Recommended Posts

So how is this considered a 1.0 release? The ONLY minor changes I see is that you've renamed the variations to "fatty mcgee" and "on a diet" and you added the text to the top left of the start panel and added the flag to the bottom right of the start panel, none of which are all that exciting. Even the file sizes are the same from the previous one...not that that means much...

You need to fix the bugs. All of these bugs that people are reporting have been with the theme the whole time. The font differences, the all programs spacing is STILL messed up and you can't deny that I haven't said that because I've said it 10 times at least. Also, the tabs are still unattractive at best. I'm not trying to hurt any feelings but dude, change log, change log, change log! At least tell us that you've made progress...upping the version number doesn't cut it. Keep up the good work! I really like the potential of this theme...

So how is this considered a 1.0 release?  The ONLY minor changes I see is that you've renamed the variations to "fatty mcgee" and "on a diet" and you added the text to the top left of the start panel and added the flag to the bottom right of the start panel, none of which are all that exciting.  Even the file sizes are the same from the previous one...not that that means much...

You need to fix the bugs.  All of these bugs that people are reporting have been with the theme the whole time.  The font differences, the all programs spacing is STILL messed up and you can't deny that I haven't said that because I've said it 10 times at least.  Also, the tabs are still unattractive at best.  I'm not trying to hurt any feelings but dude, change log, change log, change log!  At least tell us that you've made progress...upping the version number doesn't cut it.  Keep up the good work!  I really like the potential of this theme...

Well I guess he should just stop everything since you posted 10 times about a bug YOU want fixed.

Please! You only make yourself look like a prick when your trying to act like your the authority. Get over yourself man. We understand your post, but honestly, you need to read it over because you came off as a bit of a jerk.

Work at your own pace bro, love the theme and I KNOW YOU WILL CONTINUE to do so and working out the bugs as you have the time for such things. Great work so far.

So how is this considered a 1.0 release?  The ONLY minor changes I see is that you've renamed the variations to "fatty mcgee" and "on a diet" and you added the text to the top left of the start panel and added the flag to the bottom right of the start panel, none of which are all that exciting.  Even the file sizes are the same from the previous one...not that that means much...

You need to fix the bugs.  All of these bugs that people are reporting have been with the theme the whole time.  The font differences, the all programs spacing is STILL messed up and you can't deny that I haven't said that because I've said it 10 times at least.  Also, the tabs are still unattractive at best.  I'm not trying to hurt any feelings but dude, change log, change log, change log!  At least tell us that you've made progress...upping the version number doesn't cut it.  Keep up the good work!  I really like the potential of this theme...

Well I guess he should just stop everything since you posted 10 times about a bug YOU want fixed.

Please! You only make yourself look like a prick when your trying to act like your the authority. Get over yourself man. We understand your post, but honestly, you need to read it over because you came off as a bit of a jerk.

Work at your own pace bro, love the theme and I KNOW YOU WILL CONTINUE to do so and working out the bugs as you have the time for such things. Great work so far.

don't see how he's being a prick .. a lot of 'bugs' were reported in the last thread ... and havent been addressed yet. a changelog would be great. so lets stop the arguments now before this thread gets out of hand like the last. this theme is very nice .. just has a few minor issues that need to be addressed :)

So how is this considered a 1.0 release? The ONLY minor changes I see is that you've renamed the variations to "fatty mcgee" and "on a diet" and you added the text to the top left of the start panel and added the flag to the bottom right of the start panel, none of which are all that exciting. Even the file sizes are the same from the previous one...not that that means much...

You need to fix the bugs. All of these bugs that people are reporting have been with the theme the whole time. The font differences, the all programs spacing is STILL messed up and you can't deny that I haven't said that because I've said it 10 times at least. Also, the tabs are still unattractive at best. I'm not trying to hurt any feelings but dude, change log, change log, change log! At least tell us that you've made progress...upping the version number doesn't cut it. Keep up the good work! I really like the potential of this theme...

pls PM me a list of all the bugs you have found, and I would be glad to abide...I don't have all the same bugs, as my settings are different....so what you have, PM me pls. I don't like the tabbies either.

/me goes to fix the tabbies.

I was wondering if this can be fixed. I use "small icons" on my start menu w/ 10 programs to be shown, and usually it evens out nicely w/ no space @ the bottom. Any ideas?

Thats the blody places icons on the right. take one out and youll see its fixed

pls PM me a list of all the bugs you have found, and I would be glad to abide...I don't have all the same bugs, as my settings are different....so what you have, PM me pls. I don't like the tabbies either.

/me goes to fix the tabbies.

I'll post the bug list so people can add/subtract from it...community input and all.

Bug list...old and new:

1 & 2) The two variations you have...the slim one has the correct "All Programs" spacing. The font looks like default Luna, whatever that is but it doesn't match the font on the start panel. In the fat variation, the "All Programs" spacing is messed up and arrows are skewed to the right, but the font matches that of the start panel....there's no way this is a settings issue. So you have inconsistent fonts AND inconsistent menu spacing. Is that combination a bug or not?

3) Taskbar is too short, needs to be taller since it cuts off the top of some quick launch icons.

4) Tabs are bad...

5) Title bars have inconsistent heights between the two variations? bug or not?

6) As discussed before, are we locked in on the sky blue for the hover color of the caption buttons?

7) Whatever else someone already posted in this thread that I left out...

And my personal opinions would include...

1) Lose the new flag and the "Luna II Reborn" that you've added to the start panel.

2) Keep ALL of the fonts the same...ditch them ALL and go with the default Luna fonts. Have you seen Dazzla's NewLuna? or Bant's Reluna? The theme looks so much more professional when the fonts are consistent.

Man, your theme's great but so is progress. And if you would document it in a change log or something, things would run a lot smoother for you. Sorry to be so blunt but a lot of these bugs have stayed with your theme from the very beginning eventhough they've been reported numerous times, which is frustrating. I've been keeping up with this theme since you took it over from mgartner so I'm keeping the faith you'll finish it up nicely!

Edited by Smitjel

"3) Taskbar is too short, needs to be taller since it cuts off the top of some quick launch icons."

I like the taskbar just the way it is.

"2) Keep ALL of the fonts the same...ditch them ALL and go with the default Luna fonts. Have you seen Dazzla's NewLuna? or Bant's Reluna? The theme looks so much more professional when the fonts are consistent."

Use the same font for everything but dont use the luna default one.

and the most important bug:

As I have already said in my last post

the little white transparent dots on the top right and top left of a maximed window.

if you click on em its like you are clicking on your desktop. the annoying thing about this

is that if you click on the top right of the window it doesnt close the window (should be part of the X button).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!