Recommended Posts

I expect the Metro CP to replace the default AERO CP. Most likely by Windows 9. I really wish Microsoft would kill off the classic Control Panel for Windows 8's release, but I don't think that's going to happen.

I'm pretty sure that would make a few people's heads explode here. :rolleyes:

The Desktop/Aero isn't aimed to disappear. It looks like you think that it's here for legacy reasons, but it's not.

For that reason and others, like the fact that you can't break 20+ yrs of retro-compatibility, you won't see the control panel to disappear.

The Desktop/Aero isn't aimed to disappear. It looks like you think that it's here for legacy reasons, but it's not.

For that reason and others, like the fact that you can't break 20+ yrs of retro-compatibility, you won't see the control panel to disappear.

One of them needs to disappear. You can't have all these widgets thrown all over the place.

post-293012-0-39831000-1335783077_thumb.

Rest i leave to your eyes.

It's an improvement. As long as they're going to keep this kind of dialogue, i'd like them to change it a bit more though. Just a rough idea:

post-128385-0-99998700-1335781980.png -> pointeroptions-1.png

Now that the title is centered, I don't see why the tabs should be left-aligned. The titlebar seems a bit too large and the scrollbar a bit too wide. I also don't see a reason for giving the scheme selection or cursor preview area its own box - and it should be clear from the context what it is you're selecting, so it's pretty redundant to give the box its own name ("scheme").

Anyway. That's just my opinion. Considering how radical a departure the Metro UI is from the windows UI as we know it, it would be nice if the changes to the "legacy" UI were a bit more dramatic as well. ...

^ Replacing every single legacy UI element is surely a tedious work and then to make sure you did not break anything is again a tough call. I don't think they would go for that in development of a nearly half baked OS. Lets hope we see that in Windows 9 development :)

Never mind those new cursors. My concern is why the mouse and cursor setting is still a separate dialog and has not been fully integrated into the control panel window. Wasn?t that Microsoft?s original plan, to eventually do away with dialogs all over the place?

That's what I want to see, cut down on all the dialog boxes for settings and so on. They started to integrate a bit of the basic stuff with Windows 7 but I don't see much more, at least on the desktop side, in Windows 8.

Yes you can, see Windows 8.

While I'm not disagreeing with your stance on the desktop and why it's there the thing is they can drop the old dialog windows and, like they started in Win7, put more of them into the main/central control panel window. There really is no reason for "advanced settings" to bring up a dialog etc, imo.

While I agree that having just the metro CP isn't enough they should also add more options/settings into it as well unless they want to keep to the line that the desktop is where you'd go for more advanced options thus keeping the metro CP more basic. If so that's fine with me as well and I figure having both is fine and not just a way to keep legacy compatibility going. That said, the desktop, which I to don't think will be vanishing etc, will change more, probably in Windows 9 to better fit with the new start screen.

At that point all those old 9x UI elements like the dialog boxes/windows etc probably won't fit and look very out of place. Remember how everyone, or at least a vocal minority, tossed a fit over Windows still having the old add fonts dialog from Win 3.11 around? Remember how off that looked with the new Aero UI etc? Finally MS just got rid of it fully and now you actually don't see anything when you add new fonts to the OS. I think we're going to run into that same type of issue soon.

While I'm not disagreeing with your stance on the desktop and why it's there the thing is they can drop the old dialog windows and, like they started in Win7, put more of them into the main/central control panel window. There really is no reason for "advanced settings" to bring up a dialog etc, imo.

While I agree that having just the metro CP isn't enough they should also add more options/settings into it as well unless they want to keep to the line that the desktop is where you'd go for more advanced options thus keeping the metro CP more basic.

Can you find some advanced options that should be added into metro CP ? I can't find any that really applies to metro/tablet. For instance, there's no place for a mouse cursor option in metro CP, that's why it isn't there.

Can you find some advanced options that should be added into metro CP ? I can't find any that really applies to metro/tablet. For instance, there's no place for a mouse cursor option in metro CP, that's why it isn't there.

I agree, which is why I said if they want to keep it basic then fine, but you're kinda sidestepping my point about the dialogs being dropped. The new metro CP does a good enough job of bringing it's settings into one main window which is what the desktop CP should do. That's all I'm really saying here. They started the trend in Windows 7 but it doesn't seem like they've built on it in Windows 8 at this point.

I don't see why they should rewamp it totally. Power user will complains about it because they won't find the settings back where they are used to and newb won't even try to find them.

There are always some minor improvements here & there. Windows 8 has new settings inside the device manager (event history) for example.

With the action center, the network center and the device center, I don't see what else they can do. What do you want to see improved?

I don't see why they should rewamp it totally. Power user will complains about it because they won't find the settings back where they are used to and newb won't even try to find them.

There are always some minor improvements here & there. Windows 8 has new settings inside the device manager (event history) for example.

With the action center, the network center and the device center, I don't see what else they can do. What do you want to see improved?

Since you bring it up here's my example. Using the network center as an example, if you open it up a number of the different settings are stored inside it's window while some other things toss up an old dialog window that's been around since Windows 98. Since they've already started to put most things into the main window why just stop and leave things out in their own dialog windows/boxes etc? Like when you click on Local Area connection in the Network Center and you get the old dialog box that's more or less the same that it's been for 10+ years? Why shouldn't that info just be put inside the main Network Center window like other things have, like for example Windows Firewall, that's been placed inside the main window and no longer brings up it's own separate dialog window.

