UK ISP BT Offers up to 76Mbps Superfast Broadband Boost for Free


Recommended Posts

Interesting, how do you interface with the openreach modem?

Mines not the HG612 though, I have the V2 I think but would be cool if I could get a faster sync

EDIT - I lied, it is a HG612, Rev.B - just found the guide :D

Just incase, everything you need should be here: http://huaweihg612hacking.wordpress.com/

Just incase, everything you need should be here: http://huaweihg612ha....wordpress.com/

Cheers, I unlocked it, I have UI access now, Line stats say (79999 / 20000 ) but I'm still getting 75/16

Need to find where it explains how to get a faster sync :)

telnet shows

Max: Upstream rate = 31364 Kbps, Downstream rate = 84876 Kbps

Path: 0, Upstream rate = 20000 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79999 Kbps

Capped at openreach modem ?

OK so I turned off QoS at the Openreach modem and things are improving

1910811571.png

Cheers, I unlocked it, I have UI access now, Line stats say (79999 / 20000 ) but I'm still getting 75/16

Need to find where it explains how to get a faster sync :)

telnet shows

Max: Upstream rate = 31364 Kbps, Downstream rate = 84876 Kbps

Path: 0, Upstream rate = 20000 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79999 Kbps

Capped at openreach modem ?

OK so I turned off QoS at the Openreach modem and things are improving

1910811571.png

Darnsight better than me!

1910857815.png

Do you happen to know what your IP profile is set at?

whats the point of QOS on a modem? it should be on a layer 3 switch... anyway I will take a look at this later on this week.

Which guide did you follow?

Followed this guide

https://huaweihg612h...ctions_v1-3.pdf

Used the firmware from here (Mine was SP10, check the back of the modem for the correct version) - The download 404s but gives a menu toolbar, use FILE > Download

https://docs.google....DNhYTNjOGJlZTBj

Apparently the firmware is stock with the exception of the firewall being lowered from BT to Standard to allow LAN2 access

Darnsight better than me!

1910857815.png

Do you happen to know what your IP profile is set at?

Its weird, I get that speed with Chrome, but all other browsers give me 75/16

Profile 17a

# xdslcmd info --pbParams
xdslcmd: ADSL driver and PHY status
Status: Showtime
Retrain Reason: 0
Max:	Upstream rate = 31368 Kbps, Downstream rate = 84876 Kbps
Path:   0, Upstream rate = 20000 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79999 Kbps

Discovery Phase (Initial) Band Plan
US: (0,95) (868,1207) (1972,2783)
DS: (32,859) (1216,1963) (2792,3959)
Medley Phase (Final) Band Plan
US: (0,95) (868,1207) (1972,2783)
DS: (32,859) (1216,1963) (2792,3959)
	   VDSL Port Details	   Upstream		Downstream
Attainable Net Data Rate:	  31368 kbps		 84876 kbps
Actual Aggregate Tx Power:		2.4 dBm		  13.6 dBm
============================================================================
  VDSL Band Status		U0	  U1	  U2	  U3	  D1	  D2	  D3
  Line Attenuation(dB):  2.8	 14.8	22.0	 N/A	8.1	 18.8	29.2

Signal Attenuation(dB):  7.7	 14.1	21.3	 N/A	8.1	 18.8	29.2

		SNR Margin(dB):  14.6	15.0	15.0	 N/A	7.3	 7.3	 7.4

		 TX Power(dBm): -12.1   -35.4	2.1	  N/A	10.9	7.6	 7.1

Followed this guide

https://huaweihg612h...ctions_v1-3.pdf

Used the firmware from here (Mine was SP10, check the back of the modem for the correct version) - The download 404s but gives a menu toolbar, use FILE > Download

https://docs.google....DNhYTNjOGJlZTBj

Apparently the firmware is stock with the exception of the firewall being lowered from BT to Standard to allow LAN2 access

Its weird, I get that speed with Chrome, but all other browsers give me 75/16

Profile 17a

# xdslcmd info --pbParams
xdslcmd: ADSL driver and PHY status
Status: Showtime
Retrain Reason: 0
Max:	Upstream rate = 31368 Kbps, Downstream rate = 84876 Kbps
Path:   0, Upstream rate = 20000 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79999 Kbps

Discovery Phase (Initial) Band Plan
US: (0,95) (868,1207) (1972,2783)
DS: (32,859) (1216,1963) (2792,3959)
Medley Phase (Final) Band Plan
US: (0,95) (868,1207) (1972,2783)
DS: (32,859) (1216,1963) (2792,3959)
	   VDSL Port Details	   Upstream		Downstream
Attainable Net Data Rate:	  31368 kbps		 84876 kbps
Actual Aggregate Tx Power:		2.4 dBm		  13.6 dBm
============================================================================
  VDSL Band Status		U0	  U1	  U2	  U3	  D1	  D2	  D3
  Line Attenuation(dB):  2.8	 14.8	22.0	 N/A	8.1	 18.8	29.2

Signal Attenuation(dB):  7.7	 14.1	21.3	 N/A	8.1	 18.8	29.2

		SNR Margin(dB):  14.6	15.0	15.0	 N/A	7.3	 7.3	 7.4

		 TX Power(dBm): -12.1   -35.4	2.1	  N/A	10.9	7.6	 7.1

By IP profile I mean the max speed your line is capped at. You can find that out here under the results section: http://www.speedtester.bt.com/

Although I just tried to run it and there was an error so it may not be working at the moment.

