Windows 8 8220 x64 Screens Leaked :D


Recommended Posts

youre right - it's just that the 'new' feature in Windows 8 doesnt apply to me. so im still trying to figure out why i might need Windows 8 :laugh:

It washes your dishes for you?.... lol :D jk. How about the idea of having the information that you need at a glance (without needing to open programs right away)?

You know what I find funny - I remember when Windows 2000 came out, it was seen as the ultimate operating system for the hard core Windows user then Windows XP came out and it was ridiculed by 'had core Windows users' as being merely 'fisher price' GUI and how it was only a pretty face and nothing serious. Windows Vista came out and these same people said that Windows XP was absolutely awesome then suddenly a year or so later these same people said that Windows Vista had matured and that the bashing (of course that *THEY* never did *rolls eyes*) were by uninformed people. Same thing for Windows 7 and I'll promise you that the same thing will happen with Windows 8.

Want to know what is pathetic - the fact that people are making a value judgement based on a incomplete customer preview not quite beta version of a project still in progress and concluding that based on a few screen shots that what they see will be the final product. Every time I see some posts here I die a little inside.

I was one of those people who knocked Windows XP upon release and it's something i say till this day. Windows 2000 was a lot better than Windows XP, the fisher price GUI did slow the system down and use more memory, remember we are talking 2001/2002 when memory was not as abundant as it is now. Windows 2000 was a lot cleaner and allowed you to get the job done, Windows XP was noticeably slower and didn't really much if anything over Windows 2000, i used Windows 2000 till i had to switch because some apps required WinXP, however i moved to WinXP x64 for work and WinXP for games and kept the two environments separate.

I found just using Windows XP (32bit) purely for games kept it pretty lean and not so bloated over a period of time, Using WinXP x64 was also designed a little differently being based on Win2k3 (which i thought was a great release over Win2k Server) made it a lot smoother and not prone to slow downs after a year, it was quite well optimised.

I used Vista in beta and had high hopes for longhorn but found the release (RTM) bugs too troubling. The file copying in Vista was a disaster as too was the streaming of media due to a bug which would then throttle the network back. As well as some other performance bugs (high memory etc..troublesome wireless connectivity, especially when coming out of sleep), it was pretty messy for a RTM, SP1 did resolve most issues and because Microsoft had changed a lot of the core fundamentals of Windows, i hoped at the time the next release would mature these changes (new network stack, new UI drawn on the GPU instead of going through the CPU etc..).

I find Windows 7 the same breath of fresh air Windows 2000 was, it has taken the technologies introduced in Vista and really matured and built upon these. The memory utilisation is incredibly well done with the caching/using all RAM really offering a big performance gain, since NT4 i have gotten into the habit of running task manager all the time in the bottom right hand corner to give me an idea of how the computer is performing so i generally keep an eye on memory usage and Win7 does this expertly.

Windows 8 i am reserving judgement, i really like the new under the hood changes, such as the new file system, Hyper-V in the client etc.. however i do have my concerns about the Metro UX, i will see what the Beta is like, however i found the developer preview of Metro too jaring, i didn't like the switch between the metro start menu and the desktop/application. Hopefully this will a smoother experience, however again as above i will wait for the Beta and see how Microsoft has tackled this.

no, not really. Never heard of this (http://en.wikipedia....wiki/Intel_Atom) processor range?

It's only the Silverthorne, Lincroft and the N2xx series that don't support 64bit. The latest generations support 64bit fine. The only machines that they were mostly sold in were netbooks and those nebooks also don't have a large enough screen resolution to make the most of the Metro Start Page.

I think most would agree as a tablet/phone the Metro GUI is fine, I'm not sure many would complain about that. But most PC's have a mouse and a keyboard. Seems really odd to me and I'm not sure what to make of it at all until beta. Most people hate change, lately I have pushed myself to adjust to changes in just about every application. So it maybe the same

for Win8. I still don't get the UI for your standard desktop, tablet/phone on the other hand it would be fine.

Why do people think "System Reset" is something new and exciting ?

Correct me if I am wrong, but haven't we been able to do this for at least two OS's now by sticking the DVD in the drive while windows is running and choosing "Upgrade" essentially replacing the current broken OS with a fresh copy of the same while keeping all programs and files ?

