Recommended Posts

So how is this considered a 1.0 release? The ONLY minor changes I see is that you've renamed the variations to "fatty mcgee" and "on a diet" and you added the text to the top left of the start panel and added the flag to the bottom right of the start panel, none of which are all that exciting. Even the file sizes are the same from the previous one...not that that means much...

You need to fix the bugs. All of these bugs that people are reporting have been with the theme the whole time. The font differences, the all programs spacing is STILL messed up and you can't deny that I haven't said that because I've said it 10 times at least. Also, the tabs are still unattractive at best. I'm not trying to hurt any feelings but dude, change log, change log, change log! At least tell us that you've made progress...upping the version number doesn't cut it. Keep up the good work! I really like the potential of this theme...

So how is this considered a 1.0 release?  The ONLY minor changes I see is that you've renamed the variations to "fatty mcgee" and "on a diet" and you added the text to the top left of the start panel and added the flag to the bottom right of the start panel, none of which are all that exciting.  Even the file sizes are the same from the previous one...not that that means much...

You need to fix the bugs.  All of these bugs that people are reporting have been with the theme the whole time.  The font differences, the all programs spacing is STILL messed up and you can't deny that I haven't said that because I've said it 10 times at least.  Also, the tabs are still unattractive at best.  I'm not trying to hurt any feelings but dude, change log, change log, change log!  At least tell us that you've made progress...upping the version number doesn't cut it.  Keep up the good work!  I really like the potential of this theme...

Well I guess he should just stop everything since you posted 10 times about a bug YOU want fixed.

Please! You only make yourself look like a prick when your trying to act like your the authority. Get over yourself man. We understand your post, but honestly, you need to read it over because you came off as a bit of a jerk.

Work at your own pace bro, love the theme and I KNOW YOU WILL CONTINUE to do so and working out the bugs as you have the time for such things. Great work so far.

So how is this considered a 1.0 release?  The ONLY minor changes I see is that you've renamed the variations to "fatty mcgee" and "on a diet" and you added the text to the top left of the start panel and added the flag to the bottom right of the start panel, none of which are all that exciting.  Even the file sizes are the same from the previous one...not that that means much...

You need to fix the bugs.  All of these bugs that people are reporting have been with the theme the whole time.  The font differences, the all programs spacing is STILL messed up and you can't deny that I haven't said that because I've said it 10 times at least.  Also, the tabs are still unattractive at best.  I'm not trying to hurt any feelings but dude, change log, change log, change log!  At least tell us that you've made progress...upping the version number doesn't cut it.  Keep up the good work!  I really like the potential of this theme...

Well I guess he should just stop everything since you posted 10 times about a bug YOU want fixed.

Please! You only make yourself look like a prick when your trying to act like your the authority. Get over yourself man. We understand your post, but honestly, you need to read it over because you came off as a bit of a jerk.

Work at your own pace bro, love the theme and I KNOW YOU WILL CONTINUE to do so and working out the bugs as you have the time for such things. Great work so far.

don't see how he's being a prick .. a lot of 'bugs' were reported in the last thread ... and havent been addressed yet. a changelog would be great. so lets stop the arguments now before this thread gets out of hand like the last. this theme is very nice .. just has a few minor issues that need to be addressed :)

So how is this considered a 1.0 release? The ONLY minor changes I see is that you've renamed the variations to "fatty mcgee" and "on a diet" and you added the text to the top left of the start panel and added the flag to the bottom right of the start panel, none of which are all that exciting. Even the file sizes are the same from the previous one...not that that means much...

You need to fix the bugs. All of these bugs that people are reporting have been with the theme the whole time. The font differences, the all programs spacing is STILL messed up and you can't deny that I haven't said that because I've said it 10 times at least. Also, the tabs are still unattractive at best. I'm not trying to hurt any feelings but dude, change log, change log, change log! At least tell us that you've made progress...upping the version number doesn't cut it. Keep up the good work! I really like the potential of this theme...

pls PM me a list of all the bugs you have found, and I would be glad to abide...I don't have all the same bugs, as my settings are different....so what you have, PM me pls. I don't like the tabbies either.

/me goes to fix the tabbies.

I was wondering if this can be fixed. I use "small icons" on my start menu w/ 10 programs to be shown, and usually it evens out nicely w/ no space @ the bottom. Any ideas?

Thats the blody places icons on the right. take one out and youll see its fixed

pls PM me a list of all the bugs you have found, and I would be glad to abide...I don't have all the same bugs, as my settings are different....so what you have, PM me pls. I don't like the tabbies either.

