UK ISP BT Offers up to 76Mbps Superfast Broadband Boost for Free


Recommended Posts

That's good to know. My ADSL connection gets really unstable in Autumn and Spring as the temperature shifts (weird, I know :)) and it would be nice to have a stable connection. I just wish BT offered static IP addresses on their consumer packages because I could accept the customer service problems if I didn't have to find workarounds and alternatives to the things I do now. BT Business plan prices are steep when all you want is a static IP address.

I was losing the will to live, I was with Orange BB and they sold their lines to BT which dropped me from ADSL2+ to ADSL and I lost about 3 meg from an already crappy 5-6meg connection, then went with BT BB and the exchange kept dropping my profile from FAST to Interleaved error correction and losing me even more speed, you can get the line reset and all the trimmings but by that time I was already in line for FTTC so I just put up with it for a few more weeks and it was worth the wait

Yea business prices are hefty, I'm going to assume you already looked into things like DynDNS to solve the dynamic IP issue ?

I ditched Virgin for it. Virgin varies depending on area - in some places it's spot on, like yours, but in others it's a disgrace and they don't seem to care about fixing it. Cable is hit and miss but if you're in a good area then it's excellent.

Whilst is't good that BT are doing this, I don't understand why they dont offer at least what Virgin can do. my 100MB is going up to 120 in June. Are BT going to ramp the speeds up quickly to compete?

Whilst is't good that BT are doing this, I don't understand why they dont offer at least what Virgin can do. my 100MB is going up to 120 in June. Are BT going to ramp the speeds up quickly to compete?

BT have only just started rolling out FTTC, they will overtake VIrgin in no time, I might be wrong, but since Blueyonder > Telewest > Virgin Media, they have not layed any extra cable and are only using what is already there since the beginning

I might be wrong about that but thats what I have heard every time I asked about it, BT are way ahead of Virgin and will continue to take the lead imo

Now we await and see if we get this upgrade. We ordered infinity earlier in the day before I saw the announcement.

Yea you`ll get it, its a free upgrade anyway, and the only rule it to renew your contract, so as yours hasn't even started yet, you`ll automatically get it

Quote system on Neowin is broken.

^^ Cool cheers. I just looked up the speed and we will get 50 down and 13 up with the infinity 2 package. Hopefully we won't get the issues that some report on the BT forums.

I fail to see how.

Because, while I have the same speed as you, it simply doesn't work. Connection drops out and latency between a few hundred and the thousands are my main issue (can't use Spotify or the BBC iPlayer, can't play online games and I won't even get started on downloading), and they keep suggesting there's no problem and refuse to fix it. I have shown them so much evidence of this and they still only go about with their vmspeed.com test and says "oh look lols, u has 103Mb/s when no one else is using the interwebs so all is good" and ignore me when I show them a weeks worth of ping tests.

That's how... but anyway, this is a bit off topic. :/

I'm on the Virgin 50mb-soon-to-be-100mb and I have absolutely no beef with it at all. Works flawlessly, I've never been capped on this package (unlike when I had 10mb with a 5gb/day fair usage policy cap) and unless I start to see the service diminish in quality, I'll not be jumping ship.

It's about time ISPs other than Virgin started raising the bar, hopefully it'll drive down prices and favour the consumer.

Yea but they're not making you re-contract for nothing, your getting double your current speeds which are pretty damn fast as they are.

Plus, if you were looking to go with BT for the first time, you would have to sign the same contract.

I'm just saying that I prefer to be upgraded without having an extra commitment of a new contract. Probably wouldn't make that much of a difference if I am a month into one, but if I am close to its end it gives me extra ammunition of re-negotiate to get a better deal.

BT have only just started rolling out FTTC, they will overtake VIrgin in no time, I might be wrong, but since Blueyonder > Telewest > Virgin Media, they have not layed any extra cable and are only using what is already there since the beginning

I might be wrong about that but thats what I have heard every time I asked about it, BT are way ahead of Virgin and will continue to take the lead imo

BT may have Virgin beat for coverage, but the latter trumps in terms of speed. In actuality, they did lay new cable. Personally, and this will probably sound quite selfish, I don't care if Virgin did not lay extra cable and just concentrated on improving existing infrastructure. As a customer, my primary concern is the quality of the service that I receive. Therefore, I applaud their efforts to boost 50 Meg service to 120 and more than double the upload speed.

