Recommended Posts

Steve Jobs's RDF seems to have been transferred to the other Steven it seems. If you have a problem with Metro on the Desktop you "don't get it", i.e. "you're holding it wrong".

When they put a UI optimized for tablets on the Desktop, you're told "there is no tablet UI". Actually, that last one reminds me more of Walter Ulbricht claiming "Nobody has the intention of building a wall". Two months later the Berlin Wall is erected. Only, in Metro's case, the wall's already built, for all to see.

Even though you can press a keyboard button to get passed the swipe screen, the mere fact the swipe screen is there in the first place shows it is designed for tablets. What need is that intermediary screen other than to add a home screen for tablets? The whole point of that screen is to provide a "slide to unlock" function that is present on iOS. That is plain as day. A tablet doesn't have a physical keyboard which is why that screen goes away when you press a key but that isn't intuitive and the screen shouldn't even be there in the first place on a desktop/notebook.

And if you say the Start Menu is not required then surely Metro which is merely a Start Menu replacement isn't needed either.

Actually, the lockscreen serves a wonderful purpose. I actually like the lockscreen with the giant clock and notifications. The first I know after booting up is any new messages, new mail, new calendar events, etc.. all without logging in. Windows 8 connect to the network very quickly, so it's able to deliver all these notifications pretty much immediately. You would then know if you need to check the mail or not.

[. . .] If you can't see that you're blind. I don't mean to offend you but that's just the facts.

I appreciate you expanding and posting your reasoning for the previous post. But this last comment suggests to me that you don't understand what me or Microsoft are saying. The large tiles and option to swipe in order to access some features are elements of an interface that has been optimised for touch input; however, Microsoft have ensured the interface works just as well with a keyboard and mouse, by including mouse hotspots and keyboard shortcuts. Wherever an element works well with touch, it works just as well with a keyboard and mouse. For example, one is able to swipe up to access the login screen, but they are also able to just press Enter on the keyboard (they have both options, in case they are not using touch input); likewise, the user has the option to swipe from the bottom to access the application bar, but they also have the option of pressing a keyboard shortcut. I have come across no element in Windows 8 that is hard to access when using a keyboard and mouse, and it's clear that Microsoft have worked hard to ensure this is the case.

That is my experience with it.

You say you tried Windows 8 out, but then you erroneously claimed that one has to swipe up in order to access the login screen :/ That is not true at all; as I have pointed out, one just needs to press Enter on the keyboard. Are you sure you gave Windows 8 a fair chance, used it with an open mind, and tried it out thoroughly? You not knowing the best way to access the login screen using a mouse indicates to me that you didn't try it out thoroughly.

  • Like 2

Actually, the lockscreen serves a wonderful purpose. I actually like the lockscreen with the giant clock and notifications. The first I know after booting up is any new messages, new mail, new calendar events, etc.. all without logging in. Windows 8 connect to the network very quickly, so it's able to deliver all these notifications pretty much immediately.

Yeah you already said that to another poster. When I boot my computer I want to login and start using it. I don't need to see that information at a glance because if I'm turning my computer on the first thing I'm going to do is check my email and I'd rather do that than see a summary of how many I received. That kind of screen is only useful on a tablet where you would press the sleep/wake button to see at a glance if you had received any new messages. Pointless on a desktop/notebook.

Tablets are great for many applications, but ultimately, much of the heavy lifting is done on a desktop.

Ding ding ding! We have a winner. Heavy lifting will be done on the desktop. The desktop is slowly becoming a niche market. Laptops are the mainstream right now and soon, so will tablets. Microsoft is aiming for the future while still keeping compatibility to the past. Just like how there are things you can do easier on a command line compared to a GUI application (and "faster" mind you), there is going to be a time where touching something is easier than interacting with a mouse. It's just natural evolution of mainstream activities.

The easiest way to figure this out is an analogy on why Microsoft is making this move (and why Apple as well made this move).

