UK ISP BT Offers up to 76Mbps Superfast Broadband Boost for Free


Recommended Posts

I'm on BT Infinity and whilst my problems aren't as bad as yours, I agree that their router is a joke. The WiFi just randomly decides to stop working about 3 times a day, and the whole connection (wired too) drops daily requiring a reboot. >_<

Yea I got rid of the Home Hub 3.0 after about a week of getting weird router crashes everynight around the same time, replaced it with my own and rarely goes down now

Do you have that Huawei HG612 Openreach modem (not the router, the VDSL modem).

They're known to fail in this way and as such have been replaced by newer 2B and 2V revisions (Should be sticker on the back which says if you have a 2x revision) and also Openreach are now providing modems manufactured by ECI (Although I think this depends on whats in the cabs rather than because of the Huawei's failing).

They get notoriously hot. Even the two newer versions aren't exactly reliable unfortunately.

Just checked mine, its the 2B and doesn't seem to have any problems

What happens to the speeds when you plug directly into the modem, bypassing the router? I think you need to set it up as a PPPoE connection, although as you've changed the router you'll know the settings yourself.

If you get the same poor speeds I'd bet your modem has started to fail.

What happens to the speeds when you plug directly into the modem, bypassing the router? I think you need to set it up as a PPPoE connection, although as you've changed the router you'll know the settings yourself.

If you get the same poor speeds I'd bet your modem has started to fail.

I tried it quickly once and couldn't connect but I might have had a static Internal IP set on the PC so it would have been on the wrong range, I guess your PC would be given an external IP if it worked

Doesnt sound like a very safe thing to do though

All you're doing is removing the router. As long as your firewall is up and running then it's just removing a potential piece of faulty equipment. If his speeds are still low then its either a fault with the 612 (Google HG612 overheating) or a problem on the line - both of which Openreach have to sort out.

As Paul says, he went off to restart the router. When he did another speed test, the results were still poor. To me, it's looking like its not more the router at fault but his actual internet connection.

It's like back when ADSL first came out, you pretty much needed an ADSL modem and a separate router as combo devices were rare and expensive. If there was only one computer in the house, you could plug the modem directly into it. No need for an internal network etc.

All you're doing is removing the router. As long as your firewall is up and running then it's just removing a potential piece of faulty equipment. If his speeds are still low then its either a fault with the 612 (Google HG612 overheating) or a problem on the line - both of which Openreach have to sort out.

It's like back when ADSL first came out, you pretty much needed an ADSL modem and a separate router as combo devices were rare and expensive. If there was only one computer in the house, you could plug the modem directly into it. No need for an internal network etc.

What acts as a DHCP server though? Your ISP ?

Do you have that Huawei HG612 Openreach modem (not the router, the VDSL modem). They're known to fail in this way and as such have been replaced by newer 2B and 2V revisions (Should be sticker on the back which says if you have a 2x revision) and also Openreach are now providing modems manufactured by ECI (Although I think this depends on whats in the cabs rather than because of the Huawei's failing). They get notoriously hot. Even the two newer versions aren't exactly reliable unfortunately.

Just checked now - it's the HG612 here as well. Best bet is to replace it then, right?

shame there is no date for my exchange. My county will be getting 90% FTTC/FTTP by the end of 2014 but my 20mb virgin cable will do me until then, getting free upgrade to 60mb hopefully in july. I hope BT reduces the cost of FTTC in the near future as it is around ?30 inc phone line for the cheapest FTTC from any ISP as a result of BT charging ISP loads. Yet i can get 30mb virgin cable for ?22.50 ish, fttp is too pricey at the moment.

One restart later, and here are my results from both:

Date of Speed Test: 2012-04-11 16:45:54 Download Speed: 680 kbps (85 KB/sec transfer rate) Upload Speed: 6828 kbps (853.5 KB/sec transfer rate)

1888354051.png

Ridiculous, to be honest. I've had nights where it's absolutely silky smooth as well, which makes it even more frustrating to me.

Check the IP Profile for your line and post back with details - http://www.speedtester.bt.com/ (click the "Fibre to the Premises Diagnostics" under Note 2).

A stuck IP Profile with low download speeds usually indicates a fault due to line noise or restarting the modem/router quite frequently on your end (which also shows your local exchange there is instability), contact BT to reset it and/or get them to sort you out a new router.

Once they do, it can take up to 3 weeks to get the maximum speed for your line (providing there are no other issues).

Check the IP Profile for your line and post back with details - http://www.speedtester.bt.com/ (click the "Fibre to the Premises Diagnostics" under Note 2).

A stuck IP Profile with low download speeds usually indicates a fault due to line noise or restarting the modem/router quite frequently on your end (which also shows your local exchange there is instability), contact BT to reset it and/or get them to sort you out a new router. Once they do, it can take up to 3 weeks to get the maximum speed for your line (providing there are no other issues).

I got 3.67MB. Still not good, but it's an improvement. I checked with my mum and we'll see about getting a replacement for the current HG621 we have in the house as well. If there's a new router too, that'd be great.

