UK ISP BT Offers up to 76Mbps Superfast Broadband Boost for Free


Recommended Posts

I'm on BT Infinity and whilst my problems aren't as bad as yours, I agree that their router is a joke. The WiFi just randomly decides to stop working about 3 times a day, and the whole connection (wired too) drops daily requiring a reboot. >_<

Yea I got rid of the Home Hub 3.0 after about a week of getting weird router crashes everynight around the same time, replaced it with my own and rarely goes down now

Do you have that Huawei HG612 Openreach modem (not the router, the VDSL modem).

They're known to fail in this way and as such have been replaced by newer 2B and 2V revisions (Should be sticker on the back which says if you have a 2x revision) and also Openreach are now providing modems manufactured by ECI (Although I think this depends on whats in the cabs rather than because of the Huawei's failing).

They get notoriously hot. Even the two newer versions aren't exactly reliable unfortunately.

Just checked mine, its the 2B and doesn't seem to have any problems

What happens to the speeds when you plug directly into the modem, bypassing the router? I think you need to set it up as a PPPoE connection, although as you've changed the router you'll know the settings yourself.

If you get the same poor speeds I'd bet your modem has started to fail.

What happens to the speeds when you plug directly into the modem, bypassing the router? I think you need to set it up as a PPPoE connection, although as you've changed the router you'll know the settings yourself.

If you get the same poor speeds I'd bet your modem has started to fail.

I tried it quickly once and couldn't connect but I might have had a static Internal IP set on the PC so it would have been on the wrong range, I guess your PC would be given an external IP if it worked

Doesnt sound like a very safe thing to do though

All you're doing is removing the router. As long as your firewall is up and running then it's just removing a potential piece of faulty equipment. If his speeds are still low then its either a fault with the 612 (Google HG612 overheating) or a problem on the line - both of which Openreach have to sort out.

As Paul says, he went off to restart the router. When he did another speed test, the results were still poor. To me, it's looking like its not more the router at fault but his actual internet connection.

It's like back when ADSL first came out, you pretty much needed an ADSL modem and a separate router as combo devices were rare and expensive. If there was only one computer in the house, you could plug the modem directly into it. No need for an internal network etc.

All you're doing is removing the router. As long as your firewall is up and running then it's just removing a potential piece of faulty equipment. If his speeds are still low then its either a fault with the 612 (Google HG612 overheating) or a problem on the line - both of which Openreach have to sort out.

It's like back when ADSL first came out, you pretty much needed an ADSL modem and a separate router as combo devices were rare and expensive. If there was only one computer in the house, you could plug the modem directly into it. No need for an internal network etc.

What acts as a DHCP server though? Your ISP ?

Do you have that Huawei HG612 Openreach modem (not the router, the VDSL modem). They're known to fail in this way and as such have been replaced by newer 2B and 2V revisions (Should be sticker on the back which says if you have a 2x revision) and also Openreach are now providing modems manufactured by ECI (Although I think this depends on whats in the cabs rather than because of the Huawei's failing). They get notoriously hot. Even the two newer versions aren't exactly reliable unfortunately.

Just checked now - it's the HG612 here as well. Best bet is to replace it then, right?

shame there is no date for my exchange. My county will be getting 90% FTTC/FTTP by the end of 2014 but my 20mb virgin cable will do me until then, getting free upgrade to 60mb hopefully in july. I hope BT reduces the cost of FTTC in the near future as it is around ?30 inc phone line for the cheapest FTTC from any ISP as a result of BT charging ISP loads. Yet i can get 30mb virgin cable for ?22.50 ish, fttp is too pricey at the moment.

One restart later, and here are my results from both:

Date of Speed Test: 2012-04-11 16:45:54 Download Speed: 680 kbps (85 KB/sec transfer rate) Upload Speed: 6828 kbps (853.5 KB/sec transfer rate)

1888354051.png

Ridiculous, to be honest. I've had nights where it's absolutely silky smooth as well, which makes it even more frustrating to me.

Check the IP Profile for your line and post back with details - http://www.speedtester.bt.com/ (click the "Fibre to the Premises Diagnostics" under Note 2).

A stuck IP Profile with low download speeds usually indicates a fault due to line noise or restarting the modem/router quite frequently on your end (which also shows your local exchange there is instability), contact BT to reset it and/or get them to sort you out a new router.

Once they do, it can take up to 3 weeks to get the maximum speed for your line (providing there are no other issues).

Check the IP Profile for your line and post back with details - http://www.speedtester.bt.com/ (click the "Fibre to the Premises Diagnostics" under Note 2).

A stuck IP Profile with low download speeds usually indicates a fault due to line noise or restarting the modem/router quite frequently on your end (which also shows your local exchange there is instability), contact BT to reset it and/or get them to sort you out a new router. Once they do, it can take up to 3 weeks to get the maximum speed for your line (providing there are no other issues).

I got 3.67MB. Still not good, but it's an improvement. I checked with my mum and we'll see about getting a replacement for the current HG621 we have in the house as well. If there's a new router too, that'd be great.