You can buy a car and use it because it's simple enough to be taught (please do not rebuttle with the word "intuitive"...I despise it right now, everything is taught/learned) and you can do the basics to drive. - Average User

You can drive that car and get better at it and learn a couple of things, you find out how some things work but not almost everything, just enough (ex: change tires, know that your car needs oil without the sticker telling you, etc...) - Above Average User

You can be a mechanic and if you don't know how to fix something you can figure it out or ask other mechanics to help you. - Techie/Engineer/Enthusiast

Early on in car history, if you were not a mechanic, you were not driving a car. You needed to know everything. - Techie

Later on, cars got simpler for some people but not everyone could do it. - Above Average User

Now, you learn the basics, get a license and you're off. - Average User

Right now, desktop UIs of computers are for the Above Average User and the Techie. The reason I say that is because when a person buys a BRAND NEW car, friends of the person (techie, above average user) don't expect to have to do anything to that car in order for the person to drive safely. Right now, if one of our family members were going to buy a new windows laptop, we all know we would like to take things off, put certain things on so we know we won't have to deal with any unreasonable issues later on. We all know that there will be issues at some point (just as with cars) but we don't want to have to teach them that.

Just like a car, a mechanic can do anything they wanted to with the car, yes they will have to go through layers of "simpler" things but it will always be there because cars still need to be made and fixed. This is exactly what Microsoft is doing for the desktop PC. It's an app because there will always be a need for heavy, complicated things to do with computers and Average Users can go there if they want, to try to learn and become an Above Average User or even a Techie one day, but for the most part, people just want to drive. Most people want to run applications and most people just want to get on the internet. Where do they get that? The store. Where will it be after they buy it, on the screen with the rest of their stuff.

Yes, it is simplifying computing but keeping what we techies are used to, we just have to go through some layers aka pop the hood.

  • Like 1

I appreciate you expanding and posting your reasoning for the previous post. But this last comment suggests to me that you don't understand what me or Microsoft are saying. The large tiles and option to swipe in order to access some features are elements of an interface that has been optimised for touch input; however, Microsoft have ensured the interface works just as well with a keyboard and mouse, by including mouse hotspots and keyboard shortcuts. Wherever an element works well with touch, it works just as well with a keyboard and mouse. For example, one is able to swipe up to access the login screen, but they are also able to just press Enter on the keyboard (they have both options, in case they are not using touch input); likewise, the user has the option to swipe from the bottom to access the application bar, but they also have the option of pressing a keyboard shortcut. I have come across no element in Windows 8 that is hard to access when using a keyboard and mouse, and it's clear that Microsoft have worked hard to ensure this is the case.

That is my experience with it.

You say you tried Windows 8 out, but then you erroneously claimed that one has to swipe up in order to access the login screen :/ That is not true at all; as I have pointed out, one just needs to press Enter on the keyboard. Are you sure you gave Windows 8 a fair chance, used it with an open mind, and tried it out thoroughly? You not knowing the best way to access the login screen using a mouse indicates to me that you didn't try it out thoroughly.

No where on the lock screen does it say you can press a keyboard button to get passed that screen. NO WHERE. I used the OS for a whole week. And this is just the problem with the OS. It is not intuitive - at all - just trying to find a shutdown switch in the OS is like going on a cross-country journey. It took me over 5 minutes to find something so simple in Metro.

Yes, Windows 8 is segregated, and it is called WOA (Windows On ARM), where your current x86 applications has no backward compatibilities.

Just out of curiosity, could you explain how WOA segregates Metro and the Explorer UIs?

Even though you can press a keyboard button to get passed the swipe screen, the mere fact the swipe screen is there in the first place shows it is designed for tablets. What need is that intermediary screen other than to add a home screen for tablets? The whole point of that screen is to provide a "slide to unlock" function that is present on iOS. That is plain as day. A tablet doesn't have a physical keyboard which is why that screen goes away when you press a key but that isn't intuitive and the screen shouldn't even be there in the first place on a desktop/notebook.