Why do people think "System Reset" is something new and exciting ?

Correct me if I am wrong, but haven't we been able to do this for at least two OS's now by sticking the DVD in the drive while windows is running and choosing "Upgrade" essentially replacing the current broken OS with a fresh copy of the same while keeping all programs and files ?

Hmmm Yes we have :p. Although this just removes the need for the DVD and places it on the HDD. This way is more user-friendly and speed efficient.

I was one of those people who knocked Windows XP upon release and it's something i say till this day. Windows 2000 was a lot better than Windows XP, the fisher price GUI did slow the system down and use more memory, remember we are talking 2001/2002 when memory was not as abundant as it is now. Windows 2000 was a lot cleaner and allowed you to get the job done, Windows XP was noticeably slower and didn't really much if anything over Windows 2000, i used Windows 2000 till i had to switch because some apps required WinXP, however i moved to WinXP x64 for work and WinXP for games and kept the two environments separate.

I found just using Windows XP (32bit) purely for games kept it pretty lean and not so bloated over a period of time, Using WinXP x64 was also designed a little differently being based on Win2k3 (which i thought was a great release over Win2k Server) made it a lot smoother and not prone to slow downs after a year, it was quite well optimised.

As you pointed out, Windows XP was more or less Windows 2003 rather than being a direct lineage of Windows XP but one but point out that Windows XP introduced deep OS changes - it was more than just a 'fisher price GUI on Windows 2000'. There was an interesting article when Windows XP came out (IIRC it was a developer magazine by Microsoft or closely associated with Microsoft) that covered the deep OS changes such as removing some kernel memory limitations etc.

I used Vista in beta and had high hopes for longhorn but found the release (RTM) bugs too troubling. The file copying in Vista was a disaster as too was the streaming of media due to a bug which would then throttle the network back. As well as some other performance bugs (high memory etc..troublesome wireless connectivity, especially when coming out of sleep), it was pretty messy for a RTM, SP1 did resolve most issues and because Microsoft had changed a lot of the core fundamentals of Windows, i hoped at the time the next release would mature these changes (new network stack, new UI drawn on the GPU instead of going through the CPU etc..).

I find Windows 7 the same breath of fresh air Windows 2000 was, it has taken the technologies introduced in Vista and really matured and built upon these. The memory utilisation is incredibly well done with the caching/using all RAM really offering a big performance gain, since NT4 i have gotten into the habit of running task manager all the time in the bottom right hand corner to give me an idea of how the computer is performing so i generally keep an eye on memory usage and Win7 does this expertly.

Windows 8 i am reserving judgement, i really like the new under the hood changes, such as the new file system, Hyper-V in the client etc.. however i do have my concerns about the Metro UX, i will see what the Beta is like, however i found the developer preview of Metro too jaring, i didn't like the switch between the metro start menu and the desktop/application. Hopefully this will a smoother experience, however again as above i will wait for the Beta and see how Microsoft has tackled this.

From what I have read there will be XAML framework for traditional applications so I wouldn't be surprised if we ended up seeing more details being released right up till the 'Enterprise Preview' which will be more or less a release candidate.

So far I really like what I'm seeing.

There is no need for a start/orb button when you get the charm menu anyway

I do still hope they are holding back on showing us the updated Destop, i hope they will integrate the icons and design of Metro a little bit more then right now.

I feel the design differences make it feel a bit inconsistent.

But let's see what the CP brings in about 2 weeks

Looking forward to it

Why do people think "System Reset" is something new and exciting ?

Correct me if I am wrong, but haven't we been able to do this for at least two OS's now by sticking the DVD in the drive while windows is running and choosing "Upgrade" essentially replacing the current broken OS with a fresh copy of the same while keeping all programs and files ?

Probably because doing that leaves a lot of clutter and slows things down quite a bit. Everytime I have seen the "Upgrade" install used on Windows, it has caused the installation to become sluggish. This will wipe all of that old garbage clean and start everything fresh (and still maintain your files and settings). :)

So far I really like what I'm seeing.

There is no need for a start/orb button when you get the charm menu anyway

I do still hope they are holding back on showing us the updated Destop, i hope they will integrate the icons and design of Metro a little bit more then right now.