Where is the bt sign up link?

I would not hold your breath on when your exchange will get affinity.

Mine was supposed to be March 2011, then January 1st 2012, then April 2nd 2012, now I can finally get it, upto 38 mbps-1.

Its being done at my home 19th April 2012.

I did contact B.T. just now and they said I need to phone them if I can't find the form for double speed, says it takes 3 days.

Where is the bt sign up link?

I would not hold your breath on when your exchange will get affinity.

Mine was supposed to be March 2011, then January 1st 2012, then April 2nd 2012, now I can finally get it, upto 38 mbps-1.

Its being done at my home 19th April 2012.

I did contact B.T. just now and they said I need to phone them if I can't find the form for double speed, says it takes 3 days.

Where is the bt sign up link? I would not hold your breath on when your exchange will get affinity. Mine was supposed to be March 2011, then January 1st 2012, then April 2nd 2012, now I can finally get it, upto 38 mbps-1. Its being done at my home 19th April 2012. I did contact B.T. just now and they said I need to phone them if I can't find the form for double speed, says it takes 3 days.

This is the upgrade link, but you`ll need to already be on Infinity to use it, if you are in the process of being connected you`ll get 80/20 profile anyway

http://www.productsandservices.bt.com/consumerProducts/displayTopic.do?topicId=29280

Does anyone else have issues with the router handlying these speeds over wifi?

I sometimes get the 40mb currently, but it mainly seems to be between 20-30 over the wifi (2.5Mb/s download speeds for example). If I plug something directly into the router it will get the full 40.

If I am not going to be able to utilise the 80mb over wifi I'm not sure if its worth upgrading?

Also, on the site it says:

"By upgrading, you're agreeing to start a new contract with us: depending on what contract you're on at the moment, it'll either be for 12 or 18 months."

Anyone know how this is calculated? Is it based on whatever length your original contract was? clicking through the pages it doesn't actually tell you how long you will be renewing for

****! I'm on virgin business and the speed I get is utter ****, 10Mb down, 768Kb up, ?50/month.

I ****ing hate virgin with a passion but BT infinity isn't in this area.

What's infinity like, do they do bandwidth limiting/DPI/'fair use'/cut down your speed at certain times?

got a call from BT infinity this morning. They upgraded my business line to 80mb/20mb. gets switched-on on the 16th of April.

Currently getting a solid 40down/10up. Since I only joined in late feb 2012. I get a re-contract for 24 months- perfect timing BT!!

pay extra ?5 (aka option 2 package) and you get unlimited usage-24/7. they only throttle torrents during peak. but you can get around that via vpn tunnel.

Does anyone else have issues with the router handlying these speeds over wifi?

I sometimes get the 40mb currently, but it mainly seems to be between 20-30 over the wifi (2.5Mb/s download speeds for example). If I plug something directly into the router it will get the full 40.

If I am not going to be able to utilise the 80mb over wifi I'm not sure if its worth upgrading?

Also, on the site it says:

Anyone know how this is calculated? Is it based on whatever length your original contract was? clicking through the pages it doesn't actually tell you how long you will be renewing for

Depends what length contract you signed up for in the first place, it just renews that one, mine was 18 months

I also noticed I only get around 20meg over wifi checking it last night on my laptop but have not looked into it much, just shrugged it off as being wireless g through 3 walls and upstairs

****! I'm on virgin business and the speed I get is utter ****, 10Mb down, 768Kb up, ?50/month.

I ****ing hate virgin with a passion but BT infinity isn't in this area.

What's infinity like, do they do bandwidth limiting/DPI/'fair use'/cut down your speed at certain times?

They limit p2p at peak times so they say, but I haven't noticed anything at all, I seem to get full steam ahead 24/7

wifi will always be slower than lan. You will need a N router + usb dongle to get the full 80mb.

BT infinity only throttle torrent traffic. If your torrent traffic is ecrypted over https then it will not get throttled :wink:

wifi will always be slower than lan. You will need a N router + usb dongle to get the full 80mb.

BT infinity only throttle torrent traffic. If your torrent traffic is ecrypted over https then it will not get throttled :wink:

Wireless G is 54meg though, so the 20-30meg we are getting over wifi has a problem

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!