I've just placed an order for this BT product. The house I'm in is a new build and not to mention the cab is less than 100metres, so I'm hoping to get nearly the full speed. I'll find out next Thursday (the 19th) any ways. :)

Been on the 40/10 (sorry, 38/9 as BT are now forced to advertise it as...) Infinity package for months now with no problems - had full speed since the day it was installed and no downtime. Was on Virgin 50 meg at the time but it was diabolical in this area so I moved to VDSL. I'll certainly be renewing my contract for the extra speed tomorrow. Should see at least 70Mbit out of it given how far I am from the FTTC cab.

Yea that's what I thought, not going to help if the openreach modem is the problem though

It narrows it down to it being the modem rather than the router though. Its only a method of fault finding - its not any form of fix if that's what you thought I meant!

Been on the 40/10 (sorry, 38/9 as BT are now forced to advertise it as...)

I wondered why they'd stopped using 40!

Aww. Still stuck on 6mbps/448kbps :(. Guess that's what you get for living with a tiny amount of exchange subscribers.

My whole internet life I was always on a crappy slower than 90% of anyone connection no matter where I lived, it has only been a few months since I finally got FTTC

Kinda makes up for all those years of hair pulling to get a huge upgrade twice in 12 months

Why not, I'm not going with any other ISP while BT are providing these sorts of speeds, quite happy to renew

That's fine if you're happy with BT but not everyone wants to be stuck on a contract for internet. To be honest, I don't even know why there is such a thing as a contract for internet access - what exactly are you paying off?

I was a BT Broadband customer years ago when they offered unlimited ADSL. I wasn't effected but I saw a lot of people stuck when BT changed their terms of service and introduced download limits - all the people on contracts were stuck with nowhere to go. I've been considering BT Infinity because the speeds look so good but I really don't want to end up stuck with BT because they're dodgy, unreliable, overpriced and their customer service is the worst I've ever had to deal with. Seeing them force users to extend their contracts just to take advantage of network improvements is not the sort of thing that makes me want to switch.

I've been with Be* for the last few years. They don't have contracts (you just have to give them a month's notice I think), they offer things like static IP addresses as standard and their customer service is top notch. The only problem is, they don't have any clear plan to migrate to fibre-optic any time soon :angry:

That's fine if you're happy with BT but not everyone wants to be stuck on a contract for internet. To be honest, I don't even know why there is such a thing as a contract for internet access - what exactly are you paying off?

I was a BT Broadband customer years ago when they offered unlimited ADSL. I wasn't effected but I saw a lot of people stuck when BT changed their terms of service and introduced download limits - all the people on contracts were stuck with nowhere to go. I've been considering BT Infinity because the speeds look so good but I really don't want to end up stuck with BT because they're dodgy, unreliable, overpriced and their customer service is the worst I've ever had to deal with. Seeing them force users to extend their contracts just to take advantage of network improvements is not the sort of thing that makes me want to switch.

I've been with Be* for the last few years. They don't have contracts (you just have to give them a month's notice I think), they offer things like static IP addresses as standard and their customer service is top notch. The only problem is, they don't have any clear plan to migrate to fibre-optic any time soon :angry:

Yea contracts suck in general, but I'm not planning on moving house any time soon and not planning on leaving BT so it really doesn't make much difference to me atm

But I get where you are coming from, the only reason I can think of contracts is for when they actually have to install equipment your end or they could spend millions doing that every day only for the customer to leave them 1 month later and keep all the gear

Yea contracts suck in general, but I'm not planning on moving house any time soon and not planning on leaving BT so it really doesn't make much difference to me atm

But I get where you are coming from, the only reason I can think of contracts is for when they actually have to install equipment your end or they could spend millions doing that every day only for the customer to leave them 1 month later and keep all the gear

Yes, I presume BT argue that the contract covers the cost of the modem/router. Of course, nobody actually wants these and I can't think of the last time I ever used an ISPs hardware. Be* expect you to give them the router back when you leave them (or charge you for it if you don't return it) which I think is fair and much better than being stuck on a contract.

BT also make you sign contracts for landlines despite the fact that they're not supplying any hardware and they force you to renew the contract if you ever try to switch packages. I think they're just taking the p*ss to be honest and I know they use it as an excuse to lock you in and charge you extra if you ever want to change anything.

Anyway, hopefully everything will work out for you with BT :) In the meantime, I need to make a list of pros and cons to see whether I can stomach returning to BT.

Anyway, hopefully everything will work out for you with BT :) In the meantime, I need to make a list of pros and cons to see whether I can stomach returning to BT.

Thanks, well I have to say since getting FTTC I haven't had an ounce of bother with them, their ADSL package is a joke though, constantly resetting routers and emailing and calling them to try get something working, but the lines are old, so no wonder FTTC is more or less problem free, it has removed 95% of the copper line from the equation

Thanks, well I have to say since getting FTTC I haven't had an ounce of bother with them, their ADSL package is a joke though, constantly resetting routers and emailing and calling them to try get something working, but the lines are old, so no wonder FTTC is more or less problem free, it has removed 95% of the copper line from the equation

That's good to know. My ADSL connection gets really unstable in Autumn and Spring as the temperature shifts (weird, I know :)) and it would be nice to have a stable connection. I just wish BT offered static IP addresses on their consumer packages because I could accept the customer service problems if I didn't have to find workarounds and alternatives to the things I do now. BT Business plan prices are steep when all you want is a static IP address.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!