I feel the design differences make it feel a bit inconsistent.

But let's see what the CP brings in about 2 weeks

Looking forward to it

If it's in a "Consumer Preview" state, this is what we're getting. It's essentially done. They just have to run it through tons of testing and iron out the multitude of bugs.

Windows 7 "consumer preview" version was pretty much the final product, as was Vista's. Nothing is gonna change now.

If it's in a "Consumer Preview" state, this is what we're getting. It's essentially done. They just have to run it through tons of testing and iron out the multitude of bugs.

Windows 7 "consumer preview" version was pretty much the final product, as was Vista's. Nothing is gonna change now.

I realize that, that's why I'm hoping they still have to merge the build with the adjusted UI with the one they are leaking right now

A man can only hope right :)

Words of wisdom. Though I'm really unsure as to how Microsoft could develop such an undeveloped UI in the first place.

Based on the last few versions of Windows, the UI is usually one of the last things to receive an overhaul. While they had to get Metro in, I would expect a large number of UI changes and polishing before the final.

Probably because doing that leaves a lot of clutter and slows things down quite a bit. Everytime I have seen the "Upgrade" install used on Windows, it has caused the installation to become sluggish. This will wipe all of that old garbage clean and start everything fresh (and still maintain your files and settings). :)

I am not 100% about this, but I think you will find that Windows 8's reset feature is exactly the same as upgrading Windows 7 to Windows 7 same version.

And upgrading to the same OS does not leave anything sluggish or slow, how could it, the files it is upgrading to are the same ones that were already there, upgrading from one OS to a newer one can leave many problems behind, but not to the same OS

If it's in a "Consumer Preview" state, this is what we're getting. It's essentially done. They just have to run it through tons of testing and iron out the multitude of bugs.

Windows 7 "consumer preview" version was pretty much the final product, as was Vista's. Nothing is gonna change now.

Win 7 didn't had a "consumer preview", it had a beta and a RC, then RTM. The consumer preview for Win 8 is equivalent to 7 beta.

And many things changed between the beta and the RC, so yeah, things can changes.

The main issue here is that people just scream "it sux" without being constructive, MS have to spend to many time to sort out the real & constructives comments.

Are we still on this whole "Metro sucks, rage, rage, rage, I'm moving to Mac/Linux" thing? Either try out the damn beta or buzz off. Metro isn't going away, and if that doesn't suit you, Apple or Linux are there for you to use.

You need to start realizing you're on a public forum where people are allowed to express their opinions regarding these subjects. Them being positive, negative or neutral. A lot of people tried the Windows 8 preview and still don't like Metro. If you can't deal with that simply "buzz off" yourself.

Win 7 didn't had a "consumer preview", it had a beta and a RC, then RTM. The consumer preview for Win 8 is equivalent to 7 beta.

And many things changed between the beta and the RC, so yeah, things can changes.

What are you talking about? Interface-wise hardly anything changed from Windows 7 Beta 1 through RTM. The new task bar and modified Aero look were all in place and didn't seen substantial changes.

the difference that is system rest gonna wipe out program and temporary files unlike upgrade

Yea full reset without keeping files is gonna do that, but that is just a reinstall of the OS which can be done just as easily with Windows 7

The system reset using the option to keep all the files and folders is just an upgrade, so neither one of them is anything new, it just saves a few seconds by not having to put the DVD in, or saves no seconds at all if you have a folder with your setup files already extracted into on a separate drive or partition as I do

Also remembering using the Keep Files option with the DP, it still asked me to put the DVD in, so it saves no time at all.... kinda goes hand in hand with the whole Metro UI nonsense :D

Yea full reset without keeping files is gonna do that, but that is just a reinstall of the OS which can be done just as easily with Windows 7

The system reset using the option to keep all the files and folders is just an upgrade, so neither one of them is anything new, it just saves a few seconds by not having to put the DVD in, or saves no seconds at all if you have a folder with your setup files already extracted into on a separate drive or partition as I do

Also remembering using the Keep Files option with the DP, it still asked me to put the DVD in, so it saves no time at all.... kinda goes hand in hand with the whole Metro UI nonsense :D

i can see there main need would be for those machines with no DVD drive (tablets + ultrabook/ultrathin laptop)

as for requiring DVD , they would fully integrate image inside windows that is my bet

