Recommended Posts

It's an a whole other level. Walking Dead, Breaking Bad... all awesome. But they pale in comparison to Game of Thrones.

watched the first season of game of thrones and I found it rather boring.

Decent episode, not as much action/excitement as last episode. However it does set the stage for the coming episodes.

watched the first season of game of thrones and I found it rather boring.

I started watching it (due to this thread), only halfway through episode one. At this point the show seems like it's about inceset, messed up monsters, rape, and yea.. Not that any of that bugs me, but it's definitely not very Action..istic.. as I was hoping for off the bat.

Actually I thought the episode was really well done. Not as gripping as the last episode, but still was good in my opinion.

<span style="font-family:lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">Of course this begs the question, but if Carol when out the door then where did she go to or why has she not came back yet? kind of makes you wonder if more prisoners are still there that may have her?  Ya I was still a bit confused on what happened to the rest of Lori's body? Obviously the zombie did not eat all of Lori but yes what happened to the rest? I was so sure when Rick entered that room and heard a zombie that it would have been Lori.  I think that would have been really intense if he would be forced to shoot her</span></span>

If you watch the Talking Dead aftershow, the director Greg Nicotero said

That the bloated zombie had dragged Loris corpse around the corner and eaten her

Really looking forward to whats coming up, especially what the telephone signifies.

Decent episode, not as much action/excitement as last episode. However it does set the stage for the coming episodes.

I started watching it (due to this thread), only halfway through episode one. At this point the show seems like it's about inceset, messed up monsters, rape, and yea.. Not that any of that bugs me, but it's definitely not very Action..istic.. as I was hoping for off the bat.

Give it to 2nd season. They are building everything up :p

If you watch the Talking Dead aftershow, the director Greg Nicotero said

That the bloated zombie had dragged Loris corpse around the corner and eaten her

Really looking forward to whats coming up, especially what the telephone signifies.

Would be nice for them to make that known through the story telling and not just something to be left assumed of.

If you watch the Talking Dead aftershow, the director Greg Nicotero said

That the bloated zombie had dragged Loris corpse around the corner and eaten her

Really looking forward to whats coming up, especially what the telephone signifies.

Season 3 is definitely meeting my expectations.

I suppose we can't have non stop action every week :p but I liked it...WTF at fat zombie it was obvious it had eaten Lori though

I thought that Lori had been eaten by that zombie too, surely not every single last bit of her though? Still an awesome epispode, hell of a load of zombie kills!

I thought that Lori had been eaten by that zombie too, surely not every single last bit of her though? Still an awesome epispode, hell of a load of zombie kills!

No, apparently it was all of her.

There were a ton of problems with the timing in this episode.

How did the fat zombie have enough time to consume ALL of Lori in the couple of minutes since Carl shot her?

How did Carl Maggie and the baby get out into the prison yard with those zombies that Rick axed alive and in the way?

This episode started right where the last ended. There was no time in between. Yet, they had those two mistakes as well as them not even looking for Carol and just assuming she was dead. Why would they dig the graves and not even look for bodies? And if they were just making graves to mourn, theres no reason to dig 6 foot deep holes.

Dumb.

We noted before that WWE Champion CM Punk reportedly booked himself an appearance on a popular TV show without WWE?s knowledge because he felt they would have given the role to someone else. It?s no secret that Punk is a big fan of AMC?s The Walking Dead and the un-confirmed rumor is that he will have a special walk-on role in an upcoming episode.

I hope this isnt the start of something, i like the fact i dont really recognise any of the actors.. If this does happen hopefully it'll be done well.

If he does a GTS to a zombie I am out of here! :p

Robert Kirkman sat down with the people over at Entertainment Weekly to talk about AMC's hit Zombie show The Walking Dead. During the chat Krikman revealed that major things are in store for the upcoming Fall finale. One of the major things is that you can expect is a new character to be revealed. Not only is it a new character, but it's a fan favorite from the comic series. "There?s a new character added. A big deal fan favorite from the comic book is introduced into the show in this episode, so be on the lookout for that," explained Kirkman. EW speculates that the character in question is none other than Tyreese. While this has not been confirmed there is some substantial evidence to back this up.

Source

I feel i have missed out here lol

I have never read the comics lol

I have Volume 1 and 2 but I think they have no passed that so its new area for me but am tempted to pick them up at book store

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!