Recommended Posts

does anyone else think that this version of the game just does not have the allure of the second game?

does for me. black ops online sucked after a while. treyarch can never figure out how to do online like infinity ward can unless it's zombies.

does for me. black ops online sucked after a while. treyarch can never figure out how to do online like infinity ward can unless it's zombies.

You're forgetting that the infinity ward that made the games you like doesn't exist anymore. It's Infinity Ward only in name.

  • Like 1

You're forgetting that the infinity ward that made the games you like doesn't exist anymore. It's Infinity Ward only in name.

not really, a lot of the original guys are still there. whoever didn't stay got replaced with sledgehammer guys. we'll see what happens though.

Personally, I'm looking forward to seeing what the new group can do. Considering how awful MW2's multiplayer was and how mediocre the Treyarch installments are, I always thought that the franchise's multiplayer could benefit from a new set of eyes.

Nice. That new flag mode is looking pretty similar to Team Oddball from Halo (which I'm sure was taken from some other game long ago) which I was never a fan of, but I'll try anything once.

Truthfully, I'll probably end up spending the majority of my time in Team Deathmatch and Search & Destroy again :).

Nice. That new flag mode is looking pretty similar to Team Oddball from Halo (which I'm sure was taken from some other game long ago) which I was never a fan of, but I'll try anything once.

Truthfully, I'll probably end up spending the majority of my time in Team Deathmatch and Search & Destroy again :).

yeah it's definitely like odd ball. i like the claim your kill thing though, puts a twist on team deathmatch that'll make it more competitive.

yeah it's definitely like odd ball. i like the claim your kill thing though, puts a twist on team deathmatch that'll make it more competitive.

That should be pretty good. Hopefully it encourages some more direct gunfights, as opposed to sniping and killstreak rampaging (not that there's anything necessarily wrong with those two things, but a change of pace is always nice). Though I can see that "kill confirmed!" voice getting annoying in a hurry :laugh: .

I really like the capture and run the flag thing.

And kill confirmed and denied will definetely put a sense of immersiveness in the matches.

One question though, if anyone knows the answer:

You kill a guy and didn't confirmed the kill, will it still be added as +1 in your stats or you must confirm the kill to register it?

looks good..

looks GOOOOOOD tongue.gif

conan style..

but then again

why arent the competing with BF3?? the graphics look so outdated.. Also the rest of it feels pretty much the same as MW2. I think the are just sticking to the winning formula

It's unfair to use these trailers to talk about the graphics since those trailers where on a console and not on a pc, since consoles are outdated atm compared to high end pc's they are forced to keep the same quality because those consoles just can't do any better then that(on bf3 they screwed the fps 50% lower, thats also not a good idea...)

So we should have to compare desktop versiosn when it's out on high end pc's before we can say anything about that.

It's unfair to use these trailers to talk about the graphics since those trailers where on a console and not on a pc, since consoles are outdated atm compared to high end pc's they are forced to keep the same quality because those consoles just can't do any better then that(on bf3 they screwed the fps 50% lower, thats also not a good idea...)

So we should have to compare desktop versiosn when it's out on high end pc's before we can say anything about that.

*facepalm*

Dude.

That is, literally, the same engine the same HUD and even the same goddamn font as MW2

I really like the capture and run the flag thing.

And kill confirmed and denied will definetely put a sense of immersiveness in the matches.

One question though, if anyone knows the answer:

You kill a guy and didn't confirmed the kill, will it still be added as +1 in your stats or you must confirm the kill to register it?

the kill confirm points go to your entire team, not just you. you still get the +1 for killing the guy, but you won't get the bonus points. whoever picks up the tags teams gets them and you may get a bonus for denying a kill confirm. they explained it on their live stream they did with IGN. the livestream was sweet, the game looks awesome.

It's unfair to use these trailers to talk about the graphics since those trailers where on a console and not on a pc, since consoles are outdated atm compared to high end pc's they are forced to keep the same quality because those consoles just can't do any better then that(on bf3 they screwed the fps 50% lower, thats also not a good idea...)

So we should have to compare desktop versiosn when it's out on high end pc's before we can say anything about that.

imma go out on a limb and say BF3 is going to look better. though CoD main focus has always been getting the game optimized as possible to get it running at 60fps, they care about that more then graphics.

Better then BF3 with a waaaaaay too low fps...

Yes I agree that more than half of gamers out there cannot afford a setup to play every game on ULTRA but here's the thing.

Every now and then, a game should be released which pushes the PC specs to the limit. It was Crysis before then came Metro 2033 and now BF 3.

If we don't get these kind of demanding games then what is the point of upgrading your PC? What is the point of producing new GPUs and CPUs?

Today, we need more and more of these kind of games so that new hardware comes to the market at affordable prices and more and more people, who care about PC, buy it. This is the only way PC gaming will survive.

If you are just releasing a new game with the same old engine, then their isn't a point.

Played some SP. Not impressed at all. With the exception of a couple cool set-piece moments, it's really nothing to brag about.

It's constant Michael Bay music blaring and gun-fire everywhere. Just hurry-up hurry-up orders given to keep you from sitting around long enough to notice how bland the experience really is.

It really doesn't feel like a new game in the very least. A hefty X-pack at best.

Seems FPShooters have reached their limits as far as diversifying the SP experience goes.

They all really are starting to feel exactly the same.

Yes I agree that more than half of gamers out there cannot afford a setup to play every game on ULTRA but here's the thing.

Every now and then, a game should be released which pushes the PC specs to the limit. It was Crysis before then came Metro 2033 and now BF 3.

If we don't get these kind of demanding games then what is the point of upgrading your PC? What is the point of producing new GPUs and CPUs?

Today, we need more and more of these kind of games so that new hardware comes to the market at affordable prices and more and more people, who care about PC, buy it. This is the only way PC gaming will survive.

If you are just releasing a new game with the same old engine, then their isn't a point.

to be fair though, there is a crap load of games out there, AAA ones that sell amazingly well, that use old engines. just because the engine is old doesn't mean it's bad. it's about what you can do with it. that's like saying an last gen amg or lambo engine is bad when mclaren and audi use them on new cars.

Played some SP. Not impressed at all. With the exception of a couple cool set-piece moments, it's really nothing to brag about.

It's constant Michael Bay music blaring and gun-fire everywhere. Just hurry-up hurry-up orders given to keep you from sitting around long enough to notice how bland the experience really is.

It really doesn't feel like a new game in the very least. A hefty X-pack at best.

Seems FPShooters have reached their limits as far as diversifying the SP experience goes.

They all really are starting to feel exactly the same.

stupid xbox's always get the leaks first...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!