---

myself rather not go the hassle with drive , hardly use it if ever. (this way would either use previous backup or just rest system) :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Russia was able to invade Crimea because of those people. But my point is that I've personally heard how great it was to be "back in Russia" right afterwards - look how great it is now. I've asked you a question in another comment which you haven't answered, so I'll ask it again: is it better now without "Europrats"?
    • ZimaBoard 2 1664 Starter Kit review: it's a cool and affordable DIY NAS by Steven Parker IceWhale Technology reached out to me asking if I was interested in testing the ZimaBoard 2, and after convincing them to send me the Starter Kit, it arrived at my doorstep in May. A bit of background: it is a Shanghai-based Chinese company founded in 2020, which specializes in single-board servers and personal cloud solutions. From searching around online, user feedback on the company and ZimaOS is mostly positive, so we're off to a good start. In addition, I should probably point out that although they do not have a large portfolio of NAS devices, with just four of what they do offer, they seem to have covered everything from a relatively low-priced entry point with the ZimaBoard 2, right up to the high end, with the ZimaCube 2 Creator Pack that even includes an NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000. Anyway, as already mentioned, what we have today is the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit, and here are the full specifications: ZimaBoard 2 Model 832, 1664 CPU Intel Core N150 (4x E Cores/Threads, Max burst up to 3.6 GHz) TDP: 6W (Base) 10W (Max) Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (1.00 GHz) Memory 8 GB, 16 GB DDR5 4800MT/s non ECC SODIMM (soldered) Disk Capacity 60 TB (30 TB x 2) Supported RAID Types TRAID, TRAID +, RAID0, RAID1, RAID5, RAID 6, RAID 10 Storage 2 x SATA 3.0 6Gb/s Ports with Power Bootloader 32 GB, 64 GB eMMC Network 2x RJ-45 2.5 GbE PCIe 1 x PCIe 3.0 (via LPC) USB Ports 2 x USB-A 3.1 (5 Gbps) Display Mini-DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@60Hz) Hardware Transcoding Engine H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, VC-1 Maximum resolution: 4K (4096 x 2160); Maximum FPS: 60 Virtualization Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Size (H/W/D) 140mm x 83mm x 31mm Weight 0.4 kg (only ZimaBoard 2 device) Power 12v 5A Power Supply Warranty 1 year (Global) 2 Years (EU) OS ZimaOS v1.6.1 MSRP $339, $399 ($548.60) As you can see above, there are two variants of the ZimaBoard 2. The lesser variant has half the eMMC storage and 8 GB less RAM, although it also costs $60 less than the top variant we are testing today. The above pricing is only for the ZimaBoard 2. I put the MSRP of the Starter Kit next to it in brackets, although as of publishing, it is discounted to $534.50. The ZimaBoard 2 started life on Kickstarter and shipped to backers in August last year. It became available via the official website in late 2025 and Q1 2026. This hobbyist NAS contains the still relatively new N150 Intel CPU released in the first quarter of 2025, with support for DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, although in this case, the memory is integrated into the board itself, so it will not be possible to upgrade or expand the amount. It also supports AV1 decoding, as well as H.264, VP8, VP9, H.265 (8 bit), and H.265 (10 bit). The different capabilities in the Alder Lake-N (and Twin Lake) series are listed below. Processor E-cores L3-cache Turbo clock GPU GPU-clock TDP Intel N355 8 6 MB 3.9 GHz 32 EUs 1.35 GHz 9 W Intel Core 3 N350 3.9 GHz 1.35 GHz 7 W Intel Core i3-N305 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 9 W Intel Core i3-N300 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N250 4 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 6 W Intel Processor N200 3.7 GHz 0.75 GHz Intel N150 3.6 GHz 24 EUs 1 GHz Intel N97 1.2 GHz 12 W Intel Processor N100 3.4 GHz 0.75 GHz 6 W The CPU is part of the Twin Lake series that sits near the bottom of the N-series, designed for low- powered systems and entry-level laptops, and as such has a base level TDP of just 6W. As I have noted before, we are seeing another NAS with a great amount of RAM. It's important to mention that the ZimaBoard 2's memory is integrated into the base board (which is why they have two variants of it). As a reminder, up until a couple of years ago, it was commonplace to only get 2 or 4GB max on a flagship Synology or QNAP home NAS. Ever since the likes of TerraMaster and more have entered the market with ample RAM sizes included in their NAS offerings, it has gone a long way in forcing