E3 2011: Microsoft Press Conference


Recommended Posts

For those of you who didn't see the conference, here it is summed up: nsTRA.gif

Yeah to bad Kinect stuff was less than 50% of their presentation though, not by much, but still slightly below half. with about the same percentage for other non kinect games, or non kinect games with kinect capability, and the new dash filling up the remaning.

I understand their point that Mass Effect 3 could also be done using a headset, but it's not. So why they wouldn't like that ability I don't understand.

No it couldn't really. Well yeah it could, but then they would have to write a full API and library for voice commands, noise separation, Voice recognition and so on themselves. And then they also wouldn't have the capabilities of the kinect microphone that suprasses that of the headset, and you would have to be annoyed by the annoying headset wire.

meanwhile Kinect is plug and play for them, it does voice detection, voice recognition, library for voice commands, and plug and play for recognizing custom commands, like they are doing.

For them adding in their own support for voice commands without Kinect would cost a LOT of money, and it wouldn't be as good.

Again, and for the millionth time, these are optional controls, use them if you want or just use the damn controller. It seems people can't get their head around this at all. What part of "optional" don't you all get? If anything Sony has "ramed" the move into more "core" games at this point.

If you are saying it for a millionth time then you are sounding like a broken record and missing the point. I explicitly stated the ME3 kinect integration was optional which was a GOOD thing in addition to that the kinect integration within forza that had hit a sweet spot with the head tracking. Kinect is being rammed into almost everything and they are pushing it too hard. Destroying franchises like fable (its not optional in Fable). The new one looked ridiculous. There is no concrete evidence to show that Kinect integration has been omitted altogether from GoW3 however I think CliffyB and the GoW team and intelligent enough to not include it. It is possible that there maybe a kinect specific mode but full on kinect integration I do not see happening, its a game for core gamers, as for MW3 again not enough details have been given about it IW may include it or may not, its best if they don't it just wont feel right in a CoD game.

Kinect should supplement games like the above 2 examples, the option to play the game conventionally should always be there unless we are talking about kinect specific games.

Ryse and Kinect Star Wars seem the same to me just set in different time lines and contexts, even though I am a really big star wars fan I think I will give Kinect Star Wars a miss.

Ghost Recon looked awesome with Kinect, I mentioned this before but I guess you didn't bother to read it. It works well in some situations not all.

As for the comment about move well I really do not care about Move, I own one and I think its rubbish compared to the kinect the games shown at the Sony E3 conference did not entice me that were Move titles. The medieval title that was shown was diabolical.

Microsoft does have some say in where kinect gets integrated, it can put pressure on Developers to integrate it Sony did the same with Bioshock Infinite.

If you are saying it for a millionth time then you are sounding like a broken record and missing the point. I explicitly stated the ME3 kinect integration was optional which was a GOOD thing in addition to that the kinect integration within forza that had hit a sweet spot with the head tracking. Kinect is being rammed into almost everything and they are pushing it too hard. Destroying franchises like fable (its not optional in Fable). The new one looked ridiculous. There is no concrete evidence to show that Kinect integration has been omitted altogether from GoW3 however I think CliffyB and the GoW team and intelligent enough to not include it. It is possible that there maybe a kinect specific mode but full on kinect integration I do not see happening, its a game for core gamers, as for MW3 again not enough details have been given about it IW may include it or may not, its best if they don't it just wont feel right in a CoD game.

Kinect should supplement games like the above 2 examples, the option to play the game conventionally should always be there unless we are talking about kinect specific games.

Ryse and Kinect Star Wars seem the same to me just set in different time lines and contexts, even though I am a really big star wars fan I think I will give Kinect Star Wars a miss.

Ghost Recon looked awesome with Kinect, I mentioned this before but I guess you didn't bother to read it. It works well in some situations not all.

As for the comment about move well I really do not care about Move, I own one and I think its rubbish compared to the kinect the games shown at the Sony E3 conference did not entice me that were Move titles. The medieval title that was shown was diabolical.

Microsoft does have some say in where kinect gets integrated, it can put pressure on Developers to integrate it Sony did the same with Bioshock Infinite.

Your argument about it destroying franchises doesn't stick at all. If they had originally smacked it into fable3 and you had to use it then sure I'd agree, but the new fable kinect game has nothing to do with a future fable 4, it's a different team in the end and who cares if it shares the same name and takes place in the same universe? What's the big deal here? If you don't like it don't get it, it's got little effect on the core Fable RPG game, it's just a spinoff.

People are moaning how adding it to core games is a gimmic, so when they make specific games for it that aren't that kiddy it's now trashing franchises? WTF? It seems that regardless of how it's used, as a optional interactive way or as the base for a full game theres something to bitch about out of this.

Agree with some but not all. ME3 kinect feature is optional it retains the ability to play the old fashioned way.

Ryse was basically Kinect Star Wars but set in Roman times :laugh: with some different moves looked not so good and probably will not take off. I think people are and will get sick of kinect this and that, they are over doing it pushing it in anything and everything which will be its downfall.

As someone has already mentioned kinect works great and complements some games in some situations such as forza but it seems Microsoft's philosophy is to ram it into every game almost now.

Ryse looks like Kinect Star Wars? Could've fooled me. :blink:

Anyone got a good video link? The ones I keep finding are either 360/480p or they have horrible artifacting. I checked the thread for links but it seems there are none for a full recording of the conference.

Anyone?

Your argument about it destroying franchises doesn't stick at all. If they had originally smacked it into fable3 and you had to use it then sure I'd agree, but the new fable kinect game has nothing to do with a future fable 4, it's a different team in the end and who cares if it shares the same name and takes place in the same universe? What's the big deal here? If you don't like it don't get it, it's got little effect on the core Fable RPG game, it's just a spinoff.

People are moaning how adding it to core games is a gimmic, so when they make specific games for it that aren't that kiddy it's now trashing franchises? WTF? It seems that regardless of how it's used, as a optional interactive way or as the base for a full game theres something to bitch about out of this.

you know, it's kind of like how Fable Coin Golf is ruining his Fable :)

Nope. There haven't even been any HD streaming ones to begin with, just 480p or so, so I very seriously doubt you'll find an HD recording.

The Microsoft Presspass stream was streaming 720p I believe... only 3MBP/S but still good enough (If they can manage to stream 1080p at 5MBP/S I'm sure 3 is enough for 720p) :p

Nope. There haven't even been any HD streaming ones to begin with, just 480p or so, so I very seriously doubt you'll find an HD recording.

I found them last year, strange that this year there are none to be found...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!