And if you say the Start Menu is not required then surely Metro which is merely a Start Menu replacement isn't needed either.

So CTRL-ALT-DELETE is any better?

Let's see = CTRL-ALT-DELETE = Swipe Screen (or any key on the keyboard)

After CTRL-ALT-DELETE or Swipe Screen, login screen shows up on all Windows version

So what is the difference? In addition, the Swipe Screen, as you call it, is also a notification area.

Start Screen = Contains Applications Links, Internet Shortcuts, Dynamic Tiles

Current Desktop of regular users = Links to Applications, Shortcuts, and physical documents.

Really, Microsoft is only giving everyone what they are already doing with the Start Screen, and if you are a Windows Power Users, and you shouldn't have any issue using the keyboard to navigate with any version of Windows.

Even though you can press a keyboard button to get passed the swipe screen, the mere fact the swipe screen is there in the first place shows it is designed for tablets. What need is that intermediary screen other than to add a home screen for tablets? The whole point of that screen is to provide a "slide to unlock" function that is present on iOS. That is plain as day. A tablet doesn't have a physical keyboard which is why that screen goes away when you press a key but that isn't intuitive and the screen shouldn't even be there in the first place on a desktop/notebook.

Of course it was designed for touch input. However, it was also designed to work well with a mouse and keyboard. That is why both options are there. I am astounded that so many of you appear to not see this. You state, "the mere fact the swipe screen is there in the first place shows it is designed for tablets," but I see no one disputing that. What we are pointing out is that Microsoft have also made it accessible when using a mouse and keyboard. The option is there: One can either swipe or press a button, depending on what works best with their input device or what they prefer.

And if you say the Start Menu is not required then surely Metro which is merely a Start Menu replacement isn't needed either.

This is again an astounding-to-witness oversight by many of you. The Metro experience is not just a Start Menu replacement. The Start Screen is just one part of the Metro experience. The Metro experience caters for the running of WinRT apps (WinRT is a powerful platform that provides many benefits to both developers and users, yet your post completely dismisses that). The Start Screen for the Metro experience is similar to what the Start Menu has always previously been for the Desktop; a place to launch apps. The reason the Start Menu was removed is because the Start Screen can launch both Desktop and Metro apps, which makes sense, and the Desktop is now actually seen as another app which is accessed from the Start Screen.

So CTRL-ALT-DELETE is any better?

Let's see = CTRL-ALT-DELETE = Swipe Screen (or any key on the keyboard)

After CTRL-ALT-DELETE or Swipe Screen, login screen shows up on all Windows version

So what is the difference? In addition, the Swipe Screen, as you call it, is also a notification area.

Start Screen = Contains Applications Links, Internet Shortcuts, Dynamic Tiles

Current Desktop of regular users = Links to Applications, Shortcuts, and physical documents.

Really, Microsoft is only giving everyone what they are already doing with the Start Screen, and if you are a Windows Power Users, and you shouldn't have any issue using the keyboard to navigate with any version of Windows.

Actually I thought this was terrible till I realized you only had to hit Ctrl. One key better than 3 :) I also like having custom lock screen, though desktop wallpaper is buried beneath Start Page :/ Win some lose some. I'll get a Win 7 Logon screen changer, ha.

A simple fix would be to... Make start orb reappear, click for start menu, long click for start screen.

That wouldn't be a fix; it would be a step backward. No other app has an extra Start Screen-type element in it, so why should the Desktop app have one (the Start Menu)? So many people are forgetting that the Desktop experience is no longer the main part of Windows 8. The Metro experience is the main part, and the Desktop is accessed from that experience, just like any Metro app is.

So CTRL-ALT-DELETE is any better?

Let's see = CTRL-ALT-DELETE = Swipe Screen (or any key on the keyboard)

After CTRL-ALT-DELETE or Swipe Screen, login screen shows up on all Windows version

So what is the difference? In addition, the Swipe Screen, as you call it, is also a notification area.