/me goes to fix the tabbies.

I'll post the bug list so people can add/subtract from it...community input and all.

Bug list...old and new:

1 & 2) The two variations you have...the slim one has the correct "All Programs" spacing. The font looks like default Luna, whatever that is but it doesn't match the font on the start panel. In the fat variation, the "All Programs" spacing is messed up and arrows are skewed to the right, but the font matches that of the start panel....there's no way this is a settings issue. So you have inconsistent fonts AND inconsistent menu spacing. Is that combination a bug or not?

3) Taskbar is too short, needs to be taller since it cuts off the top of some quick launch icons.

4) Tabs are bad...

5) Title bars have inconsistent heights between the two variations? bug or not?

6) As discussed before, are we locked in on the sky blue for the hover color of the caption buttons?

7) Whatever else someone already posted in this thread that I left out...

And my personal opinions would include...

1) Lose the new flag and the "Luna II Reborn" that you've added to the start panel.

2) Keep ALL of the fonts the same...ditch them ALL and go with the default Luna fonts. Have you seen Dazzla's NewLuna? or Bant's Reluna? The theme looks so much more professional when the fonts are consistent.

Man, your theme's great but so is progress. And if you would document it in a change log or something, things would run a lot smoother for you. Sorry to be so blunt but a lot of these bugs have stayed with your theme from the very beginning eventhough they've been reported numerous times, which is frustrating. I've been keeping up with this theme since you took it over from mgartner so I'm keeping the faith you'll finish it up nicely!

Edited by Smitjel

"3) Taskbar is too short, needs to be taller since it cuts off the top of some quick launch icons."

I like the taskbar just the way it is.

"2) Keep ALL of the fonts the same...ditch them ALL and go with the default Luna fonts. Have you seen Dazzla's NewLuna? or Bant's Reluna? The theme looks so much more professional when the fonts are consistent."

Use the same font for everything but dont use the luna default one.

and the most important bug:

As I have already said in my last post

the little white transparent dots on the top right and top left of a maximed window.

if you click on em its like you are clicking on your desktop. the annoying thing about this

is that if you click on the top right of the window it doesnt close the window (should be part of the X button).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So what is it, "Some exciting upgrades happened under the hood, and one of those upgrades is now available to all Windows 11 users." or "Also, you may need to enable it manually, as new features are rolling out gradually. Here is how to do it:" We keep hearing these are rolling out but they never seem to show up, we have force them on with ViVetool. Getting a bit tired of it.
    • Seems very lazy, so basically drain more battery power on laptops/tablets if this is turned on.
    • Edifier's popular R1280Ts bookshelf speaker can be a nice upgrade for your PC desktop audio by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered a very nice discount on Sony's high-resolution SS-CS5M2 speakers, which are currently on sale for just $178. It packs the rather rare super tweeter that offers an additional level of clarity and "airy"-ness which a tweeter cannot provide. It's a passive speaker though which means it will require external amplification, which will cost extra. Let's say though that you have a budget of under $150 but still want a decent-sounding speaker that's active. The Edifier 1280Ts can help in this regard, as the unit is currently at a decent price of $130 (purchase link under the specs table down below). While you will not get deep sub-bass from the 1280Ts, you should get clearer vocals and highs like cymbals than a cheaper satellite-based 2.1 system. Obviously the soundstage and imaging will also improve due to the better reproduction of highs. As mentioned above, the Edifier R1280Ts is active and so does not need a separate amplifier, as it's a powered system with its own amplification. A great thing about this model is that you can add a separate active subwoofer to it too using the "sub out" option, which essentially acts like an LFE. This way, you can add in the missing deep bass. The technical specifications of the Edifier R1280Ts are given in the table below: Specification Value Total Output Power 42W RMS (21W + 21W) Driver Units 4-inch mid-range/bass driver + 0.5-inch silk diaphragm treble driver Frequency Response 52Hz – 20kHz Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) ≥85dBA Input Sensitivity Line In1: R/L: 500±50mV Line In2: R/L: 700±50mV Inputs Dual RCA inputs Outputs Sub Out port for external subwoofer Get it at the link below: Edifier R1280Ts Powered Bookshelf Speakers - 2.0 Stereo Active Near Field Monitors with Subwoofer Line Out: $129.99 (Sold by Edifier Online Store, Shipped by Amazon US) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Appreciate the focus on UI performance, but this is going the wrong way. Instead of optimizing performance, coding to lower latency, etc. this is just throwing horsepower. This is lazy.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      489
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      197
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!