Recommended Posts

^It's not about exposure though, it's about how well your ideas work in the real world and how they'll work for the average consumer. And a whole lot of other reasons.

obviously.

what i meant was. exposure gets you noticed. And only then will they think about it.

And yes.. Real world performance is the big big problem. Not because such a UI might perform bad but because people are going to rebel against such a drastic change. (like Metro) atleast we had 2 years to see how it works with zune and WP7.

I dunno if you've ever used OS X but OS X does it this way. There is no border on a lot of menus on the sides and bottom of windows. When you mouse near the edge there is a 4 pixel tolerance on both sides of the border where the mouse icon changes to indicate you can now click to resize the window. That is how it would work in this concept negating the problem you are describing.

this is what I was thinking how they can do it. I was concerned about this as well

It also has no border or corner space to resize on. while you can still resize without border you need to aim like a sniper which is not good usability.

No, you can set the resize zone internally like OSX does.

It's very operable and I use it in a couple of my applications. WPF is a beast like that.

Yes, but where would you click and drag (in the case where you have lots of tabs open, so the area to the right of the tabs is not available)? On the tabs? That behavior already tears off or moves a tab. On the actual page? That will either scroll or highlight text. The buttons? Probably not a good place. Address bar? Maybe, but not ideal. There simply isn't an open place to click and drag to move the window... in the worst case.

I really really want that Internet Explorer concept to work. If you know how you would want this handled, let me know. I do want a workaround.

In OS X Snow Leopard and before, you couldn't even resize the window by grabbing an edge. You had to grab the bottom right corner. Very annoying. But from what I hear this might be fixed in Lion.

A number of ways, either in the top left corner or any of the tab spaces (when available).

That said, you could even make it drag from the text zone. You could make the entire "non-interact-able" area of the window a move zone.

Sure it's a new design concept (as opposed to the current Windows schema) however that's a pretty substantial redesign >.<

...grampa? Izzat you?

BAS TARD :p

In OS X Snow Leopard and before, you couldn't even resize the window by grabbing an edge. You had to grab the bottom right corner. Very annoying. But from what I hear this might be fixed in Lion.

Not "fixed" because it was never a feature included to be broken.

The feature was added in Lion.

I'd rather put it like this:

Windows 8 skinning should be possible, whether officially or through hacked means (as long as security doesn't become an issue). I, personally, don't like these mockups, but there's no faulting taste. I'm waiting to see what Windows 8 actually looks and handles like, unlike much of the tech savvy community that spent a little time with an alpha-quality developer preview and came to all of their conclusions from that alone (a ridiculous and idiotic perspective if ever there was one). I might like it, I might not--but I don't know yet. I'm not going to sit here and say how W8 will or won't feel with a mouse and keyboard because of how I IMAGINE a tablet-friendly interface would feel--that's equally stupid. So many opinions floating around are based on preconceived notions and interpretations of screenshots. Ironically, anxiety over Windows 8 (and Windows Phone) stems/stemmed almost entirely from screenshots, while people who enjoy the platforms gush endlessly about how they feel in motion, and yet these mockups are just more 'screenshots' that people are gushing over, despite having no ability to experience using such an environment.

When did we start getting so emotional about screenshots?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!