Start Screen = Contains Applications Links, Internet Shortcuts, Dynamic Tiles

Current Desktop of regular users = Links to Applications, Shortcuts, and physical documents.

Really, Microsoft is only giving everyone what they are already doing with the Start Screen, and if you are a Windows Power Users, and you shouldn't have any issue using the keyboard to navigate with any version of Windows.

Don't worry about us power users. We won't be upgrading to it anyway. I think it is pretty clear from Neowins recent front page poll where almost 60% of respondents said they would not use Windows 8 speaks for itself when it comes to power users. And I think it would be fair to say Neowin is made up of a majority of "power users". In-fact I think the term power users is a bit silly. What we are is geeks. We are people that care so much about our computers that we signed up to a forum dedicated to computers and we discuss at length computers. We are computer geeks and the majority of the computer geeks on this forum have said nay to this operating system, I'm not talking for everyone I'm letting the poll from the front page do that.

This is again an astounding-to-witness oversight by many of you. The Metro experience is not just a Start Menu replacement. The Start Screen is just one part of the Metro experience. The Metro experience caters for the running of WinRT apps (WinRT is a powerful platform that provides many benefits to both developers and users, yet your post completely dismisses that). The Start Screen for the Metro experience is similar to what the Start Menu has always previously been for the Desktop; a place to launch apps. The reason the Start Menu was removed is because the Start Screen can launch both Desktop and Metro apps, which makes sense, and the Desktop is now actually seen as another app which is accessed from the Start Screen.

You know what WinRT apps are? Dumbed down tablet applications that lack the complexity and granular controls of full desktop software. That is what WinRT apps are. ****ty apps.

Of course it was designed for touch input.

Thanks for acknowledging that, makes it much easier to listen to you even though we may disagree.

>>However, it was also designed to work well with a mouse and keyboard.<<

They still have a loooooooong way to go here IMO.

Don't worry about us power users. We won't be upgrading to it anyway. I think it is pretty clear from Neowins recent front page poll where almost 60% of respondents said they would not use Windows 8 speaks for itself when it comes to power users. And I think it would be fair to say Neowin is made up of a majority of "power users". In-fact I think the term power users is a bit silly. What we are is geeks. We are people that care so much about our computers that we signed up to a forum dedicated to computers and we discuss at length computers. We are computer geeks and the majority of the computer geeks on this forum have said nay to this operating system, I'm not talking for everyone I'm letting the poll from the front page do that.

Congrats. You are the 1%. Think Microsoft cares? No, they're catering to the masses of average users out there who want simplicity. Windows 8 is far from complete. I'd expect even more drastic changes at the RC.

  • Like 2

That wouldn't be a fix; it would be a step backward. No other app has an extra Start Screen-type element in it, so why should the Desktop app have one (the Start Menu)? So many people are forgetting that the Desktop experience is no longer the main part of Windows 8. The Metro experience is the main part, and the Desktop is accessed from that experience, just like any Metro app is.

Actually, if the start screen was superimposed over the desktop with transparency, that I think I could live with. More of a HUD type environment. Then switching out wouldn't be so black and white and disruptive. Would actually be rather cool.

No where on the lock screen does it say you can press a keyboard button to get passed that screen. NO WHERE. I used the OS for a whole week. And this is just the problem with the OS. It is not intuitive - at all - just trying to find a shutdown switch in the OS is like going on a cross-country journey. It took me over 5 minutes to find something so simple in Metro.

Nowhere on the lock screen does it say you can swipe up to access the login screen, yet that is the only thing you tried. Why? You suggest it isn't intuitive, but why would you try to swipe the screen up, when that has never previously been the way to access the login screen?

Yeah you already said that to another poster. When I boot my computer I want to login and start using it. I don't need to see that information at a glance because if I'm turning my computer on the first thing I'm going to do is check my email and I'd rather do that than see a summary of how many I received. That kind of screen is only useful on a tablet where you would press the sleep/wake button to see at a glance if you had received any new messages. Pointless on a desktop/notebook.