By IP profile I mean the max speed your line is capped at. You can find that out here under the results section: http://www.speedtester.bt.com/

Although I just tried to run it and there was an error so it may not be working at the moment.

Yea its been broken for ages, even BT advise not to use it, I am on the 80/20 connection though

EDIT - Works with IE9 but slow

IP Profile for your line is - 77.43 Mbps

Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 20 Mbps

Yea its been broken for ages, even BT advise not to use it, I am on the 80/20 connection though

EDIT - Works with IE9 but slow

IP Profile for your line is - 77.43 Mbps

Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 20 Mbps

Just worked on my third try. My downstream IP profile is stuck at 55mbps! Rubbish!

Just worked on my third try. My downstream IP profile is stuck at 55mbps! Rubbish!

I wouldn't trust the BT speedtest site anyway, while I was on the BT forums waiting for my upgrade there were loads of complaints about it and the mods advised to use the Lite version linked to from the main test page once you tick the accept button, but even that is broken, giving me 11meg down lol

Speed does seem to be improving though, with FF I could never get over 74999 down, but its hitting 76xxx ish now and turning off QoS has given me an extra 1meg up at least too

I wouldn't trust the BT speedtest site anyway, while I was on the BT forums waiting for my upgrade there were loads of complaints about it and the mods advised to use the Lite version linked to from the main test page once you tick the accept button, but even that is broken, giving me 11meg down lol

Speed does seem to be improving though, with FF I could never get over 74999 down, but its hitting 76xxx ish now and turning off QoS has given me an extra 1meg up at least too

It gave me something like 40mbit down but the max ip profile is set at 55... that's lower than when I initially upgraded. I imagine it's something to do with dynamic line management and the fact my line is most likely made of aluminium - the max achievable speed that they've "determined" for my line is 55mbit.

Just checked again - ignore the download speed that's a load of rubbish. But you'll notice the line is capped off at 55:

post-33944-0-84782000-1335197033_thumb.j

Might call BT and query it... not sure if it'll do any good though.

What attenuation did you guys have on ADSL2?

Can't remember exactly but I had endless problems with the line dropping to Interleaved EC, the router would sync at 8000kbps and I'd get 300KB/s max - I spent more time trying to get the line stable than I did using the net, 2 different ISPs both incompetent and clueless to what I was telling them.

Got my upgrade done over night. Re-synced at 76MB down and 16mb up (wondering why its no at full 20mb up).

BT is 76mb down 18mb up. So 16mb isn't that far off it. companies were advertising as 80/20 but Ofcom forced them to advertise with their real speeds.

BT is 76mb down 18mb up. So 16mb isn't that far off it. companies were advertising as 80/20 but Ofcom forced them to advertise with their real speeds.

This is true, I forgot about that, just goes to show that Chrome speedtest results are false then considering all other browsers hit the line cap more or less and chrome shows 80meg

Same... the absolute fastest we can get here is 22Mbps and it's like 90-120/mo I pay 55 for a 11mbps down and 1.2mbps up.

BTW any of you guys use the AMPED WIRELESS R10000G with any of the provided homehub/superhub routers???

was wondering as some people said they had issues with that and wanted to confirm this...

This is true, I forgot about that, just goes to show that Chrome speedtest results are false then considering all other browsers hit the line cap more or less and chrome shows 80meg

When I had a problem with a client leased line I spoke to a guy at BT who said not to put to much faith in speed tests, he gave me a ftp server with 10 and 100mg files and a script to run which pulls down the files and uploads them several times and reports the speed.

As it turned out I missed a setting and the speeds shown on speedtest.net were very near what I had from his test.

This is true, I forgot about that, just goes to show that Chrome speedtest results are false then considering all other browsers hit the line cap more or less and chrome shows 80meg

What are you on about? Chrome doesn't show false anything:-

Chrome:-

1911888506.png

IE9:-

1911889203.png

B.T, have cheesed me off.

I signed up for double bubble and they said as of Tuesday 00:00 it will be activated.

Today it has not happened and B.T. now tell me I have to wait a further 10 days.

All this on the fact that infinity did not arrive in March 2011 when it did not happen but April 2012.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
    • OK so SearXNG is a meta search engine that you can install locally or use via a public instance. It scrapes other search engines which you choose and then sorts the results. Not as complicated as multiple relays
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      224
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!