Recommended Posts

^It's not about exposure though, it's about how well your ideas work in the real world and how they'll work for the average consumer. And a whole lot of other reasons.

obviously.

what i meant was. exposure gets you noticed. And only then will they think about it.

And yes.. Real world performance is the big big problem. Not because such a UI might perform bad but because people are going to rebel against such a drastic change. (like Metro) atleast we had 2 years to see how it works with zune and WP7.

I dunno if you've ever used OS X but OS X does it this way. There is no border on a lot of menus on the sides and bottom of windows. When you mouse near the edge there is a 4 pixel tolerance on both sides of the border where the mouse icon changes to indicate you can now click to resize the window. That is how it would work in this concept negating the problem you are describing.

this is what I was thinking how they can do it. I was concerned about this as well

It also has no border or corner space to resize on. while you can still resize without border you need to aim like a sniper which is not good usability.

No, you can set the resize zone internally like OSX does.

It's very operable and I use it in a couple of my applications. WPF is a beast like that.

Yes, but where would you click and drag (in the case where you have lots of tabs open, so the area to the right of the tabs is not available)? On the tabs? That behavior already tears off or moves a tab. On the actual page? That will either scroll or highlight text. The buttons? Probably not a good place. Address bar? Maybe, but not ideal. There simply isn't an open place to click and drag to move the window... in the worst case.

I really really want that Internet Explorer concept to work. If you know how you would want this handled, let me know. I do want a workaround.

In OS X Snow Leopard and before, you couldn't even resize the window by grabbing an edge. You had to grab the bottom right corner. Very annoying. But from what I hear this might be fixed in Lion.

A number of ways, either in the top left corner or any of the tab spaces (when available).

That said, you could even make it drag from the text zone. You could make the entire "non-interact-able" area of the window a move zone.

Sure it's a new design concept (as opposed to the current Windows schema) however that's a pretty substantial redesign >.<

...grampa? Izzat you?

BAS TARD :p

In OS X Snow Leopard and before, you couldn't even resize the window by grabbing an edge. You had to grab the bottom right corner. Very annoying. But from what I hear this might be fixed in Lion.

Not "fixed" because it was never a feature included to be broken.

The feature was added in Lion.

I'd rather put it like this:

Windows 8 skinning should be possible, whether officially or through hacked means (as long as security doesn't become an issue). I, personally, don't like these mockups, but there's no faulting taste. I'm waiting to see what Windows 8 actually looks and handles like, unlike much of the tech savvy community that spent a little time with an alpha-quality developer preview and came to all of their conclusions from that alone (a ridiculous and idiotic perspective if ever there was one). I might like it, I might not--but I don't know yet. I'm not going to sit here and say how W8 will or won't feel with a mouse and keyboard because of how I IMAGINE a tablet-friendly interface would feel--that's equally stupid. So many opinions floating around are based on preconceived notions and interpretations of screenshots. Ironically, anxiety over Windows 8 (and Windows Phone) stems/stemmed almost entirely from screenshots, while people who enjoy the platforms gush endlessly about how they feel in motion, and yet these mockups are just more 'screenshots' that people are gushing over, despite having no ability to experience using such an environment.

When did we start getting so emotional about screenshots?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
    • Gamers Nexus already did their review, and building your own will be faster and cheaper, so not very convincing.
    • They've told outlets who got review units that it isn't. Partially because they believe that contributes to closed ecosystems. GamersNexus also believes this is because Valve's fighting a monopolistic practices lawsuit in Europe right now. They've also never subsidized any of their past hardware efforts and well, they definitely aren't subsidizing the Steam Deck right now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!