Another example is what they're doing in office, most if not all of the different office options/settings appear inside the main office apps window, they don't bring up another window/box or w/e. In contrast we still have something like Internet Explorer that's been using the same old Internet Options dialog since IE5, if not older. I just think that the desktop CP should contain all of the different settings areas inside it's main Window, which is the same main window that Network Center and Device Center etc show up in, look at the address bar and you can see the path listed. I believe it's time to ditch the old dialog boxes that have been around since the 90s.

All Aero bugs fixed on latest builds, now only AeroLite looks like unfinished, we will see it in later pics

now qiklB.png vs WCP post-293012-0-02077300-1335858206.png (just in case you wanna see the difference)

quote_icon.png Originally Posted by eze310 viewpost-right.png

canouna, I wanted to ask if the new messenger (beta) change the interface because the latter turned out to not be as good at least in my opinion,thanks anyway

Yes UI changed, better than the previous release.

Keep following http://winunleakedfo...-Preview/page28 for more news and please post them here to keep the Neowin forums up to date (at least)

/no i am not promoting that site but the info it contains ;)

Since you bring it up here's my example. Using the network center as an example, if you open it up a number of the different settings are stored inside it's window while some other things toss up an old dialog window that's been around since Windows 98. Since they've already started to put most things into the main window why just stop and leave things out in their own dialog windows/boxes etc? Like when you click on Local Area connection in the Network Center and you get the old dialog box that's more or less the same that it's been for 10+ years? Why shouldn't that info just be put inside the main Network Center window like other things have, like for example Windows Firewall, that's been placed inside the main window and no longer brings up it's own separate dialog window.

I don't see what's wrong with the current UI. They are working fine for 10+ years, don't break what is working fine just for the sake of "let's change it".

If you go to the network center, you have at a glance all the infos that newbs needs. And with 1 or 2 clicks, you have the advanced infos for power user, nothing is wrong here. There's no need to overload the UI.

Another example is what they're doing in office, most if not all of the different office options/settings appear inside the main office apps window, they don't bring up another window/box or w/e. In contrast we still have something like Internet Explorer that's been using the same old Internet Options dialog since IE5, if not older. I just think that the desktop CP should contain all of the different settings areas inside it's main Window, which is the same main window that Network Center and Device Center etc show up in, look at the address bar and you can see the path listed. I believe it's time to ditch the old dialog boxes that have been around since the 90s.

Applications != OS. We aren't debating about IE vs Office UI here. :/

The control panel is a mess in my opinion. You can usually get to what you're looking for with a bit of searching and looking and running across options by accident, and after having used it for so long you basically know where things are anyway. But it's not completely logically organized and its hierarchical structure isn't very well thought out at all. Take this screenshot as an example:

cp.png

In some cases, the blue links simply take me to the very same place that clicking on the category header they're listed under does, in some cases they act as a shortcut for performing an operation that would be accessible from there, and in some cases they take me to options that are not accessible at all if you first clicked on the category header. Then, on the left side bar you can switch between different categories one level up, yet when you click on e.g. "Display", the left side bar starts to list options for that control panel pane there (that may or may not have already been listed one level up, below the category header)?! It all seems very disorganized to me...

I can see the pixels in my Windows 7 curosrs too... No biggie.

Don't forget that some cursors have gradients while some don't. :D

It just shows that Microsoft still doesn't pay much, if any at all, attention to detail or consistency for that matter.

The new cursors look pathetic. I didn't like them.

Though I would've loved the circular dots animation at windows startup to be used in cursors.

I agree. The dots animation is really beautiful. Something I wouldn't mind staring at.

There's so much inconsistency between the desktop UI and metro. The boot loading animation is different from the loading cursor, the buttons are different, so are the scroll bars, thr icon style etc...

The revised Aero with the Watercolor-style widgets would look much better if the title bar weren't quite as tall. As it is the proportions between title bar and rest of the GUI are out of whack.

Agreed. The Aero titlebar is disproportionally large compared to the rest of the interface elements.

New screenshot featuring "new icon for Windows Update, Add features, and new style for Windows Color"

dlYnB.png

One thing I do think would help overall is with the title bar size, if those could take up less space it'd look overall better IMO.

The control panel is a mess in my opinion. You can usually get to what you're looking for with a bit of searching and looking and running across options by accident, and after having used it for so long you basically know where things are anyway. But it's not completely logically organized and its hierarchical structure isn't very well thought out at all.

I completely agree. I was never a fan of the modern Control Panel since it was introduced in Vista and it's a shame to see remain virtually unchanged in yet another version of Windows. One of the biggest problems is that it's not consistent - some functions will open up in the same window, while others will launch separate windows in different locations on the screen (e.g. click 'Taskbar', 'Change sound effects' or 'Folder Options'). Not only that but it's basically a wall of text with a few small and unhelpful icons to the left. There is also a lot of duplication.

When Microsoft decided to port a lot of Control Panel functionality to Metro they should have also taken a serious look at the Control Panel. One option would have been to move the Control Panel completely to Metro - for the desktop they could have gone for a side-snapped app with conventional sized text and images, while for Metro they could have gone for the full-sized approach see in More PC Settings. I still think it was a mistake to not allow Metro apps to co-exist with regular windows (so they could scale down, yet still keep the same dimensions), which would have been especially beneficial for high resolution displays. I have a 2560x1600 display and I hate what they've done to Solitaire, as it simply cannot co-exist with other apps (the side-snapped mode is horrible). Microsoft has put a lot of work into Metro but I just don't see full-sized Metro apps being used much on desktop systems - although I quite often use side-snapped apps I rarely ever use any fullscreen and most have a decided lack of content, largely due to the design constraints associated with supporting low resolution displays and touch.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!