I've just placed an order for this BT product. The house I'm in is a new build and not to mention the cab is less than 100metres, so I'm hoping to get nearly the full speed. I'll find out next Thursday (the 19th) any ways. :)

Been on the 40/10 (sorry, 38/9 as BT are now forced to advertise it as...) Infinity package for months now with no problems - had full speed since the day it was installed and no downtime. Was on Virgin 50 meg at the time but it was diabolical in this area so I moved to VDSL. I'll certainly be renewing my contract for the extra speed tomorrow. Should see at least 70Mbit out of it given how far I am from the FTTC cab.

Yea that's what I thought, not going to help if the openreach modem is the problem though

It narrows it down to it being the modem rather than the router though. Its only a method of fault finding - its not any form of fix if that's what you thought I meant!

Been on the 40/10 (sorry, 38/9 as BT are now forced to advertise it as...)

I wondered why they'd stopped using 40!

Aww. Still stuck on 6mbps/448kbps :(. Guess that's what you get for living with a tiny amount of exchange subscribers.

My whole internet life I was always on a crappy slower than 90% of anyone connection no matter where I lived, it has only been a few months since I finally got FTTC

Kinda makes up for all those years of hair pulling to get a huge upgrade twice in 12 months

Why not, I'm not going with any other ISP while BT are providing these sorts of speeds, quite happy to renew

That's fine if you're happy with BT but not everyone wants to be stuck on a contract for internet. To be honest, I don't even know why there is such a thing as a contract for internet access - what exactly are you paying off?

I was a BT Broadband customer years ago when they offered unlimited ADSL. I wasn't effected but I saw a lot of people stuck when BT changed their terms of service and introduced download limits - all the people on contracts were stuck with nowhere to go. I've been considering BT Infinity because the speeds look so good but I really don't want to end up stuck with BT because they're dodgy, unreliable, overpriced and their customer service is the worst I've ever had to deal with. Seeing them force users to extend their contracts just to take advantage of network improvements is not the sort of thing that makes me want to switch.

I've been with Be* for the last few years. They don't have contracts (you just have to give them a month's notice I think), they offer things like static IP addresses as standard and their customer service is top notch. The only problem is, they don't have any clear plan to migrate to fibre-optic any time soon :angry:

That's fine if you're happy with BT but not everyone wants to be stuck on a contract for internet. To be honest, I don't even know why there is such a thing as a contract for internet access - what exactly are you paying off?

I was a BT Broadband customer years ago when they offered unlimited ADSL. I wasn't effected but I saw a lot of people stuck when BT changed their terms of service and introduced download limits - all the people on contracts were stuck with nowhere to go. I've been considering BT Infinity because the speeds look so good but I really don't want to end up stuck with BT because they're dodgy, unreliable, overpriced and their customer service is the worst I've ever had to deal with. Seeing them force users to extend their contracts just to take advantage of network improvements is not the sort of thing that makes me want to switch.

I've been with Be* for the last few years. They don't have contracts (you just have to give them a month's notice I think), they offer things like static IP addresses as standard and their customer service is top notch. The only problem is, they don't have any clear plan to migrate to fibre-optic any time soon :angry:

Yea contracts suck in general, but I'm not planning on moving house any time soon and not planning on leaving BT so it really doesn't make much difference to me atm

But I get where you are coming from, the only reason I can think of contracts is for when they actually have to install equipment your end or they could spend millions doing that every day only for the customer to leave them 1 month later and keep all the gear

Yea contracts suck in general, but I'm not planning on moving house any time soon and not planning on leaving BT so it really doesn't make much difference to me atm

But I get where you are coming from, the only reason I can think of contracts is for when they actually have to install equipment your end or they could spend millions doing that every day only for the customer to leave them 1 month later and keep all the gear

Yes, I presume BT argue that the contract covers the cost of the modem/router. Of course, nobody actually wants these and I can't think of the last time I ever used an ISPs hardware. Be* expect you to give them the router back when you leave them (or charge you for it if you don't return it) which I think is fair and much better than being stuck on a contract.

BT also make you sign contracts for landlines despite the fact that they're not supplying any hardware and they force you to renew the contract if you ever try to switch packages. I think they're just taking the p*ss to be honest and I know they use it as an excuse to lock you in and charge you extra if you ever want to change anything.

Anyway, hopefully everything will work out for you with BT :) In the meantime, I need to make a list of pros and cons to see whether I can stomach returning to BT.

Anyway, hopefully everything will work out for you with BT :) In the meantime, I need to make a list of pros and cons to see whether I can stomach returning to BT.

Thanks, well I have to say since getting FTTC I haven't had an ounce of bother with them, their ADSL package is a joke though, constantly resetting routers and emailing and calling them to try get something working, but the lines are old, so no wonder FTTC is more or less problem free, it has removed 95% of the copper line from the equation

Thanks, well I have to say since getting FTTC I haven't had an ounce of bother with them, their ADSL package is a joke though, constantly resetting routers and emailing and calling them to try get something working, but the lines are old, so no wonder FTTC is more or less problem free, it has removed 95% of the copper line from the equation

That's good to know. My ADSL connection gets really unstable in Autumn and Spring as the temperature shifts (weird, I know :)) and it would be nice to have a stable connection. I just wish BT offered static IP addresses on their consumer packages because I could accept the customer service problems if I didn't have to find workarounds and alternatives to the things I do now. BT Business plan prices are steep when all you want is a static IP address.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!