If there is not any notification, that would eliminate the need to go check your email. Or are you going to check your email just to look at it even though you know you don't have any new emails (unless you're looking for an old one, which would not be the purpose of you checking your email as you had a different objective in mind). That information saves you time. I use Windows 8 on my desktop and that information (including messaging even though it's kinda useless for me as I get that to information sent to my Windows Phone as well...currently) helps me as I know that I don't need to check my mail and I just open up whatever other thing I want.

Congrats. You are the 1%. Think Microsoft cares? No, they're catering to the masses of average users out there who barely know their way around a computer.

They're catering to tablet users who actually don't need a PC. This is where iPad is cleaning house. There are many many great technological improvements for the Enterprise that are being annoyed by the huge pimple known as Metro on the Desktop. Without that, there would be parades by everyone for 8.

Actually I thought this was terrible till I realized you only had to hit Ctrl. One key better than 3 :) I also like having custom lock screen, though desktop wallpaper is buried beneath Start Page :/ Win some lose some. I'll get a Win 7 Logon screen changer, ha.

You can hit any key not just the CTRL. The space bar is the biggest target.

[. . .]

You know what WinRT apps are? Dumbed down tablet applications that lack the complexity and granular controls of full desktop software. That is what WinRT apps are. ****ty apps.

Then it's clear you don't understand how powerful the platform is. I suggest you read about the great APIs available and what that means regarding one's app interacting with apps it doesn't even know about, and interacting with Windows 8 features.

Nowhere on the lock screen does it say you can swipe up to access the login screen, yet that is the only thing you tried. Why? You suggest it isn't intuitive, but why would you try to swipe the screen up, when that has never previously been the way to access the login screen?

Because when I clicked on the boxes in the bottom left corner, the background moved. It was just dumb luck. Not intuitive. Even apple adds the text "Slide to Unlock" to their slide button on the iPad. Microsoft just doesn't get it.

Then it's clear you don't understand how powerful the platform is. I suggest you read about the great APIs available and what that means regarding one's app interacting with apps it doesn't even know about, and interacting with Windows 8 features.

This is where you're wrong. I know exactly how powerful the API's are - It is the interface that holds the software back and I made that quite clear. I think you are having trouble understanding things from my point of view. The code the frameworks the API's are all fine. It is the interface and the HIG that will hold Metro apps back.

Congrats. You are the 1%. Think Microsoft cares? No, they're catering to the masses of average users out there who want simplicity. Windows 8 is far from complete. I'd expect even more drastic changes at the RC.

Of course they don't care about the desktop users. They want to beat Apples iPad. That is pretty clear by Windows 8's Metro interface.

Nowhere on the lock screen does it say you can swipe up to access the login screen, yet that is the only thing you tried. Why? You suggest it isn't intuitive, but why would you try to swipe the screen up, when that has never previously been the way to access the login screen?

When you click/drag it actually bounces and you discover the lock screen goes up. I dragged it for quite a while till I said there must be a better way and tried Ctrl-alt-del and it went up as soon as I touched ctrl.

When you implement a touch UI on the desktop, people's tendency will be to try to discover by dragging, touching, sliding. You know, like on a tablet device ;>

You can hit any key not just the CTRL. The space bar is the biggest target.

This is true. But ctrl requires less movement for me and I'm sued to it. Anywhoo, I do like the lock screen.

Of course they don't care about the desktop users. They want to beat Apples iPad. That is pretty clear by Windows 8's Metro interface.

[snipped] Are you honestly able to believe that they forgot about their 90% market share, 95% of which uses desktops?

Metro UI is one UI to rule them all. Desktop. Laptop. Ultrabook. Tablet. Transformer. You name it, it'll fit it. If you're bitching about fullscreen apps, if you don't want them, don't use them! There is no reason you should be bitching about the new Start Menu.... Not when all the old functionality is STILL there.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!