the hands of the traditional makers to up their game a bit. First impressions The Starter Kit came in one outer box with several packages inside it (shown above). I forgot to take pics of it because when it arrived, it wasn't clear what was inside, and I had to confirm with my contact that I received the entire Starter Kit. In the box ZimaBoard 2 ZimaBoard 2 HDD Expansion Bracket + PCIe card frame Zimaboard Mini DisplayPort Male to HDMI Female Cable 4K 60Hz Zimaboard PCIe 3.0 x4 to Dual NVMe M.2 SSD Adapter Card Quick guide [full online guide] Limited warranty notice Screws Design Where to start? You'd be forgiven for mistaking it as an SSD enclosure if not for all the ports on it. It is completely made out of metal, and the top is an entire heatsink. It has a premium feel about it, but it definitely looks like a hobby device. As you will see, the completed build looks like it belongs in a server or meter closet rather than as a showpiece on someone's desk. On what I am calling the rear, there's a Mini DisplayPort (1.4), two 2.5 GbE ports, with Type A 3.1 USB ports, and then the barrel connector port. Around the front, there are two SATA6 ports with a power connector in the middle. Left side Right side One side is completely free of ports. On the other there's a slit that allows for the feed of a CPU fan cable, and a PCIe 3.0 X4 slot. Top Bottom The top is entirely made up of a heatsink except for the extended height for the I/O on the rear. Around the other side, you can find the ZIMA branding and some regulatory information stamped near the bottom. As you may see from the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, it scratches quite easily from just moving it around on my Ikea island. Teardown Before we get started, let's have a look at this thing on the inside. The steps to get to the board are as follows: Remove the four smaller Torx screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2; Remove the four larger Torx screws on the sides of the device; Carefully unstick the CMOS battery from the PCB; Remove two Phillips screws on the PCB; Lift out the PCB. Yes, as you can tell from the instructions, you need three different tools to remove Torx and Phillips screws (10 in total), and unhelpfully, one of the screws is located under the CMOS battery, which is stuck onto the PCB. Building Now comes the fun part. Because the ZimaSpace website does not provide any guidance on how to put the Starter Kit together. They only have guidance for connecting the CPU fan. However, they did upload a video to their YouTube channel that shows the entire process. To install the fan, first remove the four screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, then on the inside, there is a CPU FAN connector where you can attach the fan, reattach the ZimaBoard 2 frame, and feed the fan cable through the provided slit. Then remove the nearest screw on the side and attach the fan frame to the side of the device using the same screw. ZimaBard 2 screws Aligning the screws Bottom view Remember those four screws we removed to access the CPU FAN? Longer screws are provided in the box with the HDD Expansion Bracket, which is what you will now need to attach the ZimaBoard 2 to it. Helpfully, the orientation on how to attach it is made obvious when the frame can only be screwed on at the same overall length as the ZimaBoard 2. If you do it the wrong way around (which is what I did initially) one side hangs off the frame, and it becomes difficult to attach the PCIe Adapter Card cable. PCIe card frame Other side PCIe slot connector Next, it's time to attach the PCIe card frame, which is fastened with the help of 3.5-inch SATA HDD (3 screws). These are toolless screws that you can just use your fingers to fasten them with. Then it is time to connect the provided PCIe cable with the slot connector on one side of the ZimaBoard 2, feed it through the bottom of the HDD frame, and fasten it with two standoffs. Both bracket options 2280 standoffs with 2x 4TB MP44Q The PCIe 3.0 X4 card comes with a short bracket option, handy if you decide to place it inside a different NAS or rack server, but here we need the long bracket. Oddly enough, the M.2 standoffs were preinstalled into the 22110 position, but extra standoffs are included in the box, which I installed at the 2280 position for our use. I added a couple of MP44Q M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs (2 x 4TB) that can be availed on Amazon for $478.99 (the lowest price for 3 months) that TEAMGROUP supplied us with Then we have the almost completed build, you just need to push the card into the PCIe slot. Unfortunately, IceWhale Technologies did not provide a screw for the PCIe card frame (this is also apparent