is an *expansion/extension* of the Starcraft II series, it does NOT require Wings of Liberty to be installed first.

2. If you HAVE Wings of Liberty installed and up to date, Heart of the Swarm will use the same client; however, if your client is outdated, installing HotS will update your client as well. (This also applies to the Starter Edition.)

3. Other than client updates and a new skin, Starter Edition is largely unchanged. It still includes the same *teaser* of the WoL campaign - it does NOT include any missions from HotS..

4. All versions (including Starter Edition) include access to Arcade Mode - the various minigames based on the Starcraft II engine.

Oddly enough, the game actually crashed to the desktop for me. My screen froze but I was still able to talk to my cousin via voice chat. On his end, it showed that I was dropping from the game but on my end... I didn't see anything at all. I've played Wings of Liberty before the launch of Heart of the Swarm and it has never crashed like this for me. :/

very smooth gameplay so far (most likely due to the fact it is an expansion set rather than a full new game) Loving the new missions it feels fresh. I am also impressed with how smoothly the digital upgrade went. Just signed in and it streams each mission as they begin without me having to download a huge chunk to get started. load times for missions are about 30 seconds do to the downloads though. but the game is fantastic so far. It feels more polished than WoL did.

Did anyone watch the MLG this weekend? Looks like balance-wise we're returning to some of the earlier issues in WoL, namely reapers seem overpowered early game vs Zerg. Zerg had a 30% win rate during the tournament, with the notable exception of Life who just stomped everyone.

Anyhow I'm overall quite excited with the changes in HoTS which should make the game more dynamic and fun to watch. Faster mutas and heavily nerfed infestors will mean more fast-moving harass and less careful positional play. Medivacs were made much more agile to offset that, which should mean more drop play (as opposed to slow-moving tank-thor based armies). The redesigned reaper and the mothership core give terran and protoss interesting new harass options early game. Faster hydras will also mean a more dynamic late game vs protoss, at least I hope so. Late game ZvP was the least dynamic thing imaginable in WoL so it wouldn't be hard to improve on that. :p

It's of course very difficult to balance for early game harass units as the lack of information at that point can lead to rock-paper-scissor dynamics where if a player chooses the wrong build it's an auto-loss. It'll be interesting to see how balance evolves over the following months, but the pessisimist in me predict fairly one-sided competitions until the dust settles.

  • 3 weeks later...

Did anyone watch the MLG this weekend? Looks like balance-wise we're returning to some of the earlier issues in WoL, namely reapers seem overpowered early game vs Zerg. Zerg had a 30% win rate during the tournament, with the notable exception of Life who just stomped everyone.

Anyhow I'm overall quite excited with the changes in HoTS which should make the game more dynamic and fun to watch. Faster mutas and heavily nerfed infestors will mean more fast-moving harass and less careful positional play. Medivacs were made much more agile to offset that, which should mean more drop play (as opposed to slow-moving tank-thor based armies). The redesigned reaper and the mothership core give terran and protoss interesting new harass options early game. Faster hydras will also mean a more dynamic late game vs protoss, at least I hope so. Late game ZvP was the least dynamic thing imaginable in WoL so it wouldn't be hard to improve on that. :p

It's of course very difficult to balance for early game harass units as the lack of information at that point can lead to rock-paper-scissor dynamics where if a player chooses the wrong build it's an auto-loss. It'll be interesting to see how balance evolves over the following months, but the pessisimist in me predict fairly one-sided competitions until the dust settles.

And there is now something NEW that you have to start planning around - weather as a battlefield condition.

Until the beginning of the SC II cycle, the biggest differences between maps/battlefields were presence/absences of resources or staging areas, obstacles - that sort of thing. Weather was not a worry - neither was the environment, really.

Wings of Liberty brought environmental hazards to maps; now Heart of the Swarm does the same with weather hazards (initially, extreme cold). I shudder to think what will happen when community mapmakers get the weather mutators to play with.

And what about maps with environment AND weather nastiness? Possible? Heck - it's LIKELY, now that HoTS is out. Some units will thrive in certain weather extremes, but fail otherwise - for other units, the reverse is true.

Start thinking like a real sandbox general - unit mix is about to get critical all over again - just not for the usual reasons.

Wings of Liberty brought environmental hazards to maps; now Heart of the Swarm does the same with weather hazards (initially, extreme cold). I shudder to think what will happen when community mapmakers get the weather mutators to play with.

And what about maps with environment AND weather nastiness? Possible? Heck - it's LIKELY, now that HoTS is out. Some units will thrive in certain weather extremes, but fail otherwise - for other units, the reverse is true.

That's an interesting thought. I highly doubt time-based weather events would make it into the ladder pool, but perhaps a perpetual freezing zone could make sense.
  • 1 month later...

That's an interesting thought. I highly doubt time-based weather events would make it into the ladder pool, but perhaps a perpetual freezing zone could make sense.

Not perpetual; however, time-based weather nastiness is a real possibility for mapmaking (that is what is shown in the first cold-weather map in HotS, in fact). *brrrrrr*

I'm having a different problem though - I'm trying to get through the "Leggo my Eggo" campaign mission (Char) in HotS. (I'm actually concentrating on the campaign, instead of sticking strictly to skirmish, like I did with Wings of Liberty, and I'm paying for it now - I have no real experience playing Zerg, and "Eggo" is Z v. Z.)

How have some of you tackled this nasty piece of work? (There are three objectives - collect 100 eggs before your opponent, make sure they CAN'T collect 100 eggs at all, and take down the Infested Command Centers.)

I'm having a different problem though - I'm trying to get through the "Leggo my Eggo" campaign mission (Char) in HotS. (I'm actually concentrating on the campaign, instead of sticking strictly to skirmish, like I did with Wings of Liberty, and I'm paying for it now - I have no real experience playing Zerg, and "Eggo" is Z v. Z.)
You mean Domination? Rule of thumb, start all missions by looking for nearby expansions, and take them asap. Zerg is worthless on one base. Once you saturate these bases with drones and constantly pour all your money on reinforcements, you should have well enough units to beat any mission fairly easily even on Brutal. Case in point, there's a small expansion to the right of your starting location in this one.

I don't remember that one presenting much of a challenge; IIRC you should ignore the command centers until you have a large army and can easily deal with whatever Zagara throws at you. Zerglings are incredibly mobile so stay on the move constantly, you can basically be everywhere at once with zerg and that's the main strength of the race.

I'm in the same boat. I've yet to pick it up.....I've kinda moved on out of highly competitive gaming due to my wife and son as I like to put in 100% effort when I focus on something and I don't want to neglect them. I sold off my gaming computer, but I'm thinking of building a new one, not sure yet when that will happen.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hi all. I have a seven year old Acer laptop which according to Acer website can't receive the new MS updates. This device lives in my bedroom and is purely a consumption device. No gaming, no nothing. I have followed online instructions and turned off secure boot which now gives me a green tick in W11 Security. Now, I have MWB Premium now for several years and I'm reasonably careful with my online activity with this laptop. I'm also not a gamer in any way so I'm not asking much from this laptop. Given that, am I safe to continue using this device given I've turned off secure boot? That's it, that's my question.
    • finally [Taskbar] Taskbar customization just got easier. As we continue to make improvements to the Taskbar experience mentioned last month, we've introduced a dedicated Taskbar Size setting, making it simpler to find, understand, and personalize your ideal taskbar experience.
    • Let me get this straight... It was a web interface for Gmail, so if privacy at Google wasn't concerning enough you'd be going through two companies. And their big feature was the very thing that would make people consider dumping Gmail.
    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!