in their own video). Here it is at several different angles, with the last pic showing the SATA Y-Cable connected to the two WD Red Plus 4TB drives. Setup and Usage Next, you connect your cables to the I/O, and the ZimaBoard 2 powers on automatically, as there is no power button on the device. Power is controlled through the Settings in ZimaOS. BIOS The ZimaBoard 2 includes an Aptio BIOS from American Megatrends [1, 2, 3], and you can setup pretty much everything here including the boot order, which is locked to the UEFI OS, however above that choice you can enable or disable booting to a SATA/USB bootloader so this would still allow you to switch to an alternative bootloader and boot from it, or disable it to instead always start from the first disk with an OS installed on it. Initial Setup Upon connecting to the LAN and booting up, the ZimaBoard 2 can be reached by navigating to the IP address (shown if you have a monitor connected), or you can find it using the ZIMA Client desktop application, which is essentially a Zima device finder. Initializing the ZimaBoard 2 The ZimaOS setup process is pretty straightforward, through a wizard, and in full above, it basically consists of setting up an account and some handy tips, and that's that! Post Setup (ZimaOS update) Upon first boot, you are alerted that there is a ZimaOS update from 1.5.0 to 1.6.1, which I applied; the full process is shown above with the changelog. ZimaBoard 2 Storage Setup Next, it is time to set up the storage. ZimaOS actually throws everything onto the eMMC flash drive; it is also the default location of AppData, which is definitely something to be wary about, as the 45GB available storage could fill up quickly. HDDs I first attempted to create a Storage Pool using the two 4TB WD Red Plus NAS drives, and got an error message: After several attempts and then looking online, I discovered it was a bug with ZimaOS where the fix was simply to reboot ZimaOS and then try again, this time I was able to create a RAID mirror using the two drives. SSDs I did the same for the SSDs, as you will see in the above gallery, when I created the second Storage Pool, it only allowed me to select available drives. ZimaBoard 2 AppData ZimaOS comes with an App Store that includes a repository of almost 400 apps, so you will be able to find most of what you'll need for a NAS (although after a quick search, I wasn't able to find a Surveillance Manager), and now comes the important part: moving the default AppData location off the 45GB eMMC and onto a larger volume: Open Settings Then Apps Then, in the Select a new location field, click on the new Storage volume you want to move it to (in my case, the Apps Storage Pool), which is the SSD RAID mirror. Confirm the Migration warning Be praised! You can also do this for Docker (which by default installs onto the 45GB eMMC flash drive) and the User database. Plex Setup Next, I tested the configuration by installing the Plex Server app from the App Store. The library folders must already exist (which I placed into the Storage Pool). Plex Server setup is straightforward and requires very little configuration. In my case, all I had to do was add the media path I just created, which you can also browse to using the folder icon in the path field. In addition, you can now map the new Media library in Windows Explorer using the Zima Client. Oddly enough, it is not possible to access the ZimaBoard 2 over the Network Neighborhood; you must map drives using the client, which is shown in the last image in the above gallery. I watched one of my Blu-Ray rips, which is Dolby Vision with Dolby Atmos, and the content played fine with no stuttering or buffering, which is what anyone needs in this scenario. ZimaBoard 2 Zima Client mobile app There's also a client for mobile. It is pretty barebones, as shown in the above gallery, for example, the Apps screen launches the WebUI for that app, and the Backup must be done manually. On opening Backup, you can select internal storage folders on your phone to backup to the ZimaBoard 2's storage, and although this is constantly scanned, the backup action itself must be manually triggered. There is an option to allow foreground backup (last image in the above gallery), but this basically means the queued backup gets triggered when you manually open the app. Benchmarking SATA PCIe 3.0 X4 A CrystalDiskMark test on a mapped network drive from within a Windows 11 25H2 PC (image above) connected over a 2.5 GbE was well within acceptable ranges. Writes were generally better on the SSD RAID mirror. SATA PCIe 3.0 X1 I also ran the NAS Performance tester, which tests the link speed performance. As you can see, it pretty much maxes out the 2.5GbE connection. Of course, you can also opt to bond the two 2.5 GbE connections for a bit more umph, but I didn't do that. Thermals Top PCIe card SATA HDDs Next, I measured some hotspots while playing content on Plex. It's fair to say this will perform better than a NAS that is enclosed in a metal or plastic case, as almost everything storage-wise is exposed! Anyway, the ZimaBoard 2 did not break a sweat with Plex streaming or disk benchmarks. ZimaOS Factory Reset ZimaOS does not include a factory reset option. Instead, you have to download the ZimaOS image and flash it to the eMMC manually. The flashing process is shown in the above gallery. The steps to do so are listed below: Download the ZimaOS image here; Open BalenaEtcher (Run as Administrator) and select the image; Select your inserted USB drive (min 8 GB) Flash to it; Connect your USB drive, monitor, keyboard, USB hub (optional), mouse (optional), and network cable (recommended) to the ZimaBoard 2; Connect power and press F11 continuously; Select your USB drive starting with UEFI in the boot device menu; Press Enter on the Install ZimaOS option; Select /dev/mmcblk0 (MMC) flash drive as target; Confirm with (three times) to wipe the target disk; Wait a couple of minutes while ZimaOS installs; Remove the USB drive and confirm with a reboot; Your ZimaBoard 2 has been factory reset. However, you don't have to stick with ZimaOS, in fact the company also offers official CasaOS images, that are based on Debian; or as they say themselves, put anything you want on this "hackable single board server" it's up to you. Conclusion I had a lot of fun putting this together. I've custom-built all my own PCs and servers since the 90s, and this is the first time I have had to put a NAS together. Even if the actual base ZimaBoard 2 was already a completed build, it still feels pretty custom. I just wish that IceWhale Technology included a getting-started guide in the box for the Start Kit, which would have really completed this kit. Instead, I had to search for the official video on the YouTube channel to make sure I wasn't doing anything wrong. So who is this for? Definitely the hobbyist who is comfortable building their own PC and servers. It also has a much smaller footprint than its nearest equivalent (in terms of specs), like the Beelink Me Pro, which is another NAS I will be testing soon. Although the Beelink does not come with the PCIe 3.0 X4 expansion, the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit suddenly looks to be a great bargain, even if it only offers the two 3.5-inch bays over the four in the other example. It makes a lot of sense to use Intel's N150 chip inside a NAS; it is more than capable of doing what the ZimaBoard 2 is intended for, media streaming and backup. It also looks like the IceWhale Technology staff are quite active in the official forums helping people with issues they come across with ZimaOS and the devices, peer support seems to be good as well, I was quickly able to find why I was not able to create a new Storage Pool in ZimaOS v1.6.1 even though that is quite a serious bug, hopefully it will be fixed in the next update. If you are comfortable with the command line and Docker, you'll be fine. You can do great things with this hardware. This was my first time with ZimaOS. It seems a bit barebones in comparison to the likes of Synology DSM, TOS, and UGOS, but it has a ton of apps to get you started with your home or small business NAS. Where to buy As of publishing, IceWhale Technology is running a discount of up to 5% for the Starter Kit. If you opt to get just the ZimaBoard 2 itself, it does come with a SATA Y-Cable, so you will be able to connect up to two 3.5-inch HDDs to it. ZimaBoard 2 1668 Starter Kit for $534.50 on Amazon US (was $548.60) ZimaBoard 2 832 Starter Kit for $372.88 on Amazon US (was $390.60) Zimaboard 2 1668 (16GB+64GB) for $419.90 on Amazon US Zimaboard 2 832 (8GB+32GB) for $359.90 on Amazon Disclosure: IceWhale Technology provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. Good to know The Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, when you purchase through links on our site, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • It's in the Insider's group so yes it's technically beta, though these days it's hard to see much of a difference unless you opt for the most extreme beta builds, which I don't. When I moved here from the Release Preview channel I did so primarily because I wanted to see how well the restored taskbar functionality (restored from Win10, and earlier) is working and whether it was time to finally abandon SAB--and it is--working fine, so far. Not as polished as SAB, but it'll do for me.
    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!